Obama Shameless as Debt Crisis Looms
Late Monday new plans were introduced by both Republicans in the House and Democrats in the Senate, both of which call for spending cuts at some point without any revenue enhancements or tax increases. Contrary to what the president said in his remarks, both parties in Congress seem to have recognized that, rhetorically at least, the “cuts only” approach is all the American people want to hear about. They understand what Obama does not — the problem is spending, not a lack of revenue.
There remains hope that the crisis can be averted. As Boehner said, “There is no stalemate in Congress,” something Obama charged more than once. “The House has passed a bill to raise the debt limit with bipartisan support. And this week, while the Senate is struggling to pass a bill filled with phony accounting and Washington gimmicks, we will pass another bill — one that was developed with the support of the bipartisan leadership of the U.S. Senate,” the Ohio Republican said.
The one part of Boehner’s plan that is sure to produce concern among his congressional allies — some of whom were quick to denounce it shortly after it was announced — is what the speaker called “a serious, bipartisan committee of the Congress will begin the hard but necessary work of dealing with the tough challenges our nation faces.”
Already being referred to as “the tax hike commission” by its critics, it is an issue Boehner will have to resolve before the plan can pass the House with a majority of GOP votes. U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who chairs the influential House Republican Study Committee, said Tuesday in a statement that he could not support the new Boehner plan.
“The credit rating agencies have been clear that no matter what happens with the debt limit, the U.S. will lose its AAA credit rating unless we produce a credible plan to reduce the debt by trillions of dollars,” Jordan said, arguing that “Cut, Cap, and Balance is the only plan on the table that meets this standard” and that “[o]nly a Balanced Budget Amendment will actually solve our debt problems.”
Through out much of his speech Obama was shameless in his pitch for new revenues to be used for new programs, warning that without a deal on the debt “we won’t have enough money to make job-creating investments in things like education and infrastructure.” Indeed, he was even cavalier in the way he talked about the current crisis, as though his mismanagement of the U.S. economy had little if anything to do with it.
“For the last decade, we have spent more money than we take in,” he said. The budget surplus the nation once enjoyed as a result of the hard work and discipline of the Gingrich Congress was, Obama said, “spent on trillions of dollars in new tax cuts, while two wars and an expensive prescription drug program were simply added to our nation’s credit card.”
The financial crisis in place when he took office, Obama said, only made it worse. “The recession meant that there was less money coming in, and it required us to spend even more.” While factually correct, this is bad economic policy, policy that Obama should accept the blame for just as much as he tried to claim credit for it when he and his administration were pretending their efforts to fix the economy were working.






Bah hah hah. What a maroon. I can’t wait to hand this guy his hat in 2012.
Oh, does that make me a racist?
PJM, no, that doesn’t make you a racist. It would at HuffPo or MediaMatters, though.
Can we instead deport him to Indonesia in 2011?
Mexico, to be put on trial for acts of war against an “ally.”
passing around the hot potato again
The Sociopath-In-Chief will never grasp the fact that we want him to drastically reduce the size of the federal government and its activities, and thus cut spending, perhaps by half or more. His tiny communist mind is wrapped around the weird notion that the more government controls, the better off we all are. He wants us to report to our assigned places of work like good little robots while he and his fellow “professional politicians” do all the thinking,
entertaining, vacationing, luxuriating, etc. Those who fail to agree must “sit behind the yellow line”, he said, in one of his racist rants.
He will spend over a billion dollars to stuff the ballot boxes in 2012, so he can complete the destruction of America, the Land That He Hates, to paraphrase the song.We need desperately to rid ourselves of Oscumbo and his fellow travellers, once and for all. Could we convict them of sedition, treason, and sequester them at the South pole?
You’re right. The first thing to do would be to stop spending enormous amounts of money warring with puny dictators around the world for the mostly imaginary threats they pose – an idea that the doofus-in-chief before Obama was unable to fathom.
It’s not that he’s being shameless, it’s just that he doesn’t care.
Bingo!
“In his speech on Monday, the president tried to pin the blame for failing to pass the debt ceiling squarely at the feet of congressional conservatives.”
Well, I certainly hope that’s what they’re doing. Cutting off the cash flow to the feds is the whole idea.
We’re tired of their constant stealing.
I can’t stand to listen to the mahogany messiah; I just catch the summary. Basically, the guy’s got nothing. No debt plan. No economic Plan, No foreign policy (unless you consider condemning Israel and funding jihad foreign policy) He is a blathering pandering narcissistic phony, who is apparently incapable of modifying his hard left agenda, no matter how evident its many massive failures.
@White Tiger- I would leave the south pole alone. How about tar and feather followed by drawing and quartering the bastards.
2012 hurry up!
Chris,
With all respect, it is a distraction from the valid point of your post to mention BHO’s skin tone. This is not a PC comment on my part. I care not what skin tone a person may have, I care only about their actions/deeds. When it comes to BHO, I have no problem with his skin tone, instead I have deep distrust of his ideology and his extreme case of narcissistic personality disorder. His ideology and mental illness make him toxic as president, not his skin tone.
Sorry Parker, Mahogany Messiah is the least offensive name I could come up with at the moment, and I reserve my right to be non PC. And to tell you the truth I really no longer give a sh!t about all the racist nonsense. I would take Thomas Sowell or Clarence Thomas, or Walter Williams for president any day. Obummer is not in their league and never will be. And if the MSM decided to call BHO the mahogany messiah, I’d be called a racist for not agreeing. Since I only know of one actual Messiah, calling the faux god Obama the mahogany messiah makes the distinction. But now with your sensitivity in mind, I’ll call him a ‘marxist messiah’. But no matter what you call him he is a moronic pile of excrement, that need to be flushed from governance ASAP.
Who should the nation ‘blame’ for the congress not passing a debt ceiling pass and go? Senate voted down “Cut, Cap and Balance” proposal of GOP House debt ceiling plan. A bill that would have raised the nation’s debt ceiling by $2.4 trillion failed to win the votes needed to pass the GOP majority House
["...the president tried to pin the blame for failing to pass the debt ceiling squarely at the feet of congressional conservatives."]
The GOP majority House will NOT present a ‘clean’ CAP bill and the Democrat majority over in the Senate won’t bring any (D) CAP bill to the floor. So, its pretty much a House GOP majority game playing…. our way or the highway.
On the same note, the GOP House hasn’t sent to the Senate, a budget bill that even qualifies for the Senate to attatch to for the reconciliation process.
A divided party congress…a divided GOP within and total dysfunction. A majority of the dysfunction comes from the divided GOP within. All the dems have to do is similar to forest fire fighters….contain the fire/dysfunction within its own/party boundry. Speak of self destruct!
What meds are you on? The house GOP are the only ones to actually pass plan(s). Put the dysfunctional label where it belongs.
“Senate voted down “Cut, Cap and Balance” – T.T. Thomas
Please provide the roll call for that vote. Thanks.
The Senate voted to table the discussion of the Cut, Cap and Balance Act, 51 to 46 last Friday.
“Our way or the highway” was pretty popular with Obama and the Left during the last Congress, totally controlled by the Democrats. The cynicism and hypocrisy of the Left is on full display as usual, similar to Obama’s hypocrisy over raising the debt ceiling, which he adamantly opposed when he was a senator. Also, why didn’t the Democrat-controlled Congress produce, or even introduce a budget last year when it had the chance? And why does ObamAlinsky keep talking about deals he was willing to do when no details have been provided? He insists on whining that he is taking heat from his base…but that’s nonsense. He hasn’t proposed anything except to raise the debt ceiling so that he can spend more money while at the same time insulting the intelligence of the American people by pretenting to be a “moderate.”
Right. No GOP bill, except CCB. Obama is on pace to increase the debt by 4.5 trillion in 3 years… and yet this crisis is the fault of the House GOP.
Here’s the problem: “The recession meant that there was less money coming in, and it required us to spend even more.”
In the real world, when you have less money coming in it requires you to spend less, not more. You can’t spend your way out of a recession.
What are you talking about?? The Senate didn’t vote on the House bill of Cut, Cap and Balance. It wouldn’t even bring it to a vote.
And what’s wrong with cutting the deficit and federal spending, with capping how much can be borrowed and with daring to suggest a balanced budget? Could you explain what is wrong with these agendas?
The House offered a budget (Ryan’s); the President and the Democrats, even when they controlled the House (got that?) offered no budget. Nothing. None. Got that?
What are the sticking points? Obama’s re-election campaign. That’s what this is really all about. Obama wouldn’t at all mind if the nation went into default (it won’t, there’s enough monthly income to meet basic debtors and including social security and medicare)..but Obama wouldn’t mind. He could blame it all on the GOP – and that’s his agenda.
Obama can’t run for re-election on his record; it’s disastrous. He’s still trying to Blame Bush for everything – but it’s three years now, and the economy is worse, worse, worse. Obama’s stimulus wasn’t to create jobs but taxpayer money to SAVE the unionized public service – Obama’s basic campers.
Health care is a disaster, with companies paralyzed at the constant restrictive and costly rules and more and more trying to get out (heh – it’s all his unionized campers who have the waivers)..
His foreign policy? Heh.
So, Obama can only run, as he did in 2008, on emotional hyperbole and hate hysteria. Now, he’s still on about Bush, and now, it’s the GOP and the Tea Party.
If the debt ceiling is raised (and Obama likes to polarize and weaken Americans by suggesting it won’t be)..Obama wants it to last until he’s re-elected. That’s one criterion. He has NO interest in working on reducing the size of govt. No interest; his focus is on increasing it.
Oh – and Obama wants more ‘revenue’. Heh..that’s his new term for taxation. Oh, and he’s got another new term. 200,000 income is now defined as a million! Can you imagine! With a flip of his tongue, Obama changes a six figure income to a seven figure income. Anyone with an income of 200,000 is now a millionaire, and Obama says they are ‘greedy’ and ‘selfish’..and ought to give it all up to those who don’t work.
Why does Obama want to tax the 200,000 crowd..who are primarily small businesses..and thus, will be deprived of their profits to hire and expand their businesses? Why? Because he plans to bribe the electorate next year. Watch him; he’ll offer ‘bonus checks to the unemployed and the welfarites. To vote. For Him. The One. As he’s said, sigh, it would be so much easier to be a dictator and not have ‘the people’ (Congress) to deal with. Sigh.
Memories run deep in the halls of congress! What goes around…comes around.
Congress has functioned on a ‘get even scorecard’ for a long time now….thanks in large part to Sen. Byrd. And of course we shant forget the deep memories of of the Bush/Gore/Supreme Court score card.
Villify, obstruct and politicize are the rules of congress and their various support organizations…not governing!
Those across the nation who support and perpetuate this kind of non governance, juvenile nonsense are equal conspirators in destroying this nation.
["The Senate didn’t vote on the House bill of Cut, Cap and Balance."]
The record would indicate otherwise! A vote to table is akin to house cleaning…get the garbage off the table…so to speak. There hasn’t been a ‘legislative’ bill moved from the house with the possible exception of the Ryan document. All the garbage being shuffled from the House has been ‘political’ socalled bills.
Currently, governing has been replaced in total with a ‘political circus’ on the world stage. So consumed with their petty political ego’s they haven’t a clue they are messing with the USD and its position as the worlds currency.
Domestic economny. For those of such great intellect who believe that politicizing the deficits/debt by removing federal and foreign ‘investment’ from the economic equation…they are simply nuts!
General welfare and the necessary and proper clauses of the Constitution. Define them as self serving as you wish, but the cosntitution grants to the congress (the government) to legislate and ‘borrow’ in the best interest of the nation as a whole…not some particular political ideology or activist group.
Like any private sector business, when times and econoics get tough for whatever reason(s), one has a couple of choices. Close shop or infuse more capital investment. The government and the federal reserve have long been in the business of investment support for the nations private sector economies. The federal govbernment according to the constitution has long been in the business of regulating import/export commerce in the interest of the nations economy.
Take the governments support for the nations economy off the table and watch who screams the loudest and what happens! The economy will go to baseline where it essentially is now and economic infrastructure will crumble as it continues right now. A little tip! If the nations government doesn’t have any interest in its economic and infratructure welfare….neither will foreign investors continue to have any interest.
The Tea party folks have some ‘simple’ idea that the private sector economy should operate in some isolated vacuum in a global marketplace. Thats a ‘simple’ conclusion not supported by any facts of of realism. The fact is the nations econic bases that gave the nation its dominate economic leverage in the world was destroyed not by the government but by the peoples demands for labor unions extortions of the private sector economies. A success that has carried itself into a position of being the nations ‘standard’ regardles of a union shop, a union state or NOT. The ‘people’ (an overwhelming majority) of the union mindset created an arbitrary and ‘circular’ inflation model that has destroyed the nations economy, its competitive position in the global economy and economic infrastructures. If YOU think you’re not of the union mindset, come work for me for $2.50 an hour. I’ll leave it at that!
You can yell all you want and blame the government but…it is the peoples demands and mindset that first created the monster that consumed itself…eventual government support or not.
The nation is broken from the bottom up….not the top down!
If you are always going to take arguments to the extreme, I suppose you will always believe you have won the debate.
First, citing the government’s role in import/export trade, as defined in the Constitution, is not an argument that is germane. It is a Constitutional role of government. Who are the people you are making this argument to? It is not even an issue in any of this debt/ smaller government debate. It IS the role of government, as defined by the Constitution, and supported by the Tea Partiers.
The Tea Party does not believe in “no government”. The Tea Party does not believe that in a nation of over 300 million people, there is no role for the government in trade or commerce.
Nobody except your debating pal, the straw man, is making any of these arguments.
Sorry you’re having trouble comprehending. I was explaining how the government props up and subsidized private sector economies….including global import/export markets for the private sector.
“Most Americans,“ he said, “don’t understand how we can ask a senior citizen to pay more for her Medicare…”
That’s simple. Tell the lady that I bought pharmaceuticals for today that since she has several million dollars in assets, that she can damn well pay for her own pharmaceuticals, instead of getting taxpayers, who have far less money than she does, pick up the tab.
See how easy that is, Obambi?
And, quit acting like you know what “most” Americans think, you self-righteous twit.
Dave…though you quoted out of context, I salute you for your comment!
Means test SS and Medicare to a formula set to each states median income plus all assets beyond ones primary residence and one automobile. An inflation formula can easily be applied. A limited sliding scale range is very easy to construct also.
Ironically, I think those of means would adjust quite nicely in short order. Though not concerning means testing but rather to indicate the attitudes of those of means, this latest Rasmussen poll on taxes is…. interesting!
["Americans who earn more than $75,000 a year are evenly divided as to whether a tax hike should be included in the debt ceiling deal. Those who earn less are opposed to including tax hikes."]
Still going on about “corporate jet owners”?. Is this guy’s needle stuck in the record groove or what?. Is he forgetting about Air Force One that’s always at his disposal ON OUR DIME. How ’bout rictus face Pelosi holding the Air Force hostage whilst Speaker of the House?. Why do liberals have such selective memory?
Forget Pelosi. She’s an hereditary hack politician, following in her father’s Baltimore path (D’Annunzio, D-Mafia). She’s one of the footsoldiers, but your problem is when an honest Leftist shows up. They didn’t call Robespierre “The Incorruptible” because it poll-tested well, but because he was incorruptible. Any record that Lenin had a Swiss bank account or villa on the Black Sea? The folks who will kill every opponent, real or imagined, without hesitation, don’t have time for enjoying ill-gotten gains or perks. People who use power in Leftist government for personal gain are unsavory, but people who believe in the Leftist program are evil beyond evil.
When he’s in the WH he’s in an echo chamber. This kind of rhetoric is all he hears. It’s the way they think.
July 15, 1979…
I didn’t do it, nobody saw me do it, you can’t prove anything!
Bart Simpson
I didn’t do it, nobody saw me do it, you can’t prove anything!
Commonly known as the Bart Simpson Defense.
In addition to being an inveterate liar, this man simply cannot and will not accept responsibility for any of his own actions, much less those of the Donks in both Houses of Congress. “Se me cayo”, it “happened” to me, as they say in Spanish, implying that whatever happened was not my fault.
As far as T.T. at #7 is concerned, the Senate has not consider a budget bill regardless of who authored it in over 900 days! Harry the Deficit Hawk doesn’t want to be bothered by little things like laws and such regarding spending…unless, of course, it allows unlimited spending a la 0care. Mr. Ryan’s budget was a reasonable effort to rein in spending by the left.
Don’t underestimate the devil. Obama is successfully playing the classes against each other. He can’t wait until Aug. 2 comes around so that he can declare a financial emergency. The first thing he will do is cut the money going to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Not that he will need to but on a the pretense already mentioned. His intention is to piss off the public against the GOP. He lays the ground work for this every time he can. Your average American doesn’t understand his ploy. He is a shrewd knifing b……………
Andy…You’re absolutely correct! When it comes to strategy capacities, it’s the diaper brigade angainst the three piece pin stripped suit brigade.
The more modern GOP has consistanly been a multi divided body by the likes of the moderates, the social conservatives/religious right coailition, the anarchists reorganized as the libertarians and now the reconstituted religious right coalition rebranded as fiscal conservatives…I guess. They keep rebanding themselves. They have become a flipant bunch in constant battle within, vascilating from one platform of ideal to another one day to the next.
The Dems on the other hand, have forever, been a coexsisting body of only progressives and moderates…and damn well masters of ‘unitized’ strategy.
It looks like the President has created another crisis for his own purposes. Somebody needs to call on the Joint Chiefs and Congress to remove Barry Soetoro before he plunges us into default. Every legal avenue should be explored and acted upon. Playing chicken with the economy and our credit rating just isn’t the American way.
“How can we ask a grandma to give up life-extending medical treatment and accept death early while not asking a horribly overpaid, underworked government employee to defer a large raise for a year?”
“How can we ask a hard-working young private school student from a poor, inner-city neighborhood to give up their dreams and return to their failing, crime-infested union-led public school before asking the public school’s superintendent to do with a few less unnecessary high-paid administrators?”
“How can we ask a poor child to do without a subsidized, warm and nourishing breakfast without asking Michelle Obama to pay for a private flight instead of sucking the life out of the taxpayers as she and Barack head to Chicago for a high-calorie date-night burger fest?”
Really Barack, it’s much easier to approach these examples from our side of the equation.
“Moving seamlessly between talk of “millionaires and billionaires” and those Americans “making more than $250,000 a year,” Obama tried to pin the blame for failing to pass the debt ceiling squarely at the feet of congressional conservatives.”
In a variation of Jonathan Swift’s 1729 essay “A Modest Proposal,” why don’t we just eat the millionaires and billionaires? After all, Obama always mentions them, obviously hates them, and seems to blame all of our problems on them. So why not just get rid of them and eat them?
Obviously, I’m joking. But Obama is not. I have not seen this type of class warfare in my lifetime. Every time Obama keeps bringing up the “evil” rich, he is spouting socialist platitudes that would make Lenin proud. Obama acts as if the rich just take their money and stick it under a mattress. He doesn’t quite mention that they invest it in corporations, small and large businesses, and do things like build big houses or hire lots of people, the types of things that give people like you and me JOBS. You know, JOBS, those things Obama has not a clue on how to create, let alone keep.
So lets just eat the rich so that we’ll have a country filled with poor and middle class people sucking off of the Federal government for all of its wants and needs. But just remember, after people like Obama are finished destroying the rich, what’s to stop him and people like him coming after the Middle Class? People like Obama will then think the Middle Class are not “carrying their weight” or “giving their fair share.” And then the Middle Class will just have to go.
Then what will be left? Well just the poor, of course. A country filled with poor people, scratching around to get just the basics for living, like in the Soviet Union. Some of you people out there are too young to remember the Soviet Union and how it treated people. Well, what you should remember is that the Soviet Union was made up of a lot of poor people, but that there always seemed to be an elite political class that had everything it wanted and needed. The Obama class. And why not? They made the rules and they determined what it was the rest of the nation needed. And so it was, we too can create the same life people once had in the Soviet Union. Now THAT is progress.
Can’t happen here, you say? Well, in a way, it already has. When Obamacare goes into effect the country really will be broke and it will be forced to pour ever greater amounts of money and resources into an insatiable Federal government. In time, the only job you’ll have is working for the Federal government, which is just the way it’s supposed to be in Obamaland.
So cheer up, America. The first step in achieving the perfect worker’s paradise in Obamaland is to eat the rich. And then all Obama and people like him will have left is to come after you. Somewhere, Jonathan Swift is laughing right now.
Obama’s presidency reminds me of an old song “Eve of Destruction” How can one man systematically destroy what was the greatest nation on earth. He seems to want to turn it into a Cuba or some other third world country. He needs to be stopped in his tracks when it comes to spending. Maybe we should send him in air force 2 to a place that has a golf course and let him spend the rest of his term playing golf. Create a cable station for him to talk every day even though no one would listen. Maybe we could get him a fancy Generals uniform to strut around in on his Island. That way he would let the country get back to normal and get this nation back on the right path.
He is a poverty pimp. Virtually no different than Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton.
The sad part is he believes he can convince a nation that he’s right just by reading an idiot board. Like any freak show you see it once or twice and it get’s repetitive.
The sad thing is you have so mant people dependent upon the Government he still has an outside chance of a second term.
I shudder to think what other countries must believe about the US after viewing the antics of Nerobama.
I look forward to the rants from those naieve enough to justify any confidence in this POVERTY PRINCE
I could only stand to watch the first two minutes and the line from the Jim Carey lawyer character in Liar, Liar came to mind when his criminal client called him from jail again. I shouted at the TV, “STOP STEALING A_____!”
Was anyone besides me yelling at the TV during his speech? I was cooking dinner and lost my appetite. It was all the same-ol’ same-ol’ divisiveness which I won’t bother to regurgitate here. He said nothing to help solve the looming crisis at hand. In fact, he’s blocking all attempts to fix the budget mess. Blame, blame, blame, blah blah blah. Am I angry? You betcha!
The accumulation of wealth has always been the sticking point for collectivists. They want the government to control the means of production and make sure everyone gets their fair share of the pie. Problem is, when government controls the means of production, there is no control over the quality and quantity of production. No matter how much brainwashing they perform, they will never be able to make human beings produce enough to gain any real wealth if they don’t see a gain for themselves through their efforts. People may be social animals, but like every other animal on the planet, they will only work for their own well being. We can’t be cajoled into altruistic behavior until our own needs are provided for. Obama is one of the floaters who have always gotten by on good looks and high minded rhetoric. Now that he has run out of other people’s money to spend, his freeloader lifestyle is plain to see. His reaction is perfectly normal. How does any animal behave when it discovers it is being caged?
The thing I find disturbing is the tacit acceptance of his proposed “cuts”, designed to take place over a long time, as equivalent with more immediate cuts using CBO logic.
Show me the last time the government stayed within a budget set 10 years prior.
His “cuts” which supposedly meet the original Republican demands are a bill of goods, and should be called out as such. It is not unreasonable to reject an illusion, and the unserious brinksmanship is on the part of the one who puts forth such a charade.
This tired and lazy demagogue can’t even come up with new demonizations- he’s STILL going on about private jets and evil oil companies, and trying to conflate $250k a year with Bill Gates.
Quick question, Mr. Resident: what is a “fair share” of too much?
I no longer bother watching Obama’s speeches. It’s the same old song, over and over. The man is incapable of change.
Obama has only one agenda: Himself. As the Ultimate Power. He’s focused both on hisre-election and on getting himself into a role of ultimate political governmental power. Congress has always been irrelevant to Obama and he’s going to make it even more so.
Obama won the 2008 election not on any experience, qualifications; nothing. He won by setting himself up within an Image. Remember, Obama lives in a virtual bubble. Of words. Of images. Unconnected to hard reality. Obama has no ability to connect to reality – either to people as equal, or to hard facts. He lives within his own words and his words have one function: to manipulate others into being within His control. Period.
So Obama won the 2008 election by the Imagery of Not Bush, and the equally empty imagery of Hope and Change, the oceans ceasing to rise..etc.
Again, Obama’s existence is only within words. He does not connect words to reality or actions. That’s why he’s a pathological liar..because his words aren’t meant to reflect reality. But to manipulate you emotionally.
Obama has now one focus: his Power. Within his re-election. He cannot campaign within the real world, and the results of his actions. His stimulus was a fraud, meant to support the salaries of his unionized public service base, not ‘shovel-ready private enterprise projects’. His health care is despised by the majority and Obama’s unions have, for the most part, ‘waivered’ themselves out. All his other actions, domestic and foreign, have been disasters.
So, Obama is going to campaign – and frankly, that’s all he’s capable of, is campaigning, i.e., speaking Words to cheering crowds – in 2012, using the same emotional tactics. He’s continuing with the Bash Bush, but, he needs two more areas. He’s got to Bash the GOP/Tea Party.
The TeaParty is a new voice since 2008; it’s in reaction to Obama..and Obama has to crush it. How? I’m suggesting that Obama will deliberately PUSH THE US INTO DEFAULT. Deliberately. And then blame it all on the GOP/Tea Party.
That’s his tactic. After all, Obama could have dealt with this coming situation before Nov 2010..when the Democrats had control of the House and Senate. He did nothing. No budget. Nothing. Then, he lost the House…and his tactic has been to first, ignore this event..and disparage the Tea Party..and now, I’m suggesting that he is DELIBERATELY PUSHING DEFAULT. Because he’ll blame this on the Tea Party.
Now, we know that he doesn’t want to deal with the debt ceiling during his campaign…he wants no reality to interfere with his Words, Words, Words.
That’s one reason for his insisting on a long term ceiling. I note that he’s indifferent to cutting costs..
And, he wants more money..which he calls ‘revenue’ but which the correct Word is : taxes. I note that Obama has also redefined the meaning of ‘millionaire’. It used to be a 7 figure term; Obama defines 200,000 (which is one/fifth of a million)..as ‘a millionaire’. Words, words, words.
I suggest that he wants the money to bribe the electorate next year; giving his electoral base, which is made up of the non-productive sectors of the population ..some extra benefits. Just watch him.
So- three tactics to get Obama re-elected:
1) Allow a default of a few weeks..to Bash the Tea Party;
2) Not allow any discussion of budgets, the economy..until after his re-election;
3) Increase taxes for a slush fund to use to ‘bribe’ his electoral base.
Well, don’t bother your pretty little heads about Mr. Obama. Whether his term is limited to one or stretches to two, our national Dumuzi will eventually have his sacred kingly term truncated, and a new Dumuzi installed in his place.
And then, of course, everything will be just fine, perfect, and paradise. We’ve been assured of this for 6,000 years.
It was vomitous when he walk down the long red-carpeted hallway lined by throne-like chairs. King Oblahblah, leading us idiots out of the darkness.
HR4646: The Damned Democrat 1% Solution for What Ails Us
. . . Well, those Dems are at it again with HR4646. Compounding their deceit and since they were unable to pass it in 2009, it will be shelved until after the 2012 election, assuming they win.
When first proposed, then-Speaker Pelosi said of HR4646, “I believe that the transaction tax still has a great deal of merit” and would have a “really minimal impact on the transaction, but a tremendous impact on helping us meet our needs.”
From the perspective of the multimillionaire Pelosi family, the 1% tax/fee might be really minimal. From the perspective of real Americans, the impact would be really significant.
Even liberal-leaning Snopes.com expressed outrage in its article, “The One Percent Solution,” subtitled, “The Transaction Tax WHAT THE HELL IS THIS??” (Snopes’ emphasis) . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5094)
“For the last decade, we have spent more money than we take in,” he said.
So do something Mr President! Don’t just sit there and whine! Grow up and do what has to be done! If things are not as good as they were then stop complaining and take action. Regrets are for wimps. Nostalgia is for retirement. Action is for today.
Thank you, I have just been searching for info approximately this subject for ages and yours is the best I’ve found out so far. But, what concerning the bottom line? Are you certain about the source?|What i do not understood is actually how you’re not really much more well-favored than you might be now. You are very intelligent.
Helpful info. Lucky me I discovered your website accidentally, and I’m shocked why this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.