<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Tehran Bluffing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro-Israeli</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-76628</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro-Israeli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-76628</guid>
		<description>While the Israelis have pledged not to be the first to introduce (the use of) nuclear weapons to the Mideast, I think they should break that pledge and use tiny, tactical nuclear weapons to stop Iran cold. 

Tactical nuclear weapons would allow Israel to:

- penetrate hardened underground installations
- ensure the sites remain too radioactive for re-use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the Israelis have pledged not to be the first to introduce (the use of) nuclear weapons to the Mideast, I think they should break that pledge and use tiny, tactical nuclear weapons to stop Iran cold. </p>
<p>Tactical nuclear weapons would allow Israel to:</p>
<p>- penetrate hardened underground installations<br />
- ensure the sites remain too radioactive for re-use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro-Israeli</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-76621</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro-Israeli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-76621</guid>
		<description>Very interesting analysis. Thank you, PJM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting analysis. Thank you, PJM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iran &#171; Chockblock&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-74547</link>
		<dc:creator>Iran &#171; Chockblock&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-74547</guid>
		<description>[...] has a column up on the missile tests at pajamasmedia.com. He points out errors in the reporting. Western media for years has believed foreign reports about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a column up on the missile tests at pajamasmedia.com. He points out errors in the reporting. Western media for years has believed foreign reports about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kabud</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-74325</link>
		<dc:creator>kabud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-74325</guid>
		<description>John Samford:

evidence, right))) 

the evidence is a poor state of our affairs in the ME

enough for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Samford:</p>
<p>evidence, right))) </p>
<p>the evidence is a poor state of our affairs in the ME</p>
<p>enough for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Samford</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73605</link>
		<dc:creator>John Samford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73605</guid>
		<description>&quot;almost all american right wing was antisemitic and largely remains so to this day: this fact gives kremlin the best means to blackmail out right wing opinion makers&quot;

Evidence?  This lie has been around a Looong time and the left just won&#039;t let it die.  This is despite the FACT that a continuous line of right wingers have provided the most support for Israel.

&quot;All the business of war, and indeed all the business of life, is to endeavour to find out what you don&#039;t know from what you do.&quot; *
*
_Arthur Wellesley, Duke Of Wellington</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;almost all american right wing was antisemitic and largely remains so to this day: this fact gives kremlin the best means to blackmail out right wing opinion makers&#8221;</p>
<p>Evidence?  This lie has been around a Looong time and the left just won&#8217;t let it die.  This is despite the FACT that a continuous line of right wingers have provided the most support for Israel.</p>
<p>&#8220;All the business of war, and indeed all the business of life, is to endeavour to find out what you don&#8217;t know from what you do.&#8221; *<br />
*<br />
_Arthur Wellesley, Duke Of Wellington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry J</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73259</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73259</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“3. Warhead type - as the missiles become more accurate, the need for powerful warheads decreases.”

The development problem is not in the powerfullness of the warhead but the physical size of warhead.

Does the successful development of a mediam/long range missile provide a vehicle for a chem/bio attack?&lt;/i&gt;

Developing a biological or chemical warhead for a long range ballistic missile is tough. For one thing, the warheads will be moving very fast when they reach the target area. If you let them impact the ground, the heat will destroy most of the chemical or biological agents. To get maximum dispersal, you&#039;d want an air burst but not too high. Again, heat issues from the speeds involved can make this a challenging engineering proposition. Conventional explosives do relatively little damage for the cost involved while developing a nuclear warhead isn&#039;t exactly easy, either. It&#039;s one thing to develop a nuclear device, it&#039;s another to make one small enough to make a good missile warhead.

&lt;i&gt;Brian H:
 

Larry;
the counter-strike would be on its way by the time the Iranian missiles completed their boost phase, I suspect.&lt;/i&gt;

Quite likely, but Israel might choose to wait until they&#039;ve engaged the incoming missiles before firing their counter-strike. For one thing, there could be no denying who shot first. It&#039;s also possible that you wouldn&#039;t want your own missiles adding to the radar clutter when you&#039;re trying to discriminate the incoming missiles in order to shoot them down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“3. Warhead type &#8211; as the missiles become more accurate, the need for powerful warheads decreases.”</p>
<p>The development problem is not in the powerfullness of the warhead but the physical size of warhead.</p>
<p>Does the successful development of a mediam/long range missile provide a vehicle for a chem/bio attack?</i></p>
<p>Developing a biological or chemical warhead for a long range ballistic missile is tough. For one thing, the warheads will be moving very fast when they reach the target area. If you let them impact the ground, the heat will destroy most of the chemical or biological agents. To get maximum dispersal, you&#8217;d want an air burst but not too high. Again, heat issues from the speeds involved can make this a challenging engineering proposition. Conventional explosives do relatively little damage for the cost involved while developing a nuclear warhead isn&#8217;t exactly easy, either. It&#8217;s one thing to develop a nuclear device, it&#8217;s another to make one small enough to make a good missile warhead.</p>
<p><i>Brian H:</p>
<p>Larry;<br />
the counter-strike would be on its way by the time the Iranian missiles completed their boost phase, I suspect.</i></p>
<p>Quite likely, but Israel might choose to wait until they&#8217;ve engaged the incoming missiles before firing their counter-strike. For one thing, there could be no denying who shot first. It&#8217;s also possible that you wouldn&#8217;t want your own missiles adding to the radar clutter when you&#8217;re trying to discriminate the incoming missiles in order to shoot them down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabba the Tutt</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73252</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabba the Tutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73252</guid>
		<description>The Iranians photoshopped a picture from two years ago to show 4 (3) missile launches.  As far as I know, we have no other information that the Iranians launched ANY missiles Wednesday and again on Thursday.  We only have their announcement that they launched missiles.  

The oil price had started heading down, now it&#039;s heading up again.  All for the price of a press release.

The American military can determine if there was a missile launch.  I haven&#039;t heard anything from them.  Sec. Rice is out there responding, but not SecDef Gates or Central Command in Dubai.  Why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iranians photoshopped a picture from two years ago to show 4 (3) missile launches.  As far as I know, we have no other information that the Iranians launched ANY missiles Wednesday and again on Thursday.  We only have their announcement that they launched missiles.  </p>
<p>The oil price had started heading down, now it&#8217;s heading up again.  All for the price of a press release.</p>
<p>The American military can determine if there was a missile launch.  I haven&#8217;t heard anything from them.  Sec. Rice is out there responding, but not SecDef Gates or Central Command in Dubai.  Why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saus</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73081</link>
		<dc:creator>saus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73081</guid>
		<description>Hi Spook86, the infamous photo-shopped &#039;4th missile&#039; launch photo appear to be Fateh-110s, slightly better than Zelzals, this is a guided variant and conceivably able to carry a small nuclear payload, at least the N.K. &amp; Chinese variants might be able to - it is a solid state fuel missile. Also, I believe you are correct and the Shahab3 launched in images shown from this crop of launches appears to be the earlier liquid fuel based shahab3, and not the more advanced solid rocket stage missile which the Iranians appear to have renamed Ghadr-1, or Power-1.

Some info on the Iranian primary missile arsenals below
http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/30/proliferation-parade-iranian-weapons-in-the-hands-of-terrorists/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Spook86, the infamous photo-shopped &#8217;4th missile&#8217; launch photo appear to be Fateh-110s, slightly better than Zelzals, this is a guided variant and conceivably able to carry a small nuclear payload, at least the N.K. &amp; Chinese variants might be able to &#8211; it is a solid state fuel missile. Also, I believe you are correct and the Shahab3 launched in images shown from this crop of launches appears to be the earlier liquid fuel based shahab3, and not the more advanced solid rocket stage missile which the Iranians appear to have renamed Ghadr-1, or Power-1.</p>
<p>Some info on the Iranian primary missile arsenals below<br />
<a href="http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/30/proliferation-parade-iranian-weapons-in-the-hands-of-terrorists/" rel="nofollow">http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/30/proliferation-parade-iranian-weapons-in-the-hands-of-terrorists/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian H</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73003</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-73003</guid>
		<description>Larry;
the counter-strike would be on its way by the time the Iranian missiles completed their boost phase, I suspect.  

dan; 
I think Oblabla is a de facto sleeper agent whether or not he&#039;s aware of it.  

Spook86;
the photo you use is a &#039;shopped fake, according to Memri. The usual: duped images of one launch with minor perspective fiddles to make them look slightly different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry;<br />
the counter-strike would be on its way by the time the Iranian missiles completed their boost phase, I suspect.  </p>
<p>dan;<br />
I think Oblabla is a de facto sleeper agent whether or not he&#8217;s aware of it.  </p>
<p>Spook86;<br />
the photo you use is a &#8216;shopped fake, according to Memri. The usual: duped images of one launch with minor perspective fiddles to make them look slightly different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-72966</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-tehran-bluffing/#comment-72966</guid>
		<description>hm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

