Monday Morning Quarterback: A Long Hot Summer
Heading into the middle of summer, some of the dangers of an ultra-long campaign are coming more clearly into focus.
This coming week, the Democrats hold another debate on Monday night, on CNN, this time with the seemingly techno-savvy gimmick of sifting through citizen-generated video questions via YouTube.
On the Republican side, John McCain seeks to show proof of life after virtually everyone I know — or anyone else knows — has left his campaign. Rudy Giuliani seeks to remind that he leads in most polls, albeit by smaller margins. Mitt Romney counters by pointing out that he leads in Iowa and New Hampshire (after months of unanswered TV advertising, which kind of lessens the significance of those leads) as he tries to engage Hillary Clinton by labeling her Democratic Leadership Council program as “Marxist.”
And Fred Thompson, who burst onto the scene a few months ago as the great populist conservative hope, struggles with getting an actual campaign up and running.
First the Democrats. The good news for them is that Barack Obama is not the only Democrat doing very well against all Republican prospects. Hillary Clinton now tops them too, in some very recent polls, the most recent of which is a Fox News poll.
Since Hillary has the unique problem of being disliked by a majority of voters, something is counteracting her inherent lack of mass popularity. That seems, according to the Fox News poll, as well as others, to be the increasingly weighty albatross of Iraq around all major Republican necks. (Not you, Ron Paul.)
Meanwhile, the Democrats gather for another debate Monday night in South Carolina. Hillary has, by most assessments, prevailed in most of the forums and debates held thus far.
And there have been a lot, so many that boredom may set in. Especially since all the candidates — first through fourth tiers — are still on the stage. My assessment of the tiers? First tier: Clinton and Obama. Second tier: John Edwards and Bill Richardson. (Richardson has moved into third place in New Hampshire, and raised nearly as much money as Edwards in the second quarter.) Third tier: Joe Biden and Chris Dodd. Fourth tier: Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel.
There is, frankly, no chance that Kucinich or Gravel can be nominated. As passionate and entertaining as they no doubt are, they take up as much as a quarter of debate time. But that is a problem for the Democratic Party to deal with.
Although a certain amount of boredom is setting in with these large joint appearances in lieu of combat-ready debates between the real contenders, tomorrow night will be interesting.
This will be, in some measure, because of the YouTube factor, despite the fact that it is frankly a gimmick, an attempt to look hip. If we’re being frank, it will essentially be the video equivalent of a Commonwealth Club event, since the moderators at CNN will select the questions just as they would amongst a bunch of handwritten cards collected from a luncheon audience.
Obama, who is trouncing Hillary in fundraising and generally draws much larger and more engaged crowds, is finally getting better at the soundbite politics of these large joint appearance forums and debates. That will be the key question for the spinmeisters following the debate. Will he best her? (One might ask whether he wants to start winning debates against her yet. After all, she makes a wonderful protective target for all the attacks from the right.)
The Republican race, which is far less defined, has no such potentially, if momentarily, defining event this week.
In many ways, the spotlight is on Fred Thompson. After an excellent start as a shadow candidate a few months ago, Fred Thompson is becoming something of a question mark. He is not, as was widely assumed, announcing his candidacy this month. Next month may slide as well. Which would bring us into September.
The explanation? Perhaps he is aware, as others who have run for president and won many primaries have pointed out to me, such as Jerry Brown and Gary Hart, that in such a long campaign, it is quite possible to end up boring the voters before they ever vote. Or perhaps Thompson simply is not prepared.
Thompson has a few fundraisers to watch between now and the end of the month in Houston and Washington. Will he picking up McCain backers? That will be one clear measure of his potential.
For his part, McCain is trying to reboot once again, having melted down twice already this year – first amongst moderates and independents over the Iraq War and then amongst conservatives and independents over his comprehensive immigration bill.
Is the third time the charm? Given that his campaign spent well over 90% of what it raised in the first half of the year, McCain will probably have to take federal matching funds to be competitive in the primaries. Which would force him to accept federal spending limits. A very dicey proposition should he win the nomination and face off against an uber-fundraiser like Obama or Hillary.
Obama, incidentally, has more contributors than all the Republican presidential candidates combined.
Erstwhile frontrunner Giuliani is hanging on against attacks on his 9/11 bona fides by the firefighters union, who charge he didn’t bother as mayor to synchronize first responder radio frequencies before the second attack on the World Trade Center.
Although he’s contesting all of the four earliest states, he clearly looks to California, among other early states, as key to his success. In fact, he campaigns in San Francisco on Monday.
That’s a city that George W. Bush has never even visited as president.
Ho-hum…I almost dozed off, not because of campaign fatigue, but because of smoke inhalation from the smoke screen that you put out to cover up the existence of Ron Paul’s exploding grassroots campaign.
Then, you startled the hell out of me, and I was jolted out of my lethargy. “Oh, my god, did I hear correctly? Did you actually say ‘Not you, Ron Paul’ in acknowledging that Dr. Paul was a Republican candidate who opposed the war?” Yep, you did! I went back and checked to make sure that I wasn’t dreaming.
But, then snoring set in again as you proceeded to talk about most of the other candidates, without so much as a complete sentence about Ron Paul.
Guess I’ll just sleep through the week and check back in with you next week after Ron Paul blows everybody away again on the pajamasmedia straw poll.
Sweet dreams…’cause dreamin’ is what you folks are doing. Wake up time will be in Ames, Iowa.
What is it with this Paul people? You run over to Real Clear Politics and find Cong. Paul running somewhere between 0 and 3 percent on all national polls. Then they come over and gangbang the open Pajamas poll and think they’ve accomplished something that impresses people. Quite the reverse. They seem like a weird cultists desperate to make their candidate (and themselves) known. Creepy.
Erstwhile frontrunner Giuliani is hanging on against attacks on his 9/11 bona fides by the firefighters union, who charge he didn’t bother as mayor to synchronize first responder radio frequencies before the second attack on the World Trade Center.
It seems to me that this is not a matter of “charges” — it’s a factual matter that’s easy enough to check out.
Compare, for instance, the state of Virginia, which, when it was rebuilding its highway network and deploying broadband underneath the new roads, also put in the infrastructure for a unified wireless system for first-responders. (I have two reasons for being interested in this topic — my employer, Motorola, had a big piece of the work building the system, and the first candidate I supported for Pres was the governer responsible for getting the system built and an expert on wireless tech.)
Paul Skeptic…Let me see…the name of the game in politics is to gain name recognition, right? And, if you are denied such legitimate recognition by the tactics of writers like the author of this article and others who do their mainstream editors’ bidding, what better way than to mobilize support online, just like one would do offline. At least, online there is freedom for people to get information uncensored by “Big Brother’s” paternalistic protectors of the public consciousness. Other candidates are free to do exactly the same thing. Why are they not doing it? Because they don’t recognize the motive power of the Internet, that’s why.
The online “gangbang,” as you so indelicately put it, represents nothing different from the 1,100 people who showed up in Iowa, when Paul was not invited to the Forum held there, and who outnumbered the 700 or so persons who showed up to hear six other candidates, including Romney, speak. and, these 1,100 people were mobilized within just one week, while the Forum, itself, had been promoted for a number of months!
The aforementioned “gangbang” is no different from the almost 30,000 activists that have joined Meetup groups nationwide as spinoffs of online activities, including voting in the pajamasmedia straw poll. The number is exploding daily. Now, that truly is “creepy” as you so picturesquely put it.
This week, Paul’s margin grows even greater in the pajamas poll. After less than two days, Paul has accumulated 543 of 874 Republican votes for 62.1%. Fred Thompson has 204 for 23.3%. Giuliani has a whopping 46 votes and Romney, a sizzling total of 25. Admittedly, a small sample thus far, but by the end of the week, the total votes will likely be 3,000 or more.
And, would you say that Paul’s 69% of about 39,000 votes cast in the MSNBC Poll after the NH debate was a “gangbang,” or was it, perhaps, just a flat out “orgiastic” celebration of individual freedom? I think that you will agree that this was a rather large sample, given the fact that most polls sample less than a 1,000 people. In fact, it begins to look, not so much like a sample, but more like a “population” of MSNBC viewers, from which poll samples might be drawn. It is interesting that Paul’s percentage, given his strong antiwar message, is very close to the 70% of Americans across the country who are opposed to the War in Iraq. This very close correspondence suggests, in fact, that the MSNBC poll may provide a rather accurate representation of voter sentiment across the country.
People are being drawn to Ron Paul’s message of freedom, Paul Skeptic, because truly “Freedom is popular!” Why? Because tyrannical, big government control, in its suppression of freedom, is inimical to creative expression and productivity. There is a longing for such freedom that is bursting out all over the country, like flowers in the Springtime, bursting into red, white, and blue blooms. Yes, “Freedom is popular!” And, it is gathering energy like the wind before a summer storm. Hold on to your hat, my good sir.
Why Dr Ron Paul?
• He has never voted to raise taxes.
• He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
• He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
• He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
• He has never taken a government-paid junket.
• He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
• He voted against the Patriot Act.
• He voted against regulating the Internet.
• He voted against the Iraq war.
• He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
• He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.