Click here to watch a preview at PJTV of the Next Generation programming coming in February.
The Next Generation initiatives from PJ Media will be launched in February 2013. Under the brand of NextGeneration.TV, they will focus on the issues of the day through the perspective of the next generation as well as how all Americans can stand up for their nation’s future. Through weekly newsletters and alerts, Internet TV, live events, social media, and outreach programs, the leader of this program, Allen West, and the PJ Media team will help grandparents, parents and youth examine the issues confronting the next generation in the areas of America’s economic future, educational pursuits, employment, safety and security, and basic human freedoms.
Looks like this is going to be a very good informative show. One thing I think Col. West should have pointed out to Michelle when talking about School Resource Officers is that it took Sandy Hook law enforcement almost 20 minutes to respond. An armed officer on campus could be there in a minute or so depending on the size of the school. We will never know how many lives that could have saved.
All the present fuss about gun laws overlooks the fact that Adam Lanza did NOT BUY the guns he used.
OMG!!!
You mean to say Adam was a criminal for stealing guns even before he shot those kids?
Isn’t that amazing?
Was this theft ever reported?
Maybe this is where the police department dropped the ball. They probably thought a mentally challenged kid wouldn’t know what to do with guns like these.
And after all; Kids with mental disabilities are given “special dispensation” for their strange behavior.
The theft was ever reported. The owner was dead.
I’m so sorry y’all, but this lovely experiment is over. I hate it for my husband and I, our 3 children and 2 grand children, but it’ s true. we have lost the media, academia and our government. We will lose the house in 2014 and then Obama will be king. It’s over. God rest the United States Constitution.
I’m so sorry y’all, but this lovely experiment is over. I hate it for my husband and I, our 3 children and 2 grand children, and all of you, buit it’s true. we have lost the media, academia and our government. We will lose the house in 2014 and then Obama will ibe king. It’s over. God rest the United States Constitution.
It is way too late to save the entirety of the US. That ship sailed, or rather sank, sometime during the Clinton regime.
But then, it may still be possible to save some parts of what is now the US – much as parts of the Eastern Roman Empire survived the fall of western Rome by roughly a millenium.
The question is: how many people are ready to face facts and take what will be, at first, an unpopular stand?
Lt. Col. West – I hope you call attention to the nonsense being taught at West Point on our taxpayer $ – please see full post at the link, thank you!
West Point center cites dangers of ‘far right’ in U.S.
The report says there were 350 “attacks initiated by far-right groups/individuals” in 2011.
Details about what makes an attack a “far right” action are not clear in the report, which was written by Arie Perliger, who directs the center’s terrorism studies and teaches social sciences at West Point.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/17/west-point-center-cites-dangers-far-right-us/#ixzz2INyDNuB9
Your point is very much in sync with the Founding Fathers having a great disdain for having a standing army and is the main reason for the Second Amendment, with the right to bear arms in their minds being arms equal to that of any standing army, foriegn or domestic. The only kind of army they would have disdained more than a standing army is a standing army of careerists.
And don’t forget they are also being taught to respect Islam and bow and scrape to it.
As to our military, the generals of which have become an utter disgrace and extreme national embarrassment, it didn’t start under Obama, he’s just mashed his foot on the accelerator.
Just in case the groveling apologies of Barack Hussein Obama and USMC Gen. John R. Allen for burning a few Mein Kampfs of the jihad movement, as the late and lamented Oriana Fallaci used to call the Koran, have anyone nostalgic for George W. Bush and his commanders, let’s recall one reason this story is so deja-vu-all-over-again.
“Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Hammond, commander of U.S. forces in Baghdad, flanked by leaders from Radhwaniya in the western outskirts of Baghdad, apologized for the staff sergeant who was a sniper section leader assigned to the headquarters of the 64th Armored Regiment. He also read a letter of apology by the shooter. “I come before you here seeking your forgiveness,” Hammond said to tribal leaders and others at the apology ceremony. “In the most humble manner I look in your eyes today and I say please forgive me and my soldiers.” Another military official kissed a Quran and presented it as “a humble gift” to the tribal leaders.”
Our own hundreds of billions of dollars a year military is more an enemy than a friend. To deny this is to be irrational and only further facilitate their serial treachery.
What exactly is the military’s main mission again, especially the Army and the Marines? It’s winning, or buying, Mohammedan “Hearts-and-Minds”. Is that the same mission as it was 10 years ago? Can anyone believe that? Will the mission 10 years from now be the same as what it is now or will Soldiers and Marines have to go a small step further and actually convert to Islam?
Does this new Lady Marine know that if she is sent to Afghanistan she will have to show great respect for the Koran? Does she know what that means? I wonder if she will get any lessons on proper infidel dhimmi behavior from Shafiq Mubarak an instructor hired by the Marines to train Marines for deployment
I do not understand. Must laws comply with Law or may they be created willy nilly depending on the societal flavour of the month? Or who’s the star or stars of the show for the month? Or which neighbourhood gang is the most powerful? Or all of these?
In the recent furore about guns in the USA I re-read the Constitution of the USA
with special attention to the Second Amendment. On the understanding that the Constitution of the USA is the fundamental law on which all laws of the several states of the nation must be justified.
The Constitution begins with the words “We The People of the United States, in Order to from a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity… and secure Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and to our Posterity do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America…”
That Constitution continues as the Bill of Rights and Amendments to the Constitution: “Articles in addition to and Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the several states, pursuant to the fifth article q.v. of the original Constitution”
Amendment II of interest here: “A well regulated militia BEING NECESSARY to the security of a free state, the RIGHT of the People to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. (emphasis added)
Infringe: from Chambers 20th Century Dictionary, to violate, esp law; to neglect to obey…
Given those words in the Second Amendment and with no history of an Amendment consistent with the procedures provided in Article V of the Constitution, I question the entire hullabaloo about private ownership of guns in the USA. DO those persons contemplating limiting that “Second Amendment RIGHT”.
Whether ANY law requiring permission – permit – to keep and bear Arms is lawful in the United States. Whatever persons of other nations and allegiances believe a “good thing”.
Might reasonable perons suppose the tub thumpers for Second Amendment abrogation under the guise of lawful action have ulterior motive for their assaults on law abidinig citizens of the USA? Using as is their wont wworst case scenario or special pleading.
The whole thing can be resolved with one simple, new law. We need a law that says that guns for defense are OK but need be loaded with one round only. If attacked, a defender must use his gun with one round to shoot the attacker’s weapon from his hand. Hell, even Schumer will vote for that.