Get PJ Media on your Apple

No More ‘Peace Talks,’ Please

The Arab-Israeli conflict has no clear parameters for resolution.

by
Shoshana Bryen

Bio

February 2, 2012 - 12:00 am
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Oslo foundered over the fact that the most Israel could give to the Palestinians was short of what the Palestinians could accept. It was and remains inevitable — they are trying to solve different problems.

Since this assumption is false, that invalidates the other two as well.

Israel’s essential requirements are:

  • Recognition of the state of Israel as a permanent, legitimate part of the region (known as “end of conflict/end of claims”);
  • “Secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force”—the promise of UN Resolution 242.

For the Palestinians, the requirements are:

  • International recognition of an independent Palestinian state without accepting a Jewish state of Israel and a continued effort to achieve total victory;
  • The right of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to live in Israel if they wish in order to negate the Jewish majority and assist in achieving the first goal.

This is no way implies that there shouldn’t ever be a Palestinian state, or that Israel must resign itself to permanent occupation. It simply recognizes that the misnamed “peace process” is an exercise in frustration and will make no progress at this time in the existing framework.

A better route than desperately and futilely seeking to satisfy Palestinian policies that refuse to be satisfied is for a different process that would highlight Israeli-Palestinian bilateral talks on local issues, economic issues, and day-to-day security. This would involve multilateral talks under American or Quartet auspices between Israel and the other states in the region with the aim of ending their states of belligerency with Israel and recognizing the legitimacy of the state of Israel.

It won’t happen? OK, but it behooves the parties — particularly the outside parties — to be honest about the futility of alchemy when they persist in demanding that the existing dross be turned into gold.

The fact is that the Arab-Israeli conflict, of which the Palestinian quest for independence is only one part, has no clear parameters for resolution at this time. That is the best reason to stretch the parameters of our thinking.

In the interim, the U.S. can pursue those problems and issues that lend themselves to amelioration — including advancing economic and political development on the West Bank — and should continue to provide Israel with the security that comes from our long and close relationship.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Shoshana Bryen is Senior Director of The Jewish Policy Center. She was previously Senior Director for Security Policy at JINSA and author of JINSA Reports from 1995-2011.
Click here to view the 21 legacy comments

Comments are closed.