Jack

All I really wanted to say was that I really hoped for better. — Jack(al)

….disappointment.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Jack

Hardly. You’re just not worth engaging. I consider you to be on a par with vivo (claiming he/she is between 7 and 11 years of age) and one on my own (a self-proclaimed twinkie-obsessed, overweight, post-operative trans-sexual with painful hemmoroids).

Hope that helps….but I have my doubts….

Regards,

Chuck(le)
P.S. The only reason I drop by here now and then is to see if anyone else has offered anything useful to discuss.

P.P.S. You don’t qualify. But I felt obliged to allow others to recognize that you have not won this particular ‘field’.

I’m not trying (again) to be a jerk, but I’ve tried to engage you in conversation NUMEROUS times and you just won’t. I can only assume (as I have before without you countering it) that you either don’t want to have a conversation or you are unable to debate. I don’t want to assume the worst, so I won’t, but that leaves me with you just don’t care that much.

To be fair, even after your most recent challenge (which I answered in less than an hour) that you decided you didn’t feel like answering any more, but then I guess that means you asked those questions to ask them and not to discuss them. Or, again to be fair, you didn’t think I was serious in my willingness to discuss them or more likely, knowing you, that I was too stupid to have a conversation, then I question why you ever deigned to speak to me.

With all of your loftiness and self-proclaimed Mensa membership and master of all things great and small (ok, I’m being snarky) do you (once again) care about these issues, just want to be snarky, want to have a conversation, or just have idle fingers and access to the Interwebs?

I guess we are done here, but I’m sure I’ll come across you again elsewhere. We are going to have the same tussle (sic) if you continue to not answer questions, avoid discussion, and keep having the lack of respect of the serious issues that face this country to only toss out one-liners and walk away. In my mind that’s sad.

And once again to be fair, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and take your non-answer to this as well as indication that you didn’t read this.

In hope of future DISCUSSION and not having to just continue to chuckle at you (as I said, you can be funny) and find you irrelevant on the stage of honest debate,

Jack.

#145 Chuck – I am pro-choice, but I think it should be restricted to the first tri-mester. Thank you for actually asking a question, big step. Let’s see if you can muster a response to me that is more than an insult (unless you don’t care about this issue and then by all means, trivialize it).

That said, what (again) does that have to do with MikeD suggesting taking up arms against the government? You seem to have a hard time staying on point…is this what they taught you to do in Mensa debate school…if you don’t like the question put to you, answer a different one? And then when you don’t get the response you want, keep doing it…maybe some day it will work…

#146 Chuck – Um, what? Seriously, do you think that is communicating…I have no idea where you are going with that. Should I just state a word? Ok, look up “artifact”…it might mean absolutely nothing…

Jack

Are you REALLY a card-carrying member of Densa?

Do you support abortion on demand, vis-a-vis Roe v. Wade?

That was what your powerful intellect came up with? — Jack(al)

…it TOOK so long. But eventually, patterns of behavior DO manifest themselves and I’ll overcome my own unwillingness to think poorly of someone.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[The Truth will out....eventually.....]