<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manufacturing on Demand: The Future Is Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-110610</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 04:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-110610</guid>
		<description>Gunner said: 
&lt;i&gt;interesting, but this presupposes an understanding of the technology of the widget you’re trying to replicate, as ken points out. even a relatively “simple” machine, like a semi automatic pistol, requires understanding the forces acting in and on the mechanism in its operation. heat, pressure, mechanical friction, cyclic timing, mechanical linkages, etc. then you get into the wonderful world of writing a programme the computer can run to acually build your widget. not unsolvable problems but still many process steps between idea and product. thinking will still be required before pushing the magic button.
“gunner”&lt;/i&gt;

My Reply:
Unfortunately, the strange multi-click system on PJM erased my original reply.
I will reply again.
Your concerns are only relevant if you&#039;re designing a brand new pistol design from scratch, then printing it out of the fablab. They are not relevant to pistol designs that have existed for decades since those concerns have already been addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunner said:<br />
<i>interesting, but this presupposes an understanding of the technology of the widget you’re trying to replicate, as ken points out. even a relatively “simple” machine, like a semi automatic pistol, requires understanding the forces acting in and on the mechanism in its operation. heat, pressure, mechanical friction, cyclic timing, mechanical linkages, etc. then you get into the wonderful world of writing a programme the computer can run to acually build your widget. not unsolvable problems but still many process steps between idea and product. thinking will still be required before pushing the magic button.<br />
“gunner”</i></p>
<p>My Reply:<br />
Unfortunately, the strange multi-click system on PJM erased my original reply.<br />
I will reply again.<br />
Your concerns are only relevant if you&#8217;re designing a brand new pistol design from scratch, then printing it out of the fablab. They are not relevant to pistol designs that have existed for decades since those concerns have already been addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-110608</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-110608</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;interesting, but this presupposes an understanding of the technology of the widget you’re trying to replicate, as ken points out. even a relatively “simple” machine, like a semi automatic pistol, requires understanding the forces acting in and on the mechanism in its operation. heat, pressure, mechanical friction, cyclic timing, mechanical linkages, etc. then you get into the wonderful world of writing a programme the computer can run to acually build your widget. not unsolvable problems but still many process steps between idea and product. thinking will still be required before pushing the magic button.
“gunner”&lt;/i&gt;

If you&#039;re designing a &lt;b&gt;new&lt;/b&gt; pistol design to print out of your fablab then your statement would be relevant. If you&#039;re printing out a well tested pistol design that has existed for decades then your statement would be irrelevant. The mechanical stresses would have been already accounted for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>interesting, but this presupposes an understanding of the technology of the widget you’re trying to replicate, as ken points out. even a relatively “simple” machine, like a semi automatic pistol, requires understanding the forces acting in and on the mechanism in its operation. heat, pressure, mechanical friction, cyclic timing, mechanical linkages, etc. then you get into the wonderful world of writing a programme the computer can run to acually build your widget. not unsolvable problems but still many process steps between idea and product. thinking will still be required before pushing the magic button.<br />
“gunner”</i></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re designing a <b>new</b> pistol design to print out of your fablab then your statement would be relevant. If you&#8217;re printing out a well tested pistol design that has existed for decades then your statement would be irrelevant. The mechanical stresses would have been already accounted for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrl</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-109763</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 07:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-109763</guid>
		<description>Analog Science Fiction has in their November issue a science-fact article, &quot;The 3D Train Wreck&quot; (might eventually be available online at http://www.analogsf.com/ but right now you gotta go get the atoms to read it) about this very subject.

You can download the plans and parts list for a 3D printer from reprap.org and the parts should cost less than $1000. I&#039;m afraid it looks rather tinker-toy-ish.

You can download the plans (including software) for a better one - which can handle multiple materials - at fabathome.org ; in this case the parts for the basic version will cost about $2400 or you can buy the basic version, assembled and ready to go, for about $4000. This is not a commercial-grade device by any means, but one adventurous owner has set up his printer to deal with multiple materials simultaneously - and printed a working electric battery.  Also, while 3D printing is strictly additive, some of the people involved in this this project are imagining subtractive approaches such as using a Dremel roto-tool as a &quot;print&quot;head. That could open up some serious improvements in surface quality.

There&#039;a also a guy at USC working on printing buildings. NASA&#039;s looking at one of his prototypes and imagining printing buildings on the moon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analog Science Fiction has in their November issue a science-fact article, &#8220;The 3D Train Wreck&#8221; (might eventually be available online at <a href="http://www.analogsf.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.analogsf.com/</a> but right now you gotta go get the atoms to read it) about this very subject.</p>
<p>You can download the plans and parts list for a 3D printer from reprap.org and the parts should cost less than $1000. I&#8217;m afraid it looks rather tinker-toy-ish.</p>
<p>You can download the plans (including software) for a better one &#8211; which can handle multiple materials &#8211; at fabathome.org ; in this case the parts for the basic version will cost about $2400 or you can buy the basic version, assembled and ready to go, for about $4000. This is not a commercial-grade device by any means, but one adventurous owner has set up his printer to deal with multiple materials simultaneously &#8211; and printed a working electric battery.  Also, while 3D printing is strictly additive, some of the people involved in this this project are imagining subtractive approaches such as using a Dremel roto-tool as a &#8220;print&#8221;head. That could open up some serious improvements in surface quality.</p>
<p>There&#8217;a also a guy at USC working on printing buildings. NASA&#8217;s looking at one of his prototypes and imagining printing buildings on the moon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tightwad Technica &#187; Where Image Meets Physicality</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108747</link>
		<dc:creator>Tightwad Technica &#187; Where Image Meets Physicality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108747</guid>
		<description>[...] Linky. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linky. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108707</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108707</guid>
		<description>Good point, Ellen.  Isn&#039;t there a tax advantage too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Ellen.  Isn&#8217;t there a tax advantage too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108531</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s okay, &#039;cause Toad only needs one round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s okay, &#8217;cause Toad only needs one round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108496</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108496</guid>
		<description>A word on another cost reduced w/print on demand (not the focus of the article, but it&#039;s my field) - insurance costs. Not having to insure a warehouse full of books reduces costs mightily for a publisher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A word on another cost reduced w/print on demand (not the focus of the article, but it&#8217;s my field) &#8211; insurance costs. Not having to insure a warehouse full of books reduces costs mightily for a publisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108486</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108486</guid>
		<description>SHB, it&#039;s worth remembering that there are a lot of things that you only buy one at a time.  This has the promise of being rather like the change in the record business: big sellers will make big money, but small specialized designers will be able to get into the market easily.

Allston, the mention of Heinlein is absolutely right: remember his Universal Pantograph?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHB, it&#8217;s worth remembering that there are a lot of things that you only buy one at a time.  This has the promise of being rather like the change in the record business: big sellers will make big money, but small specialized designers will be able to get into the market easily.</p>
<p>Allston, the mention of Heinlein is absolutely right: remember his Universal Pantograph?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manufacturing on Demand: the Future is Now &#124; Explorations</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108377</link>
		<dc:creator>Manufacturing on Demand: the Future is Now &#124; Explorations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108377</guid>
		<description>[...] new article on Pajamas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new article on Pajamas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allston</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108345</link>
		<dc:creator>Allston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/manufacturing-on-demand-the-future-is-now/#comment-108345</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great to see inventions predicted by the Science Fiction greats, such as Clarke or Heinlein, becoming a reality.

It&#039;s a *good* time to be alive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to see inventions predicted by the Science Fiction greats, such as Clarke or Heinlein, becoming a reality.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a *good* time to be alive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

