Obama Hits Neglectful Fathers — And, Of Course, McCain
Barack Obama’s Fathers Day speech came as no surprise. Speaking at a black church in Chicago, at which he called out absentee fathers, especially in the black community, for acting “like boys instead of men.”
The move was part of an expected pivot to the center by Obama for the general election and a way for the exotic candidate, the father of two girls, to highlight his commonality with mainstream American culture and challenge fellow African-Americans. It’s certainly not the last time: there will be further such moves, you can be sure. With this under his belt, Obama will start the second week of his opening general election tour on the economy today with a look at his “competitiveness” agenda on Monday.
Obama, who is consolidating the Democrats following the long campaign between he and Hillary Clinton, has opened up a five-point lead over John McCain in the latest Rasmussen poll, 45% to 40%.
Meanwhile, John McCain’s new TV ad campaign continues, as does the debate over debates. McCain’s ad introduces or, actually, re-introduces this famous man in various battleground states, trying to frame the election around security rather than the economy.
McCain senior advisor Steve Schmidt tells me that the ad is airing in 54 broadcast TV markets in key swing states, a more than $3 million buy. Where exactly is it airing? Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Missouri. Another million or so is being spent on cable TV, where the ad will run on Fox News, CNN, Lifetime, The Learning Channel, and the Discovery Channel.
Here’s the ad’s text:
Only a fool or a fraud talks tough or romantically about war. When I was five years old, my father left for war.
My grandfather came home from war and died the next day.
I was shot down over Vietnam and spent five years as a POW. Some of the friends I served with never came home.
I hate war. And I know how terrible its costs are.
I’m running for President to keep the country I love safe. I’m John McCain and I approve this message.
Barack Obama isn’t running any TV ads. Right now.
Obama is campaigning far more aggressively against McCain and the Republicans than he did against Hillary Clinton and his fellow Democrats, hammering McCain and the Bush Administration every day now. The tyro Illinois senator said at a private fundraiser in Philadelphia the other night, featuring Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, whose machine helped Hillary win one of her biggest victories over Obama but where Obama now leads McCain: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”
That’s a rip-off of a Sean Connery line in The Untouchables. About “the Chicago Way.” Obama, of course, is from Chicago.
Well, from Chicago via Honolulu and Jakarta.
It’s hardly all good for Obama, who is actually running behind his party in what should be an excellent year for Democrats given President Bush’s near historic levels of unpopularity.
He had to cut loose his principal veep vetter, Jim Johnson, a prominent Washington insider who vetted the last two Democratic vice presidential nominees, Joe Lieberman and John Edwards. Neither of whom turned out all that well, incidentally, though not for background problems. Johnson had received favorable treatment on loans from Countrywide, a controversial firm at the center of the subprime mortgage crisis. He’s such a political fixture that it apparently didn’t occur to Obama and his team to see if he might have any problems. Whoops!
But the move comes after McCain had to let five people go from his campaign for controversial lobbying ties, including to the murderous Burmese military dictatorship and to Saudi Arabia.
Speaking of Saudi Arabia, the kingdom will next weekend host a very unusual conference which may have great bearing on this presidential election. The most important leaders of the oil cartel are bringing together, next Sunday in Jeddah, representatives of the principal oil-producing and oil-consuming nations of the world to seek a solution to the world’s oil crisis. Or at least the portion of the crisis that has led to record oil and gasoline prices.
Obama says that the oil men in the White House, President Bush and Vice President Cheney, have done little to follow through on their promise of cheap oil following the takeover of Iraq, which was viewed as having the second largest reserves in the world.
McCain says that Obama should follow his lead in moving to suspend federal gasoline taxes over the summer.
Perhaps it’s something for the two to debate. When they finally have debates.
Both have agreed to the three standard debates, slated to begin in September. But McCain, as the underdog, naturally wants more.
He’s challenged Obama to appear with him at another ten “town hall” debates. Obama countered by suggesting that the pair engaged in “Lincoln-Douglas” debates around the nation, after the fashion of the famed 1858 series of debates between Illinois politicians Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas over slavery, and a U.S. Senate seat. (Douglas won that election, but Lincoln won the debates, setting him up to win the presidency in 1860.)
It’s amusing in that McCain and Obama have both suggested debate formats that play specifically to their respective greatest strengths.
For McCain is best at town hall meetings, where he is a master. Obama is best at platform speeches, where he is a master. And the Lincoln-Douglas format is essentially a duel of lengthy speeches, rather than a debate as we have come to know it.
There’s no agreement yet between the two camps, but talks will continue this week and ultimately there will be more than the scheduled three debates.
Neither man was his party’s best debater. Obama, especially early on, as in a Las Vegas forum which I filmed and where he bombed, struggled at times as he attempted to shoehorn elements of his stump speech into much shorter debate answers. But the lengthy campaign against Clinton honed his skills.
But Clinton also was not her party’s best debater. That was John Edwards. The Republicans’ best debater? Rudy Giuliani.
For all the good it did either of those candidates. Giuliani, by the way, has resurfaced following his disastrous campaign. He is willing to help his financially-challenged party: for a cut of the take at fundraisers he headlines.
This week, Obama will continue the consolidation of his takeover of his own party. While the Clintons are on vacation — former President Bill resurfaced Thursday night to fete Warren Beatty as the liberal actor/filmmaker received the American Film Institute Life Achievement Award in Hollywood — Obama is moving most Democratic National Committee operations from Washington to Chicago, site of his own campaign headquarters. The Republican National Committee will continue to operate out of Washington, near McCain headquarters. The Beltway, in the meantime, belongs to them.






Is there a pool on where the DNC moves after Ohhhhh…BAMA get blown out this November? My money is on Riyadh. Although N.O.W> might have a problem with that. They’ll get over it, since the Saudi’s have more money then N.O.W.
Actually almost any foreign country would do. Fwance, China, Russia, Cuba, Montana. The Democratic peoples Republic of Korea would do nicely, although even N.O.W. has more money then Kim. Dresses better too.
Blehh.
While I don’t think Obama is ready for prime-time as president, he is quite an inspiring speaker. I wish him well in his efforts to restore two-parent families, especially among blacks.
“Boys?” Did the Democratic candidate actually suggest that strong, proud African men behave like “boys?”
I was under the impression that using the B word in reference to black males was like using the N word. If a White, Asian or Hispanic politician suggested that Black men behave like Bs he could kiss his career goodbye.
I guess that’s the advantage of an African American at the bully pulpit. He can say what others can’t without being accused of racism. If it walks like a B and talks like a B, he can call it a B.
Chris Rock on deadbeat dads “‘I take care of my kids.’ You’re supposed to, you dumb motherf—-!…What do you want, a cookie?! I’m surprised that the author did not see within this pseudo Sistah Souljah moment is a cookie called govenrment aid.
“We should reward fathers who pay child support with job training and job opportunities and a larger Earned Income Tax Credit.” Huh. A huge problem is just getting these men to pay child support. This is a character issue. When Obama addresses the disastrous effects of welfare on the African American community I’ll listen.
Yeah. Kick blacks off welfare affirmative action life support
Obama has opened up a five-point lead over John McCain in the latest Rasmussen poll, 45% to 40%.
I don’t know if “opened up” a five-point lead is quite the best wording since on Rasmussen Obama has been running six and seven points ahead of McCain for several days now. Maybe I don’t read Bradley consistently enough, but it seems he only quotes Obama poll results in a glowingly selective way.
Meanwhile according to Gallup, Obama’s lead has shrunk to two points and Gallup reports the contest as a “virtual tie.”
http://www.gallup.com/poll/107854/Gallup-Daily-ObamaMcCain-Race-Reverts-Virtual-Tie.aspx
Meanwhile, in the real world …
A. Obama leads McCain by 6 or 7 points and is up/way up in most swing states.
B. “Huxley” is a quite disingenuous fellow, who posts repeatedly on New West Notes, where he gets shot down by most of the insider consultants of both parties who post there, and is quite aware of my analysis.
C. Enough time wasted on that …
There you go …
>david levavi:
“Boys?” Did the Democratic candidate actually suggest that strong, proud African men behave like “boys?”
I was under the impression that using the B word in reference to black males was like using the N word. If a White, Asian or Hispanic politician suggested that Black men behave like Bs he could kiss his career goodbye.
I guess that’s the advantage of an African American at the bully pulpit. He can say what others can’t without being accused of racism. If it walks like a B and talks like a B, he can call it a B.
Jun 16, 2008 – 11:15 am
“Especially among blacks.”
>huxley:
While I don’t think Obama is ready for prime-time as president, he is quite an inspiring speaker. I wish him well in his efforts to restore two-parent families, especially among blacks.
Jun 16, 2008 – 9:50 am
Very nice.
>John Samford:
Is there a pool on where the DNC moves after Ohhhhh…BAMA get blown out this November? My money is on Riyadh. Although N.O.W> might have a problem with that. They’ll get over it, since the Saudi’s have more money then N.O.W.
Actually almost any foreign country would do. Fwance, China, Russia, Cuba, Montana. The Democratic peoples Republic of Korea would do nicely, although even N.O.W. has more money then Kim. Dresses better too.
Jun 16, 2008 – 7:25 am
Say what?
>Olivia:
Chris Rock on deadbeat dads “‘I take care of my kids.’ You’re supposed to, you dumb motherf—-!…What do you want, a cookie?! I’m surprised that the author did not see within this pseudo Sistah Souljah moment is a cookie called govenrment aid.
“We should reward fathers who pay child support with job training and job opportunities and a larger Earned Income Tax Credit.” Huh. A huge problem is just getting these men to pay child support. This is a character issue. When Obama addresses the disastrous effects of welfare on the African American community I’ll listen.
Jun 16, 2008 – 12:13 pm
Bill Bradley is quite a disingenuous fellow.
A. Note that he makes no substantive response to my reasonable and cited post above. It’s true that Obama has been leading McCain by six or seven points for a week on Rasmussen, as I said. It’s true that Obama’s lead has shrunk to two points on Gallup, as I said.
B. I posted about five times on NWN in the space of a week two or three weeks ago. In my estimation I gave as good as I got. I stopped because I found the discussions rather breezy, superficial, and sometimes abusive. And because Bradley is, well, a disingenuous fellow who usually dismisses challenges rather than meeting them.
C. Enough time wasted on that …
Obama chooses Fathers day to denigrate Black men. When That same someone chooses to castigate Black Women for their part in Black Society being in the crapper, I will give a Sh**. As a black man, I am tired of taking the blame for the short sightedness and stupidness of the black woman. When they stop choosing thugs, and choose the “white acting” good black man who works to get ahead, we as a race will have come a long way.
>“Especially among blacks.”
Bill Bradley — Yes, that’s what I said.
It’s pretty close to what you said: “…which he called out absentee fathers, especially in the black community” and to what Obama said: “We know that more than half of all black children live in single-parent households, a number that has doubled — doubled — since we were children.”
So why do you repeat my words back in scare quotes as though those three were particularly significant?
Sorry if I was unclear and didn’t end my quote but it was one of Chris Rock’s funnier rants from his second HBO special. I think nestled in his la-di-da of his recycled speech were some weird ideas about how government should take care of people who are doing what they are supposed to do.
And why is he always so damn patronizing when he’s around black people. I never see him give these kinds of lectures to other demographics. He always has to make these kinds of remarks when he has a large black audience. No one called him out on that ridiculous comment about eating leftover fried chicken for breakfast. Ugh it’s so offensive.
If he wants to be provincial he could talk about urban policy, welfare reform or a trade relationship with Africa. Or go over major issues that effect all Americans. But no why do that?
Is Barak blaming his father or something? Why does he have to always sound condescending and negative?
He can make his message positively strong and not so threatening.
By the way, I just don’t get it. Is he saying that Black Men don’t care much about their children? He is again generalising. Look how the father of the Williams sisters take care of his children. That’s pretty much okey. My point is this: In 21st Century, if you are a bad father, you are bad, regardless of your color and religion.
Why does he have to play race card. He knows that he has already almost 100% of Black vote.
His strategy is called “agitation” in the parlance of NGOs. But he is already one step to the White House. He doesn’t have to take the role of a religious minister to play on morality. He can just strengthen family values through the proper institutions.
Now, he’s beginning to sound so scary. As if even moral actions of a person shall be controlled by his impending presidency.
To me, everyone’s missing the point of Obama’s speech. He’s going after the Hillary vote. He’s going after the embittered liberal women with a “Men are bums” message.
On the weekend, a Minnesote Hillary delegate came out and said she was going to vote for McCain. Then Obama comes out with his “men are bums” message. That’s all what this is about and nothing more.
Reading through “replies” from Bill Bradley, what I see is a copy of the post he is replying to with no substantive reply.
Stallywood:
“Obama chooses Fathers day to denigrate Black men. When That same someone chooses to castigate Black Women for their part in Black Society being in the crapper, I will give a Sh**. As a black man, I am tired of taking the blame for the short sightedness and stupidness of the black woman. When they stop choosing thugs, and choose the “white acting” good black man who works to get ahead, we as a race will have come a long way.”
Very well said, Stallywood, but as we learned from the Dem infighting, part of Hillary’s base was the “lesser-educated” blue collar worker, your use of the word “denigrate” might “confuse” some of the “lesser-educated” base because of its “similarity” to the “N” word. No offense meant. Just an observation.
Huh?
Ehh … no.
>Jabba the Tutt:
To me, everyone’s missing the point of Obama’s speech. He’s going after the Hillary vote. He’s going after the embittered liberal women with a “Men are bums” message.
On the weekend, a Minnesote Hillary delegate came out and said she was going to vote for McCain. Then Obama comes out with his “men are bums” message. That’s all what this is about and nothing more.
Jun 17, 2008 – 4:49 am
Hey, I thought Obama was too black re wacko Rev. Wright. Now he’s not black enough …
I actually don’t consider Obama as a black guy, as I think him and Mac re serious presidential issues, which we might get to some day or another, maybe.
>Olivia:
Sorry if I was unclear and didn’t end my quote but it was one of Chris Rock’s funnier rants from his second HBO special. I think nestled in his la-di-da of his recycled speech were some weird ideas about how government should take care of people who are doing what they are supposed to do.
And why is he always so damn patronizing when he’s around black people.
Because, my friend, you have posted many times — far more than you let on here — on New West Notes, and I know exactly where you are coming from.
>huxley:
>“Especially among blacks.”
Bill Bradley — Yes, that’s what I said.
It’s pretty close to what you said: “…which he called out absentee fathers, especially in the black community” and to what Obama said: “We know that more than half of all black children live in single-parent households, a number that has doubled — doubled — since we were children.”
So why do you repeat my words back in scare quotes as though those three were particularly significant?
Jun 16, 2008 – 4:49 pm
Well, and let me put this politely, you are totally wrong.
>huxley:
Bill Bradley is quite a disingenuous fellow.
A. Note that he makes no substantive response to my reasonable and cited post above. It’s true that Obama has been leading McCain by six or seven points for a week on Rasmussen, as I said. It’s true that Obama’s lead has shrunk to two points on Gallup, as I said.
B. I posted about five times on NWN in the space of a week two or three weeks ago. In my estimation I gave as good as I got. I stopped because I found the discussions rather breezy, superficial, and sometimes abusive. And because Bradley is, well, a disingenuous fellow who usually dismisses challenges rather than meeting them.
C. Enough time wasted on that …
Jun 16, 2008 – 3:11 pm
>”Well, and let me put this politely, you are totally wrong.”
Well, that’s sure tellng me off. Considering at least two things I said are verifiably true, we can leave it at this, politely of course:
Bill Bradley is disingenuous and lame.
>Because, my friend, you have posted many times — far more than you let on here — on New West Notes, and I know exactly where you are coming from.
Bill Bradley — You’ve got me mixed up with someone else.
There is no ‘pivot to the center’ there is the just the same verbal BS that has been done in prior campaigns that signifies absolutely nothing. It is insulting in the extreme that the already biased Obamedia take Obama’s self-interested poses as seriousness. It is not. This abuse of a church pulpit for a political pander is attempting to white-wash if you will the extremist Rev Wright, Rev Pfleger, and the other ‘faith’ connections Obama had. What church was this in? Trinity, the church he attended for 20 years, or another venue found for more suitable PR purposes? hmmmmm.
Obama has the media 100% on his side, eager to cover his rear on his extremist associations, his left-liberal record, and his thin resume and lack of accomplishments. He is certainly the least qualify nominee for President in a long time. Yet we take his superficial style-over-substance campaign charades as serious; its one thing to observe a bomboozling, it is egregious to not acknowledge it as such.
Obama poses for change. So did Carter.
http://no-bama.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama-is-another-jimmy-carter.html
Obama promises middle class tax cut. So did Clinton. Then again, Obama is openly for multiple tax hikes, including boneheaded windfall profits tax.
Obama preaches against lobbyists – yet uses 527 loopholes that skirt the law. Obama has gotten hundreds of millions from lawyers and elites in these industries, including oil, power co, hedge funds, pharma, and of course big-time Hollywood exec money. Trial lawyers are big Democrat givers, and their payback was a $1.6 billion tax giveaway in the Democrat energy bill.
And so it goes. He preaches to Dads but pursuing an agenda hostile to Fathers and families on many levels, starting with his very hostility to protecting the rights of the unborn.
A vote for Obama is like a second marriage: the triumph of HOPE over EXPERIENCE.