Comments on: Is North Korea Testing Biological Weapons on Children?

By: Gordon Chang

Gordon Chang — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:22:09 +0000

Kabud, thanks, but once a nation gets nuclear weapons, it in a sense becomes independent of the provider of the technology. That’s one of the reasons why North Korea has been so successful in defying the international community recently. Its deterrent is working.

By: Kabud

Kabud — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:02:08 +0000

To 21. Gordon

well, I have to say that when kremlin in the past considered to give out nuclear weapon, first to Beijing and later to Korea-

they calculated consequences with extreme precision

affair like that means you don’t just control the `gift receiver`

NO!!! You own them. Totally own them.

How? Well from what i know : contingency plan to immediately destroy the receiver government and if needed -most of their population

I know that this is exactly the way kremlin `owns` both N Korea and China

By `destroy` i mean a set of attack measures:

including immediate elimination of rulers of the object country.
This should work well because under the communist regime all you
(and i hope USA does it one day) have to do is :

arrive in a `stealth` manner right where they are in Beijing or Pyongyang

and attack them in their underground or other bunkers with tactical nukes

If, say, they attack you first- then the plan is to destroy 80% or some other big part of their population with biological and 4th generation nuclear weapons

it is EXACTLY planned like that, details may differ but the idea is to OWN those whom you give nukes/wmd by genocidal attack with WMD.

By: Gordon Chang

Gordon Chang — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:21:38 +0000

Kabud, I certainly agree that North Korea has been a Moscow-Beijing joint venture since 1948. Now, however, the place is taking on an independent streak as the military regime in Pyongyang is starting to go its own way as Kim’s health fades. China is beginning to realize that its client state is becoming a real danger to all in the region, maybe even the Chinese themselves.

By: Kabud

Kabud — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:22:15 +0000

There is no independent state of North Korea

it is a joint venture of Kremlin and Beijing

all weapon technologies and science is done by russians mostly,

the idea is to use bio weapons on USA, and make stupid TV viewers believe that it is North Korea or non-existing Al Quada

By: Gordon Chang

Gordon Chang — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:31:39 +0000

Idd, who would enforce the embargo? The United States, Japan, and South Korea. And the three of them would say to China that it cannot remain a part of the international community if it does not join with them.

Many will say this won’t happen, and my reply is that sometimes what is necessary is not considered practical. Those times are usually followed by uncertainty, turbulence, and death in great numbers.

Thanks for asking.

By: ldd

ldd — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:48:54 +0000

Gordon, I’d like to agree however who will do this ‘air tight’ embargo? Besides it only hurts the poorest of the people not the regime and it’s cronies. But nonetheless, that leaves the UN to do this no matter that it’s a corrupt organization. They’d love the chance to personally gain personal wealth like with Iraq…mind you, maybe they’d leave the ‘lets guilt and tax the productive people to death’ program alone for another decade or so…keep ‘em busy stealing from the most marginalized of the world and covering up their useless but very expensive existence, and not focused on trying to steal the personal wealth and freedom of working class people all over the globe any way they can. Same-o, same-o.

By: Gordon Chang

Gordon Chang — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:09:50 +0000

abi, how about an airtight embargo on everything except food and medical aid that is strictly monitored by in-country inspectors?

By: abi

abi — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:55:36 +0000

We watched a documentary of North Korea, children were of particular interest. They were pitiful. Most roaming the streets are orphans, so no one cares if they “disappear”..into some experimental world of chemicals.

This man needs to be stopped, not through warfare, but taken out some how.

By: Gordon Chang

Gordon Chang — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:25:16 +0000

ding, it’s hard to figure out which of Kim’s weapons are the worst. That’s why, one way or another, we have to get make sure this regime does not threaten us, our allies, or the international community.

By: Gordon Chang

Gordon Chang — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:22:29 +0000

sodacrackers, we have to provide for all Americans, even the weak. That’s something Obama doesn’t talk about when he refers to “excessive costs.”