Comments on: Jihadist Recruitment Techniques Are Changing

By: Paul T.

Paul T. — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:54:12 +0000

EVERYONE needs to understand Islam is about World domination in the name of Religion and if you resist they get to KILL you….in the name of Religion. People they want to KILL us, GET IT? AND, The Quaran says it’s OK to lie to people if it is to help to dominate….in the name of Islam, GOT IT!!!!

By: ked5

ked5 — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:24:02 +0000

@6,

I think you misunderstand the original post. I don’t think it was ever suggested anything in the west was responsible for inciting the violent feelings of these radicals – but rather the “friendly” policies of western countries can make it “easier” for violent islamofacists to act out their already violent tendencies.

By: LynnS

LynnS — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:19:05 +0000

I think that your article points out the ability of Jihadist recruiters to be like chameleons changing as they find the need. Jihad is very adaptable as a word so therefore it can be fit to many beliefs of what it means and can take on new or different meanings as the need may be. A struggle can mean within, without, for something, and/or against something. It is illusive and be a call to an individual or a call to a group or to a nation.

It might be why there is much conflict within the world of jihad. It means different things to different people so when there is a need for group action it can often lead to the need for total control over peoples lives to become cohesive.

By: Turkey Brain

Turkey Brain — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:27:02 +0000

James

Gobble Gobble

Turkey Brain sees him there too!

Gobble gobble

By: Marie Claude

Marie Claude — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:58:43 +0000

James was he dressed in white ?

By: WestGuard

WestGuard — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:51:01 +0000

Amazing they can recruit in Western prisons. I’d have thought our Cons would be giving them a daily arse whooping.
What’s the world coming to..

By: James

James — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:13:08 +0000

I think there was an Islamo fascist under my bed.

By: vb

vb — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:14:35 +0000

I remember reading about a mosque in the US that was taken over by bullying radicals. The original members tried to tell authorities what was happening, but no one listened. This certainly wouldn’t inspire many people to resist the radicals, and certainly any hint of government-endowed legitimacy would decrease resistance further.

By: Patrick Poole

Patrick Poole — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:15:41 +0000

Sorry, Marc. These groups continually invoke their participation in govt outreach programs and their govt contacts as proof of their legitimacy (take a look at the CAIR website sometime). You and I may not see it that way, but THEY certainly do. And so does the media, etc. That’s the very reason they demand to be included – to give the appearance of acceptability. In the case of ISNA, in court documents they have cited their involvement in govt outreach programs and their contacts with govt agencies as proof that they are legitimate, e.g. not radical. The legitimacy and cover these programs provided is the very reason why many of us have been so vocal about the govt cutting their ties with these Muslim Brotherhood front groups, like CAIR and ISNA.

By: Marc Malone

Marc Malone — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:38:06 +0000

#7 Mr. Poole – Government outreach does not provide these radical groups legitimacy. If it weren’t that, then they’d have some other canard for denying their radicalism. Control freaks lie. It’s what they do.

What government outreach does do, is deny the problem. The problem is the very nature of Islam. It is simply a Theocracy. It is a political/religious system with the clearly stated goal of conquering the world. The stated means are through Fascism and genocide. Because govenment does not address the realities of the situation, they abet the Islamofascism.