<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama and the Politics of Personal Destruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackT</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-373497</link>
		<dc:creator>JackT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-373497</guid>
		<description>What Obama needs to do is stop trying to work with the Republicans, they have no intention of helping America. Their main problem is Obama&#039;s color. And if they can make him look bad, they think it will somehow make them look better. But they are too full of hatred to realize that in this Universe everything you put out, you get back. Also, Obama should use the majority they have right now and ram everything, including the kitchen sink, down the Republicans throat. He should do what Bush and Cheney did, just ignore the american people, and do what ever the hell you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Obama needs to do is stop trying to work with the Republicans, they have no intention of helping America. Their main problem is Obama&#8217;s color. And if they can make him look bad, they think it will somehow make them look better. But they are too full of hatred to realize that in this Universe everything you put out, you get back. Also, Obama should use the majority they have right now and ram everything, including the kitchen sink, down the Republicans throat. He should do what Bush and Cheney did, just ignore the american people, and do what ever the hell you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-372548</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-372548</guid>
		<description>When you talk about the media&#039;s part in the SEIU puppet show- I mean, the Obama administration, think about this:
In the 2008 election we saw en entire generation of people come of voting age; people who, in many cases, haven&#039;t known life without the internet.  As much as we all hate to admit it, the internet is a haven of effortless rewards, meaningless self-aggrandizing, and non-confrontational opportunists who feel entitled to neutral immunity.

Does that sound like anybody you&#039;ve heard of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you talk about the media&#8217;s part in the SEIU puppet show- I mean, the Obama administration, think about this:<br />
In the 2008 election we saw en entire generation of people come of voting age; people who, in many cases, haven&#8217;t known life without the internet.  As much as we all hate to admit it, the internet is a haven of effortless rewards, meaningless self-aggrandizing, and non-confrontational opportunists who feel entitled to neutral immunity.</p>
<p>Does that sound like anybody you&#8217;ve heard of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nine-of-Diamonds</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-372396</link>
		<dc:creator>Nine-of-Diamonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-372396</guid>
		<description>Excellent job, Commuter. It&#039;s amazing how the cult followers keep misdirecting/obfuscating in defence of a malignant narcissist who, literally, could care less whether they live or die (read the ghoulish writings of Rahm-bo&#039;s brother &amp; the &quot;Science Czar&quot;, &amp;c. for proof). By the govt&#039;s own admissions O!&#039;s policies make no sense and will not save money. Not too sure why it&#039;s so important to them that the schemes of Dear Leader, who makes shocking gaffes and is way in over his head, should be always be proven logical. Newsflash: even &quot;postracialist&quot; Affirmative Action gold bricks from Harvard have bad ideas. Even democratic pols sometimes break promises about not raising taxes. The convoluted post hoc efforts to explain away 0&#039;s policies are quite entertaining. Not unlike 1930&#039;s era Russians&#039; fanatical insistence that Stalin was a benevolent &quot;genius&quot;.


Jharp in particular is either mentally ill or a pathological liar who has &quot;distinguished&quot; himself on quite a few other blogs. IIRC he&#039;s the same troll on Patterico who constantly fabricates stories about his profession, claiming to have expertise in whatever topic the host happens to bring up. As of now he has, what, 3 or 4 jobs? His stories may be archived on Patterico, if you are in need of a good laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent job, Commuter. It&#8217;s amazing how the cult followers keep misdirecting/obfuscating in defence of a malignant narcissist who, literally, could care less whether they live or die (read the ghoulish writings of Rahm-bo&#8217;s brother &amp; the &#8220;Science Czar&#8221;, &amp;c. for proof). By the govt&#8217;s own admissions O!&#8217;s policies make no sense and will not save money. Not too sure why it&#8217;s so important to them that the schemes of Dear Leader, who makes shocking gaffes and is way in over his head, should be always be proven logical. Newsflash: even &#8220;postracialist&#8221; Affirmative Action gold bricks from Harvard have bad ideas. Even democratic pols sometimes break promises about not raising taxes. The convoluted post hoc efforts to explain away 0&#8242;s policies are quite entertaining. Not unlike 1930&#8242;s era Russians&#8217; fanatical insistence that Stalin was a benevolent &#8220;genius&#8221;.</p>
<p>Jharp in particular is either mentally ill or a pathological liar who has &#8220;distinguished&#8221; himself on quite a few other blogs. IIRC he&#8217;s the same troll on Patterico who constantly fabricates stories about his profession, claiming to have expertise in whatever topic the host happens to bring up. As of now he has, what, 3 or 4 jobs? His stories may be archived on Patterico, if you are in need of a good laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Baker</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-371630</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-371630</guid>
		<description>Big league politics is being played by the Democrats right now.  As usual, the Republicans have no defense for this smear campaign because, as usual, they didn&#039;t anticipate it.  The Dems count on Republicans to be ignorant politicians, and the Republicans always deliver for them.  Meanwhile, the champions of our constitution get slaughtered at every turn.  Maybe the people will throw this group of collectivists out of office, but eventually they will get whatever they want, even if they are not the party in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big league politics is being played by the Democrats right now.  As usual, the Republicans have no defense for this smear campaign because, as usual, they didn&#8217;t anticipate it.  The Dems count on Republicans to be ignorant politicians, and the Republicans always deliver for them.  Meanwhile, the champions of our constitution get slaughtered at every turn.  Maybe the people will throw this group of collectivists out of office, but eventually they will get whatever they want, even if they are not the party in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deguello</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-371618</link>
		<dc:creator>deguello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-371618</guid>
		<description>193HARP You are in need of tuning.Every libtard idea is a rehash of past libtard-socialist failures.Americans will not have a camarilla of health commissars rationing their health care.As for your &quot;stump&quot; comment,were you referring to your manhood or your brain?  or both?Obama has just made himself a one term president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>193HARP You are in need of tuning.Every libtard idea is a rehash of past libtard-socialist failures.Americans will not have a camarilla of health commissars rationing their health care.As for your &#8220;stump&#8221; comment,were you referring to your manhood or your brain?  or both?Obama has just made himself a one term president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deguello</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-371612</link>
		<dc:creator>deguello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-371612</guid>
		<description>We are finding out the true nature of Obama and his liberal supporters:Stalinism. Scratch a lib,find a stalinist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are finding out the true nature of Obama and his liberal supporters:Stalinism. Scratch a lib,find a stalinist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commuter</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-371452</link>
		<dc:creator>Commuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-371452</guid>
		<description>&#039;No. I gave you those figures.&#039;

No. Do I need to consult that pesky record to expose your dishonesty once again, tool?

&#039;If there are two, the tax credit $800.&#039;

If it is a joint filing household. Which it is not. Are you purposely being obtuse or just dumb as dirt?

&#039;Because you have to 18 to smoke, dolt.&#039;

Because, what, under 18 and you only seem to smoke? However you get your smokes. Or your chew.  This is one of your weaker attempts to spin. Getting dizzy, are you, tool? 

&#039;18 = working age = tax cut. Does that help?&#039;

Working age of 18 means a tax cut?  I assume you&#039;re focused enough to remember that your position is Obama cut taxes for - whatever the percentage is of Americans that you claim on a given day - based on his tax credit. The tax credit you claim no one but you understands.

&#039;You tell me. What percentage of the 20% of American’s that smoke smoke more than a pack a day?&#039;

Would it be a fair assumption that some portion of that 20% are in the income brackets that won&#039;t get the full tax credit? I mean a fair assumption for anyone with enough brains to understand the implications, tool?

harpo, harpo. Think you&#039;d get what that pesky record means to you. Is not the question whether your 95% claim, in whatever your current iteration is, is supportable, tool? The claim where you continually call anyone a liar who disputes it using just one other metric. Think you&#039;d learn.

Funny thing. I even felt sorry for you at one point when you were running around with your pants on fire - figuratively - and threw you a bone. Told you that you could make a case for some percentage of people getting a benefit using just the two metrics or tax credit and tobacco tax, but as long as you couldn&#039;t back off the figure of 95% programmed into you by your manipulators, you were simply wrong.

But...you are stuck on stupid.

Sharper tools, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;No. I gave you those figures.&#8217;</p>
<p>No. Do I need to consult that pesky record to expose your dishonesty once again, tool?</p>
<p>&#8216;If there are two, the tax credit $800.&#8217;</p>
<p>If it is a joint filing household. Which it is not. Are you purposely being obtuse or just dumb as dirt?</p>
<p>&#8216;Because you have to 18 to smoke, dolt.&#8217;</p>
<p>Because, what, under 18 and you only seem to smoke? However you get your smokes. Or your chew.  This is one of your weaker attempts to spin. Getting dizzy, are you, tool? </p>
<p>&#8217;18 = working age = tax cut. Does that help?&#8217;</p>
<p>Working age of 18 means a tax cut?  I assume you&#8217;re focused enough to remember that your position is Obama cut taxes for &#8211; whatever the percentage is of Americans that you claim on a given day &#8211; based on his tax credit. The tax credit you claim no one but you understands.</p>
<p>&#8216;You tell me. What percentage of the 20% of American’s that smoke smoke more than a pack a day?&#8217;</p>
<p>Would it be a fair assumption that some portion of that 20% are in the income brackets that won&#8217;t get the full tax credit? I mean a fair assumption for anyone with enough brains to understand the implications, tool?</p>
<p>harpo, harpo. Think you&#8217;d get what that pesky record means to you. Is not the question whether your 95% claim, in whatever your current iteration is, is supportable, tool? The claim where you continually call anyone a liar who disputes it using just one other metric. Think you&#8217;d learn.</p>
<p>Funny thing. I even felt sorry for you at one point when you were running around with your pants on fire &#8211; figuratively &#8211; and threw you a bone. Told you that you could make a case for some percentage of people getting a benefit using just the two metrics or tax credit and tobacco tax, but as long as you couldn&#8217;t back off the figure of 95% programmed into you by your manipulators, you were simply wrong.</p>
<p>But&#8230;you are stuck on stupid.</p>
<p>Sharper tools, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warpmine</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-371199</link>
		<dc:creator>warpmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-371199</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Alinsky, aren&#039;t the current crop of gargantuan bills designed to overwhelm the morons that are Congress so that everything gets through because there isn&#039;t any time for scrutiny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Alinsky, aren&#8217;t the current crop of gargantuan bills designed to overwhelm the morons that are Congress so that everything gets through because there isn&#8217;t any time for scrutiny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter the Bubblehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-371177</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter the Bubblehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-371177</guid>
		<description>219. rrbs wrote:
Government is nearly 42 percent of the GDP. Shouldn’t it be reduced?

Peter writes: Yes!  Most definitely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>219. rrbs wrote:<br />
Government is nearly 42 percent of the GDP. Shouldn’t it be reduced?</p>
<p>Peter writes: Yes!  Most definitely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter the Bubblehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/#comment-371164</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter the Bubblehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=63647#comment-371164</guid>
		<description>180. Max Power asked:
for jharp …why do you come to a site when you disagree with everything conservative ? 

Peter writes: It is an ongoing theory among the regular posters here at PJM that jharp and some of his similar &#039;friends&#039; are paid to post devisive comments on sites like this.

It&#039;s often better and easier to simply ignore them and move on to the next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>180. Max Power asked:<br />
for jharp …why do you come to a site when you disagree with everything conservative ? </p>
<p>Peter writes: It is an ongoing theory among the regular posters here at PJM that jharp and some of his similar &#8216;friends&#8217; are paid to post devisive comments on sites like this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s often better and easier to simply ignore them and move on to the next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

