Get PJ Media on your Apple

by
Alyssa A. Lappen

Bio

May 12, 2014 - 10:30 pm
Page 1 of 3  Next ->   View as Single Page

Dr. Andrew Bostom closes the preface to his new volume, Iran’s Final Solution for Israel: The Legacy of Islamic Jihad and Shi’ite Islamic Jew-Hatred in Iran, with several rhetorical questions, answered encyclopedically in the chapters that follow.

At first glance, someone unfamiliar with the nature of the subject might recognize in them a resemblance to Jeopardy!, now in its 30th year. Jeopardy contestants must correctly identify the historical event, leader or trivia — in the form of a question. To a description, for example, of “totalitarian religious law dictating behavior in all aspects of life for persons of said faith,” a well-tutored college student might ask: “What is sharia?” Of a treaty signed in March 628 between a famous charismatic figure and military commander and a competing Arabian tribe, a brainy homemaker might respond: “What is the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah?”

However, few Westerners can actually provide these correct responses, an issue that puts Western society in grave jeopardy.

Only the near-universal ignorance on Islam could explain why the Western press corps and leaders of the so-called “P5 +1” nations — the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Iran — all naïvely lauded the late November 2013 news of an interim agreement to eliminate Iran’s ability to produce nuclear weapons, and blindly accepted the notion that the deal would halt Iran’s future military goals.

Actually, the opposite happened. The P5 leaders, hopeful that a written agreement could put Iran’s nuclear ambitions to rest, were all-too-easily duped by Iran.

This reality marched to the fore on February 11, 2014, when Iranians massed in the streets of Tehran shouting “down with the U.S.” and “death to Israel” to celebrate the 35th anniversary of the 1979 Islamic revolution, during which Ayatollah Rehollah Khomeini reestablished the Iranian Shiite theocracy that the 20th century Pahlavi shahs had forestalled for an all-too-brief 54-year juncture (1925-1979).

As if to punctuate the madness of any attempt to reach agreement, current Iranian president Hassan Rouhani that day stated that the country’s nuclear program would continue “forever,” and that all Western sanctions to stop it had been “brutal, illegal, and wrong.”

Meanwhile, three Iranian military leaders simultaneously celebrated the milestone anniversary with “in your face” bellicosity. Major-General Yahya Rahim Safavi, a senior military aide to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, promised that “Hezbollah forces of Iran and the Lebanese Hezbollah” would counter any Israeli attempt to halt Iran’s nuclear weapons program that would, just as the nuclear program is intended to do, destroy “the Zionist regime.” Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehquani proclaimed that the first Iranian ballistic missile test fire — including a long-range missile that could evade radar — provided a fitting response to “unfounded [U.S.] allegations.” And Iranian Navy Commander Admiral Habibollah Sayari confirmed that Iran had deployed warships toward U.S. Atlantic territorial waters, a message-laden move to alert “the arrogant powers that are present near our maritime borders” that Iran will “also have a powerful presence close to the American [maritime] borders.”

Half a dozen more comments in the following days emphasized that Iran never intends, even temporarily, to halt or slow its predominantly militaristic nuclear program. Chief Iranian “P5 + 1” negotiator Muhammad Javad Zarif stated — to directly rebut Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman – that Iran would not need the fortified, underground Fordow uranium enrichment center or its Arak plutonium heavy-water reactor, whose “non-negotiable” status warrants no discussion or talks. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi said Iran would not dismantle even one nuclear facility. In a February 17 Iranian TV address, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khameini stated it would be impossible to resolve the “nuclear issue” per “U.S. expectations,” and reminded viewers that Americans are Iran’s immutable enemies. Talks would lead “nowhere.”

Tragically, the gullibility of American leaders today mirrors that of U.S. policymakers in 1979. Bostom brilliantly juxtaposes the events.

In February 1979, he notes, the New York Times published an op-ed by Princeton international law professor Richard Falk entitled “Trusting Khomeini.” This is representative of the “parlous denial — born of willful doctrinal and historical negationism” that continues to shape U.S. policy on Iran today.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
Let's flash back to the WW2 era. The Germans and their allies did their best to kill all Jews. On the whole, the British and their allies did their best to prevent the Jews from escaping and relocating, especially to their ancestral homeland. They were far too genteel to commit genocide themselves but far too anti-Semitic to protect the prospective victims.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
My take on what ails western leaders from recognizing the totalitarian threat of Islam is that their is a connivance among our former Marxist and now progressives and Islamic Jihad. They all want to destroy western civilization as we know it. I believe "We the People" fail to acknowledge this fact at our own peril.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
I do not believe the current administration is gullible. There appears to be a global agenda to weaken America and empower Israel's enemies using American tax payer monies.

37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (14)
All Comments   (14)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
"The P5 leaders, hopeful that a written agreement could put Iran’s nuclear ambitions to rest, were all-too-easily duped by Iran."

Wait!! Iran lied? This is impossible. I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell you. This goes completely against everything the media, and our President, would have us believe. Why, it's almost as if THEY lied to us also.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Instead of a clenched fist, we shall extend an open hand.."--Barack Obama [Cairo speech of 2009]
Do you still have that "open hand", Barry?
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
The spread of Woodstock Totalitarianism is barely different from the dark totalitarianism of the Soviets.

Conquering the world for "socialist" domination is the parallel rail to the Sharia rail.

They are connected by ties to form a track that rumbles forward to suppress people of the Book, Old and New Testament.

To crush the West and make it weak, malleable, supplicants.

In the final battle...they will either agree to half a world each...or vie for Supremacy.

Totalitarian vs Totalitarian. Evil vs Evil.

Agenda vs agenda. I don't wish to be here in such a world.

The THIRD way...is a people willing to defend freedom from tyranny. That way needs a leader. Nobody has stepped forward to assume the role.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
You possess the required oratory skills. I read your posts often and find them excellent.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
Let's flash back to the WW2 era. The Germans and their allies did their best to kill all Jews. On the whole, the British and their allies did their best to prevent the Jews from escaping and relocating, especially to their ancestral homeland. They were far too genteel to commit genocide themselves but far too anti-Semitic to protect the prospective victims.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
My take on what ails western leaders from recognizing the totalitarian threat of Islam is that their is a connivance among our former Marxist and now progressives and Islamic Jihad. They all want to destroy western civilization as we know it. I believe "We the People" fail to acknowledge this fact at our own peril.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
The American Left constitute the "Useful Idiots" the Jihadists pray Allah delivers to them. Of course, under sharia law, the useful idiots will be the first to be deprived of their empty heads.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
But don't forget there are Western corporations eager to profit from selling to Iran whatever it wants to buy.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
And certain pseudo-conservatives who want us to sell to them. (I am thinking of a certain former Presidential contender.)
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
The UN Security Council nations were not duped. All the representatives know the Iranians will not stop building the bomb. You think they were outsmarted? This agreement is simply a fig leaf to hide behind.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
I do not believe the current administration is gullible. There appears to be a global agenda to weaken America and empower Israel's enemies using American tax payer monies.

37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
Actually,"Jeopardy" dates back to the early 60's when Art Fleming was host
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
Did you even *READ* the article?

Didn't know they let LIVs in here.

Trite, shallow and churlish.

Go crawl back under your blankie.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
Oh, get a life.
37 weeks ago
37 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All