Liberal Bloggers Crash and Burn on Bogus Palin Divorce Rumor
Boom. Up go the polling numbers yet again, with minimal effort on Palin’s part. I think the woman is pure gold on these things. One simply cannot extinguish a rumor with any greater force, save perhaps dropping a nuke on the house of the author of the rumor. We see once again that the chief rumor monger is Alaskan CNN stringer Dennis Zaki of the Alaska Report website Moran mentions. Zaki and his website, you may recall, were involved in the spread of some seriously vicious rumors about Trig Palin and his parentage – rumors some on the left have been fixated on since the Republican convention.
In fact, Zaki has been on the attack for years, with anything and everything that sounds even remotely plausible. The problem is, the divorce fiction being reported as fact is hardly unique. It’s merely the latest in a long line of such nonsense. You’d think places like CNN would stop using sources like Zaki.
It’s really enough to cause one to wonder a little about the sanity of Palin’s opposition. If Palin really is the idiot they keep making her out to be, why is it they feel they must make stuff up to generate attacks on her?
And let’s face it, the record of success of such attacks isn’t very good. Foul rumors gets quelled with lead-pipe certainty every single time. You would think that eventually they’d stop trying after so many failures. If she’s so much the idiot, what does it say about her attackers when they come away bloodied and broken after each attack attempt? Do you suppose it’s possible they’re desperate now and are tossing anything and everything at the wall hoping that something will eventually stick?
Hate will make people do strange and desperate things, and trust me, a fair amount of Palin’s attackers hate her.
Meanwhile, we sit and watch as those stories about Democratic corruption, elections violations, and malfeasance get ignored outright.
It seems to me that this goes directly to motivation. Political motivation. They know very well indeed that the woman spells trouble for the Democrats going into 2010 and 2012.
As to why Palin is the target of such attacks, it’s because she’s the one who has the support of the GOP rank and file. Thus, she is the one who poses the biggest threat to the Democrats.
And if you’re in shark-infested waters, you tend to attack the shark closest to you.





“Liberal Bloggers Crash and Burn on Bogus Palin Divorce Rumor”
First time I heard it was on POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites . . .
Besides, who cares if she was divorcing?
50% of Americans do:
1.135 million divorces per year (1998)
2.279 million marriages per year (2004)
What are her chances?
The Alinsky/Ayers/Axelrod hype machine is facing a threat it never envisioned: a genuine phenomena, a teflon political opponent, a woman, of greater charisma and authentic achievement than their Pinochio, just as his fatal flaws are becoming apparent even to the sheep, his paint peeling off and his strings increasingly tangled. As her star rises, his red star sinks. They are facing wipe out in 2010. And, unfortunately for them, they have already overdone the filthy fabrications and dirty defamation to the point where it is has become counter-productive.
Wait till she wades into them. The cesspool of Big City politics will be one of her major points of attack, resonating with middle Americans who rate party politicians lower then even lawyers and journalists. And unlike the gutless, rudderless RNC, she will actually use the words doctrinaire Socialists
Yep the way these rabid ‘libtards’ attack Palin anyone would think she was paying Lawyers hundreds of thousands of dollars to hide her original Birth Certificate , College Records,Employment records, education records, Senate records,Passport and travel details , adoption and name change details and other items. What that that’s what OBAMBI is doing well I never LOL
Uh, hello . . . even if it were, those are liberal sites, goof.
Todd seems like a great guy and they seem happy. This rumor was not believable.
Ah, all critiscism of The One (Palin) is of course made by folks who are suckered by the librul media. Right, gotcha. Never mind thats she is plain stupid, its all a conspiracy by libruls and RINOS. Right. But if she is going to run for office again, she better get some new handlers.Perhaps she will learn to ascribe quotes to the correct general next time she is using the troops as a cover for her quitting next time?
You folks are equal to the Obamaniacs in your worship of false idols.
Vivo, one of the great Leftist haters, gets it wrong again. Around 90% of all first-time marriages succeed, according to the US Census. What skews the percent is the 3- and 4- and 5- (even 9-) time losers who never learn from their mistakes.
This is why the we-hate-Palin crowd always ends up looking foolish; they can’t see beyond their own emotion (and the Left is all about emotion, not reason) long enough to reject what is otherwise is patently false.
Vivo, you’re an idiot. Many of those divorces are serial divorces — that is, people have gotten divorced before. Most Americans don’t divorce; only 34% of people who have EVER been married have also been divorced, according to at least one 2001 study.
As far as who cares if she was divorcing — it’s the number one search term on Google right now: Sarah Palin Divorce. I’d say a lot of people care.
What are her chances? Seriously. Have you ever watched footage of her with Todd? They’re clearly nuts about each other, and they are clearly a well-practiced team. I’d say their chances are — better than average, at least!
“Besides, who cares if she was divorcing?” – vivo.
She isn’t divorcing, regardless of when or where you first heard/read such rumors. That she IS married and remains so very much irritates liberal media outlets to no end.. that much is undeniable.
These liberal outlets (msm & blogs) cannot believe she’s still around at all given the lengths they go to destroy her. Again, that Sarah remains a very strong and public figure annoys liberals to infinitude.
The very mention of her name and or her sighting sends liberals into unhinged rage, they despise her with every miserable fiber of their beings and will continue to – the liberal cesspool is broad and very deep.
Can’t drive those that are already there.
That degree of success smacks to me of planning.
I keep sayin’ that in various places.. About three days before that Friday announcement, an email came out pretty sure was supposed to be from her that sounded like she had the next several years roped in and thinking very forward…..
They are messin’ with fire there, fer shur.. HeeHEEE..
PS.. You know, one of these sites I regularly read had someone say that there was really good stuff they were working on re the b/c and goodness only knows what.. For all we know, it could just as easily have been something like that which stirred the up-n-overnight-resign bug.. People instead remain wholly intent on focusing on it as failure-based why she did so…..
Actually, the Palins were never actually married. There’s no marriage certificate on file. So, never married, can’t get divorced. Simple.
Apparently, Alaska Report thought it was of value to someone… such as current Palin supporters for example, else they’d not have bothered with it.
I love it!!! A “planted” story the the hate-mongers on the left run full throttle with, right into a 5 foot thick cement wall. Priceless!!!
Palin drives the metrosexual canyon critters crazy because she confirms their worst fears that real people live outside the northeast bubble.
TROLL ALERT
what are vivo’s chances that vivo is nothing but a troll?
One must be truly clueless to bevlieve trolls.
Hey! What was the divorce rate in 1956? Can you, idiot, compare it to 2010?
Typical troll.
My spouse would not even walk across the street if Pawlenty, Huck, Mitch or Mac was walking along by himself and no one would ever know it ever happened.
But going to a Palin rally and driving for an hour to get there? You betcha!
That’s why the trolls and the moonies drool and salivate that something, just anything, whatever just maybe stick.
Why would a liberal care if she was divorcing?
Let her divorce. Marry another chick. Have a few abortions.
I thought everything was green-lighted in leftyland.
All they want is for her to be unhappy. End of story. The rumors about her personal life seem designed to crush the notion that a woman can embrace marriage, fertility and Christianity and have it all work out as well career-wise as their own values of choice, empowerment, and ambition.
12. Now and Then:
Actually, the Palins were never actually married. There’s no marriage certificate on file. So, never married, can’t get divorced. Simple.
It’s worse than that. Palin claims to have been born in something called “Sandpoint, Idaho” in 1964 but hasn’t produced a valid birth certificate. Also, she claims something called “the University of Idaho” as her alma mater but refuses to release her transcripts.
What is she hiding?
Blarty, she’s hiding the fact that she and Tod are actually aliens from the planet (*(*&&^^%%$#@!!!!, here to study humans in preparation for that planet’s invasion of earth!
And Sarah faked giving birth to Trig—because she’s actually Trig’s father! Her husband is Trig’s mother—-that’s how reproduction works on their planet.
Trig is also the reincarnation of Jimmy Hoffa, as well as the antichrist. When you see flying saucers over Washington D.C., beware!
Soon we will all bow to our new alien overlords!
“First time I heard it was on POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites . . .”
Hey Vivo,
Politico and AOL ARE liberal sites. Get up-to-speed on this stuff and check them out.
VERY leftist, and they do NOT like Ms. Palin.
#17, Spider 79:
Why would a liberal care if she was divorcing?
I don’t think that the misnamed “liberals” care, but they think you do, therefore they jump on every single unfounded rumor, planted rumor or figment of their own imaginations and make hash of it as if it were the biggest story in the history of humankind.
It’s the same thing as Dan Rather making up the Bush national guard stories: Would the left give a rat’s ass about a military shirker? Of course not. If anything, that would be a point in a candidate’s favor in their book. But they know that people like you and me care about such things.
Yes, spider, I thought the tolerant, compassionate liberals didn’t care! Married, unmarried, what the hey? I thought they weren’t supposed to be killjoy puritan types, like those evil evangelical types.
(Would it be mean to bring up paragons of virtue such as Ted Kennedy, Gov. Spitzer, etc.? Oh, probably. Not to worry. When the space aliens take over, they’ll relieve us all of the need to think. Soylent Green, anybody?)
Her confident cheerfulness drives them absolutely nuts.
Confident cheerfulness from any conservative (Democrat, Independent or Republican) will always, guaranteed, drive the statists absolutely nuts.
Can we make confident cheerfulness one of primary policies as we retake our nation based on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America?
Let’s.drive.them.absolutely.nuts.
And while we’re doing that, DNFTT.
What’s with this VIVO guy/girl/whatever? It seems to be the first respondent to Palin posts on this site. Does not he/she have a life? Is that all they have to do, to sit around and wait for a Palin post so they can be the first with the acerbic remarks? Talk about needing a life. Maybe there is some validity to the theory the trolls are paid by the Dear Leader for denigrating comments when they apply to Sarah Palin. VIVO, it sure would be a nice change of pace if you would take the time and list the reasons why you are so fascintated with the One Term Wonder. So why don’t you get busy, Okay?
Eyes full of logs.
8. Jamie W.:
“Vivo, you’re an idiot. Many of those divorces are serial divorces” . . . like Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh with 7 marriages between them.
14. thetroll01:
“I love it!!! A “planted” story the the hate-mongers on the left run full throttle with, right into a 5 foot thick cement wall. Priceless!!!” . . . Wait a minute, I thought she wanted people to “stop making stuff up.” No?
16. cedarhill:
“But going to a Palin rally and driving for an hour to get there? You betcha!” . . . Big deal, you’d do the same to see Charlie Daniels.
22. Juvenal:
“I don’t think that the misnamed “liberals” care, but they think you do, therefore they jump on every single unfounded rumor, planted rumor or figment of their own imaginations and make hash of it as if it were the biggest story in the history of humankind.” . . . Birther much?
Folks, you gotta try a little harder. Here’s a tip-Read. Next tip-Think. Final tip-Get a job.
Project much? The only place I’ve seen a WHISPER of Caribou Barbie having marriage problems is on THIS site. Of course, you should feel free to link to this so-called wave of other media running with the story.
This reminds me of a Get Fuzzy strip the other day (my favorite comic)
Bucky: “There’s no smoke without fire, pal!”
Satchel: “It’s your burning pant! Liar!”
We will see if those who identify themselves as Republicans, who do not like what Sarah Palin has to say, if they learn from this.
If not, then they were as large a danger to the best interests of the United States, and ultimately the world, as those pointed at, in this blog entry, as becoming unglued.
For I have little sympathy for those who simply do not want to be shown they are wrong, when they are wrong.
Obviously Deep Brain Diarist hasn’t been to DU or Huff Po lately. Comment after comment gleefully delighting in her supposed marital discord. No link providedd – just look yourself.
Meanwhile, there’s always the question of Obama’s trip to Pakistan, as a young man: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/obamas-college.html
And his communist mentor: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/
1. vivo writes:
“First time I heard it was on POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites…What are her chances?”
..better than yours since she is married, has a social life (other than leafing through the lingerie pages of the Sears catalog), and does not live in her mom’s basement like you do.
The left will never stop attacking Palin. And the more they attack her, the more I love her. She absolutely drives the left crazy . . . hopefully off a cliff.
Anybody who had a hand in spreading this divorce rumor is a tool- and should be ashamed of themselves. Talk about desperate- hard watching the Dear Leader crash-n-burn, I guess.
Palin’s resignation obviously puts yet more pressure on Obama to finally get some results, as the soaring rhetoric isn’t hypnotizing the plebes like it used to. There’s another viable alternative waiting in the wings now… just as we hear the first stirrings of Obamania’s death-rattle.
Alaska was a pretty corrupt system until she stepped in. Her reforms took on entrenched politicians (inc. Republicans), a mafioso-style union boss, and Big Oil.
Wouldn’t it have been nice if Obama had been principled and brave enough to confront the corrupt Chicago Democratic Machine? Or shady political operators like Tony Rezko? Racist preachers? Instead of doing business with every last one of them?
IMO Palin could trounce him in 2012, when Americans would vote for the Gipper-in-Heels in droves- they’ll surely being looking for such an antidote to the Bolshevik con-artist who’s taken a wrecking-ball to this society.
Small wonder then that the far-left moonbats -along with Team Obama’s David Plouffe’s internet squad- are out to destroy her.
Go get em ‘Cuda- there’s a lot of us behind you.
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com
Anybody who had a hand in spreading this divorce rumor is a tool- and should be ashamed of themselves. Talk about desperate- hard watching the Dear Leader crash-n-burn, I guess.
Palin’s resignation obviously puts yet more pressure on Obama to finally get some results, as the soaring rhetoric isn’t hypnotizing the plebes like it used to. There’s another viable alternative waiting in the wings now… just as we hear the first stirrings of Obamania’s death-rattle.
Alaska was a pretty corrupt system until she stepped in. Her reforms took on entrenched politicians (inc. Republicans), a mafioso-style union boss, and Big Oil.
Wouldn’t it have been nice if Obama had been principled and brave enough to confront the corrupt Chicago Democratic Machine? Or shady political operators like Tony Rezko? Racist preachers? Instead of doing business with every last one of them?
IMO Palin could trounce him in 2012, when Americans would vote for the Gipper-in-Heels in droves- they’ll surely being looking for such an antidote to the Bolshevik con-artist who’s taken a wrecking-ball to this society.
Small wonder then that the far-left moonbats -along with Team Obama’s David Plouffe’s internet squad- are out to destroy her.
Go get em ‘Cuda- there’s a lot of us behind you.
More Palin talk = less time to talk about/notice Duh’Bama’s sinking poll numbers
More Palin talk = less time to talk about/notice Duh’Bama’s hot mess (aka health care plan)
More Palin talk = less time to talk about/notice how Duh’Bama has taken race relations backwards 20 years (at least)
More Palin talk = less time to talk about/notice how Duh’Bama forgot about the soldiers dying in Afghanistan daily
Anyone else wonder why liberals love chatting about Sarah Palin?
I’m just waiting for the libtard blogs to break the story that Palin was actually the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and manufactured the evidence that sent our troops into Iraq.
#6
FNORD
While we’re on the subject of stupidity, perhaps you can mount a defense for the Usurper-in-Chief’s second in command – the inimitable Joe “Plugs” Biden – the literal personification of stupidity. Just remember, Fnord, “you can’t fix stupid” – your boys have a lock on it !
77/88
S.M.
Not quite. Try it this way… the Left will never stop attacking Palin so long as she’s a serious threat to their power.
I like seeing the liberals squirm over Palin’s popularity. They can’t stand it! The more they insult her the more the public embraces her. Kinda like Reagan. Go ahead Libs take your shots and we will watch Sarah Barracuda knock them down! Hahahahahahahaha
Maybe yes, maybe no.
The important thing is she drives the Left NUTS.
#26 Now and Then:
I gather, by your insults and witty ripostes to points not made by posters here, that you disagree with their point of view?
Either respond to the points actually made, or accept the labels of troll and moron that you deserve with uncharacteristic grace.
Deep Brain Diarist:
“Project much? The only place I’ve seen a WHISPER of Caribou Barbie having marriage problems is on THIS site. Of course, you should feel free to link to this so-called wave of other media running with the story.”
There won’t be any links posted. There aren’t any to link to.
Any day. Another fake outrage. Ya gotta laugh that this is the best they can come up with. And by the way, Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate has surfaced. Better start faking outrage how the media is ignoring it.
Life is good watching the GOP in a free fall.
It may sound ironic but the more leftist are “attacking” S. Palin the more she is stronger.
Left is no more then “L’Auberge Rouge” with the end with their own destruction. I saw it in communist Poland in pre 1980 years. I saw empty shelves and ant American propaganda. All is in vain because people have been born with unalienable rights that no government can take away. Barak Obama is perhaps naïve little lawyer that cannot grasp and judge reality better then me with richness of experience from soviet block!
He will end up (Obama) on margin of history of total failure as Chef of State in “Atlas Shrugged” and S. Palin will in the end be victorious precisely because she have what it takes to get people motivated to work for their own benefit not Government!
Maybe Sarah Palin is divorcing, maybe she isn’t, maybe she’s really Trig’s mom, maybe she’s not. But if there’s nothing there, then why are so many people talking about it?
It would be irresponsible not to speculate.
I love how the trolls on this site are squealing about the “GOP in freefall”. The current administration is dying as well and all you are doing is fiddling while Rome burns. Some Patriots you are. do you even care that our COUNTRY is in bad shape? You know what? Don’t answer that because when the system fails, you will be the first ones lined up and shot. USEFUL IDIOTS.
Really?
Did you actually look at the links provided? Whole bunches of lnks underneath it… that’s exactly why I included it.
“Hatred of the former Alaska governor is driving the left insane.”
=
Do you think you could tell the difference?
Maybe she’s divorcing because her marriage has been so successful up until now that there’s no point finishing her term.
Peter, the sad thing is—they might actually start pushing something like that! I know she’s already been accused by one nutjob of killing Michael Jackson.
(And Paul, no, the Left at this point is totally insane.)
THIS JUST IN!
Current rumor has it that Trig Palin is—actually Sarah Palin’s dad!
You see, on the planet where the Palin family actually originated, people grow backwards, rather than fowards! The older you are, the younger you get. Therefore, sneaky Sarah faked her pregnancy, to hide the family’s extraterrestrial origin. Hey, we’re just asking (stupid) questions! Go ahead, laugh! You’ll be sorry, when Sarah invades Washington D.C., with her army of super-intelligent, combat-trained polar bears!
Remember when the leftards thought the FBI was investigating Sarah and the FBI [in an unprecedented move] actually came out in the news and flatly denied it?
Gotta love the L-Tards.
Considering the box-O’-sock-puppets for brains president+cronies currently big pimpin’ and spendin’ cheese, I don’t see how the ‘WE WON’ Dems can be throwing stones from their glass houses so willy nilly.
Remember, Barry S., an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.
So WHERE IS THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE Blarty I just know you are itching to know. No your not wonder why LOL
Eric Florack -from the Palm Treo:
There won’t be any links posted. There aren’t any to link to.
Really?
Did you actually look at the links provided?
___________________________________________________
Yes. Did you?
75% of them are wingnut sites. And of the 25% that are from lefties, none take it seriously.
I’m hoping for an entire take down of the whole anti-Palin smear and lie operation. Be sure to watch “ethicsgate” video. The dems and anti-Palin bloggers have been trying to knock it off the net for days, but it is now back on YouTube and several blogs have posted it as well. It shows the relationship between the anti-Palin bloggers, “ethics” complaint filers, and the AK dem party. From there you can trace it directly to the DNC and Howard Dean, and with enough work back to Emmanuel and Axelrod, and probably to 0bama himself. A complete take down of the operation would undoubtedly reveal money laundering, falsified documents, the whole works. It would make Watergate look like small potatoes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnyrP8qQlpU
>>First time I heard it was on POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites . . .
vivo, where you first heard it and where it first started are two different things. Find out what politico and aol’s sources were and get back to us, dahling.
Conservative1:
“I love how the trolls on this site are squealing about the “GOP in freefall”.”
That’s good because it’s true.
“The current administration is dying as well and all you are doing is fiddling while Rome burns.”
No, we are supporting our President as he tries to dig out the massive problems inherited from George Bush.
“Some Patriots you are. do you even care that our COUNTRY is in bad shape?”
It is you wingnuts that are trying to impede Obama without offering a single solution. Not one.
“You know what? Don’t answer that because when the system fails, you will be the first ones lined up and shot.”
You are a lunatic. No one in their right mind could possible even remotely consider anything this absurd.
BettyBlue at 51, I think you’re on to something. Or on something. Either way, I love it.
Blathery Blackhead:
You still here? Must have gotten your commission check from Soros in time to pay Mom the rent on the basement.
54. Pragmatist:
So WHERE IS THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE Blarty I just know you are itching to know. No your not wonder why LOL
I AM itching to know. Palin claims she was born in “Sandpoint” Idaho in 1964 but has provided no documentation. How does she expect to be president if she refuses to prove she’s a natural born citizen?
We need to get Orly “ORLY?” Taitz on this pronto.
60. geokstr:
How many times do I have to tell you: Overlord Soros does not pay by check. He pays in NAZI GOLD (aka SorosBux).
And your mom doesn’t charge me rent. Well, not in money…
Has the gravity distortion around your spin ever been measured? Thanks for providing a close look at the anti-Palin crowd. Always nice when yur opposition makes your points for you, however unwittingly.
Hey Eric, according to your bio here at PJM you’ve “spent 25 years discussing politics in online forums.”
When you started was it just you and the guys at DARPA?
Hey everyone…jharp believes the GOP is in a “freefall”! LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Talk about DENIAL! This is too good. Even with a SUPER-MAJORITY Duh-Bama can’t seem to shove through his stupid policies and it’s the GOP in a “freefall”. LOL!
Note to jharp: reality is calling.
jharp believes the GOP to be in a “freefall”! LOL!!
Apparently jharp didn’t get the message that the democrats now have a SUPER-MAJORITY in Congress and still can’t get duh-Bama’s stupid policies rammed through.
jharp: Reality is calling. It might do you some good to answer.
Blarty: Why is it that even with a SUPER-MAJORITY in Congress, the democrats can’t get their policies rammed through? Hmmm…..
To borrow a phrase from my favorite resident moonbat: The Democrats seem to be in a bit of a freefall!
Eric Florack -from the Palm Treo:
75% of them are wingnut sites. And of the 25% that are from lefties, none take it seriously.
Has the gravity distortion around your spin ever been measured? Thanks for providing a close look at the anti-Palin crowd. Always nice when yur opposition makes your points for you, however unwittingly.
____________________________________________________
I have no idea what you are talking about, Mr Wrong on Everything.
You posted. “By now you have probably seen the wave of Sarah Palin rumors in the dinosaur media and the liberal blogs’ focus on the story”
“As you may imagine, the rumor was like a dream come true for many lefty bloggers.”
And I pointed out that it was wingnut blogs who focused on the story.
And that of the few mentions from the leftists, none took it seriously. They are laughing at you.
And this is somehow spin? Take another toke on the bong.
Of course I’m onto something, Blarty!
Now, quick, go spread the news! Make sure it all gets printed on Huffington’s Toast, and that Soros hears about it!
67. AThinkingPerson:
Which is it: Obama is destroying America with his socialist policies and it’s the end of the world Henny Penny, or Obama can’t get his policies rammed down our throat despite the SUPER-MAJORITY of Democrats in Congress?
JUST TELL ME WHICH LIE TO BELIEVE
Hey, VIVO – as a poster on politico for almost a year, I can tell u that they are most CERTAINLY a left-leaning site. They regularly trash Palin and those blogs attract more comments that a nuclear attack by north korea would. There are some very SICK leftists blogging and posting there.
And for those who think the story isn’t OUT big time – this AM MSNBC ran it and Donny Douchebag says he hopes Sara does get divorced becasue he wants to date her. Schmuck.
Delia, I suspect if we try, we really could get the Left to buy into the whole, “The Palins are aliens!” conspiracy theory! Go, Leftwingers, go!
72. BettyBlue:
Delia, I suspect if we try, we really could get the Left to buy into the whole, “The Palins are aliens!” conspiracy theory!
It would explain a lot…
Fnord, please remember that it is counter productive while calling someone stupid to do it with poor spelling. I would also advise that when you wish to make such a point you provide documentation to support your assertions, for example:
The Democrats are lying to us when they say that their goal is not single payer, government controlled health care that will eliminate private options.
I present video of them contradicting this position in their own words : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbXrSK_VfME
See how that works? You get to say what is important to you and give a strong argument for your case, and I didn’t even have to resort to name calling and insults. People that read my statement will be more likely to take me seriously because it allows for open and mature debate. The only reason to do the opposite is to deteriorate any discussion to the bickering of teenage girls fighting over a boy.
Anything the Press can throw at Palin darkens in the spotlight of the corruption and lying that the Obama administration is guilty of. The cause of our mortgage meltdown has been proven that it stated under the Frank’s banking leadership. Transparency in the WH is no where to be seen. Palin represents a breath of fresh air and I don’t believe she will ride off into the sunset anytime soon. This country needs a moral individaul such as Sara palin!
Florack:
The left will never stop attacking Palin.
“Not quite. Try it this way… the Left will never stop attacking Palin so long as she’s a serious threat to their power.”
Not quite. Try it this way: The left will never stop attacking the [Palin] family unit; women [Palin] who actually have babies instead of aborting them; strong women [Palin] who are married to real men (not girlie-men); women [Palin] who have a career and take care of a family; conservative women [Palin]; and spiritual women [Palin]. Hint: all the above are serious threats to their power.
The earliest online mention of this latest falsehood was by “Gryphen” on Alaska hate blog “Immoral Minority”. He’s got a years-long record of libelous mis-truths and weaselly far left rants. He’s almost never within shouting distance of Truth. His blog name pretty much sums up him & his philosophy.
Is it just me. or are the troll on this site a lot less witty than they seem to perceive themselves?
Jharp,
I’m a lunatic? You sir are an imbecile that does not know history. How many deaths can be attributed to Socialism/Communism? You are a left wing demagogue with the same Carville talking points. Its Bush’s fault. Grow up little one. Or do you want me to rip you another one?
“POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites”
Bwa ha ha ha ha!
Love the censorship PJM.
“Wouldn’t it have been nice if Obama had been principled and brave enough to confront the corrupt Chicago Democratic Machine?”
And there is the rub and the reason for the unhinged insanity of Obama supporters toward this woman. She put the LIE to the entire Obama sham of a “Change and Hope”. That is why they absolute HATE her though most of them are too stupid to know why.
Obama has always been a go-along to get along wimp who overlooked the ugliness of Chicago’s machine in order to use it to benefit HIMSELF. You will find NO incidents in Obama’s past where he ever rocked the boat to the entrenched power. Obama is right in there with all the Blago’s and Rezko sordidness of corrupt dealings in Chicago and when caught red-handed, Obama plays the race card and walks away scot-free.
The Left is all about “Speak Truth to Power” in words only. And Palin is everything that Obama isn’t when it comes to attacking the corruption and status quo. Obama is the epitome of an insider, playing the system to get ahead. At to show it, leftards, how has all that “superior intellect” and “messiah” helped out Obama’s district in Chicago? Not so much, but at least Barry\Michelle and all the rest of the scammers living now living with him in Hyde Park made a killing. Farrakhan, Ayers, Klonsky? The residents of his district, not so much???
meanwhile, here’s a story the Left wants you to ignore: http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/04/obama-press-conference-draws-288-million-viewers.html
The are extremely less witty than they perceive themselves to be; but, then, their perception was never that great to begin with.
Meanwhile, Barack’s mom’s ‘photos’ have gotten very little ‘press’:
I say when they ratchet up the lies, then we ratchet up the truth.
Ahem.
I hit about 60 places on the Internet almost every day. I see the same thing on all of them that display political comment: the left at full volume, spewing hate and frustration at the right. It reminded me of something, and I’ve finally figured out what: the Islamists.
– Both groups consist of large numbers of people that practice their religion/politics quietly, but have a radical core that is filled with hate and loathing of anyone that isn’t in “their” group.
– Both use lies and inuendo constantly, trying to bring down anyone else that might have or gain any power against them.
– Both base their behavior on a fraud.
– Neither group would hesitate for a minute to use whatever means they may have to achieve their goal – raw power.
Hate is the common denominator among these empty, hollow quasi-men.
BTW, I’m neither a Democheat nor a Repuglycon – just an American who takes our Declaration of Independence and Constitution seriously.
And another story they’d like you to ignore: http://www.riehlworldview.com/
“Hate will make people do strange and desperate things….”
Unfortunately, the Republicans aren’t immune to this one either, as the “birther” crowd demonstrates.
I left the Republican party in ’05 – I never could be a Democrat, but I can stay independent or join the Modern Whigs unless the GOP can get past its obsession with minutiae.
Blarty@64: You do know that CompuServe has been in business for 40 years, don’t you?…
ISTR being online with them myself about 25 years ago (when we had “high-speed” 300-baud modems, and online access time was about $50 an hour)….
I truly hope 2012 Republican Primary voters don’t go to far with the whole “Enemy of my Enemy” thing. As much as Palin has been treated unfairly, she is not what either the country or the Republican Party needs.
Anyone who has seen Mike Allen from Politico that thinks he is a moderate would have to either blind/deaf or Vivo/Blarty. I look at these immature fools as commercial breaks on a NFL game. I get up and take a piss when they come on.
Dude!!!!!11 No shiite!!!11 I’m emailing all by buds now!!!!!111 I’m gunna scoop Kos and Indy and Huffpo!!!!!1111
Hey, Trouble: Have YOU seen his birth certificate? His college transcripts? (was he a foreign student?) His passport he traveled to pakistan on when Americans were banned? His selective service registration? His … on and on. NO YOU HAVEN’T becasue he’s got them ALL under lock and key. Kindly explain WHY.
Only one thing about his life is transparent – his MAMA’s birthday suit, available on atlasshrugs now. Pass it around. Any OTHER president’s mama’s been such sluts as to pose nude for a communist?
There may or may not be better people for the role, but I’m curious on what you base this statement of yours.
Pretty much garden variety trolls. Seen one, seen ‘em all.
89. Challeron:
You do know that CompuServe has been in business for 40 years, don’t you?
Did not. What was the nature of their business in 1969?
Thanks for your opinion, Dale. May I disagree? What this country MUST have NOW is a true leader who KNOWS what it’s like to be an actual real ass-busting working American because she’s been one herself (or himself if we could find an honest man). Who will stand up to the CORRUPT media, which is more like TASS than an unbiased media. Who loves the country and understands the Constitution. Who fears a higher power and does not pretend to be one themselves. Who is not afraid to call out leaders of her OWN party when they’re engaged in screwing the American people. Who will represent AMERICANS and not illegals or Europeans or Africans and not run around apologizing for America, which has saved the world more than once from itself. Get real, Dale. Only Sarah Palin fits this description. We NEED Sarah Palin. Badly.
Griffen, Jesse started this rumor. He is a male that is a kindergarten teacher’s helper part time. His blog and bragging.
http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2009/08/was-it-somethng-i-said.html#comment-form
http://web.mac.com/freeman_patrick/Trailside_Web_Site/Staff.html#6
His school and picture. He is now having 15 minutes of fame.
97. GMA:
What this country MUST have NOW is a true leader who KNOWS what it’s like to be an actual real ass-busting working American because she’s been one herself…
Yeah! Palin 2012-2014.5!
“First time I heard it was on POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites . . .”
Hmmm… is that because you spend too much time trolling, or because your comrades had already deleted their comments before you got to them?
Explain
these
jharp.
And you guys thought I was joking about the Left and Palin conspiracy fantasies! http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027110.php#respond
I’m sure tales of Palin’s intelligent attack polar bears, Palins-as-aliens and Palin as 9/11 mastermind (as well as the force behind global warming) well soon be forthcoming from the Left. Don’t touch that dial!
This is the worst trolling and thread jacking I have seen on this site. What is it? Why now? I usually enjoy the comments as much as the articles but the quality of the trolling and thread jacking is ruining this for me. Either get better at trying to disrupt conversation or try entertaining somebody other than yourself.
“Besides, who cares if she was divorcing?
50% of Americans do:
1.135 million divorces per year (1998)
2.279 million marriages per year (2004)”
A simple logical examination of your statement should show you why you’re wrong. Did the couples who married in 2004 divorce in 1998?
Here’s a left wing source that explains it a little better than I can.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/19/health/19divo.html?_r=1
Why do people respond to the trolls? They use the same names every time, so you know what they’re going to say.
Anyway: as far as hate-based conspiracy theories go, the right has nothing on the left. More Democrats believe Bush ‘knew about’ or ‘was involved with’ 9/11 than right-wingers believe Obama isn’t a citizen. And then, of course, there’s the Palin hatefest.
While we’re on the whole rumor thing, that Kenyan birth certicate you are all currently flogging . . .
• The hospital is Coast Provincial General Hospital (sometimes said to be Coast Province General Hospital), not Coast General Hospital.
• Kenya was a Dominion the date this certificate was allegedly issued and would not become a republic for 8 months.
• Mombasa belonged to Zanzibar when Obama was born, not Kenya.
• Obama’s father’s village would be nearer to Nairobi, not Mombasa.
The number 47O44– 47 is Obama’s age when he became president, followed by the letter O (not a zero) followed by 44–he is the 44th president.
• EF Lavender is a laundry detergent.
• Would a nation with a large number of Muslims actually say “Christian name” (as opposed to name) on the birth certificate?
• His father (born in 1961) would have been 24 or 25 when he was born and not 26.
• It was called the “Central Nyanza District,” not Nyanza Province. The regions were changed to provinces in 1970.
• The document is dated 5 August 1964 — a Saturday but Kenyan guvmint offices close early on Friday and are closed on Saturdays. Oooops [...]
• This piece of paper certainly looks nice and new to be 45 years old — unless the Kenyans were using acid-free paper back in 1964. Heh, heh.
• Finally, Officials of Coast Province General Hospital reported: “We do not have computerized records going back to the 1960’s and can only sort through our archives by hand,” Dr. Christopher Mwanga, an administrator at the Mombasa hospital tells GLOBE. “We have searched for all the names of babies born on Aug. 4, 1961, and have not found the name of Barack Hussein Obama. That is all I can tell you.”
Come on, this stuff just makes you look stupid, planted for your embarrassment or not. Pikers. Orly Taitz? Really? I didn’t think it was possible, but you’ve actually regressed from Jerome Corsey. I think you better put Rush back at the top of the Republican party, quickly, before he puts weight back on.
Whoa, not just major hate and major threat but major jealousy as well. As a Democrat for 25 of the last 26 years (now party unaffiliated) I can tell you first hand she scares the hell out of them. She is a vote getter and is equally threatening to fellow republicans as well as the goonbird lefties. NO ONE wants to lose their power to her and as long as she is in the postion to garner votes, she will get votes that would have otherwise gone to them.
Sorry all you nonsensical gibbering liberals, i’m niether conservative or Republican-something that has burned your fanny since the campaign-that MILLIONS of Democrats voted for palin and will do so again. But you’ll never hear that from them, just more of the “makes no sense even in a mental instituion” ridicule. Even their Alinsky riducle is pathetic and nonsensical and gets worse every day. Who needs Repubs pointing lwfty and Dems lunatic ramblings out, they shoot themselves in the foot with a howitzer whenever they post
When I get some time I’ll answer all your funny lunatic comments. See you then. Now I have to flip some hamburgers . . .
Chris Dodd…resign NOW
72. BettyBlue:
“Delia, I suspect if we try, we really could get the Left to buy into the whole, “The Palins are aliens!” conspiracy theory! Go, Leftwingers, go!”
So which are you, Betty Blue? A planter of the birther story or a victim of it? Did the mean old liberals paint right wing extremists as idiots with the “Obama is an alien” ruse and you ran with it? Cuz it’s either that or conservatives are just too ignorant or pig-headed to acknowledge all the evidence supporting his American birth (and the complete lack of evidence otherwise). No, come to think of it, it must be a liberal plant, because conservatives all cheered when Palin told themedia , “How about you just stop making stuff up.” There’s really no chance that the right wing would cheer one thing and do another. You’re not that way.
But if in the off chance you ever consider setting aside your principles to gin up some media distraction, remember to make it plausible.
Either way, it’s hard to make progress when you continually buy into blatant falsehood. You’re obstructing the one true path forward. Keep it or move over. There’s work to be done. (Honestly, sometimes I feel like I’m talking to a bunch of drunk boy scouts.)
106. AtheistConservative:
Why do people respond to the trolls? They use the same names every time, so you know what they’re going to say.
Unlike the non-trolls.
108. Shady32:
You are so right, Shady. Y’all had better hurry up and run Say-rah for something while we liberals are all so skeered. Please, please, please hurry up and run her for something. Anything.
108 shady 32 . . . Well meet a lifelong conservative who wouldn’t vote for Palin if she was running for Miss Alaska . . . again. She’s an embarrassment to informed, educated and discerning voters. Let me ask you something, do you want to win, or do you want to lead? I want conservatives to lead. Palin is not a leader. She’s a sideshow. We need real vision and strength of intellect and global respect. Palin is a simple celebrity. Think what you want, but she quit up in Alaska. Now way around it. I don’t like that in me, my kids, my co-woes, nobody. And I don’t give her a pass just because she was bored or tired or scared or whatever she was.
We gotta raise the bar, people. Employ a little more shock and awe in the form of an undeniable force of conservative nature, not a hockey mom turned soap opera celebrity. Face it, we’re gonna get creamed if we keep her out front.
So forget Palin. Let’s talk about the best, most powerful and experienced CEO statesman warrior who can set this mess right. Let’s hear some suggestions!
With types like Zaki, one wonders if it is so much hate, maybe more envy. As with most envious people, Zaki might think that except for bald, unfair luck, he too could have had Todd’s enjoyments.
oops – looks like “oh yeah” is a Mittens groupie.
it was done intentionally,with a off the cuff remark prepared.the smart people gotta be working for someone,and it’s obviously not obama.
68.jack.stick to healthcare.
107:apparatchik.it takes an article about a woman(who you hate) in order for you to regrow a pair.ya gotta love the irony.
all the rest of you tools….six months in,not looking good.your people are blowing it,at this rate the next guy/gal we elect will make mark levin and dick cheney seem like a couple of moderates.
Now and Then, remember that Kenya was a British Colony at the time, thus its official religion was Anglicanism. Besides, the verb “to christen” means “to anoint or to name.”
114:
http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/dissociative-identity-disorder-multiple-personality-disorder
just sayin’
114. oh yeah wrote:
She’s an embarrassment to informed, educated and discerning voters.
Peter asks: You mean like the 82% approval rating she had during a poll not that long ago? Those informed, educated, and discerning voters?
Are you sure its liberal bloggers crashing and burning on reporting rumors? Because from where I sit, it looks like the right wing blogs crashing and burning over the ridiculous fantasies that pass for the Republican platform–health care bill euthenasia, Birthers, and of course, the race-obsessed people who are constantly looking for ways to prove that its white people oppressed by minorities. Meanwhile, your party dwindles to a bunch of Dixiecrat survivors and 60′s Klansmen. Hurray for conservative values!
Just as a side note… I worked at a Sarah Palin rally and, although I didn’t get closer than about 20 feet, I can assure everyone that Todd Palin is much better looking in person than in a photo.
114: You can’t really be serious about global respect. HA HA funny joke! Have you looked at the upside down cake that passes for governments lately? You know you are doing right when the demons are howling, crying out for your destruction, pulling out all the stops to cut you down. One thing Sarah Palin has going for her is she makes the demons yell loudest at her. It’s fun to watch. Republicans were screwed when the NYT endorsed McCain, beware when your enemies speak well of you.
In his post #37, AThinkingPerson demonstrates that at least one other of us GETS IT.
The sail-eared-simpleton servers, ball-carriers and attack-pigs: — many of them but smelly someone’s-mother’s basement-dwelling retreads from the awful eight years of the co-serial-rapist Cli’ton Crime Family’s treasonous and recidivating rampaging through our beloved fraternal republic’s institutions, traditions, tenets, history and Foundational Law; — have yet again successfully diverted those of us upon whom depends not only our nation’s survival — but that of the very Judeo-Christian/Western/Human Civilization we have long long long vanguarded and — if it is to have even a snow-ball’s chance against the living Hell of islamafascism and its ever (il)liberal (rather, read: FasciSSocialist: — 0′Zero springs to mind, as do his ideologically-identical siblings, Stalin, Mussolini, Mao, Pol Pot and Hitler!) ally — must forever guard.
And here we are essentially but emoting and playing at the (il)liberals’ game of verbalizing our bowel burblings and confusing any of those with thought and/or the consequential farts as the expression of ideas.
Be great if all of us would step back a moment and cast our intellectual and investigative resources back to that time, just prior to the Cli’ton Crime Family’s release of everything it knew and every possible mis-and-dis-information it could create about his effing around with the help. Which Cli’ton-Crime-Family release was then, as, by Law it had to be, cataloged by the investigator and trotted up the Hill and into the dirty paws of the “Democratic” potty-activist owned, operated and controlled feral-gummint machinery which, along with every “Democrat” politician and every other of America’s enemies, subsequently celebrated the senate’s inevitable “acquittal” of the otherwise and in every other place charged, convicted, fined, disgraced, impeached and disbarred FBI-Files-owning felon, W J ‘Billy-Bubbah’ Blythe. (Cli’ton)
Who, meanwhile, (with assistance from such as the execrable CIA/FBI-wall-creating Jamie Gorelicker – who, along with the Cli’tons and with every other complicit member of that co-serial-rapist Crime Family, was only incidentally therefore responsible for the security and intelligence-gathering and coordinating failures and lapses that led inevitably to the atrocities of September 11 2001) got clear away with the massive treasonous transfer of around a Trillion Dollars worth of the America’s nuclear, military, aerospace, rocketry, air-transport and computing science, research, technology, hardware and software to America’s enemies all over the world. But especially to the self-perpetuating predatory Peking-based pack of [il]liberal, lying, looting, thieving, mass-murdering gangster basta*ds that so grandiosely calls itself “china.” And to Iran.
Lets be careful here then, that we stick with the thoughts of AThinkingPerson and with the wisdom of (ref. his #2: of a stuart williamson) and that we’re not being Lewinskeyd into playing — and/or into being played with — in a game of their choosing, by any of the dirty little trolls as might drop by to distract us. From the fact the Soros-and-other-sinister-Svengali-steered mobbed-up modified-Marxist Mussolini-modeled murtadd-Muslim empty-galabiyah glove-puppet Gang is rapidly raping, looting, pillaging and detroying America — and dooming the very Civilization we (bar for Israel and perhaps – if it ever rids itself of KRudd) single handedly sustain.
PALIN/PETRAEUS/2012!
Brian Richard Allen
Lost Angeles – Calif0bambicated 90028
And the Very Far Abroad
this far leftie (rare in a nation with no left at all, but I digress) never even heard this this so-called rumor from alaskan blogs (ALASKAN BLOGS?!!), until reading this. pssst. we dont give a flip about rightwing airheads, male or female, articulate or not. we are wondering why the wingnuts root for USA failure because of Obama trouncing McCain. we do wonder why you continually support big insurance and stiff the 45-50 millions USA citizens without health insurance. we wonder why you listen to hate radio and watch Faux News. but only a little. most of the time we are busy sifting thru the wreckage of 8 years of cheney and bush and are scared silly of the hapless demoweenie corporatists that gave up on stolen elections, impeachment, war crimes, single payor and anything else that would restore order and morals to our once proud country.
god bless ALL NATIONS, no exceptions.
OBC
Hey, Now and Then:
“The number 47O44– 47 is Obama’s age when he became president, followed by the letter O (not a zero) followed by 44–he is the 44th president.”
Louis Farrakhan? Is that you?
“His father (born in 1961) would have been 24 or 25 when he was born and not 26.”
That new math? And you’re so SURE he was EITHER 24 or 25, but definitely NOT 26? Really?
“Kenya was a Dominion the date this certificate was allegedly issued and would not become a republic for 8 months.”
Kenya gained it’s independence in Dec 1963. Do u think MAYBE they’d begin calling themselves a Republic right away? Or just keep on saying they’re British subjects out of deference?
“Dr. Christopher Mwanga, an administrator at the Mombasa hospital tells GLOBE. “We have searched for all the names of babies born on Aug. 4, 1961, and have not found the name of Barack Hussein Obama. That is all I can tell you.”
Well then perhaps the good doctor should have searched for the name “Barack Hussein II” which is the name on the certificate??? Maybe in that case he could tell u something different? Just sayin…
I do wonder why so many people are focussed on Sarah Palin.
Obama trolls… I mean voters… what exactly is it that you are so proud of now? What is it that makes you say every day “I’m so glad I voted for Obama”? Really, this is no joke. Can you please list and cite, that is, if you actually have the time to post? What has he done to make you so overwhelmingly proud?
Or, is it that you are trying to hide behind Palin?
The liberals in congress are looking like a bunch of morons who are running around trying to push their socialized medicine on the people. They are catching hell. It’s funny to watch. Obama is horrible for our country! Those of you who voted for him really screwed all of us. Didn’t you pay attention to his previous statements before you voted for him? Or are you just a racist who thought that having a black president would make the world a better place? You should’ve checked his resume, no matter what his race…it’s a shame, I always thought the first black president was going to be a really smart man! Thanks for screwing up our country!
“60′s klansmen”??? Funny, I could’ve sworn Robert Byrd was a Democrat.
125.obc.WE wonder how you can be so soft and squishy.every time one of your kind procreates, you’re proving darwin wrong.
I have a theory why the Dems really hate Sara. She’s kryptonite to the Dems and their dreams. Here is a woman who doesn’t have a butt the size of an NFL interior lineman, does not have charging rhino legs in a pink suit, who is a pleasure to look at for an extended period of time, and who got where she is w/o affirmative action or marriage to a U.S. President. I love it when the Dems say she is not qualified to by President. How come they never bring up qualifications when they talk about Obama/s lackluster qualifications?
yawn… lame comments
yawn ….libtards
whether Palin runs or not… what ever she does, there will be a lot of lefties gone and out of a job! Write this date down.
I’m not a birther, Now and Then; I neither planted that story, nor am I a victim of it.
I am, however, interested in seeing what new, demented theory the Left is going to come up with about Palin, and how long they’ll keep it up, or if they’ll keep it up until they’ve lost all credibility completely, and everyone is laughing at them.
Actually, my sources tell me that Palin is actually responsible for killing off the dinosaurs! It’s true! This is a secret, but very reliable source who works in an Alaskan pawn shop, who claims Palin used a time machine she obtained from her son (actually her father, as I explain earlier) Trig, to go back in time and hunt all those poor dinosaurs to extinction!
(That was a joke, son! Really, I feel like I’m talking to a bunch of drunken lizard-aliens sometimes!)
And I firmly believe that my mock theories are as credible (well, almost) as most of the nonsense being burbled about Palin by the Left!
If the left is the political philosophy of tolerance, it surely is also the philosophy of hypocrisy.
7. Formwiz, 8. Jamie W.:
“Around 90% of all first-time marriages succeed, according to the US Census. What skews the percent is the 3- and 4- and 5- (even 9-) time losers who never learn from their mistakes.”
You mean that 10% of the marriages generate 50% of divorces? Your math doesn’t make sense. I just checked the US Census data and it approximates the 50% figure. Remember, a divorce is a divorce regardless of the # of previous marriages. Don’t worry, we all learn something every day.
9. b rahem:
The first time I saw the news I knew it wasn’t true. But, like I said, I don’t care if she’s married, divorced or whatever. I don’t agree in peeking on public figures private life.
16. cedarhill:
“Hey! What was the divorce rate in 1956? Can you, idiot, compare it to 2010 (sic)?”
Of course you can’t compare 1956 with 2009. I didn’t say anything like this. I don’t know where you’re coming from. I didn’t want to say this, but you really sound like an idiot.
33. Войска ПВО: get out much?
“leafing through the lingerie pages of the Sears catalog”
Since they quit printing them in 1993 I’m gonna guess YOU’RE the one in yo mama’s basement!
34. Chuck:
“The left will never stop attacking Palin. And the more they attack her, the more I love her. She absolutely drives the left crazy . . . hopefully off a cliff.”"other than leafing through the lingerie pages of the Sears catalog”
The right will never stop attacking Obama. And the more they attack him, the more I love him. He absolutely drives the right crazy . . . hopefully off a cliff.”
EVEN STEVEN!
In his post #129, Big Red says: ‘Sixties’ klansmen???” Funny, I could have sworn Robert Byrd (is) a “Democrat.”‘
Every KKKlansman was/is a “Democrat.” The Ku Klux Klan is but one of the murderous tools created along the way by the vast criminal enterprises that both comprise today and are the ancestors of the fascistic manifestation of evil we call the “Democratic” potty.
B A – L A – CA – and very Far Away
In her spew #137, “Melissa” tries to draw a moral equivalence between the lunatic Left’s fanatically froth-and-foam-flecked mendacious mouthings-off and every imaginable libel, slander and futile attempt to procure the malicious prosecution and/or ceaseless persecution of former governor Palin and that those of us who love America simply report on the sail eared simpleton’s fascistic desruction of everything that makes America the greatest nation — by FAR — there has ever been or will ever be.
But the difference is that everything the FasciSSocialist Psychosis sufferers have to say about Ms Palin is pure Goebbelsesque mis-and-dis-information. Every word based in fraud, falsehood and lies. And it’s that projection of the deranged Left’s driving psychopathology that both pisses us off — and drives us to circle the wagons around United States of America’s President and Armed-Forces Commander-In-Chief, Elect, Sarah Palin.
Whereas — to get the whole Left (with those of its lock-stepping Goebbelsesque propagandists and pamphleteers that pose as “The Press,” leading the way) to jump ‘collective-istly’ out of its bloody tree — all we have to do is tell the Truth about the life-long Nazi-collaborator Soros and/or other sinister-Svengali-steered empty-galabiya glove-puppet, that moronic marijuana-mumbling mobbed-up Mussolini-modeled modified Marxist murtadd-Muslim mother’s boy, 0′Zero!
The Left will never stop attacking United States of America’s President and Armed-Forces Commander-In-Chief, Elect, Sarah Palin and/or attacking America’s Vice-President, Elect, Petraeus. And the more it attacks them, the more we all love them. And would that our love and support would absolutely drive the Left crazy. To the degree that the whole shower would go jump off cliffs.
But it’s too late.
For, to be OF the Left is to be already — and definitively — rock-ape crazy.
PALIN/PETRAEUS/2012!
B A – L A – CA — and the Far Away
21. Sapwolf:
“First time I heard it was on POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites . . .
Hey Vivo,
Politico and AOL ARE liberal sites. Get up-to-speed on this stuff and check them out.”
I concede that Politico is a mixed bag with a conservative inclination, maybe most of the cartoons are pretty liberal, but they show reality pretty well.
AOL is pretty neutral, and the posters are not only conservative but crazed rednecks who can’t type or write well. I don’t go there anymore.
57. arhooley:
“First time I heard it was on POLITICO & AOL, not liberal sites . . .
vivo, where you first heard it and where it first started are two different things. Find out what politico and aol’s sources were and get back to us, dahling.”
You’re right, that’s why I wrote ‘First time I heard it’. And I didn’t believe the rumor either.
25. PoWhiteTrash:
“It seems to be the first respondent to Palin posts on this site.”
Hasn’t it occurred to you that it’s a coincidence? Some of my hours coincide with the release of new posts. No conspiracies here.
137. Melissa wrote:
The right will never stop attacking Obama. And the more they attack him, the more I love him.
Peter asks: Right. So how’s that hopey-changy working out for you?
Vivo, You ought to quit claiming to be an expert on divorce and things related to marriage. Hanging out with your blowup doll in mom’s basement doesn’t qualify you.
120. Peter the Bubblehead:
“You mean like the 82% approval rating she had during a poll not that long ago? Those informed, educated, and discerning voters?”
Not long ago? But those ratings have dropped 40 points since then. Today her disapproval numbers are higher than her approval numbers. Why is that? Simple, the people of Alaska became informed, educated and discerning about this charade called Palin.
Next.
Hey, vivo, keep up the good work. These Magoos here couldn’t see a piece of truth if it was hanging off their eyelashes. “Mom’s basement?” Wow, good one, trangbang68. By the way, is that the name of the Vietnamese hooker you married back in Saigon? (See, humor isn’t that difficult if you know what you’re doing.)
131. clay b: “I have a theory why the Dems really hate Sara. She’s kryptonite to the Dems and their dreams. Here is a woman who doesn’t have a butt the size of an NFL interior lineman, does not have charging rhino legs in a pink suit, who is a pleasure to look at for an extended period of time, and who got where she is w/o affirmative action or marriage to a U.S. President. “
I’ll be the first to say that First Lady Michelle Obama is far and away light years more attractive than Sarah Palin for a whole host of reasons. The First Lady is more fit, more intelligent, is literate, has advanced degrees, doesn’t sound like an extra from Fargo has more style, is a better mother, is more eloquent, doesn’t embarrass herself every time she opens her mouth, and is not a quitter. Plus there’s that whole thing First Lady thing – very attractive. And in reference to your infantile comment regarding NFL interior lineman, a lot of gentlemen prefer a bit of curvature in terms of bodily proportions, and in that department the First Lady wins out.
What’s so attractive about an unemployed quitter who spends her time blaming everyone else and the media for her own shortcomings? Not very attractive qualities to me.
The trolls are starting to sound desperate.
now and then some fool….oh never mind. graham I believe the pink suit, rhino legs and being married to a president was a reference to Mrs. Clinton. If you find her more attractive than Sarah Palin; you have serious issues.
The looks things is a factor with Palin’s tormentors in Alaska. Many of the lies ,slanders and false ethics complaints originated with a fat moose cow who is self proclaimed Celtic Diva and another ugly hag named Shannyn Moore. They are ugly enough to stop the midnight sun from shining.
Of course the one who has obsessed with the Trig’s birth rumors is Andrew Sullivan who is a little confused about sexual matters.
What was that ,now and then, about your mom working on To Do Street in Saigon? Oh ,I’m sorry that’s Ho Chi Minh City to you commies, isn’t it?
147 trangbang68
So, it’s To Do Street where the hookers hang out, is it? I had no idea. Thanks for clearing that up for us. I’ll defer to your expertise on that one. And congratulations, I hear you finally got the darn thing to stop dripping.
And, as the Left continues to obsess over Sarah Palin. . . http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/News/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=625
I could understand your mom not sharing her sordid stories with you, I guess. What’s dripping, Obama’s poll numbers or the collective national i.q. because of ignorant trolls like you? Sorry, I have to go to work. Enjoy living on the government nickel.
trangbang68, yes, the obsession about Palin’s appearance; her attractiveness, or lack thereof, is instructive. A.) Who’se prettier than who, or is Michelle more attractive than Sarah, or is Hilary more attractive, or less, than either of them. . . this is not the stuff of serious debate.
And B.) I thought the Left was all in favor of not objectifying women, or judging people by their looks.
The whole thing feels creepy. Yes, I have seen pictures of the Celtic Diva/fat moose cow, and I know about Sullivan’s “confusion”; I suspect a large part of PDS (Palin Derangement Syndrome) has to do with some strange people trying to work out their strange inner demons, by projecting said demons onto Palin (and conservatives in general). Ditto for hate the same sort of people feel for Trig Palin.
As I said. . . creepy.
149 Betty Blue . . . What’s this? Politicians wielding power and influencing other politicians? I’m shocked. Thank god we have Republicans to call this outrageous and unprecedented behavior to our attention. I hear Karl Rove is speaking about this tonight on Hannity. We can count on him to give us the true poop on the situation status-wise. Long live Turd Blossom.
I’m beginning to wonder if all the Palin stuff isn’t also partly motivated by the desire to distract us from things like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8UjY3YDlwA
Hey, Graham L(oser):
Michelle O more attractive than Sarah Palin? BooooHAHAAHA. Yeah, right. Whoopi Goldberg too, eh? Don’t forget Janeane Garafalo and Hillary. Yeah, you Dims got the market cornered on good lookin women all right.
Michelle’ hips are so wide, she could birth a water buffalo for goodness sake. Get your eyes checked.
Hmmm, speaking of strange people. . . what about that chameleon, womanly-woman, who’se published Shanynn moore (and other strange things) on her website? http://www.tnr.com/story_print.html?id=ce686bd3-233a-44a2-bdd4-ee3d879a1967
The trolls need to MoveOn.
154 Betty Blue . . . The Palin stuff is concocted by the right wing media establishment in order to make liberals look mean, just like the birther stuff is concocted by the left wing media machine to make conservatives look brain dead.
I guess we’re even.
And one more thing you’d think the Left would be more worried about than the Palins’ marriage, Sarah’s appearance or Trig’s birth certificate: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/31/obama-congress-working-more-cash-clunkers/
154 . . . It’s not just conservative women who are more attractive, it’s conservative men, too – John Boehner and his perma-tan, Eric Cantor’s stunning crow-like visage, and of course the epitome of conservative masculinity, Ann Coulter.
Even? We’re not even close.
But keep the Palin conspiracy theories coming, please! The more ridiculous, the better!
Though I’m surprised the Left has the time, and energy, to obsess over Palin, when stuff like this is going on: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/25765.html
I suspect a large part of ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome) has to do with some strange people trying to work out their strange inner demons, by projecting said demons onto Barack Obama (and liberals in general). Ditto for hate the same sort of people feel for Michelle Obama.
As I said. . . creepy.
158 . . . Quoting the Moonies now? Talk about desperate.
Indeed, the trolls need to MoveOn.
I think that ol’ Alinksy manual’s broken.
143. Now and Then wrote:
Today her disapproval numbers are higher than her approval numbers. Why is that? Simple, the people of Alaska became informed, educated and discerning about this charade called Palin. Next.
Peter writes: Most recent available poll numbers (June 2009) list Palin’s approval rating at 56% versus 35% disapproval. (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/071709morning-fix-winners-and.html#more)
Bet your The Won wishes his rating were so high!
Oh, and try and use actual facts when you try and make an arguement. You and the rest of your libtards only make yourselves look worse when you try to pass off your personal opinion as fact, especially when it is so easily disprovable using the internet.
Hey, Now and Then:
Alaskans are no less susceptible to the Goebbels-type propaganda that the left and their complicit media spout than was the American electorate last Nov. “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.” Alinsky + Goebbels = Modern American left AND unfortunately the media.
We MUST regain an UNBIASED media or we are sunk. We cannot fight the lies of the left if CNN, ABC, CBS and especially NBC merely regurgitates the LIES. Even FOX news many times edits out important news, though they seldom repeat the lies without context.
The media is the key. See howobamagotelected.com for a documentary which exposes the unbelievable lies of the left last year. It’s frightening.
165: PtB
Geez, again with the “actual facts” canard! Here you go, from YOUR source, Friday, July 24, 2009. (I think July comes after June, doesn’t it?)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/23/AR2009072303799.html
You and the rest of you birthers only make yourselves look worse when you try to pass off your personal opinion as fact, especially when it is so easily disprovable using the internet. It’s not a big truck you know. It’s a series of tubes. (More Alaskan insight for ya, free of charge.)
Next.
Look you make the sample unrepresentative, of any likely result, in the real world, of course
you distort the outcome, Rasmussen was the closest in state, and specially national polls
last year. PPP was off by 15-20 points in that state, last time around. MSNBC was possibly the worst sample possible
Like every woman who stayed out of Ted Kennedy’s Oldsmobile, Sarah Palin can live the life she chooses.
Hey Eric, according to your bio here at PJM you’ve “spent 25 years discussing politics in online forums.”
When you started was it just you and the guys at DARPA?
ARPAnet goes back a LONG ways. My first uses of it (quite unauthorized) were in the early 1970s. I’ve been upsetting leftists on the Internet since the mid-1980s. I’m not surprised that there are others who have done so.
167. Now and Then wrote:
You and the rest of you birthers…
Peter writes: Please show me ONE SINGLE COMMENT I have made regarding the so-called birth certificate issue.
You, like the rest of your libtard bretheren, are projecting and sidestepping issues by taking discussions completely off topic.
And while July indeed comes after June (though I’m sure I could find some libtard that would argue that point simply because a conservative said it) that doesn’t negate the fact that the most recent poll I COULD FIND was June.
170. Clayton E. Cramer:
That’s extremely interesting. Really.
I amend my earlier rhetorical question to include not only the guys at DARPA but also high school D&Ders with indulgent parents.
Hey Now and Cheat;
I was almost ready to concede your point until I re-read your cited article..
You IDIOT! That article says “Overall, the new poll found that 53 percent of Americans view Palin negatively and 40 percent see her in positive terms”
Who cares what AMERICANS say in a July poll. Most of the people polled had a negative opinion because they believed she should CONTINUE AS GOVERNOR!
I said she had high approval ratings in ALASKA. You know, the state where she was ACTUALLY THE GOVERNOR! The state where it actually MATTERED who liked her and who didn’t. The state where her approval rating STILL CONTINUES to remain HIGH!
As usual, the libtards try and change the rules of the game when they realize they are losing!
173.peter the bubble head.don’t bother trying to argue facts with these third stringers(all the “true believers” left months ago),they enjoy lying.
since you were in the military,i assume you are familiar with a ‘speed bag’(used for boxing)….just apply the same prinicple to these drones.
Peter, Oh, yeah, they’re trying to change the rules of the game, switching the discussion to “birthers” when nobody here—except them—was talking about it.
Considering all the real stuff they do have to worry about, I honestly don’t blame them for waiting to change the subject, and/or continuing their obsession with Palin.
173 PtB
“Who cares what AMERICANS say in a July poll.”
I think that pretty much sums up your attitude.
But I’ll play. Keep your hands up, here goes:
After her resignation from office, a plurality of Alaskans now have a negative view of Sarah Palin, according to a Hays Research Group poll conducted July 29-30. (Hat tip: Political Wire.) In the poll, 48% see her negatively, versus 47% who view her positively.
Here’s the link:
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/07/31/2016643.aspx
As you can see, I prefer the heavy bag.
I suggest you stick with analyzing Kenyan birth certificates. Moving on.
176. Now and Then wrote:
I suggest you stick with analyzing Kenyan birth certificates. Moving on.
Peter writes: And once again NaT tries to change the subject. Notice its the libtards who keep bringing up the birth certificate lately? Project much?
And might I add, just for the pleasure of it, that no matter how low Palin’s polls may be right now, they’re STILL higher than The Won’s!
Bambi WISHES his polls were as high as Palin’s!
176.
http://www.haysresearch.com/about.htm
“Our respected research has been featured in many national publications including:
The New York Times
The Daily Kos
The Washington Post
CBS News
Congressional Quarterly
Talking Points Memo
The Politico
Hays Research Group is a member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, the American Marketing Association Alaska Chapter, and the American Sociological Association”
“As you can see, I prefer the heavy bag”
no,that was COLOSTOMY bag and fortunatly for us,you cannot punch very hard-it would have made a big mess.
previous hay’s research results:
http://www.haysresearch.com/results.htm
1. VIVO
Uh, it doesn’t matter where YOU first heard about the info, it matters where it first came out and who was using what site as a source. “Liberal sites” is entirely accurate.
Not to mention that #4 is also right, those sites you mentioned ARE liberal sites.
178. Peter the Bubblehead:
And might I add, just for the pleasure of it, that no matter how low Palin’s polls may be right now, they’re STILL higher than The Won’s!
How many divisions have the polls?
Peter, they might be bringing up the birth certificate to prevent themselves from thinking about this: http://www.kansascity.com/273/story/1360302.html
177 and 178 PtB
“And once again NaT tries to change the subject.”
The subject is Palin’s popularity in the polls, at least it was until you got your weenus knocked in the dirt. That’s OK, you’ve been wrong before, I’m sure you’ll be wrong again.
Case in point: you offer “no matter how low Palin’s polls may be right now, they’re STILL higher than The Won’s!”
OK, two things, not to pick on you, but first, you at least had the guts to admit you’re wrong about Palin’s poll numbers (you can thank me later). Second, you say her numbers are still higher than Obama’s.
Really? Let’s see: Palin negative 48% positive 47%. Obama positive 56.4 %, negative 38.1 %.
My last bit of friendly advice, Peter von Bubblehead, you’re not very good at this. You might want to focus your commentary on, I don’t know, hunting wolves from helicopters or something.
Buena suerte, mi amigo.
betty blue.thanks for the link….a moment of mirth?
” He is less popular than both Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush were at the same period — and they both lost their bids for a second term.”
heh.
183. Now and Then wrote:
The subject is Palin’s popularity in the polls
Peter asks: Then why do you keep bringing the birth certificate back up?
Idiot libtard.
To BettyBlue @ #182:
Yes, I believe you are correct.
Frank, glad you liked the link—and Peter, yes, the birth certificate, Palin’s popularity, or lack thereof, and all the rest, are distractions, or, as Oz, the Great and Terrible, said, “PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!”
185 PtB
Reduced to name calling. So much passion, so little truth. That’s a bad combo.
Any liberal blogger who attacks Palin now should be ashamed of himself. Save it for 2012. A Republican candidate like Palin is worth her weight in gold — to the Democrats.
SP is doing that well in the polls after a year-long mugging by the Dems and their lackeys? Excellent! Wait until she starts to hit back!
Her lawyer says that she intends to sue the blogger for libel for this comment. With his past record regarding her (he started the Trig rumor), she could win. That’ll put the craven hack out of business. He’ll be the first of many dead bodies as she clears her name. It’ll be just like the many dead bodies she left on the AK political landscape.
187. Now and Then wrote:
Reduced to name calling.
Peter writes: You’re right. I apologize for the name calling. Doesn’t negate the fact that you are constantly trying to change the topic and are the first to bring up the birth certificate issue as soon as you realize your so-called facts are merely illusions of your own opinion and don’t stand up to the light of day.
Peter, Peter, Peter, fasten your seat belt. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
It’s your facts that didn’t stand up, remember. That’s when you devolved into Mark Levin-like name calling, because your facts were shown to be wrong. I cited the evidence. You couldn’t refute it. So I’m an idiot libtard. It’s a pathetic and transparent bit of amateurish technique, just like trying to characterize the craziness of the birthers as some nefarious liberal plot to make you all look insane. But since you brought it up, again, and just in case the relentless cries of birth-certificate outrage on this very site over the past few months weren’t enough proof, here’s what you cretins look like to the rest of America.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/04/whos-crazier-orly-taitz-o_n_251270.html
I suggest you and Betty and Frank keep giggling about colostomy bags and leave geopolitics to us adults.
189. Marc Malone:
Her lawyer says that she intends to sue the blogger for libel for this comment.
I hope her lawyer advises her that suing someone for publishing a divorce rumor about a public figure would be foolish. Otherwise she needs to find a new lawyer.
Also, if she won, what do you think would happen to all the websites – this one included – that have published innuendo about Obama and other Democrats? Be careful what you wish for.
191. Now and Then wrote:
It’s your facts that didn’t stand up, remember.
Peter writes: MY facts held up perfectly well, since I was stating ALASKA POLLS. Not NATIONAL polls. Not polls of DEMOCRATS in Cambridge, MA. Not polls of likely voters under the age of 16 in Los Angeles. ALASKA POLLS. The only ones that count when it comes to evaluating the popularity of Palin as Governor of ALASKA!
And I remind you, it is YOU, not me, not anyone else on the conservative side, but YOU who keeps bringing up the birth certificate issue, which tells me it is YOU that is is bothering and eating up inside.
So while you’re at it, why don’t you go try looking up The Won’s school records, college thesis, Haavaaahd Law Review publications, financial aid applications and everything else that any other NORMAL politician would be all too happy to release to the public looking to evaluate their qualifications for office, but which The Won continues to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep hidden under lock and key.
191.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fact
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/opinion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/geopolitic
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adult
and most importantly……………….
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
193 PtB . . . your delusional denials know no bounds.
Easy enough . . . I refer all to 176 and 183 . . . and 191 just for fun
Face it, you got shredded by this idiot libtard. As for Obama’s records, I suggest you start the rumor that he didn’t actually graduate from Harvard. That will keep you and Orly Taitz busy until you start to look even more unhinged, at which point you can claim it’s another liberal manipulation. You must get dizzy circling that drain all day long.
193. Peter the Bubblehead:
Have you called the library at Columbia and asked to see Obama’s thesis?
Have you gone to a law library and looked through the Harvard Law Review for the years Obama was editor? (For that matter, do you know what “editor” means?)
Can you name a single politician who has released his/her “school records” and financial aid application?
blarty.”Can you name a single politician who has released his/her “school records” and financial aid application?”
looked and looked and couldn’t find any…hmmmm.i did find this though:
“McCain attended the U.S. Naval Academy from 1954 to 1958, and was commissioned as an ensign in June of that year. He retired in April 1981 with the rank of captain. In that time he received 17 awards and decorations. Besides the Silver Star Medal, McCain also received the Legion of Merit with a combat “V” and one gold star, a Distinguished Flying Cross and a Bronze Star Medal with a combat “V” and two gold stars.”
but we already knew that,didn’t we?
197. frank grimes:
So what? McCain deserves what because of that?
198.confused much?barty posed a question,i looked it up(curious me),and could not find the records…….on any of them.
the only information available of any REAL merit was on mccain.
and to answer your second question: our gratitude and respect.
199 . . . “our gratitude and respect”
No problem. He’s got that. And just so you know, he graduated 3rd from the bottom of his class at Annapolis.
This is SO not over. Now that ‘Gryphen’ has been outed, the pot is just starting to boil. The more that leaks out about the now EX-employee of the Anchorage School District, the better it gets. Visit Dan Riehl’s blog for the lowdown.
The libtards responsible for attacks on Sarah Palin and her family members, including her children, are about to experience a living hell themselves.
And frankly, it’s LONG overdue. Always makes me wonder if the libtards mothers know just how wicked their children really are.
Honestly, Peter, I think the Left would rather pretend to be worried about the birth certificate—than have to actually worry about this! http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/08/05/white-house-actions-might-be-illegal/
#192 Blarty – Actually, she has a decent chance of success, because it falls under malicious harassment. He alleges to have a source close to the Palin’s. The civil suit will force it out (no press immunity for libel). If there is no source, then his goose is cooked.
The reason more celebs do not sue for libel is that our courts treat the defendants as the victims, rather than the aggressors they are. It essentially gives them a license to look into the plaintiff’s life. Palin, however, has been thoroughly scrutinized. She has nothing to hide.
200.oh,so you could find them….what about biden and palin?
just wondering,do you still stand by the notion that barak obama is more qualified to be the CIC than mcain?VP’s aside.
202. BettyBlue wrote:
Honestly, Peter, I think the Left would rather pretend to be worried about the birth certificate—than have to actually worry about this! http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/08/05/white-house-actions-might-be-illegal/
Peter writes: Does anyone else think it’s funny (in a not-so-humorous way) that in only seven months The Won does just about everything the Libs accused Bush of trying to do for eight years?
Yes, I do find it humorous—very dark humor.
203. Marc malone:
“Malicious harassment”? I’m not aware of that term in this context – do you have a definition from an Alaska statute or case law?
Also, she’d have to demonstrate harm. That would be hard to do when the defense could round up hundreds of blog posts saying “the more they attack Sarah, the more we love her.”
197. frank grimes:
blarty.”Can you name a single politician who has released his/her “school records” and financial aid application?”
looked and looked and couldn’t find any…hmmmm.i did find this though:
“McCain attended the U.S. Naval Academy from 1954 to 1958, and was commissioned as an ensign in June of that year. He retired in April 1981 with the rank of captain. In that time he received 17 awards and decorations. Besides the Silver Star Medal, McCain also received the Legion of Merit with a combat “V” and one gold star, a Distinguished Flying Cross and a Bronze Star Medal with a combat “V” and two gold stars.”
but we already knew that,didn’t we?
We sure did (although you left out the five planes he crashed, and how he divorced his first wife after she was disfigured so that he could marry the rich heiress he was having an affair with).
We also have that same level of detail on Obama.
Thanks for admitting that “school records” and financial aid applications are irrelevant. Please inform your fellow travelers.
206.betty blue”Yes, I do find it humorous—very dark humor.”
“gallows” humor?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20339.html
““You’re sitting here. And you’re— you are laughing. You are laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, ‘I mean, he’s sitting there just making jokes about money—’ How do you deal with— I mean: explain. . .” Kroft asked at one point.
“Are you punch-drunk?” Kroft said.
“No, no. There’s gotta be a little gallows humor to get you through the day,” Obama said, with a laugh.”
blarty”Thanks for admitting that “school records” and financial aid applications are irrelevant. Please inform your fellow travelers.”
i guess you do possess the imagination to derive that conclusion from my earlier statments,but i said no such thing.let’s keep this friendly-don’t put words in my mouth.
209. frank grimes:
blarty”Thanks for admitting that “school records” and financial aid applications are irrelevant. Please inform your fellow travelers.”
i guess you do possess the imagination to derive that conclusion from my earlier statments,but i said no such thing.let’s keep this friendly-don’t put words in my mouth.
I’m sorry. I thought it was a safe assumption since your own research proved that we knew no more about McCain than we knew about Obama. So are you saying McCain was not properly vetted?
blarty.” I thought it was a safe assumption since your own research proved that we knew no more about McCain than we knew about Obama”
you’re to smart to believe that…..i call you on your BS.what we know about obmama is what he wants us to know.
mccain on the other hand,has a lifetime of public service,easily obtainable information.your man has two autobiographies,the most liberal voting record among his peers and a hell of alot of “present” votes for his short stint as senator….not alot to go on.
i guess that’s where the “hope” comes in,an essential component of any religion or cult.
211. frank grimes:
What relevant facts do you have about McCain, but lack about Obama?
This is old OLD news. It was big on the Fascist blogosphere before the election
212.blarty.wandering around alittle bit…let me straighten you out.
your comment:I thought it was a safe assumption since your own research proved that we knew no more about McCain than we knew about Obama”
i stated clearly:schoolrecords.
and then replied:
“mccain on the other hand,has a lifetime of public service,easily obtainable information.your man has two autobiographies,the most liberal voting record among his peers and a hell of alot of “present” votes for his short stint as senator….[not alot to go on]“.emph. mine.
your reply:
“What relevant facts do you have about McCain,but lack about Obama?”
it depends on what you consider ‘relevant’,but my point was:mccain is way more qualified to be CIC than obama.see above.
and yes,i was inferring your man is devoutly controlling his own narritive,which he clearly is.
understand now?
i stated clearly:schoolrecords.
We have McCain’s school records? Could you point me to them? Thanks.
all right,rainman…go play “who’s on first?”with someone else.
Okay Frank, I understand. You feel that Obama was obligated to provide more information than McCain was.
I’d ask you to explain why you think that but I’m afraid you’d try to tell me.
And the crazy Palin conspiracies just keep on coming! You cannot make this stuff up! (And the gallows humor gets ever more grim!) http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2009/08/06/matthews-sarah-palin-poster-girl-racism
Hi guys and gals, I’m Tom! I finanaly found this site,it’s helpful.