Get PJ Media on your Apple

Norquist: ‘Conservatives May Have Wanted More Incarceration Than Was Necessary’

Decisions regarding corrections shouldn’t be “trusted to bureaucrats,” activist tells PJM.

by
Bill Straub

Bio

May 29, 2014 - 12:03 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – As a young man Grover Norquist, the conservative activist and noted anti-tax crusader, used to travel down to the local courthouse to watch the trials that were taking place.

A bit later, as part of what he characterized as a “do-gooder” program, he had the opportunity to visit and speak with prisoners incarcerated in local correctional facilities.

Now the founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform finds himself involved in another reform effort as one of the signatories for Right on Crime, an organization looking to reduce prison costs by, among other things, developing alternatives to incarceration for non-violent offenders.

“I’ve always been interested in the subject,” Norquist said during a break in the Right on Crime conference held in Washington last week. “Conservatives may have wanted more incarceration than was necessary in the past, so what we’re trying to do is find out about what works.”

Norquist, who spends a substantial amount of time judging the efficacy of various governmental programs, said corrections shouldn’t be viewed differently from the Defense Department or any number of other programs – it needs to be operated efficiently and be held accountable for its spending practices.

“It’s important to focus not on what we want but what we should do based on the data. The question should be, ‘Are you reducing crime?’” Norquist said. “We need to measure outcomes. Is crime going down, not how much are we spending.”

Decisions regarding corrections shouldn’t be “trusted to bureaucrats,” Norquist said. Instead, he said, “we need more of a focus on cost-effective, measured outcomes.”

Reforms advocated by Right on Crime – reserving prison primarily for violent and serious offenders while working with nonviolent offenders to reduce recidivism – “has worked in Texas and other states across the South,” he said. “It has cut crime and cut government spending. It’s based on solid conservative principles and it’s what good governance is all about.”

“We’re making real progress state by state,” he said.

Right on Crime, an organization founded by the conservative Texas Public Policy foundation, met in Washington this month to exchange ideas on ways to reform what supporters maintain is an inefficient criminal justice system.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
PJM, please don't call Grover a conservative. He's a Muslim Brotherhood agent who works at maligning and marginalizing anti-Jihad activists. He's also an open-borders radical who's pushing for unrestricted third-world immigration into the USA as well as amnesty. He's no more conservative than John McCain.
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
Who is Grover Norquist?

Frank Gaffney appears on the Blaze TV to discuss the underlying threat Grover Norquist poses in advancing the interests of Islamists in America.

Grover Norquist & Co. Build Islamist Influence in GOP

How the GOP Came to Embrace the Muslim Brotherhood Lobby
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
Conservative icon Michelle Malkin has written frequently of Norqust’s shady connections to jihadists. “If any Democrat activist had such shady connections, conservatives would be on him like white on rice. Instead, Norquist has gotten away with smearing his critics — most notably, former Reagan official Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, one of the most decent and patriotic Republicans I’ve had the honor of meeting — as hatemongers… The conservative movement cannot afford to be associated with race-card-playing apologists who refuse to cut their lucrative ties to terrorist sympathizers.
[http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/grovermustgo/]
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (24)
All Comments   (24)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
But crime IS going down, is it not? Maybe we're doing some thing right. And the problem with "low level offenses" is that they are often pled down from high-level ones. Not that the whole system isn't screwy.

I admit to being bleeding-heart on one issue. I don't care what the prisoner did, once he is locked up he is our responsibility, and that means we have a 100% obligation to protect him from other inmates, and not by putting him into some sort of inhumane solitary. I don't care how much it costs; the government - any government - has two basic functions, protection and justice, and the latter includes humane (I didn't say coddling) treatment of prisoners. Everything else is discretionary.
34 weeks ago
34 weeks ago Link To Comment
"I don't care how much it costs; the government - any government - has two basic functions, protection and justice, and the latter includes humane (I didn't say coddling) treatment of prisoners."

Agreed. Pink uniforms, no conjugal visits, no TVs, no porn, are all fine. In fact, they are all common sense and should not be the subject of lawsuits.

But basic safety is an obligation that is not negotiable.

34 weeks ago
34 weeks ago Link To Comment
PJM, please don't call Grover a conservative. He's a Muslim Brotherhood agent who works at maligning and marginalizing anti-Jihad activists. He's also an open-borders radical who's pushing for unrestricted third-world immigration into the USA as well as amnesty. He's no more conservative than John McCain.
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
Grover has Gone Native.
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
There is a feud between the Frank Gaffney - Robert Spencer - Pamela Geller - Michelle Malkin wing and Grover Norquist. In other words the "Sky is Falling" clique on the right is battering the reasonable, mainstream view expressed by Norquist. The democrats never eat their own this way. This is why republicans can't elect a president anymore. People who support the feud against Norquist are a big reason that we have had two terms of Obama, and next up will be either Clinton or Warren.
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
I rather think he is the one changing policy.
34 weeks ago
34 weeks ago Link To Comment
Fed up with Norquist and his love for Islam.
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why does PJM soil its reputation with this self-appointed poser and Muslim Fifth Columnist?
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
the comments on this article needs to go viral; Norquist has to be exposed. His wife is also a muslim. That's is why Robert Spencer and Pamela Gellar would not speak at CPAC last year, because they were asked not to talk about Islam, even though Robert won an award. Alan West obvioulsly caved in and agreed not to speak on anything about Islam
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
Who is Grover Norquist?

Frank Gaffney appears on the Blaze TV to discuss the underlying threat Grover Norquist poses in advancing the interests of Islamists in America.

Grover Norquist & Co. Build Islamist Influence in GOP

How the GOP Came to Embrace the Muslim Brotherhood Lobby
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
Grover Norquist? What's that mendacious money man trying to pull now? Spring members of the Muslim Brotherhood?

On February 11, 2014, ten influential national security practitioners– including former Congressman Allen West, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, former CIA Director Jim Woolsey, former Pentagon Inspector General Joseph Schmitz and others– sent a letter to American Conservative Union board member Cleta Mitchell, urging her and her colleagues to take action against Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan, two ACU members who have for years been running influence operations against conservatives on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist causes. [http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/grovermustgo/]
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
Conservative icon Michelle Malkin has written frequently of Norqust’s shady connections to jihadists. “If any Democrat activist had such shady connections, conservatives would be on him like white on rice. Instead, Norquist has gotten away with smearing his critics — most notably, former Reagan official Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, one of the most decent and patriotic Republicans I’ve had the honor of meeting — as hatemongers… The conservative movement cannot afford to be associated with race-card-playing apologists who refuse to cut their lucrative ties to terrorist sympathizers.
[http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/grovermustgo/]
35 weeks ago
35 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “Norquist: ‘Conservatives May Have Wanted More Incarceration Than Was Necessary’”