Obama Said There’d Be Days Like This
Earlier this year, President Obama started adding a stock line to the stump speech he gives at his endless fundraisers, recalling what he supposedly said in 2008. As he phrased it at a campaign event in Florida last month:
Now, ever since I first ran for this office, I’ve said it’s going to take more than one year or one term or maybe even one president to restore the dream that built this country.
A week later, he mangled his oft-repeated statement, reversing the subject and predicate, saying that ever since he had run for president he had said it would take that long to “restore the dream this country built.” Perhaps he was confusing his 2008 statement with his 2012 campaign theme. (That dream you have? You didn’t build that).
But the more significant question is: when in 2008 did he say anything like it would take two terms and maybe two presidents to do what he promised?
On the night he effectively secured the Democratic presidential nomination, he told the crowd it was a “defining moment for our nation,” a “moment that will define a generation,” a “moment when … the rise of the oceans began to slow.” Five days before the election, he said we were “five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” His nomination would make the waters recede; his election would transform America. It was all about the fierce urgency of now — not two terms or maybe two presidents.
In his inaugural address, Obama said that “everywhere we look, there is work to be done” and that what was required was “action, bold and swift.” He assured the nation that:
[W]e will act, not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We’ll restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. All this we will do.
People listening to Obama on the first day of his presidency might have thought to themselves, “Boy, this has gotta take two terms, and maybe even two presidents; I mean — not just creating new jobs, but laying a new foundation for growth; not just building roads and bridges, but grids and lines; restoring science to its rightful place; raising health care’s quality while lowering its cost; harnessing the sun and wind; transforming schools, colleges and universities — that’s gonna take a while.”
But if Obama’s listeners thought his ambitions might be a tad grandiose, and that the system might not tolerate his big plans all at once, Obama disabused them of that notion in the next paragraph of his address:
Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions, who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. … What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them, that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply.
No reference to two terms, and maybe two presidents — as he had supposedly been saying ever since he first ran for president. Things were not going to be done one at a time, and certainly not over an extended period of time. They would be done right now, because with his election contrary arguments no longer applied. And his party completely controlled Congress, so the legislative branch was no impediment.
Obama was confident it wouldn’t even take three years. In a February 2, 2009 interview with NBC’s Matt Lauer, Obama was asked if he would adopt a different strategy if all the spending didn’t work, and he responded as follows.
THE PRESIDENT: … Look, I’m at the start of my administration. One nice thing about the situation I find myself in is that I will be held accountable. You know, I’ve got four years –
Q: You’ll know quickly how people feel about what’s happened.
THE PRESIDENT: That’s exactly right. And, you know, a year from now, I think people are going to see that we’re starting to make some progress, but there’s still going to be some pain out there. If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition. And I welcome that responsibility … [Emphasis added].






littl o says he hates Christians and he does,littl o says he has contempt for Business but he does,the snake dosent have the poison,the snake handler does!
Stop the press! Obama is telling another lie! For nearly four years, it has been one lie after another. His word is only as good as the next time he moves his lips. What is really interesting is that he apparently has the ability to actually believe his own lies.
There must be a scientific term for this employed by those who study abnormal psychology.
I’d call it the “Costanza Syndrome” from “Seinfeld’s” George Costanza (Jason Alexander): “Remember, Jerry; it’s not really a lie if you truly believe it.”
Another great Costanza rule is to go out on a high note. Obama missed that bus the day after his inaugural.
What’s really scary is there are a lot of voters who believe those lies.
My only prayer is that the people I just heard on C-SPAN condemning Paul Ryan as ‘radical’ are not representative of American voters. If they are, this country is doomed to four more years of Obama and an inevitable downfall.
You have to listen to them. Some of them are obviously reading talking points. They don’t even know what words mean. One caller had obviously never seen the word ‘facade’ on paper.
Pat,
You mean millions of voters who want to believe his lies. Most know this is a failed presidency. Many are simply too commited to the liberal ideology or the Democratic party to re-assess their beliefs. Stubbornly clinging to Obama’s lies allows them the illusion of being rational.
Kind of reminds me of the quintessential battered wife who wants to believe her abusive husband’s promise that he will change, so she doesn’t have to do any tough introspection.
The term used by psychiatrists is pathological liar.
Or, “Mendax Pathologicus”, aka “The Chronic Reducer of Chronic Dissonance”.
What’s really bad about this: Most people who listen and believe never catch on that he himself has created the dissonance his lies are busily trying to reduce.
Like going to the same Dr. who broke your legs to get them fixed.
BO, so clever and so slick,
You never thought the truth might stick,
But failing fast are all your schemes,
From your Choom* Gang Days to your False Father’s Dreams.
* http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/obama-and-his-pot-smoking-choom-gang/
It is quite a remarkable thing. This President seems to have zero respect for telling the truth. In fact he seems to regard the truth as something to be avoided by any means necessary, as if the truth were a kind of poison or deadly snake.
That’s what the truth is — for him and his pals.
He tells people what he thinks they want to hear…thus somehow validating his ideas. No one ever confronts him with, “Well, that’s not what you said. What you said was exactly the opposite of what you did.”
Watch his head explode the moment someone actually hits him with that…if ever.
I feel this man will pull off another four years. With the help of friends from the “Ideological Department” (news channnels), the clowns in the comedy channels, the “illusionists” in Hollywood and the foot soldiers like Media Matters and Daily Beastiality, we will have him for another term. Add to that the complacent American citizen, who in many years have not been vigilant in watching what these men and women have been doing in our nation’s capitol. We get what we deserve.
Here in Iowa Romney is already running ads with that “one-term proposition” quote. The media can cover for Barry-O all they want. Romney has enough money to buy the time to get the truth out there.
Iowa is supposed to be a battleground state this year but if yard signs and bumper stickers are good indicators support for the Grifter-in-Chief is going down the drain. This state was covered with “Obama” signs in 2008. I do a fair amount of traveling through the eastern third. Last week I saw the very first “Obama/Biden” yard sign. “Romney” signs have been all over for months.
Having escaped the Dem plantation four years ago (thank you, Sarah) I still have a lot of Dem friends. The one word that describes all of them to a T is “disillusioned”.
I believe that Romney’s selection of Ryan will force Obama to replace Biden. Yes, Bam will make a change. Joey will drop out for health reasons but, after a brief period, will get a “job” where the graft, kickback,or influence sales will be as (if not more) lucrative than his VP slot.
Who will replace Biden on the dem ticket? It won’t be Hillary! My bet is that it will be John Kerrey, who will keep his Senate seat, and if the dems win, will be replaced by appointee Elizabeth Warren.
There are thousands (millions!) of folks better than Kerrey but he has same same political prostitute characteristics that the lefties find so endearing in Biden.
Note, that Obama got a slot at Harvard law that he didn’t deserve and Kerry didn’t get a slot at Harvard law that was his by birthright.
Obama got a slot at Harvard law that he didn’t deserve and Kerry didn’t get a slot at Harvard law that was his by birthright.
Didn’t deserve?! The consensus is that he got into Harvard based on his scintillating performance at Columbia, a prestigious diploma mill in its own right. Unfortunately no professors or fellow students recall him there, but that’s probably racism at work, if ya axe me. Tex, tread lightly when navigating the shallow rocks lurking in the Prestige Game. Those are shifting sands covered by capricious waters, so one is best to tiptoe on eggshells there.
The clue that he is lying his ass off is when words come out
All we have to do is remind folks of Biden’s infamous “Recovery Summer” in 2010.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjilL1TvTCc
Has there ever been a national leader in the history of man on TV as much as Prez Barack Hussein? I mean, the guy’s on camera every single day; he never shuts up.
Oh the supreme irony that for all his press “access” he never seems to address the tough questions. Maybe that’s because he’s never asked them. Well, the one guy did ask a tough question a couple of months ago, but his colleagues and Hussein himself were deeply offended, and he was shunned as unprofessional. The news entertainers spent a couple of days raking him over the coals and that was it, no question.
To Barry, it doesn’t matter what he said. What matters is what he said he said. Got it?
Unfortunately, more people should have actually been listening to what he said in 2008. He told us what he was going to do when elected if anyone really cared to pay attention.
Who did he mean when he said “we” were going to build roads and bridges, the electrical grid, infrastructure, etc.? The private sector? Ah, no.
Sorry Seniors: Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Calls Gutting of Medicare an Achievement Katie Pavlich News Editor, Townhall
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/08/12/sorry_seniors_obama_deputy_campaign_manager_calls_gutting_of_medicare_an_achievement
Okay, hold Obama accountable for failing to realize just how traitorous Republicans would be.
Be sure you put the blame where it belongs, though. It’s not Obama who stopped all consideration of legislation to fight pollution (and climate change). It’s not Obama who tried to stop even the study of climate change. It’s not Obama who has blocked every serious jobs bill or balloon proposal over three years. It’s not Obama who insisted that for every dollar given to create jobs and stop unemployment and get America back on track, $8 go to the very rich as a reward for being very rich.
You’re right, Obama was wrong. He needed a lot more support in Congress than he got. He maybe should have seen the rise of the militant idiot right called the Teabaggers. But voting to support the obstacles to progress, instead of Obama, won’t help.