I want to be the Devil’s Advocate here. All of this talk about pledged delegates, Super Delegates, half-vote delegates, etc. means NOTHING until the votes are cast on the convention floor. Hillary DID NOT relinquish her delegates to Obama, which wouldn’t really make much difference because the delegates are only obligated by “promises” and ethics (a lacking quality in politicians) – nothing more.

As we know, several bombshells have exploded around Obama in the past months. The Rev. Wright, Michelle’s new found “pride” to be an American, Father Pfleger, his connection with Rezko, his resignation from the church (20 years too late???), quotes from his published books, and the list goes on. The mainstream media has managed to sweep all of this under the carpet. Pooh-poohing or ignoring much of it as “irrelevant”, out of context, “not the way he REALLY thinks”, etc. What do we really, REALLY know about Obama, other than he has been recognized, without question, as the MOST liberal person in the Senate?

So, let me paint my hypothetical picture. One or more HUGE bombshells are going to be dropped just before the convention that will make the previous ones seem like firecrackers, and the Super Delegates will run from Obama like rats from a sinking ship. (Hmmm? Rats seems an appropriate comparative term.) Does anyone really think that the Clintons are going to give up so easily? Especially, Slick Willie. He hates to lose.

Anyway, as I said, this is a hypothetical picture, but . . .

The American Thinker website is one of the more erudite spots to read online.

That you so desperately attempt to – hah! let’s be generous here – “argue” that it is NOT and that the information there is either invalid or of no merit only shows your inability to reason.

POOR BWILL: “…this is my column.”

I, sir, am no troll.

YOU, SIR, ARE NO JOURNALIST, IMHO. Perhaps your efforts would be better suited to “Kos”-sack or your local soup kitchen.

You just linked to a nitwith post that is totally divorced from reality.

As I told you, Hillary Clinton is out of the campaign.

She has endorsed Obama.

The vaunted Clinton fundraising machine is integrating with the Obama machine.

Now, is Obama the best candidate?

I’m worried he’s not experienced enough.

I say this as a member of Veterans for McCain in 2000.

But enough time wasted on a wingnut stalker.

>Ed Wallis:

Of interest to readers (no, no, Mr. Bradley, it’s likely too advanced for liberal trolls…):

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/the_clintonobama_battle_contin_1.html
Jun 3, 2008 – 7:42 am

Not in this century, at least.

>George Clarke:

Science is something you can duplicate in the laboratory and measure, and achieve the same result every time. Which scientest duplicated form transitional evolution in the laboratory. Darwin did not so it is not scientific evolution. It is a theory, based on alot of scientific evidence. On the other side, divine intervention may well be true, but being supernatural it is not science. Because we can certainly breed dogs, horses and peas for particular characteristics, over dozens of generations, does not mean the elephant is related in kinship to the ameoba. Maybe it is, but alas there is so much we don’t know. All theories at this point are at least viable if not equal (and not necessarily exclusionary of the alternatives) so I do not believe any candidates adherence to any genesis tale is a political deal breaker.
Jun 2, 2008 – 8:38 pm

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/the_clintonobama_battle_contin_1.html

>poet1b:

Why should Hillary concede. The super delegates have until the convention to make up their minds, and with the contest so even, that is exactly what they should do. Obama’s numbers are dropping, and after carrying the role of the presumptive nominee, they might find that Obama isn’t capable of carrying the role, so they should wait until August for the final decision.
Jun 3, 2008 – 12:23 am

>Sembo:

The black whip is going for B. Huessin Obama? I wonder why?
Jun 2, 2008 – 8:10 pm