Travelers from Muslim Countries Still Jumping U.S. Borders
In 2007, in a crowded suburb of Damascus, Iraq war refugee Joseph Zaiad told me why attempting to leave Syria and sneak into Mexico for an illegal border crossing into the U.S. wasn’t an option. Zaiad had contemplated doing so at one point, because, like thousands of other Iraqi war refugees, he found himself unable to return home or find a way to legally enter a third friendly country that might offer a better future. “We all know the border between Mexico and the U.S. is closed,” he said. “Before the crackdown, you used to be able to go. But now? It is impossible.”
Not exactly. But President Barack Obama might want to consider the deterrent effect of border security measures his predecessor and Congress put in place on the Mexican frontier following 9/11. As he prepares to turn his attention to immigration reform, the new president is under mounting pressure from elements of his party to tear down the wall, slow the mass deportations, stop illegal-entry prosecutions and workplace raids, and never let the National Guard leave its barracks again.
Lost in the distracting debates about Mexican illegals is the fact that thousands of immigrants from the Muslim world and state sponsors of terrorism can, do, and always have found it easy to steal across the Mexican border. In intelligence parlance, these immigrants have come to be known as “special interest aliens” because they come from Muslim countries that are flagged for hosting known terrorist organizations. The Obama administration and immigrant advocacy groups pressuring for a rollback of the Bush-era crackdown policy need only read current Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “threat assessments” to be reminded that border security was never squarely about Mexicans and Central Americans. It was always about “special interest aliens.”
The 2008-2013 threat assessment put out by the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of Homeland Security enunciates what it still considers to be the central threat for the next half decade: “At the highest level of concern, terrorists will attempt to defeat border security measures with the goal of inserting operatives and establishing support networks in the United States.” It goes on to state: “These illicit actors also could pose as refugees or asylum seekers to gain access to the United States. State failure and internal conflicts abroad will continue to generate sizable refugee flows to the United States — notably from countries of special interest for terrorism in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia — which could provide opportunities for illicit entry.”
Obama will no doubt soon learn from access to classified intelligence — off limits to immigrant advocates — that this is hardly unsubstantiated fear-mongering.
As I documented at length in the 2007 four-part series “Breaching America,” illegals from up to 43 “countries of interest” are getting caught crossing the Mexican border all the time. They come from nations where U.S. military personnel are battling radical Islamist movements, such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and the Philippines. They come from countries where organized Islamic extremists have bombed U.S. interests such as Kenya, Tanzania, and Lebanon. They come from U.S.-designated state sponsors of terror such as Iran, Syria and Sudan. And they come from Saudi Arabia, the nation that spawned most of the 9/11 hijackers.






But isn’t obama going to talk to the terrorists so that they will like us and this won’t be an issue any more? That’s what I heard.
Still waiting for my free stuff.
I am a missionary in Central America. I constantly see and hear about men who murders someone, who rapes a young girl, who is a visious gang member, or who is a drug dealer fleeing to the United States before the police can catch them. Beware, they may move to your neighborhood. My point-close the border.
Are you kidding? This is just gravy to these guy. Anything to destroy the country.
Then they can set up the USSA.
What a disaster these epople are to this country. Is it too late even now to save us?
We are facing the worse crisis of our history.
if they want to take the border fence down then they should take the fence around the white house down at the same time. why does there need to be one around the white house?
What border crackdown? How many millions of illegals crossed the border during Bush’s tenure? 10? 12?
Until the border patrol are considered troops instead of law-enforcement agents, the border will never be secure. Shoot on sight on this side of the border should be the policy. THAT will stop the illegal crossings in a hurry.
Lets not forget their is now probably more fear in the muslim world of pissing off violent Mexican narcos, due to Calderon’s offensive, over payments and travel arrangements before they even get to the border itself. In that sense Calderon’s offensives have probably had the side benefit of deterring amateurs. In that sense, it is much like Michael Moore’s Sicko movie – all it really did was increase PPO participation (a + for the insurance companies), not bring about universal health care.
Bad Former Steeler Quarterback #5-
If so, what will do fat Tejanos do for a fall-back job?
since the housing bubble burst the illegals are moving back…so lets build a fence thats 12 feet high …and they will build a ladder that 14 feet high..yeah lets spend billions on a fence that takes ten minutes to tunnel under oh and remember its really hard to get into mexico(it actually is) but watch out for terrorist they will be coming to get you…so the iraqi navy is on the way over to attack and next santa clause is real and theres a easter bunny
Well, as long as ladders are built here by ‘Mericans, why the heck not?
Making our border impenetrable is probably not possible. Even east germany couldn’t do it, and they had a lot less border. I do think our border should be patrolled by troops and crossers treated as invaders, because that’s what they are.
What will really help, though, is ending the benefit of coming over. Shut down companies that hire them. Do not offer citizenship to their children born here. No free medical care. No food stamps or section 8 housing. No public school for illegals. No one is going to come here to be homeless and starve. And run citizen checks on everyone everytime they have any contact with the police or hospitals. Still prosecute crimes against illegals, but then deport them.
Yeah but, but, but the more illegals that can stick around the more Democratic votes. *sniff-sniff*
War? Who cares about a little ol’ war. Oh fiddle-dee-dee, I’m just a little hot house flower who can’t be concerned with such things! *cranks up the heat in the oval office* Ahhhh. Nice!
I remember back in 2004 and 2005, the local radio stations our here in AZ would cover any stories regarding border crossers who were non from Central or South America. China, Iran, Iraq, Syria, African Nations, etc. There were a number of them. Then I heard a statistic on the radio that as a US Border stat: out of some 150,000 detainees, approximately 3000 were not from the Americas.
This IS why I want a border fence, military sweeps, guard dogs with lasers and rockets mounted on their heads.
If you take that simple stat 3000/150,000 and for just grins apply it to another stat, and to make it easy for the sake of simplified arithmatic bring up the estimated population to say 15,000,000, that would make the ratio of potential non-Central/South American people to say…300,000!
Now of course, that would be an army larger than 2x our standing count in Iraq, and of course (God I hope so) not all of them are on a path to destroy this country, but…
30,000? A mere 0.2% of the total above? That is the amount of troops we want to add to Afghanistan.
3,000? A mere 0.02% of the total above? That is a brigade.
300, 30? How many would it take to wreak serious problems here?
Serious problems:
Car bombs?
Hostages like the school in Russia, or the ballet opera/bloodbath?
Railroad accidents?
Power Plants?
That is why I am for a fence. Yes, it is hard to build these things with our economy the way it is now, but how much cost do we want to encounter with another 9/11 style attack? It has nothing to do with planes. It is cheaper to destroy society than to build it up.
Did anyone see the film clip of Lou Dobbs on CNN? He was discussing the government plan for amnesty submitted. It is the opposite of every item listed above #9. AND the taxpayers will be paying for the illegals amnesty lawyers. This will also include convicted illegals and gang members.Last estimate of illegal gang members was over 20,000. Thank La Raza and groups like this. Even Dobbs was disgusted by the plan.
North American Union. Its for real look up security and prosperity partnership of North America.
James, N.A.U not possible through the S.P.P alone. Only possible with the Universal Health-care (Which under Obama may happen)and the fact that a Union requires parity of nations (not likely to happen anytime soon). If there is to be such a union then Mexico would have to be excluded until it was no longer a 3rd world country. Just look at the construction of the European Union (began in 1957). It actually took 42 years to create a new currency even with predominately socialist countries. All three countries must be forced to learn English, Spanish, and French. You can count out the Mexican government forcing their people to learn their neighbor’s languages. I’m not sure about Canada, but it seems the USA is only concerned about accommodating everyone’s language.
If the powers that be are trying to merge the countries together they are off to a lousy start. This is not something that you could do in secret and expect people to except. That’s why its called a Union, people must be willing to join or it is not a Union at all. If it were to be done back door the appropriate term would be North American Empire home of the Elite whom enslave its people. I doubt a N.A.U. but I don’t doubt a N.A.E. (Think Roman Empire, oppression, high taxes, no freedom of speech, Totalitarian, Dictatorships, Fascist)
Just an observation on the rhetoric many on the extreme right fail to report.
since when is this guy interested in protecting and defending america? and he rattles sabres at north korea. moron.
The Border Patrol in Arizona uses the term OTM (other than Mexicans) to describe illegals from other countries. I cannot believe that the 800 figure used for 2008 is correct. In one haul from Douglas, AZ, two weeks ago there were 28 OTMs in a group of 82 captured. According to one source they included eight Arabs.
This makes the false assumption that Mr Tambourine Man actually thinks.
Skim off some of the stimulus pork money and use it to create 20,000 new border agent jobs, security outposts, a few thousand video cameras and a monitoring / command center.
Money well spent that benefits “ALL” Americans.
I wonder WHAT ticks mr. Bensman to make the call and ask to visit Nicaragua? Is he a defender of the Jewish state? or Is he One of them? We Americans feel the right to do anythiug around the world and poke into the affairs of every nation, and when some body get close to our far away borders even inSouth America, we get irate!!
We want to defend the Jewish state by attacking Iraq and noe preparing to send our soldiers to fight for the Jewish sate and kill Iranians? WHY MR. Bensman??
Keep cool Mr. Bensman, and mind your own business. We sacrifiiced enough to defend the Jewish state. It is time for them to defend themselves, the y got enough A-bombs, so what if Iran has some.
why do you think this worries Obama?
oh Mr. Bill
We sacrifiiced enough to defend the Jewish state. It is time for them to defend themselves, the y got enough A-bombs, so what if Iran has some.
what did you sacrifice, Mr Bill?