<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Country for Black Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:59:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RI Young Republican</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-602180</link>
		<dc:creator>RI Young Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-602180</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Travis.  And I&#039;m glad you went to a fine school like Hendricken before Brown.  That&#039;s probably what kept your head on straight.  I&#039;m only sad that you don&#039;t take your analysis a step further:  The real solution to America&#039;s problems is to clear the land of all liberals, nonwhite people, and Communists.  Then we can go back to our true roots, when this used to be  the land of native European Protestants farming the land for their survival and repelling the racist Indian invasions.

God bless you (if you&#039;re American).

-RI Young Republican</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Travis.  And I&#8217;m glad you went to a fine school like Hendricken before Brown.  That&#8217;s probably what kept your head on straight.  I&#8217;m only sad that you don&#8217;t take your analysis a step further:  The real solution to America&#8217;s problems is to clear the land of all liberals, nonwhite people, and Communists.  Then we can go back to our true roots, when this used to be  the land of native European Protestants farming the land for their survival and repelling the racist Indian invasions.</p>
<p>God bless you (if you&#8217;re American).</p>
<p>-RI Young Republican</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Todd</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-561437</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-561437</guid>
		<description>You are right, Don!

See the book &quot;Uncle Sam&#039;s Plantation&quot; (Star Parker)
or &quot;The Big Black Lie&quot;! (Kevin Jackson)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, Don!</p>
<p>See the book &#8220;Uncle Sam&#8217;s Plantation&#8221; (Star Parker)<br />
or &#8220;The Big Black Lie&#8221;! (Kevin Jackson)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e dunn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-543750</link>
		<dc:creator>e dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-543750</guid>
		<description>during the time that dr. martin luther king jr. was most prominent and his words most compelling, the 1960s, consider the votes -- party votes -- that passed the civil rights act of 1964. the failure of the Goldwater campaign that year, notwithstanding, this was a time of republican pride. a bit of reflection -- and reminder of that vote -- would be appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>during the time that dr. martin luther king jr. was most prominent and his words most compelling, the 1960s, consider the votes &#8212; party votes &#8212; that passed the civil rights act of 1964. the failure of the Goldwater campaign that year, notwithstanding, this was a time of republican pride. a bit of reflection &#8212; and reminder of that vote &#8212; would be appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Lalor</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-216169</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Lalor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-216169</guid>
		<description>Lady Macbeth and Lady Michelle: Two Manipulative Peas in a Pod?

She may not look much like how I’d always envisioned Lady Macbeth, especially in a pants suit, but America’s new First Lady may be the true power behind America’s new President Obama’s throne.

You may recall Shakespeare’s Lady Mac, the scary, ambitious, vicious, and manipulative wife of the title character in Macbeth who, with a few scraggly chin hairs and some eye of newt, could have been the model for those 3 potion-stirring witches in Hamlet.  Or for Hillary Clinton, for that matter, providing they could match her witchy cackle.

Michelle Robinson Obama has no (visible) chin hairs as yet but she does have a history of, if not witchcraft, then surely expertise in various dark arts, if we can consider racism one of the dark arts as in her hatred and distrust of Whitey going back to her college years.

Lady Michelle was largely kept under wraps throughout much of the presidential campaign after it was discovered she tended to shoot off her mouth almost as much as the Dem VP candidate, Joe Biden.  She didn’t tell a crippled man at a Missouri rally to stand up, as Joe did, but her infamous line about feeling proud of America for the first time in her life after her hubby was nominated was far more outrageous.  So, in Obama’s highly scripted campaign, she was a liability and was shuffled off to Buffalo or to the friendlier confines of her Chicago home.

Needless to say, just as hubby’s reference to campaigning in all 57 states with just two to go was ignored by an idolatrous mainstream media, along with his and Biden’s many other gaffes, so too was Lady Michelle’s foot-in-mouth disease.  

Fortunately, you can run (and be muzzled) but you can’t hide on the other side of the Pond in Merry Ol’ England and at least one Brit writer, James Delingpole, has outed Lady Michelle’s dark history: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/james_delingpole/blog/2009/03/05/was_lady_macbeth_behind_barack_obamas_snub_of_gordon_brown.

Above all else and if nothing else in the twenty-first century, the Brits have their pride.  Their worldwide empire, grown after Elizabeth I and bad weather trashed the Armada in 1588, and once encompassing fully a quarter of the globe, is long gone.  It began to be whittled away after America told George III to stuff it in his wig in 1776 and was effectively ended when Mahatma Ghandi proved that passive resistance was mightier than England’s sword in 1947.  

Yet, there’s still hope for the Brits based on the above article asking the Earth-moving question:  Was Lady Michelle the driving force behind Obama’s snub of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown? 

Frankly, my dears, I don’t give a damn about snubbing P.M. Brown, aside from the fact it evidenced the foolish and amateurish nature of the new administration, and nor do I give a flying fig about presumed or actual insults to the English.  When they apologize for the atrocities committed against the Irish people for centuries, I might re-consider.  But I doubt it.

In any event, that piece on TheTelegraph.com had its redeeming social value by exposing what is actually old news, that Lady Michelle, . . .

(Read the rest of this article at http://genelalor.com/.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lady Macbeth and Lady Michelle: Two Manipulative Peas in a Pod?</p>
<p>She may not look much like how I’d always envisioned Lady Macbeth, especially in a pants suit, but America’s new First Lady may be the true power behind America’s new President Obama’s throne.</p>
<p>You may recall Shakespeare’s Lady Mac, the scary, ambitious, vicious, and manipulative wife of the title character in Macbeth who, with a few scraggly chin hairs and some eye of newt, could have been the model for those 3 potion-stirring witches in Hamlet.  Or for Hillary Clinton, for that matter, providing they could match her witchy cackle.</p>
<p>Michelle Robinson Obama has no (visible) chin hairs as yet but she does have a history of, if not witchcraft, then surely expertise in various dark arts, if we can consider racism one of the dark arts as in her hatred and distrust of Whitey going back to her college years.</p>
<p>Lady Michelle was largely kept under wraps throughout much of the presidential campaign after it was discovered she tended to shoot off her mouth almost as much as the Dem VP candidate, Joe Biden.  She didn’t tell a crippled man at a Missouri rally to stand up, as Joe did, but her infamous line about feeling proud of America for the first time in her life after her hubby was nominated was far more outrageous.  So, in Obama’s highly scripted campaign, she was a liability and was shuffled off to Buffalo or to the friendlier confines of her Chicago home.</p>
<p>Needless to say, just as hubby’s reference to campaigning in all 57 states with just two to go was ignored by an idolatrous mainstream media, along with his and Biden’s many other gaffes, so too was Lady Michelle’s foot-in-mouth disease.  </p>
<p>Fortunately, you can run (and be muzzled) but you can’t hide on the other side of the Pond in Merry Ol’ England and at least one Brit writer, James Delingpole, has outed Lady Michelle’s dark history: <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/james_delingpole/blog/2009/03/05/was_lady_macbeth_behind_barack_obamas_snub_of_gordon_brown" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/james_delingpole/blog/2009/03/05/was_lady_macbeth_behind_barack_obamas_snub_of_gordon_brown</a>.</p>
<p>Above all else and if nothing else in the twenty-first century, the Brits have their pride.  Their worldwide empire, grown after Elizabeth I and bad weather trashed the Armada in 1588, and once encompassing fully a quarter of the globe, is long gone.  It began to be whittled away after America told George III to stuff it in his wig in 1776 and was effectively ended when Mahatma Ghandi proved that passive resistance was mightier than England’s sword in 1947.  </p>
<p>Yet, there’s still hope for the Brits based on the above article asking the Earth-moving question:  Was Lady Michelle the driving force behind Obama’s snub of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown? </p>
<p>Frankly, my dears, I don’t give a damn about snubbing P.M. Brown, aside from the fact it evidenced the foolish and amateurish nature of the new administration, and nor do I give a flying fig about presumed or actual insults to the English.  When they apologize for the atrocities committed against the Irish people for centuries, I might re-consider.  But I doubt it.</p>
<p>In any event, that piece on TheTelegraph.com had its redeeming social value by exposing what is actually old news, that Lady Michelle, . . .</p>
<p>(Read the rest of this article at <a href="http://genelalor.com/" rel="nofollow">http://genelalor.com/</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-214826</link>
		<dc:creator>David S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-214826</guid>
		<description>@105. don:

Racism is judging people on the basis of their apparent heritage.  It is currently a major problem in our country.  It causes disparate treatment of citizens, both by private and public entities.  Social programs are not &quot;racism&quot; - but attempts to cut access to food and assistance for the poor could certainly be seen as &quot;class warfare&quot;, and GOP attempts to remove certain persons from voter rolls is most certainly &quot;racism&quot;.

Novus Ordo Seclorum.

Peace.

DS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@105. don:</p>
<p>Racism is judging people on the basis of their apparent heritage.  It is currently a major problem in our country.  It causes disparate treatment of citizens, both by private and public entities.  Social programs are not &#8220;racism&#8221; &#8211; but attempts to cut access to food and assistance for the poor could certainly be seen as &#8220;class warfare&#8221;, and GOP attempts to remove certain persons from voter rolls is most certainly &#8220;racism&#8221;.</p>
<p>Novus Ordo Seclorum.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
<p>DS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole in Texas</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-214568</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-214568</guid>
		<description>My personal experience supports the conclusion of this article. I had several close friends in college that were black.  Of that group, one was from Africa (Niger if I remember correctly) and another from Jamaica.  They continually wondered at the obsession of African-American leaders and students over racism to the exclusion of all other issues.  One even admitted to me that she no longer went out to eat with African-Americans because if the service wasn’t impeccable it had to be due to racism. She was just too embarrassed by their rude behavior to the servers. The immigrant from Africa really did not understand why all Americans did not appreciate the opportunities they had regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, sex or status.  She explained that in her home country the circumstances of your birth pretty much determined your life.  Not your intelligence, drive or determination.  I also had two African-American friends who were devote Christians that believed even a white girl could be a good friend.  The other African-American students I tried to befriend had little time for me.  I did not attribute a reason for their behavior, I just moved on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal experience supports the conclusion of this article. I had several close friends in college that were black.  Of that group, one was from Africa (Niger if I remember correctly) and another from Jamaica.  They continually wondered at the obsession of African-American leaders and students over racism to the exclusion of all other issues.  One even admitted to me that she no longer went out to eat with African-Americans because if the service wasn’t impeccable it had to be due to racism. She was just too embarrassed by their rude behavior to the servers. The immigrant from Africa really did not understand why all Americans did not appreciate the opportunities they had regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, sex or status.  She explained that in her home country the circumstances of your birth pretty much determined your life.  Not your intelligence, drive or determination.  I also had two African-American friends who were devote Christians that believed even a white girl could be a good friend.  The other African-American students I tried to befriend had little time for me.  I did not attribute a reason for their behavior, I just moved on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acj</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-214357</link>
		<dc:creator>acj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-214357</guid>
		<description>Do the Democrats need the African American vote just as the Republicans need the Right to Life vote? Each party has created such special interests that they fail to exist without differences.
Republican conservatives motto should be &quot;Every man for himself&quot; and with that motto comes &quot;discrimination.&quot; 
The Democrats motto should be &quot;All for one and one for all&quot; and comes without discrimination.
Republican ideology excludes homosexuals, African Americans, Hippies, progressives, intellectuals, liberals, hispanics (unless they want to work in their factory without equality) Feminists, Muslims, and any one who isn&#039;t Christian. Republicans are in the business of exclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Democrats need the African American vote just as the Republicans need the Right to Life vote? Each party has created such special interests that they fail to exist without differences.<br />
Republican conservatives motto should be &#8220;Every man for himself&#8221; and with that motto comes &#8220;discrimination.&#8221;<br />
The Democrats motto should be &#8220;All for one and one for all&#8221; and comes without discrimination.<br />
Republican ideology excludes homosexuals, African Americans, Hippies, progressives, intellectuals, liberals, hispanics (unless they want to work in their factory without equality) Feminists, Muslims, and any one who isn&#8217;t Christian. Republicans are in the business of exclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oopsif</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-214147</link>
		<dc:creator>oopsif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-214147</guid>
		<description>101 Delia . . . uplifting! And rhymey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>101 Delia . . . uplifting! And rhymey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-214077</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-214077</guid>
		<description>To david S, true racism is defined by a party that dominated through Jim Crow laws, and now encourages the destruction of hope and aspirations in a people by the means of welfare.  True racism is using racial arsonists like Wright and Sharpton (and others) to destroy initiative and creativity in a people in order to politically dominate them.  Perhaps there are many individuals who are racists in any party, but there is only one that I know of that practices both aggressive racial politics and class warfare.  Only one party seems now to be promoting the lie that is socialism (an economic fantasy that denies the basic nature of man . . . people are selfish),

Sei Gesund Genosse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To david S, true racism is defined by a party that dominated through Jim Crow laws, and now encourages the destruction of hope and aspirations in a people by the means of welfare.  True racism is using racial arsonists like Wright and Sharpton (and others) to destroy initiative and creativity in a people in order to politically dominate them.  Perhaps there are many individuals who are racists in any party, but there is only one that I know of that practices both aggressive racial politics and class warfare.  Only one party seems now to be promoting the lie that is socialism (an economic fantasy that denies the basic nature of man . . . people are selfish),</p>
<p>Sei Gesund Genosse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/no-country-for-black-men/#comment-213701</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48160#comment-213701</guid>
		<description>103. David S:

&quot;Racism is an irrational emotional response&quot;
~

Please send that message to Rev. Wright and his ilk. Please tell that to the self-segregating black people. Please tell that to YOURSELF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>103. David S:</p>
<p>&#8220;Racism is an irrational emotional response&#8221;<br />
~</p>
<p>Please send that message to Rev. Wright and his ilk. Please tell that to the self-segregating black people. Please tell that to YOURSELF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

