Get PJ Media on your Apple

Lieberman Back on Hill to Warn of ‘Rapidly Spreading’ Islamist Threat

In first hearing on Boston bombings, former senator says "it was possible to have prevented" attack and questions why mosque that says it threw out Tamerlan Tsarnaev didn't report him.

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

May 9, 2013 - 10:02 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

Former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) re-emerged on the Hill today for the first hearing on the Boston bombings to remind Congress that “the outrageously false narrative of violent Islamist extremism” is a threat to America that is growing unchecked.

“The reality is that three terrorist attacks, all homegrown, have succeeded. Carlos Bledsoe, who killed an Army recruiter in Little Rock in 2009, Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 at Fort Hood later that same year, and now the Tsarnaev brothers who killed four and severely wounded many more in Boston less than a month ago,” Lieberman said before the House Homeland Security Committee.

“The Boston Marathon attacks should again teach us that the enemy we face is violent Islamist extremism, not just al-Qaeda,” he continued. “Osama bin Laden is dead. And the remaining leadership of al Qaida is on the run, but the ideology of violent Islamist extremism is rapidly spreading.”

The longtime legislator who retired at the end of the last Congress said he believes “that, though it would not have been easy, it was possible to have prevented the terrorist attacks in Boston.”

Lieberman also opined that the information-sharing reforms enacted after 9/11 may have made it more difficult “to separate the wheat from the chaff, to identify the most important dots on the board so that they can be connected.”

“We’ve still got to ask, and I hope you will, shouldn’t the fact that the first notice of Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s possible radicalization came to us from a very uncommon source, Russian intelligence, have marked the case for special handling by our government and guaranteed that this file would not be closed? Were the original FBI interviews of Tamerlan Tsarnaev adequate to determine whether he was likely to radicalize to violent Islamist extremism?” he said.

Lieberman also wasn’t so quick to shift some blame away from the Boston mosque that claimed it threw the elder Tsarnaev brother out for radical ranting.

“The leaders and the members of the Boston mosque that threw Tamerlan out because of his extreme views could have said something to the police and even done something to counter his radicalization,” he said. “And even members of the Tsarnaev family, including Tamerlan’s wife, could have saved lives, including Tamerlan’s, if they had said something or asked someone for help.”

Committee Chairman Mike McCaul (R-Texas) noted “he was on our radar screen, and then he was off.”

“What remains unanswered is whether this information was shared between federal agencies and state and local officials,” he added, referencing the timeline of Tsarnaev leaving the country for Dagestan last year after warnings about his radicalization.

“Equally concerning is the emerging narrative which downplays the spread of the global jihadist movement,” McCaul said. “From the attack in Fort Hood to the tragedy at Benghazi, the Boston bombings are our most recent reminder that we all must — we must call terrorism really for what it is in order to confront it. You cannot defeat an enemy you refuse to acknowledge.”

A former federal counterterrorism prosecutor, McCaul said he “was disturbed in the days following the attack to read that some officials had closed the case on whether there was a foreign connection when the FBI had just begun its investigation… this rush to judgment, in my view, was premature and irresponsible.”

Ranking Member Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) chided the committee to “exercise some discretion in our questioning and our statements about these events, the suspects and theories about links to others who may have not be in custody.”

Also, Thompson said, “we must acknowledge that the kind of response that occurred on that day would not have been possible without federal grant funds.”

“So as this Congress continues to cut funding for these programs, I hope my colleagues on the other side, who are members of the committee, will oppose these cuts,” he said. “Refusal to support these funding cuts will be the greatest tribute any of us could make to the people of the Boston area.”

McCaul responded that “as a former federal prosecutor, I always reserve judgment until all the evidence is in on the case.”

“And with respect to grant funding, I met with the Boston fire commissioner yesterday, who told me if it wasn’t for the Department of Homeland Security grant funding that helped them with training exercises and response exercises, that it could have been a different situation and that that helped in saving, I think, many American lives,” he added.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
Agree. There are for all practical purposes only two types of muslims - the radical muslim all of whom would not hesitate to kill us - and the 'moderates' - those who want the radical muslim to kill us.

Other than a few muslims that are vocal whenever heinous acts occur the so-called 'moderates' seem to get lockjaw whenever one of their radical members blow up something. I'm beginning to think those few vocal muslims are practicing deception - AKA taqiyya. And the existence of the moderate muslim is myth.

Enough information now exists to remove all doubt that this admin is actively ignoring the muslim threat.

Makes you wonder who's side they're on.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
“The sad fact is today that most terrorists that we’re dealing with in America are inspired by this violent Islamic extremist ideology,” he added. “You have to recognize that to deal with them.”

They are easy to recognize. They are Muslims, this conduct is part of Islam.
Are we to believe that only a small minority of lions would attack a flock of sheep; that the vast majority of lions really are good lions.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
I agree FC we need the courage to call the enemy by its name: Islam, not any of the euphemisms currently popular. The same goes for "radicalization" or "radicalized". "Radical Islam" is a redundancy. Islam is by definition radical.

Another example of Islamic terrorism tells us that Islam is dangerous? Really? That's like getting the results of yet another study to tell us that smoking cigarettes is bad for you.

Why can't they JUST SAY IT. Islam is EVIL and needs to be squeezed until it is no more!
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (20)
All Comments   (20)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
The leaders and the members of the Boston mosque that threw Tamerlan out because of his extreme views could have said something to the police and even done something to counter his radicalization,...."
===
It's the same mentality that exists in the Black community. "You don't rat on a brother"
47 weeks ago
47 weeks ago Link To Comment
This has been going on for about 1300 years, seems to me after a short while someone would get the idea that they want to kill all of you!!!
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
We need to eliminate the use of the term "radicalize" and use the term "Islamize".
As in "self-Islamized" rather than "self radicalized"

48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
Those who follow Muhammad are following Islam. What did Muhammad do?

Muhammad lied, raided caravans, murdered, and raped. The only extremists within Islam are the Apostates.

Why is Islam within America? What will those who follow Muhammad do?
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
After the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks I tried to get an Iranian-born American friend--a U.S. citizen who grew up here-- (and is Moslem) to admit that Moslem terrorists are our enemies. He just kept shrugging and saying things like, "The terrorists haven't done anything to ME." And not a religious guy who goes to mosque, just Joe College who enjoys playing basketball and is a huge NBA fan.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
Wake up all you foolish people.
There are no Moderate Muslims, the Koran does not allow for this Moderation to exist. The Koran is very specific concerning acitons of the Muslim. Read the Koran and learn who our enemy really is.
The Muslim who does not join in Jihad must pay Zakat to support those in Jihad. Obama gave a speech about Zakat and how we were interferring with the Muslim's ability to perform this duty with our laws and he was going to change the laws so as not to interfer with this Muslim duty of Zakat. Hard to believe huh? But it is exactly true, he actually gave a speech about this.
Of course the people of the Mosque certainly chastized Tsarnaev for his extreme beliefs, is there really any doubt in your mind?
The Mosque is the Capital of Islam within the area, it is the school of Islam, it is the home of the Imam (President of the area), it is the Court of Shariah Law in the area. The Mosque is the Center of Life for Islam in the area.
Soon we will start to wake up to reality and then you will understand our enemy. You will understand they are relentless and continuous and are driven by their ideology to kill all Infidels and Infidels are those who are not Islam or slaves to Islam. This is there calling and their life.....
If you wish to be safe and secure in America then we must deport all Muslims from our country and never allow another to enter for any purpose, ever....
There is no other way. England, France, Spain, Germany and every other country in Europe has tried every method of social engineering possible. NONE of them work. Islam is not compatible with anything except Islam and even they are not peaceful with each other....
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
I love it when idiots finally get a clue...hope it's not too late.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
"...the enemy we face is violent Islamist extremism..."

And even a relatively clear-sighted person like Lieberman engages in euphemism and false distinction. It isn't "Islamic extremism." It is Islam, plain and simple. What the Tsarnaevs and all the other jihadists do is *mainstream* Islam, supported by all their holy texts and Islamic scholars ancient and modern. And until we state that truth, we'll never really deal effectively with the war they're waging against us.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
I've not always agreed with Joe Lieberman, but I've always respected him as a true patriot. He is usually spot on when it comes to national security.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
And that is why he was booted from the demonrat party.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
"...Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) asked Davis if, at this point, there’s “any mass labeling of the Muslim community in Boston.”

To Sheila Jackson and her like--including Obama first and foremost--"mass labeling" of Muslims is a greater concern than murdered Americans.

As for labels, Mohamed was a pirate, Islam is a pirate's religion and Sharia is a pirate's code. Kidnap, torture and murder are the core culture of Muslims.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
Actually, Mo' was a successful bandit and organized crime boss, turned conqueror. He raided caravans, and raked off loot from other bandits, until he had enough bandits and loot to organize into an army.
48 weeks ago
48 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All

3 Trackbacks to “Lieberman Back on Hill to Warn of ‘Rapidly Spreading’ Islamist Threat”