Get PJ Media on your Apple

Obama and the Media: Old Policy Resurfacing

The Woodward imbroglio isn't the only incident of bullying the press by this White House.

by
Abraham H. Miller

Bio

March 6, 2013 - 12:04 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

When Amory Gutierrez from the Pleasanton Weekly wanted to do a puff piece on the Obamas’ helicopter, “Marine One,” the White House put out the welcome mat. After all, Pleasanton is a very upscale bedroom community attached to Silicon Valley and San Francisco. Democrats outnumber Republicans there more than two to one. Gutierrez, however, did not keep to the anticipated script.  Her piece gushed over the helicopter flown by a Marine crew, but then went on to repeat what the Marines had told her.  In nearly four years of flying the Obamas, Michelle Obama had never so much as verbally acknowledged the crew’s existence.

Intentional or not, the one line in the otherwise celebratory piece made the first lady look aloof and disdainful of the military — or as some people put it, just plain snooty.  The White House moved decisively into damage-control mode.

Now, one might see this move as more than a bit of an overreaction. After all, the Pleasanton Weekly is not exactly the Washington Post. But, in many circles, Michelle Obama has a major image problem.  There is her statement that she was not proud of her country that seems continually to follow her. Then, there were the vacations that were roundly criticized for masquerading as state visits. Consequently, this small weekly in an overwhelmingly Democratic district was being pressured to remove the line that further tarnished the first lady’s image.

Did the Marines not say this? Was the line inaccurate? Gina Channell-Allen, the president of the Pleasanton Weekly, never contested the veracity of the line. In justifying her yielding to the “request” from the White House to have it removed, she made an argument so torturous as to remind us that the First Amendment is too important to be left to journalists to defend.

Channell-Allen told readers that she had been asked by the White House to take out something that compromised the president’s security, and while she was doing this, taking out the other line was no big deal. In fact, Channell-Allen conflated the two requests as if one were part of the other. Here is how she put it: “They also mentioned taking out a line that could be misconstrued about the first lady. It wasn’t going to change lives or destroy administrations by leaving it in or taking it out. When you’ve just been asked to do something to keep the president of the United States from harm, taking a line out about something like that is not a question.  Even journalists have to choose our battles.”

Asking the Office of the First Lady for a comment on why it was necessary to pressure a small weekly newspaper to edit its story, The Daily Caller received an email from Michelle Obama’s press secretary, Katie McCormick Lelyveld, that denied the office knew of the story or ever had interacted with the paper.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
This is news? That Moo-chelle is ungracious with the "hired help?"

Those people practice being ungracious in their sleep.

Democrats want a truly "Classless" society? Look no farther than the White House, plenty of Classlessness there.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (11)
All Comments   (11)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Remember, Obama is a big fan of Abraham Lincoln. Just look to Lincoln's treatment of the press for precedents.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I think it's more of a case of standards and ethics. As a journalism student way back in the 70's, we were taught to keep our opinions out of our writing. Just the news and facts and let the public make up their own minds.

Starting with David Brinkley, to the present day, our "liberal" attitudes have relaxed our standards enough such that, beginning with an innuendo, or a guffaw, after stating a controversial fact, the "profession" has degenerated into now where actually editing video or audio, to back up ones opinion is being touted as news, today! Amazing slide, and we are much the worse for it.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
These kinds of press bickering vs. the federal governments treatment towards some of the press, has been a part of our history forever. There is NO constitutional 'special' access to the government by anybody in the press. Likewise, there is NO constitutional mandate on the government to the release of 'any' information to the press other than the periodical presidential state of the union to the joint congress.

Todays domestic press, covering the government, has become nothing more than a corps of political propagandists and personalized headhunters using their First Amendment right to influence the electoral process and the policies of governance -- yet more irresponsible corruption of the constitution by special interest groups! Government and political 'news' is no longer news but rather, subjective, propaganda commentary.

The press use to work hard to develop real news and would then go to great lengths to validate their news stories from multiple sources for accuracy. Today, the press 'creates' subjective stories and could care less about validating anything so long as it will serve a propaganda agenda.

So long as there is a sizable weak minded audience to absorb and react to the press' corruption and propaganda, it will continue as will, the government becoming more and more defensive.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"the White House press office a bunch of liars". Now we're getting closer to the truth.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
One wonders about the relationship between the Obama family
and the Secret Service Agents who provide their Praetorian Guard.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Guess what? The one time that Obama's Media got its shorts in a knot was over lack of access to a golf weekend - http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/21/the-continued-adventures-of-the-down-low-potus-his-previous-body-double-reggie-love-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

However, not unlike totalitarian regimes, "The One" brooks no dissent, and puff pieces are the least of it. He is so sure of their loyalty, there is nothing which is off limits and under his control - Pravda-like.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
It is difficult to defend one's professional ethical standards from those one is fellating.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
White House molestation of the press! Maybe these kinds of stories will encourage more of the buggered victim reporters to reveal their dark secrets. FIrst amendment perversion must not be covered up.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Cracks in the Phalanx,finally!
Hay President Obama,blogs now trump newspapers anyway!
Freedom of the press,,,NOT!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
This is news? That Moo-chelle is ungracious with the "hired help?"

Those people practice being ungracious in their sleep.

Democrats want a truly "Classless" society? Look no farther than the White House, plenty of Classlessness there.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All