Get PJ Media on your Apple

Justice Dept. Still Under Pressure for Answers About Swartz Prosecution

Issa: "Ultimately, trusting a government is inconsistent with our founding words, 'We the people.' Aaron understood that."

by
Rodrigo Sermeño

Bio

February 17, 2013 - 2:06 pm
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Several journalists, influential activists, and members of Congress attended the event in the Cannon House Office Building on Feb. 4. Among the lawmakers were Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Darrell Issa (R-Calif,), and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who all support a bill that would amend the CFAA.

Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, mentioned at the memorial how he and Swartz would have found themselves at odds with many decisions, yet they would still find common ground on their belief that information is a human right.

“’Stick it to the man,’ something from my generation, resonates with everyone here tonight,” Issa said. “Ultimately, trusting a government is inconsistent with our founding words, ‘We the people.’ Aaron understood that. … Our copyright laws were created for the purpose of promoting useful works, not hiding them. Our government, and every asset of the government, belongs to the American people. Not one piece of federal land is off your ability to walk through at your pleasure, unless there’s a valid reason to prohibit that. That principle, I think Aaron and I would always agree on. The principle that we own our government, we own all the rights and privileges that God gave us.”

“Product after product and innovation after innovation will be stifled unless we assume what Aaron assumed – that curiosity is about you get to anywhere, anytime and look at anything unless there is a valid reason to stop you; and if you go over the line it is appropriate to be told you went over the line…but the crime and the punishment have to fit,” said Issa – the only Republican lawmaker to speak at the memorial.

Many government officials have voiced their indignation with the Department of Justice for the way that it handled Swartz’s prosecution.

Two days after Swartz’s death, Senate GOP Whip John Cornyn (Texas) wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder asking some pointed questions about the prosecution by the Department of Justice against Swartz.

In another letter to Holder dated Jan. 28, Issa and Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the Oversight Committee’s top Democrat, asked Holder to explain the factors that figured in the decision by the U.S. Attorney’s office in Massachusetts to charge Swartz.

Among the questions raised in the letter was specific information on what pleas were offered, whether Swartz’s opposition to SOPA was one of the factors considered, and why was a superseding indictment was necessary. The panel also requested a briefing by federal prosecutors to address all the questions about Swartz’s prosecution.

“It appears that prosecutors increased the felony counts by providing specific dates for each action, turning each marked date into its own felony charge, and significantly increasing Mr. Swartz’s maximum criminal exposure to up to 50 years imprisonment and $1 million in fines,” wrote the lawmakers.

The Department of Justice declined to comment on the case.

Shortly after Swartz’s death, Ortiz released a statement disputing accusations of “prosecutorial overreach.”

“As a parent and a sister, I can only imagine the pain felt by the family and friends of Aaron Swartz, and I want to extend my heartfelt sympathy to everyone who knew and loved this young man. I know that there is little I can say to abate the anger felt by those who believe that this office’s prosecution of Mr. Swartz was unwarranted and somehow led to the tragic result of him taking his own life,” said Ortiz.

She, however, made clear that her office’s conduct was “appropriate in bringing and handling the case.”

But Issa suspects that Ortiz was motivated, at least in part, by ambition. The congressman joined Swartz’s supporters during the memorial in condemning the prosecutor’s abuse of power, reported the Boston Herald.

The Department of Justice agreed to give a closed briefing to Oversight staffers and potentially members on its decision to prosecute Swartz. That reportedly took place Friday.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Rodrigo is a freelance writer living in Washington, D.C.
Click here to view the 67 legacy comments

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (2)
All Comments   (2)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Addendum:

....cf: "A similar petition started on Jan. 13 to remove Carmen M. Ortiz has over 50,000 signatures, which meets the previous threshold of 25,000 signatures – changed by the administration on Jan. 15 to the higher minimum."........

We're being stiffed and suffocated by metastasizing "political correctness"; but the alarming indicator is this Orwellian "administration" itself.

Some may say..."Oh, 'Orwellian" is so over-used just now".....wonder why?......
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
....and, may this pressure continue unabated....it's of the same aroma as this "administration" stonewalling our elected Congress on the Benghazi tragic affair. Same Obama-Holder "attitude" of "we make no mistakes" on display.

Our Justice Department has apparently been left-ized, and oriented more towards "political correctness" and also "affirmatively actioned" to the point where a [self-interested?] supportive claque exists even at the ABAJournal's website.....in the wake of this crass but still elected Obama and appointed Holder.

I've [ a rank layman] been banned from posting and even "searching" on their website by their uber-sensitive administrator for having the temerity to post, "With a name like Carmen Ortiz, she should expect lifetime tenure just about anywhere she wants."

This was posted amidst the context of the questioning of her capability and tactics against this Aaron Swartz.

When perceptions such as this begin to bubble up to the surface, this nation has a problem.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “Justice Dept. Still Under Pressure for Answers About Swartz Prosecution”