Here’s Rush Limbaugh from November 4:
I mean that’s probably what they’re thinking today on our side, “Yeah, you see, Reagan conservatives can’t win in New York. We need Chris Shays-type guys. We need moderates like David Brooks-kind of Republicans to win.” … See, this is the dirty little secret: If the party had gotten behind Hoffman from the beginning, he would have won going away. I have no doubt about that. I’ll tell you something else. People are now talking about Hoffman’s lack of charisma and familiarity with local issues. The huge story of New York-23 is the shambles the Republican Party made of it. They nominated a horrendous candidate: A liberal Republican. She was far more liberal than this Owens guy, who ended up winning.
I’ve become more than a little bit tired of the disingenuous argument that conservatives can’t win elections. Had the Republicans actually gotten behind the conservative — in this case, Hoffman — he would have won, as Rush says, going away. There’s no question in my mind about that. The fact of the matter is that they tried to define themselves as Democrat-lite with Scozzafava, and that nonsense never works, particularly in a district like NY-23.
I live about three hours from NY-23. One point that you have to understand about that district is that the people there are as a rule conservative and independent-minded folks.
Residents in the district recognized that who the Republican Party presented to them as being one of their own — Scozzafava — was nothing of the sort. The conservative Doug Hoffman filled that role better.
Hoffman managed to pull within the margin of error while running against the full weight of both parties. So don’t tell me conservatives can’t be elected with the proper support.
There is a major disconnect between the Republican establishment and the Republican rank and file that the former has yet to get their head around. They do not understand conservatives. They want nothing to do with conservatives. They view them as a roadblock to power. That, too, is key to understanding my anger here. They have long since made the transition, as Reagan once put it, from being part of the solution to being part of the problem.
The Democrats have a serious loser on their hands today and they’re just getting around to understanding what a boat anchor they’ve tied themselves to. Now is the time to move real conservatives into positions of power. Now is the time to show the kind of recovery and the kind of growth that will occur when conservatives are in charge and government is diminished. But that’s not going to happen unless and until the party stands up for real conservatives and gets behind them. That doesn’t mean offering the same old faces that got us into this mess.
Want to know why Doug Hoffman got so close to taking that seat? The endorsement of Sarah Palin. You may remember that the Republican establishment isn’t too happy about her either.
As another parallel, I offer the vote in Maine over gay marriage. I recently noted Michael Steele defending Olympia Snowe for being a liberal. He said, “Well, she works in Maine, after all.” The rejection of gay marriage in Maine makes me wonder about Steele’s perceptions about the politics in that state.
Ask yourself if Olympia Snowe would have voted against homosexual marriage in Maine. If not, there’s your separation and ample evidence that Steele knows little to nothing of what he’s talking about. It goes a long way toward explaining why we’ve got such disconnects in the rest of the country as well, including in NY-23.
I have a message for Michael Steele and for Brian Walsh at the National Republican Congressional Committee. Start offering up conservatives and we will take you seriously. Until that happens, don’t ask me for money or support. You won’t get it.
It’s time to return the Republican Party to conservative values and to people who are more committed to the conservative cause. The rank and file of the party has always been there and recognize this.
Why doesn’t the Republican leadership?