News
Directly To
Your Inbox
Follow PJ Media

Obama: Al-Qaeda Racists Give Radicals a Bad Name

Al-Qaeda has no Hispanic presence? No LGBT outreach? Sue those right-wingers!

by
Oleg Atbashian

Bio

July 16, 2010 - 12:00 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

In a last-ditch effort to find a moral justification for a war that his radical leftist base could accept, President Barack Obama attributed recent bombings in Africa to al-Qaeda’s bigotry, describing the terrorist masterminds as racist radicals. Accompanied by a somber Rev. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and NAACP President Ben Jealous, President Obama read a joint declaration denouncing al-Qaeda’s bigoted practice of “sacrificing innocent African life” as a means to hit a legitimate Western target. To cover all possible bases, the declaration included a list of other random offenses, such as: the terrorist group’s failure to embrace the local LGBT community, their complete lack of interest in environmental activism and in raising awareness about climate change, turning a blind eye to the existence of a “glass ceiling” for female suicide bombers, and a few documented instances of not separating paper from plastic.

Said Obama:

Advertisement

This is not behavior most self-respecting radicals would condone, nor expect from fellow radicals. From now on, our number one priority in Afghanistan and elsewhere is to impose strict Rules for Radicals on local extremists. If they want to continue to enjoy moral support while fighting U.S. imperialism, they’ll have to play by the book and conform to accepted standards. They’re going to have to learn the meaning of diversity quotas and sensitivity training. They’re going to have to provide proof of employment of a proportional number of atheists, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, and followers of The Ancient Science of Soul Travel, in order to lift the undeserved stigma of violence and extremism from the Muslim faith.

Obama’s change of priorities brought a welcome relief to U.S. field commanders, who were all too happy to force the enemy units to comply with the same government-imposed rules and restrictions that the U.S. Army is facing on a daily basis. As a result, a number of radical groups in Iraq and Afghanistan have already switched sides after only a few days of living under U.S.-mandated Rules for Radicals.

One man, identified only as a “Soldier for Allah,” explained:

We were led into a classroom and had to sit in circles for what they called “Collective Self-Attaining Support Sessions” where they lectured us on matters such as “Gender Awareness,” “Multicultural Identity,” and “Environmental Racism.” For the love of Allah (peace be upon him and his messenger, the Prophet Muhammad), even in Saddam’s prisons, I was never accused so often of being guilty!

Trembling, he continued:

We had … had … gender role-playing. We had … non-dairy vegan diets. We had … had to …

At this point, he broke down and cried:

You win, America! I had to write a 17-page memo explaining why my unit did not have a Hispanic presence! Please, you win!

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

28 Comments, 18 Threads

  1. 1. Dave Carter

    I am certain 2+2=4 still, but I am getting weary.
    Lots of articles on marxism lately.
    I ain’t in the collective. And I will oppose until my last breath.
    God Grant us strength.

  2. 2. Steve G.

    HYSTERICAL!!

    “Islamic radicals need to understand that they must meet our goals and timetables. That is, if you’re a terrorist and you shoot at us, we’re gonna speak with you.”

    I spewed coffee out of my mouth and nose when I read this line. The sad part is that if certain people in power had their way completely, this would be the reality. That is scary.

    • I’m confused

      You mean this isn’t a REAL story?

      I suppose next you’re going to try to convince me that the” NAACP Condemns the Tea Party” wasn’t a joke.

      • Steve G.

        NAACP???? Lets see…. tryin’ to figure out what that stands for….
        National Association of Anti Conservative Progressivism??
        Neophytes And Assorted Crazy People??

        I believe that this organization served a valid and necessary purpose at some point in the past. What it has evolved into is disgusting.

        • You can put the labor unions into that category too. Eventually it seems that they all sell out to the left after achieving their stated purpose. Where else to continue to have some power for their “leadership”. The left will just continue to recycle their grievances long after they have become moldy and stale.

          • MarkTheGreat

            The “stated purposes” of unions were all acheived, long before unions, or by someone/something other than unions.

            The only thing unions have ever been good at is self-promotion.

          • Steve G.

            Again, in my opinion, unions, in the same way as the NAACP, originated with good intentions. Basically uneducated, blue collar workers were, and continue to be, protected by labor laws. The POLITICAL turn that these institutions have taken present big problems.

  3. 3. FearMonger

    ditto dat dave.
    time for a powerbar and a red bull….

  4. 4. Hershl

    The NY Times Square bomber told his judge that his moral duty, as a Muslim, is to kill American kids.

    He related how proud he was to murder Americans.

    Now a new video he made has surfaced.

    Just your next door neighbor living off of the US taxpayer.

    http://jewishdailyreport.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/muslim-soldiers-must-kill-us-kids-ny-bomber-tells-judge/

  5. 5. rbj

    Very funny.

    Only thing is, it is so close to the truth.

  6. 6. Mitrokhinkgb

    HAIL Red Square, Comrade Whoopie and People’s Cube! Lenin would be soooo happy! He would be tickled pink!

  7. 7. Jim Yardley

    Fantastic article. I must confess that I was into the second paragraph before I realized it was satire. It’s sad when such great humor is degraded by the fact that it’s all too believable. When you initially think, “Well more idiocy from the White House”, you just know we’re in deep trouble.

  8. 8. MarkTheGreat

    It’s more of an arab bigotry against anyone who isn’t an arab. They have a long history of mistreating even their co-religionists.

    • ked5

      hey, gotta test out that new bomb design somewhere. and it can be such a pain aligning a site. It makes for great target practice.

    • Pragmatist

      Islam is an Arab Supremacist CULT hence the misogyny, race hate, slavery justification. Couple that with the fact that you can only pray to Allah in correctly accented Primitive, Ambiguous 7th Century Arabic as used in the region where Mohammad grew up (what a surprise hey and what a perfect proof of its INVENTION by him).

      Now ask yourself what sort of Supreme Being can only understand Primitive, Ambiguous 7th Century Arabic.

  9. 9. Larry in the Silicon

    You have to wonder when Gibson, Grigorieva and her teeth and Whoopi Goldberg capture the morning news, together with Lohan’s latest, if the West is at all capable of being serious about anything, much less Islam.

  10. 10. MarkTheGreat

    “You win, America! I had to write a 17-page memo explaining why my unit did not have a Hispanic presence! Please, you win!”

    That has got to be the line of the week.

  11. 11. Frank

    “If they want to continue to enjoy moral support while fighting U.S. imperialism, they’ll have to play by the book and conform to accepted standards.”

    What an idiot. Muslims don’t give a crap about that. All they need to do for moral support is keep following Mohammads example, which they are doing just fine.

  12. 12. ked5

    Love the imposing” rules for radicals.

    they religiously discriminate as well.

    they need to fairly employ and provide the same benefits to christians, sihks, buddhists, shintos, etc.

    oh, heck, lets just bury the suicide bombers in a pig skin.

  13. And raiding their members pockets to gain political favor.

  14. 14. Ginger

    HA!..that’s almost as amusing as “Death to those who say Islam is violent”….I guess narcissistic ignorance is bliss…

  15. 15. Brian N

    The only reason people hear have trouble identifying this article as BS after the first few lines is that you are all brainwashed by this site. Day in and out you read articles negatively slanted and sometimes completely made up that attack liberals. As far as I have read most people here cannot tell the difference between fact and fiction.

    • Steve G.

      Brian,

      The standard line to you trolls.

      The grown-ups are having a conversation. Here’s a push pop. Now go in the other room and behave yourself. While you’re there, try to learn the difference between HEAR and HERE Einstein.

      • Pragmatist

        Steve I do agree with you in what you say about moonbat Brian but perhaps you would like to visit your ‘HEAR, HERE’ comment again Brian used ‘here’ perfectly correctly and you are just making yourself look foolish. He talked of ‘here’ as in ‘on this site’ and not ‘hear’ as in ‘what they heard’.

        So it seems its YOU who does not know the difference so as you say Einstein YOU are not. By your ‘Here’s a push pop’ one can only presume you are a young half educated fool who thinks he’s a smart arse .

    • Mr. Lucky

      Careful Mr. N, you may be being cleansed without knowing it.

  16. Al Qaeda’s response to Obama:
    You are racially profiling Al Qaeda as terrorists; We are a peaceful, social engineering organization, that sometimes agrees with the Democrat Party.
    If you continue with your racial assaults, we shall seek U.N. Sanctions against you and your regime of psychos and misfits, and will intensify our ‘No Fly Zone’ across your country.
    P.S. Please get a hijab for your wife.

  17. These groups all START with a grievance, obviously. What to do when you get pretty much what you want? Become a lobbying group for profit. Who’s going to give you credence? The party for victims.

  18. Quite interesting blog article. I randomly stumbled upon this web site when I was in the middle of doing some research using the internet. Wanted to say I like this web site and to keep on doing what youre doing. Also keep in mind, enjoy the adventure… dont over-focus on the final destination. Have fun, Pete

Leave a Reply

We know you're busy. Sign up for our Daily Digest email to get a quick look each day at our editors' picks and readers' favorite stories. (You will receive an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)