Get PJ Media on your Apple

Israel Debates ‘Loyalty Oath’ for Naturalized Citizens

The measure wouldn't affect Jews who are protected under the Law of Return, but would impact Arabs wishing to become Israeli citizens.

by
Stephanie L. Freid

Bio

October 23, 2010 - 12:00 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

When Israel’s cabinet approved a measure calling for new citizens to swear an oath of loyalty to the Jewish state, the floodgates of controversy opened wide.

Critics in the Arab sector and among Israeli and Diaspora Jews view the loyalty oath, crafted by right-wing Yisrael Beitenu party members (“Israel is Our Home”), as a means of delegitimizing Israel’s Arab population. The oath calls for naturalization candidates to pledge loyalty to “the state of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.”

Critics say it is by definition discriminatory. That’s because the oath requires future citizens to declare loyalty to an ideology that 20% of the country’s Arab sector citizens neither adhere to nor identify with.

And even among Netanyahu’s cabinet members, the vote on the oath wasn’t unanimous. Two ministers from Netanyahu’s Likud Party voted against it and Labor Party minister Yitzhak Herzog mentioned “traces of fascism” in reference to the proposal.

Is Israel, as Middle East-based author Matt Beynon Rees poses, attempting “to regulate customs of the Muslim minority in an effort to protect itself from perceived threats to national character” much in the same way Europe is now moving?

Anti-immigrant parties recently gained electoral favor in Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands. And earlier this month, German leader Angela Merkel publicly stated that the country’s attempt at multiculturalism — i.e., integration of its Turkish minority — had failed.

Is the proposed measure and subsequent vote a way for Prime Minister Netanyahu to appease his right-wing coalition partners and, notably, his foreign minister so that he can push another  settlement freeze through and resume peace talks without a coalition walk-out?

After all, Avigdor Lieberman is widely perceived as an embarrassment to the prime minister for his off-color public statements and unilateral actions that come at the most inopportune time. And the loyalty oath bill has been the foreign minister’s “vision.”  It was Yisrael Beitenu’s prominent campaign platform during elections and approval now might be the bargaining chip needed to quiet the foreign minister and green-light continued Israeli-Palestinian discourse.

Click here to view the 23 legacy comments

Comments are closed.