I notice that all the sites you refer me have some points in common:

1) They support your thethesis
2) Stalin and De Gaulle good, Franco and America bad
3) Florid author’s opinions and light on facts.

Now look like how a seriolus author would do:

Fact one: Franco asks Hitler for 400,000 tons wheat and Hitler denies his request. Franco pretexts this to deny Hitler’s requests to attack Gibraltar

Fact two: Prior to the Hendaya meeting Admiral Canaris has advised Franco not to make any pacts with Hitler.

Now an anti-franquist historian would tell about the facts and then tell that it was just that Franco was too greedy to Hitler taste. A pro-Franco one would tell that Franco despised Hitler and nazism that thanks to Caanris Franco knew exactly how much Hitler was able to give and so he asked for much more: ie if Hitler had been able to grant 400,000 tons wheat Franco would have asked for a million tons.

That is what historians do, that is not what the chomkist crap you refer me to, tells.

BTW

Fact three: Franco said no, France said yes but in the later case it was just that Hitler hated France so much he wasn’t interested