<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Government Does Not Equal &#8216;Reform&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-376397</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-376397</guid>
		<description>Here is a more recent zogby poll and it supports the 80+ percent claim made in article.


http://www.zogby.com/News/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1722</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a more recent zogby poll and it supports the 80+ percent claim made in article.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zogby.com/News/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1722" rel="nofollow">http://www.zogby.com/News/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1722</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-376390</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-376390</guid>
		<description>A poll from 2006? 3 years old?? And you are using this to support what? A 3 year old poll is beyond worthless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A poll from 2006? 3 years old?? And you are using this to support what? A 3 year old poll is beyond worthless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norris Hall</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-376168</link>
		<dc:creator>Norris Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-376168</guid>
		<description>The author quotes a poll that says 89% of americans are satisfied with their health care.
Problem is the same poll shows that the majority of Americans favor a universal health care option run by the government
Here&#039;s the entire poll

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-10-15-health-poll1.htm

Before you go extracting numbers that support your view , you need to reference the source.  
People get a totally different idea if they read the whole poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author quotes a poll that says 89% of americans are satisfied with their health care.<br />
Problem is the same poll shows that the majority of Americans favor a universal health care option run by the government<br />
Here&#8217;s the entire poll</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-10-15-health-poll1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-10-15-health-poll1.htm</a></p>
<p>Before you go extracting numbers that support your view , you need to reference the source.<br />
People get a totally different idea if they read the whole poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-375828</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-375828</guid>
		<description>&quot;No one’s asking you to do that, their asking your representatives.&quot;

You mean the same representatives who stated they didn&#039;t have time to read the 1000+ page cap and trade bill?

There is nothing unconstitutional about passing a bill... It&#039;s what is contained in the bill... the constitution is very clear about the role of the federal government everything not defined is left to the states... I looked for healthcare and social security in the constitution.... couldnt find it. What article is that under oh uber educated one Moho?
Oh by the way, since you are super educated and highly intelligent, are you STILL after 3 weeks trying to figure out if terrorists are covered under the geneva convention?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No one’s asking you to do that, their asking your representatives.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean the same representatives who stated they didn&#8217;t have time to read the 1000+ page cap and trade bill?</p>
<p>There is nothing unconstitutional about passing a bill&#8230; It&#8217;s what is contained in the bill&#8230; the constitution is very clear about the role of the federal government everything not defined is left to the states&#8230; I looked for healthcare and social security in the constitution&#8230;. couldnt find it. What article is that under oh uber educated one Moho?<br />
Oh by the way, since you are super educated and highly intelligent, are you STILL after 3 weeks trying to figure out if terrorists are covered under the geneva convention?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moho</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-375716</link>
		<dc:creator>Moho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-375716</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and the next 17 were to undo the parts about the constitution that had no bearing on issues decades and even centuries after the writing of that document. 

And Brian, how is passing a bill unconstitutional? Is there something in the constitution that mandates the amount of time that a bill needs to be considered.

Your protests may have something to do with your level of education or interest in academic pursuits. When I was in college, I easily read two thousand pages and was tested on the content every 12 weeks. No one&#039;s asking you to do that, their asking your representatives. Or do you now need to read every bill yourself? What about the legislation that got us into Iraq--that was a pretty big deal, I bet you were up all night readingt that one too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and the next 17 were to undo the parts about the constitution that had no bearing on issues decades and even centuries after the writing of that document. </p>
<p>And Brian, how is passing a bill unconstitutional? Is there something in the constitution that mandates the amount of time that a bill needs to be considered.</p>
<p>Your protests may have something to do with your level of education or interest in academic pursuits. When I was in college, I easily read two thousand pages and was tested on the content every 12 weeks. No one&#8217;s asking you to do that, their asking your representatives. Or do you now need to read every bill yourself? What about the legislation that got us into Iraq&#8211;that was a pretty big deal, I bet you were up all night readingt that one too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-375629</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-375629</guid>
		<description>&quot;and it was ammended 27 times&quot;

Do you even know what the amendments were? The first 10 were the bill of rights and were envisioned and the conception of the Constitution.... but even these simple ideals took time to consider... Obama wants Congress to put a 1000 page Healthcare bill through in a few months? That is beyond insane!
Not to mention Unconstitutional!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and it was ammended 27 times&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you even know what the amendments were? The first 10 were the bill of rights and were envisioned and the conception of the Constitution&#8230;. but even these simple ideals took time to consider&#8230; Obama wants Congress to put a 1000 page Healthcare bill through in a few months? That is beyond insane!<br />
Not to mention Unconstitutional!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-375626</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-375626</guid>
		<description>Anyone willing the put healthcare in the hands of that lying hypocritical Pelosi and her ilk are simply suicidal!

I love the Obama brought brought up UPS, Fed Ex and the USPS to make his point for government run healthcare! Nothing could highlight the dangers bigger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone willing the put healthcare in the hands of that lying hypocritical Pelosi and her ilk are simply suicidal!</p>
<p>I love the Obama brought brought up UPS, Fed Ex and the USPS to make his point for government run healthcare! Nothing could highlight the dangers bigger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moho</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-375516</link>
		<dc:creator>Moho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-375516</guid>
		<description>Hawkwatcher...I&#039;m pretty sure you have no idea what&#039;s in the constitution...

Article 1, Section 2: Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this union, according to their respective numbers, &lt;i&gt;which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.&lt;/i&gt;

I suppose you blank this part out of your little head when you harken back to the constitution. It was a guide, and it was ammended 27 times. You have no idea what you&#039;re talking about when you talk about the constitution; you&#039;re just parroting things that other people have told you to say to cover up your blind and directionless rage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hawkwatcher&#8230;I&#8217;m pretty sure you have no idea what&#8217;s in the constitution&#8230;</p>
<p>Article 1, Section 2: Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this union, according to their respective numbers, <i>which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.</i></p>
<p>I suppose you blank this part out of your little head when you harken back to the constitution. It was a guide, and it was ammended 27 times. You have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about when you talk about the constitution; you&#8217;re just parroting things that other people have told you to say to cover up your blind and directionless rage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivo</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-375490</link>
		<dc:creator>vivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-375490</guid>
		<description>108. HawkWatcher:

&quot;Vivo personifies the definition of saphead.&quot;

You&#039;ve got it all wrong.  Since this post is dyibg, I will not elaborate.

The following refers to my posts being deleted here because the authors can&#039;t stand the truth.

censorship = fear

fear = ignorance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>108. HawkWatcher:</p>
<p>&#8220;Vivo personifies the definition of saphead.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got it all wrong.  Since this post is dyibg, I will not elaborate.</p>
<p>The following refers to my posts being deleted here because the authors can&#8217;t stand the truth.</p>
<p>censorship = fear</p>
<p>fear = ignorance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkWatcher</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/more-government-does-not-mean-reform/#comment-375436</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkWatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64168#comment-375436</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t let this post die this way...

How does calling politically active conservatives &quot;teabaggers&quot; unmask their wrong thinking?  What truth would be erased if PJ censored virulent posts that offer nothing else of value?  Vivo personifies the definition of saphead.  Let&#039;s look at some American truths.

Big centralized government is the enemy of liberty; the founders knew this, I know it, the writer of the article knows it...why would anyone in their right mind support more crushing federal power upon their lives and livelyhood?

Why do libs fear and hate the Constitution and free enterprise?  Why are they so willing to surrender their liberty, and mine?  It&#039;s our Constitutional duty to defeat the enemies of freedom, and the leftists who control Washington are clearly the targets.

No wonder the liberal trolls hate us...we are successfully going about the business of fighting irresponsible federal largesse, while encouraging individual responsibility and limited government.

This is terrifying to the ignorant people who want more &quot;freebies&quot;, so the vitriol flows in absense of any supportive arguments for big government; &quot;fear=ignorance&quot; indeed.

There are many weaklings that need to be weeded out of the political arena.  If thousands of us keep throwing $20 here and there to elect more conservatives, we will prevail.  Netroots is dying, while we grow in numbers and $ support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t let this post die this way&#8230;</p>
<p>How does calling politically active conservatives &#8220;teabaggers&#8221; unmask their wrong thinking?  What truth would be erased if PJ censored virulent posts that offer nothing else of value?  Vivo personifies the definition of saphead.  Let&#8217;s look at some American truths.</p>
<p>Big centralized government is the enemy of liberty; the founders knew this, I know it, the writer of the article knows it&#8230;why would anyone in their right mind support more crushing federal power upon their lives and livelyhood?</p>
<p>Why do libs fear and hate the Constitution and free enterprise?  Why are they so willing to surrender their liberty, and mine?  It&#8217;s our Constitutional duty to defeat the enemies of freedom, and the leftists who control Washington are clearly the targets.</p>
<p>No wonder the liberal trolls hate us&#8230;we are successfully going about the business of fighting irresponsible federal largesse, while encouraging individual responsibility and limited government.</p>
<p>This is terrifying to the ignorant people who want more &#8220;freebies&#8221;, so the vitriol flows in absense of any supportive arguments for big government; &#8220;fear=ignorance&#8221; indeed.</p>
<p>There are many weaklings that need to be weeded out of the political arena.  If thousands of us keep throwing $20 here and there to elect more conservatives, we will prevail.  Netroots is dying, while we grow in numbers and $ support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

