New NASA Administrator Will Have His Hands Full
It was actually a fairly prompt appointment for this particular position. Most administrations have taken longer to find a NASA administrator. But it seemed more important to those concerned with the space program, because it is in a state of high flux and many decisions must be made soon. It’s a particularly challenging time because the incoming administrator will have to await the result of the new Augustine Commission that will provide recommendations on the fate of the shuttle, the Constellation program, and space transportation to support human exploration in general. Bolden will be starting his job at a very uncertain time, both technically and politically, and will not necessarily be able to chart his own course.
In fact, there are rumors that the meeting with the prospective NASA head and the president didn’t go all that smoothly — that the president proposed that it might be necessary to cut the human space flight budget, given the economic times in which the country finds itself (though administration critics would point out that much of this is due to the president’s own budgetary profligacy). A four-time shuttle astronaut could hardly be expected to take over an agency that was going to shut down NASA human space flight, nor could the incoming deputy, given her own history as the former head of a major public advocacy group for the human settlement of space. So at least they presumably believe that the nation will not retreat from human space flight during this administration.
The big question, of course, is how to do it and not break the budget.
There is abundant irony in the situation (as is often the case with space policy). The shuttle, whose landing was going to have been synchronized with the announcement, had repaired the telescope that prospective administrator Bolden had delivered almost two decades earlier as a shuttle pilot. The mission demonstrated, once again, the versatility of humans in space for meeting, grabbing, repairing objects, and the assembly of systems on orbit. The space station is almost complete, demonstrating the ability to assemble large structures. But the current NASA plans for future exploration beyond earth orbit, under investigation by the Augustine commission, completely turn their back on this capability and abandon it, putting in place a system that will have no such capability. Instead, it will feature an architecture that relies on launching everything needed for a lunar expedition in a launch or two, regressing our capabilities to those of four decades ago, the last time we went to the moon.
Let’s hope that this new administrator, unlike the last one, wants to look to the future and not replicate the past at great expense. Let’s hope that he wants to build a true “interstate highway system” for space and provide a direction that meets the Aldridge commission requirements of supporting free enterprise, national security, affordability, and sustainability. And let’s hope he is in favor of opening up space to not just a few NASA astronauts a couple times a year at outrageously high costs to the taxpayer, but to the rest of us as well.
Good luck, general.






Hmmm…. I’m detecting a pattern here…
Hmmm …My previous post disappeared.
To say again…. I’m detecting a pattern here to Nobama’s appointments . “White males need not apply”
Not Abbey again!!! Please, no!
#2 Well Educated Cad: That was my immediate take as well. Sadly, before Obama, I never, ever saw things through the racial lens. Does this say more about me or about Obama?
You think Obama curses his own white half? “Out, damned spot! out, I say!”
We need to start construction of solar power sats. Making big things in space is something we can do; I’d like to see us develop the capability of doing it better and cheaper. Power sats have a more immediate financial payback. It wouldn’t hurt us to appease the bean counters. The ISS needs to be expanded such that the portion of the budget devoted to exploring has a staging orbit. Constellation/Orion seems like a step backwards.
10% discrimination, 90% ‘history maker’. He’s even more wrapped up in his need to make ‘history’ every where he turns that Clinton was. He’s already made history by being the biggest money spender in world history, does he really think putting minorities in every job from SCOTUS to NASA director will overcome the fact that he will actually manage to cause a world recession? Hardly. At least as a sci-fi writer and futurist, I’m glad that he appointed an astronaut for a change. Lets hope he nukes the disastrous Constelation program and gets to work on something other than a BDB approach. Leave that to the Russians, we need an SSTO and reusable lunar landers.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Bolden’s personal history reads like the man who should have been the first African-American president. Annapolis grad, 100 A-6 combat sorties in Vietnam, test pilot, astronaut, Marine Corps General, minimal political activity post-career. The anti-Obama. He certainly seems like a man who can provide the focused leadership NASA needs.
Earth orbit is not where the real deal it. The real deal is on the moon. Helium 3.
#9 — Earth orbit is not where the real deal it. The real deal is on the moon. Helium 3.
We have fusion now?
Well, I might suggest his #1 priority. Rein in James Hansen. Better yet, fire him. Restore NASA credibility of using the scientific method. Between Hansen’s fake data (oh, it was just a mistake. yeah. right. Only rookies make those types of mistakes. He should have been fired for it.) and his community agitating, Hansen’s destroying NASA’s credibility on climate science.
Then with Hathaway’s reluctance to admit he “might” have been overly opptimistic (for three years) about SC24, NASA is developing a serious reliability gap on the solar front.
11. ked5: Great point about Hansen.
Even more important is to get the government out of the space travel business. NASA is not and will not be our pathway to the stars; they’ve proven that by spending the past 30 years diddling around in low earth orbit doing NOTHING of consequence. Take all the money that would have been spent on NASA budgets and set it aside as a promised reward to whatever private organizations successfully reach certain milestones, like a fully staffed permanent station (an actual industrial-strength station of real utility, not the flimsy excuse for junk that’s up there now), a lunar colony that pays for itself (solar power collection at least, while helium-3 isn’t useful yet), orbiting solar power satellite grids, asteroid mining trips, etc. Not one cent gets paid until the stuff gets accomplished and once it is done we all benefit from it. And in the meantime we’re not paying 50-year-old PhD bureaucrats to go on joyrides and do mock experiments for elementary school kids.
This current path is a dead end. It does not matter one whit who is in charge.
The most important aspect of this pick is Pres. Obama selected the best man for the job. I attended a speech Major General (Ret.) Bolden gave at USNA while I was there. Without any hesitation, I can state he transcends race. He is an impressive American! I wish him God Speed as he takes this challenging position. His biggest challenge will be to return the agency to its fifty and sixties pushing the envelope attitude away from the bureaucratic beast it became.
“His biggest challenge will be to return the agency to its fifty and sixties pushing the envelope attitude away from the bureaucratic beast it became.”
Unfortunately, it was NASA’S big spending, “pushing the envelope” ways of the ’60s that got us precisely on the path we are today. Pining for some romantic ideal of the NASA of old is precisely the wrong way to approach becoming a space faring society in the future.
If anything NASA is already attempting to take on the mantra of the 50s-60s by giving us “Apollo on Steroids”. It is truly infuriating to see billions of dollars being wasted, basically doing what was already accomplished 40 years ago. Flags and footprints? *yawn*
The possibility of hundreds of people being in space at any one time? Too many flight manifests to keep track of? Hmmm, interesting.
The appoitment of Bolden has promise, unlike the other bums BO has appointed.We need relief,any kind`to offset the horrendous crap he is shoveling our way
As boring as LEO has been for human spaceflight the last 30 years, some of you are forgetting that there has been some truly exciting robotic exploration. Galileo, the Voyagers (okay so they were launched a little over 30 years ago), and the more recent gas giant and Martian missions.
“”"”"”We need to start construction of solar power sats. Making big things in space is something we can do”"”"”"
Making HUGE things in space at a comparitively reasonable price is something we can’t do. Solar power sats would be huge.
As Simberg intimates, replacing a space transportation system and a space station with Earth-to-Moon retro-design systems isn’t going to create a space-faring civilization. The Constellation program is unsustainable. Here’s the most optimistic scenario for government-funded manned flight in the next 15 years: a handful of Moon landings and a skeletal attempt at a “Moon base,” and then a complete abandonment of the effort. No follow-on Mars program. That’s it. Oh, and by the way, no need to fret about the Chinese or the Russians or the Indians (and forget about the EU, that is to laugh) as they are not are going to have any greater success with a permanent Lunar presence.
The single best hope for humankind in space are the eventual maturation of systems like those being developed by SpaceX. This is not to say that SpaceX is some sort of saviour, but the concept of developing much less expensive, more reliable, and more routine launchers is what will allow humanity to enjoy a rennaissance in space. While SpaceX-type efforts are goping to take longer and cost more than these pioneers are claiming, the eventual cost difference as compared to comparable government efforts are staggering. For instance, once SpaceX has an operational Falcon 9 and a manned Dragon capsule, it will have spent less than a fourth of what a comparable NASA effort would cost.
#18. How do you get the power from those orbital ‘power sats’ down to earth? I suppose you envision RF transmission. What is the path loss? What happens if someone gets into the power transmission beam? What happens if the control system goes out and the beam starts irradiating a nearby town? What happens when a rogue nation knocks out the satellite? What we need is terrestial-based power generation. Nuclear is as ‘green’ as it gets.
#18 — Making HUGE things in space at a comparitively reasonable price is something we can’t do.
Not when the focus of NASA is rockets = ammunition. Get reusable SSTO (e.g. DC/X) operable (3 day turnaround) and the equation changes.
SpaceX and the Dragon capsule at least represent a viable civilian effort, but reusability is the key.
#20 — How do you get the power from those orbital ‘power sats’ down to earth?
Microwave. Read up on it. We already know how to do this, and we know how to do this safely. That part was figured out in the 60′s and 70′s. What we don’t have is cheap access to space, otherwise we’d be doing it already.
***
Gen. Bolden — if you’re reading this, congratulations, and please look into getting us to space cheaply.