Jihad and Genocidal Islamic Anti-Semitism in Shi’ite Iran (PJM Exclusive)
On January 29, 2010, U.S. National Security Adviser James Jones alluded to a “heightened risk” that Iran will react to increasing pressure over its nuclear program by orchestrating violence against Israel through its jihadist proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas. Eighteen months ago, during July 2008, professors Moshe Sharon 1 and Benny Morris 2 both opined solemnly about an inevitable Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. These two respected Israeli academicians, despite holding very disparate political views, also concurred on the moral justification for such preemptive action: the genocidal threat to Israel posed by a Shi’ite Iranian regime gripped with an apocalyptic, Jew-hating fervor.
For example, in a recent televised address that aired September 18, 2009, 3 “Secretary General” of Hezbollah Hassan Nasrallah referred to Jews as “the criminal and murderous limb of Abraham’s progeny [who] killed the prophets, spread corruption in the land, and committed atrocities and sins.” He concluded the speech by reminding his audience: 4
Imam (Ayatollah Khomeini) was straightforward from day one when he said: “This ‘Israel’ is a cancer gland that must be removed from existence.” President Ahmadinejad said nothing new — he only revived what the late Imam Khomeini (May God honor his soul) said: “Israel must be removed from existence.”
The so-called “Khomeini revolution,” which deposed the secular, Western-oriented regime of Mohammad Reza Shah, was in reality a return to oppressive Shi’ite theocratic rule — the predominant form of Iranian governance since 1502. 5 Khomeini’s views were the most influential in shaping the ideology of the revitalized Shi’ite theocracy, and his attitudes towards Jews — both before and after he assumed power — were particularly negative. Khomeini’s speeches and writings invoked a panoply of Judenhass motifs, including orthodox interpretations of sacralized Muslim texts, and the Shi’ite conception of najis, ritual uncleanliness. More ominously, Khomeini’s rhetoric blurred the distinction between Jews and Israelis, reiterated paranoid conspiracy theories about Jews (both within Iran, and beyond), and endorsed the annihilation of the Jewish state. 6
Since 1979, the restored Iranian theocracy — in parallel with returning, brutally, their small remnant Jewish community to a state of obsequious dhimmitude, through execution and intimidation — has always focused its obsessive anti-Jewish animus on the autonomous Jewish state of Israel. 7 For current Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the destruction of Israel is an openly avowed policy driven by his eschatological beliefs. Mohammad Hassan Rahimian, a representative of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, summarized this annihilationist eschatology redolent with Koranic Jew-hatred (Koran 5:82) — which pertains to Jews generally, not “Zionists” — on November 16, 2006:
The Jew is the most obstinate enemy (Koran 5:82) of the devout. And the main war will determine the destiny of mankind. … The reappearance of the Twelfth Imam will lead to a war between Israel and the Shia. 8
Important scholars of Islamic anti-Semitism — from Hartwig Hirschfeld in the mid 1880s, Georges Vajda in the late 1930s, S.D. Goitein in 1971, and Haggai Ben-Shammai in 1988 — have demonstrated, collectively, all of the following:
– Clear historical evidence of specific Islamic antisemitism, from the Geniza record of the high Middle Ages — including the coinage of a unique Hebrew word to characterize such Muslim Jew hatred, sin’ūth — published in full by Goitein as of 1971
– The content of foundational Muslim sources detailing the sacralized rationale for Islam’s anti-Jewish bigotry, including Hartwig Hirschfeld’s mid-1880s essay series on Muhammad’s subjugation of the Jews of Medina, based upon the earliest pious Muslim biographies of Muhammad
– George Vajda’s elegant, comprehensive 1937 analysis focusing primarily on the hadith (the putative words and deeds of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, as recorded by pious transmitters)
– Haggai Ben-Shammai’s concise 1988 study of key examples of Jew-hatred in the Koran and Koranic exegesis 9
My presentation will introduce evidence compiled from the seminal works of these scholars, Islam’s own foundational texts, and historical eyewitness accounts (adduced to considerably greater extent in The Legacy of Jihad 10 and The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism 11). These sources elucidate how Islam’s primal anti-Jewish animus — specific antisemitic motifs in Islamic theology, including Islamic eschatology, the uniquely Islamic institution of jihad war, and its corollary institution, dhimmitude — operate in tandem with regard to the annihilationist Muslim Jew-hatred directed at the Jews of Israel, in particular by the Shi’ite Islamic Republic of Iran.
It is PRECISELY due to all the excruciating, detailed truths pointed out by Andrew, that rational people can only conclude – Israel has NO choice but to pre-empt.
MAD can only work between RATIONAL actors. Surely, NO cogent person can surmise that Islamic eschatology fits such a paradigm.
While the notion of waking up in the near future to an Israeli pre-emption is a very frightening prospect, it is INFINITELY more frightening to wake up to Iran’s announcement that it joined the ‘nuclear club’.
Time’s a wasting…….
Less of the Islamophile apologetics its not just Shi’ite who are antisemitic the whole of Islam is antisemitic Mohammad was antisemitic the Koran is FULL of antisemitism just READ it if you don’t believe me. Antisemitism is parroted at every Mosque every Friday the Hezzbollah and Hamas and Fatah charters are full of antisemitism. Islam is Antisemitsm.
Towards a better understanding of Islam: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/everything-you-need-to-know-about-islam.html
Andrew G. Bostom is an Associate Professor of Medicine at Brown University Medical School. He apparently possesses no credentials in Islamic studies. His efforts are likely a labor of love—and financially unrewarding. And yet, I’m sure Dr. Bostom is incredibly knowledgeable. He is a harsh reminder that perhaps the majority of the so-called experts in this area of study are postmodernist radicals. Those who are actually getting amply compensated are not worthy of respect. We are presently compelled to consider soft science credentialed professionals as idiots until proven otherwise.
Pragmatist @ #2: I’ll see you and raise you one — Not only is Islam antisemitic, it is anti anything non-Islamic. That is, its antisemtism is only one corner of its perverted world view. More importantly, no one should be taken by Islam’s claim that it is a religion. Think instead of the wolf in sheep’s clothing. Islam is a political ideology clothing in the pretense of being a religion. (All the better to fool you.) How else can you explain its attempt to conquer everything is sight, as per Mr. Bostom’s suggestion? How else can you explain its adamant demand that everything it conquers is forever and for all eternity Islamic territory?
Fundamentalist Islam is the issue…but the West is blinded by their multicultural deity. When Iran builds it’s nuclear bomb, I suspect they will use it when they have enough to nuke the major cities of Israel…when millions have died for a demented religion only then will the world wake up…but, by then, most of the large cities in the Middle East will be glowing husks, in return, we’ll all be wondering what went wrong, “how could this have happened?”
I can happen and will happen if the viscious regime in Tehran is permitted to finish their bomb program. They will probably achieve that goal within a year. Even if they do not immediately bomb Israel, the nuclear arms race (including Bio and Chemical weapons production) in the region will be very ugly. You can bet Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey will all immediately begin to develop similar weapons capabilities. They’ll have to in order to survive.
If the idea of Iraqi regional hegemony (under Saddam Hussein) was frightening, what about a region dominated by religious zealots who see nothing wrong with raining rockets (as well as suicide bombers) on civilian populations…?
Now is the time to follow the advice of Theodore Roosevelt, and speak softly while showing the very large stick to the Iranian regime. If we do this while it’s simultaneously being rocked by protest inside as well as shutting off the spigot of gasoline (Iran has almost no ability to produce distilled oil products)…the regime will collapse in a few months.
Interesting. Time to wake up. Islam is a fascist social system fronting as a religion. What other religion kills prior disciples for leaving the religion? It’s in the surras. I forget where. Too much of it is hateful. Honestly, I used to think the Book of Mormon was hateful but they don’t hold a candle to Islam.
David # 4 – While you are correct that Andrew is a medical doctor, and is not a traditionally trained Islamic expert, I am certain that Robert Spencer, who is trained in the discipline, would not refute Andrew’s thesis, nor his findings.
Generally it is best to leave certain fields to experts. However, since 9/11/01 there has arisen a whole cadre of self taught experts in the field of Islamic history, politics and its intersection with their core religious doctrine.
When a people are dragged into a war no one should be surprised how quickly they learn their lessons. They do not have to sit in a classroom to read and comprehend core books, especially those who are as educated as Andrew.
Home schoolers,are often better educated than those who attended traditional schools.Therefore, the ‘expert’ argument falls flat in many instances.
And from the “moderate” Palestinian Authority, their Chief Justice Tayseer al-Tamimi:
“The Jews are destined to be persecuted, humiliated, and tortured forever, and it is a Muslim duty to see to it that they reap their due. No petty arguments must be allowed to divide us. Where Hitler failed, we must succeed.”
And the bell tolls not just for Israel or the Jews. Straight from the horse’s mouth (or whatever), Osama bin-Laden:
“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue — one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice — and it is: does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually?
“Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing conversion; [2] or payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; [3] or the sword — for it is not right to let an infidel live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.”
TPTB have gamed out all the options, and can find
none which avoid Armaggeddon in the Middle East.
Perhaps the Iranian people can find a way to save themselves:
The Nuclear sites are going away, one way or another;
Turn them over to the UN and live to fight another day.
7. Lorita:
Honestly, I used to think the Book of Mormon was hateful but they don’t hold a candle to Islam.
~~~~
You’ve obviously NEVER read the whole Book of Mormon, but only the excerpts your minister gave you. The only “hateful” groups in it were the heathen one’s killing *Christians*.
I thought it was hate speech to point out the glaringly obvious ugliness of Islam?
I enjoyed the read. Perhaps, the next issue can shed light for everyone how allah is Mohammed’s family worshiped. Then, Mohammed turned into the one and only god. The Jews called BS on it, as well as I.
This is my prediction of the near future. Hamas, Hizboallh, and Syria attack and/or invade Israel at the request of Iran. All the above are destroyed by Israel. This sets up a larger war with Russia, Iran, and a bunch of other moon god worshiping POS countries.
The USA gets involved. Russia, and Iran are defeated. The price of oil goes through the roof, and China gets involved. Setting up Armageddon.
That is how I understand the King James version of G-d’s word. I hope I am wrong, but in case I am correct, repent of your sins in Christ’s name.
Over.
Of course its hate speech…for all their caveman-like violent tendencies, Islamists are indeed hip to the prevailing “weakness” of the west I.E. politically correctness…
In addition to the “regular” jihad with bombs, burkas, and broad swords, they are waging a soft war through their proxies (C.A.I.R. et all) to keep us afraid to criticize them. Remember, Islam is the only religion that CANNOT ALLOW OUTSIDERS TO EVEN QUOTE ITS OWN WORDS…. We cannot question it, for thats insulting, we cannot quote it, for that is blasphamy. We must submit not (yet) before swords, but (for now)lawyers as well.
Yes, those primitive cave people are pretty sophisticated at manipulating the “guilty liberal” west.
We have only ourselves to blame
Iran must be stopped before it gets the bomb. North Korea is bad, but compared to the Imams, NK is a rational player. After Iran is stopped, Islam must be thwarted at every turn. Unfortunately, our recently elected leaders lack the intestinal fortitude/cojones to help stop Iran, or stop the spread of Islam. So when the time comes, we must step up where our gov’t won’t and fight the good fight against a bellicose religion. “Death before Dhimmitude”
7./11.
Hateful? Perhaps. Lame? Absolutely!
Oops…Hate speech! Sorry!
Let’s take a look at the balance of which religion, Christianity or Islam, has done more harm to the other over the course of history.
Christians committed the following against Muslims:
1. Held a small piece of land (considered Christian’s holiest) in Israel on and off for 150 years total?
2. Held Iraq between WWI and WWII.
3. Held modern-day Pakistan and the Suez Canal for 200 years?
4. Most of N. Africa for fifty years?
These infractions against Islam by Christians for the most part ended fifty years ago. However, Spain continues to hold the Canary Islands and two dirt lots in Morocco.
And now the infractions by Muslims against Christians:
1. Muslims invaded and then lorded over most of Christian Spain and Portugal for five centuries.
2. Until 1918, Ottoman Muslims ruled over most of the historically Christian Balkans for hundreds of years.
3. Four hundred years ago Muslims conquered and continue to hold Eastern Christendom’s holiest city: Constantinople (now named Istanbul). A city which sits on historically Christian European land.
4. For centuries, Muslims raided European coastal regions and–by piracy–terrorized the Mediterranean Sea up to the 20th Century.
5. Muslims enslaved an estimated FOUR MILLION European Christians while they had the ability.
Per Wikipedia:
According to Robert Davis between 1 million and 1.25 million Europeans were captured by Barbary pirates, who were vassals of the Ottoman Empire, and sold as slaves between the 16th and 19th centuries.[13][14] These slaves were captured mainly from seaside villages from Italy, Spain, Portugal and also from more distant places like France or England, the Netherlands, Ireland and even Iceland and North America. The impact of these attacks was devastating – France, England, and Spain each lost thousands of ships, and long stretches of the Spanish and Italian coasts were almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants. Pirate raids discouraged settlement along the coast until the 19th century.”
Add in the slavery of Eastern Europeans and the estimated number or Christian slaves soar to four million plus.
6. Starting in 1915, Muslim Turks killed an estimated one to 1.5 million Armenian Christians.
Per Wikipedia:
“. . . with the total number of Armenian deaths generally held to have been between one and one-and-a-half million.[2][3][4] Other ethnic groups were similarly attacked by the Empire during this period, including Assyrians and Greeks, and some scholars consider those events to be part of the same policy of extermination.[5]
“It is widely acknowledged to have been one of the first modern genocides,[6][7][8] as many Western sources point to the systematic, organized manner in which the killings were carried out to eliminate the Armenians.[9] Indeed, the word genocide was coined in order to describe these events.[10]
“The date of the genocide is conventionally held to be April 24, 1915, the day that Ottoman authorities arrested some 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople. Thereafter, the Ottoman military uprooted Armenians from their homes and forced them to march for hundreds of miles, depriving them of food and water, to the desert of what is now Syria. Massacres were indiscriminate of age or gender, with rape and other sexual abuse commonplace. The Armenian Genocide is the second most-studied case of genocide after the Holocaust.[11]”
Now, this is probably not an all-inclusive list (I’m sure many additional crimes on both sides of the religious spectrum could be added). Nor do I write this as a call of “Let’s get ‘em!” but rather to point out that the next time you hear someone talk about the horrible crusaders and “Islam-as-victim” prattle, these are a few points you may want to bring up.
@Adina Kutnicki said:
David # 4 – While you are correct that Andrew is a medical doctor, and is not a traditionally trained Islamic expert, I am certain that Robert Spencer, who is trained in the discipline, would not refute Andrew’s thesis, nor his findings.
Generally it is best to leave certain fields to experts. However, since 9/11/01 there has arisen a whole cadre of self taught experts in the field of Islamic history, politics and its intersection with their core religious doctrine.
I no longer hold much respect for soft science experts.
First: Because these disciplines tend to perverted by ideology.
Second: Because some of them (ag psychology) are more about regurgitating the guru’s rambling than about oberving reality.
Third: Because they tend to exmpthize with the subject of their study (eg: No, the Aztecs weren’t good guys and despite some achievements in some areas the fact is that globally they were lagging a couple millena behind the Europeans).
Also expertise in soft science is relatively easy to adquire respective to say mathematics so it is not unheard that self-learned people end doing better than people trained in the academia (and victims of the teaching of some Chomsky disciple). Victor Davs Hanson is an example. Also the best books about the Russian front in WWII I have ever read have been written by… a former captain of merchant ships.
@18 Keith said:
These infractions against Islam by Christians for the most part ended fifty years ago. However, Spain continues to hold the Canary Islands and two dirt lots in Morocco.
The Canary islands were never Muslim. There had been a little trade between the original inhabitants and Morocco but that it is all. When the Spanirds landed on them there was not a single mosque on the islands.
I stand corrected.
ISLAM will be defeated by an unrelenting fight for freedom of speech around the world (it is sorely lacking in Europe & the main stream media in the US), a cold war strategy to tear it apart at the seams with 24/7/365 broadcasts in native languages in India, Africa & SE Asia designed to dismantle the ideology just as the West dismantled Communism and a tit-for-tat military response – they blow a plan out of the sky, we drop a few cruise missiles on government buildings and key economic/military facilities, they mob a hindu temple or a church & burn it to the ground, we burn a mosque to the ground. ISLAM gets away with the thuggish behavior because they do not fear retribution. That needs to change. Being a Muslim who supports jihad should be a very dangerous past time.