If Obama Is the ‘First Jewish President,’ I Am the Last Barbie Doll
We know that Obama’s appeasement and flowery, flattering dhimmi-like rhetoric has not made the Arabs love, like, or respect America at all and that on Obama’s watch, Islamists and terrorists have spewed vicious anti-American and anti-Israel hate speech, and have continued and escalated their attacks on American diplomats and embassies in Afghanistan (2011), Libya (2010-2011), Yemen (2008), Syria (2011), and Turkey (2008).
I know, I know: Heilemann and Bill Keller at the New York Times will explain this away by blaming President Bush and the Republicans.
Despite Heilemann’s view of Jews as rich and loud (Jews wield an “earsplitting volume of the collective megaphone”), he does not believe that Jews really count (Jews “are only 2% of the national electorate, too small a proportion to matter much”). Heilemann seems to believe that bogeyman Jews are not to be feared: They do not kidnap or behead people, nor do they blow up civilians or fly planes into Wall Street and Pentagon buildings.
Heilemann knows whom to fear and whom to appease….the other brand. And Heilemann’s, perhaps Obama’s, concern about their “big-time Jewish problem” merely concerns his access to Jewish money for his campaign. Heilemann (and Obama) are cold — very cold — where Israel is concerned.
The piece is far worse than the cover. It should be “fisked” line by line — and probably will be by those who do these things rather well. Suffice to say: Heilemann’s piece has no context and is rife with factual errors. But my concern is the callousness of his overall tone. For example, Heilemann writes:
In attempting to apply tough love to Israel, Obama is trying to make a stalwart ally see that undertaking the painful and risky compromises necessary for peace with the Palestinians is the only way to preserve the Zionist dream — which is to say a future as a state both Jewish and democratic. His role here is not that of the callous assailant but of the caring and sober brother slapping his drunken sibling: The point is not to hurt the guy but to get him to sober up.
Thus, Prime Minister Netanyahu is Obama’s drunken brother and he deserves “slapping.”
Whoa! Is Heilemann perhaps thinking of Obama’s Kenyan half-uncle, who was recently arrested for drunken driving in Massachusetts and who faced deportation for this? Or is he thinking of Obama’s own Kenyan father, who was known as a polygamist, wife-batterer, and alcoholic?
Actually, I was thinking he was the first Jewish American princess as president, but I thought I was being too stereotypical, bordering on sexist and racist.
Oh dear. Winning the thread at the first post.
Brilliant.
Just because he throws a ball like a girl….
Lipstick on a pig – The pig and POTUS are both treif.
Barky’s Jewish appeal only extends to self-hating Jews. Same for his appeal to Americans.
What one can definitely say about the Indonesian Imbecile is that he is the first true America-hater to occupy the White House. But then, what would one expect from an idiot whose inauguration benediction included wishing for the day “when white will embrace what’s right”?
Scandal or not?
“The Indonesian Imbecile”, the best and most accurate nickname I have yet heard for Obama. Good one.
I actually have to disagree a bit. I don’t think Obama was the first President to hate America. I think he’s the first to know WHY he hates America – because Middle Class White People make up the Foundation of it.
There are others … most notably Woodrow Wilson who hated this country with a blinding passion but could never explain to anyone publicly nor to himself privately why (he knew there were too many “uncivilized brown people breeding like rabbits” who should have been rounded up and sent off the continent after the Civil War and way too many Middle Class white peasants who dared to object to the wisdom of a college professor in things like even their drinking beverages). He was far more comfortable with cultured Eurotrash – with whom he wished he could repopulate America.
When the peasants finally rejected his Socialist “League of Nations” the heartbreak of his loss eventually killed him. After a while even the 100,000+ peasants he had the American Legion put into concentration camps for refusing to pay for his stupid war or merely even saying bad things about his stiff neck got released. Eventually even Roosevelt – who was no real America fan – even let folks have a drink again.
The stupidity of Manhattan elites would be laughable if it weren’t so insulting.
Nevermind insulting, but their stupidity is dangerous.
In a nutshell, depicting Obama (corruptly doing so, I agree with you) as “the first Jewish president” relates to that infamous, ugly photo of the newly-sworn-in Obama as President bowing to the Sauds. Meaning, if he’s “Jewish,” then he is quick to bow to the Sauds, to Islam. That’s what I get from this awful imagery and headline by New York magazine. It’s in keeping with the Left’s subjugation of Israel, of Jews, and ongoing submission to Islam (or so they want to take us there).
Our schools do not teach about antisemitism, nor about the history of the founding of Israel. Too controversial, and too revealing about the assumptions of progressivism and the New Deal. See http://clarespark.com/2010/11/14/the-abcs-of-antisemitism/ for a summary of the many streams feeding current-day antisemitism, which invariably bleeds into anti-Zionism.
It seems so strange that Obama wants to befriend terrorists in Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood, but he wants to reject one of the few allies we have left, Israel. Obama has always been pro-Palestine and really, honestly, believes that Israel is the problem in the world and not the solution. The sooner we get this anti-semite out of office in 2012, the better.
Liberty, yes.
However, as nearly as I can determine, every Jewish friend and colleague not only voted for Obama, they also donated to and worked on his 2008 campaign.
I’d like to say that they’ve wised up and seen the error of their ways, but that would be stretching the truth.
I simply do not understand all of this. Seriously, are American Jews this stupid?.. are they so ashamed of who they are?, that they would back Obama in his misguided endeavors?
Again..i simply do not understand
@anne:
In a word, yes.
It’s a shondeh fur die goyim.
For those who aren’t familiar with Yiddish, the phrase is an expression that literally means ‘a shame before the nations’… but which is used colloquially to describe any embarrassing or compromising behavior performed by a Jew where a non-Jew can observe it. (Thanks, Treppenwitz, for a clear definition.)
Many of them are stupid. They might be academically talented or excell in hightech or even be geniuses and still be incredibly stupid (which, unfortunately, isn’t limited to Jews). I used to read an American Reform blog for a while (Reform Jews are all liberal). Before reading it I used to be sympathetic to the Reform movement, or how they call themselves in Israel, The Movement for Progressive Judaism. You don’t meet too many Reform Jews in Israel because most of them prefer to live in America. They didn’t have a significant part in founding, building, developing, nurturing and defending Israel – Israel is mostly the product of secular Jews. Yet it turned out that the people on this blog, most of which were living in the US, know and understand Israel and the Middle East far far better than us Israelis, and know all the answers, or at least so they thought. I couldn’t believe the stupidities I read on this blog.
For instance, one of the rabbis wrote a post about the new government ad campaign on Israeli TV trying to prepare the Israeli public at large for possible rocket attacks (since after Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon and Gaza Hizaballah and the Pal-Arabs acquired rockets that can reach central Israel. Since Hizballah is on our northern border and Gaza on our southern, it means that between them they can target most of Israel whereas before they could only target northern and southern Israel). The Rabbi thought the ad campaign wasn’t a good idea since the terrorists’ objective according to him is to scare us, and by supposedly giving in to fear with all those security stuff we let the terrorists win. He was wrong about the terrorists’ objective (fear isn’t their objective, but their means to extort their objectives from a terrorized population), but the important point is that this type of campaigns really saves lives. They give you instructions on how to prepare for such scenarios and how to behave when they happen – and being prepared and knowing what to do saves a great many lives. When I was a child we had ad campaigns about bombs. They weren’t meant to cause panic, but to inform, raise the awareness level of the average citizens to suspect objects that might contain explosives, and give them instructions on what to do if they see such an object. It was so successful that planting bombs in bags and other objects lost its effectiveness as a terrorist MO since they were usually spotted by alert citizens who told everyone around to get away and called the police. That’s why the terrorists adopted the method of suicide bombings as their new MO. But according to this rabbi, these ad campaigns are unnecessary and constitute a surrender to the terrorists. Maybe the best way to fight terrorism, then, is not educating the public about the danger and how to protect themselves and their families, and instead just fearlessly get blown up to pieces in the streets, or fearlessly remain in your living room when rockets shower on your neighborhood? This rabbi is surely intelligent, but wouldn’t you call him stupid?
Or another example that shocked me. Some rabbi wrote a post on the Egyptian revolution. One of the commenters wrote that it’s not our business and we should go back on topic of all sort of Israeli internal squabbles and criticisms. How can any intelligent person in their right mind not get that the revolution next door is a major event for Israel that might change the entire Middle East picture? I’m sure the first thought that occured to almost every Israeli Jew is what’s gonna happen to the peace agreement now that the regime has changed. But this guy was an American liberal Jew, so he didn’t connect the obvious dots. He just didn’t understand that something of major importance to Israel just happened next door, something that might prove to be very dangerous. It was an educated and seemingly intelligent man, but wouldn’t you call him stupid?
There are many examples like that, but you get the idea.
“(Reform Jews are all liberal)”
Wanna bet?
Whenever men of God, no matter which God, run a nation or have influence and power in the running of that nation, you get negative results because of their ignorance. America’s founders had brilliant insight in this and established separation of state and religion. For contrast look at the Islamic countries before oil pulled a few of them out of the mud and where they will all end when oil is gone. Those who blind themselves with beliefs, the lowest form of thinking, will always be doomed.
Historically, American Jews were left-wingers, from staunch liberals all the way out to actual Communists.
I don’t know why this comes as a surprise. Just look at all the famous names from the socialist, communist and feminist movements.
Jews haven’t changed. It’s leftism that’s changed.
Jews became leftists because they thought that was the way to champion economic and social justice. But starting in the 1960s, the New Left switched the focus of leftism from economics to multiculturalism. Now their great cause isn’t fighting unemployment or poverty, but supporting Third World “peoples of color” in their struggles against the West.
And flying in the face of history and anthropology, the New Left has made the Palestinians into honorary “people of color” who are fighting the “Israeli apartheid”.
It’s not so easy for a Jew to side with that anymore.
But some still manage.
Maybe that’s been your experience but it wasn’t all of us. The vast majority of religious Jews (those of us who believe that God blesses America, that morals are not relative, and that we owe a debt of gratitude to this country that has been so good to us and others) emphatically did NOT vote for O. and won’t this time around as well.
Does anyone remember when Clinton was in trouble with the Black community, and at the same time was beset by the Lewinsky scandal, et al, and one female black commentator protested that Bill was “America’s First Black President” in response? The intent was to distract credible criticism of him with something frivolous, and at the same time remind Blacks that he’d (supposedly) done lots of things for them. I think, once you think about that episode, this one becomes more clear in several respects:
1. Obama can’t be our first Black President; that was Bill Clinton.
2. Apparently some liberal Jews feel that Obama needs shoring up among their coreligionists, and since they can’t remind those Jews of actual things that he’s done for them specifically, a magazine cover seemed like a good idea.
3. They’re desperate.
David, that is *precisely* what’s going on here; they are trying to sell us Obama, because we’ve rejected him. & since so many of us were dumb enough to vote for him in the first place (ok, not me, but that’s beside the point), they figure we’re still dumb enough to fall for this imagery.
Phyllis, you’re far more attractive in every way- intellectually, facially, spiritually- than any Barbie doll.
Phyllis Chesler is right, This is much worse than simple absurdity, worse than just a joke in bad taste, it is insulting the jews by implying that they are misguided in the pages of a well circulated magazine, with a blatant lie on its cover, pretending to be concerned with their welfare. The one who deserves the blame is the president who could not help himself but perpetuate a myth from the height of his lofty perch, but the editorial is deflecting the blame to the victim of the slander instead. Isn’t this precisely how pogroms are started?
Abject! It does not fool everyone, but it cultivates hate in those who are so disposed.
It’s part and parcel of the Left’s attitude toward Obama: He’s too good for Americans, Jews included. Americans are too stupid, racist, ignorant, violent and insane to realize how lucky they are that Obama is POTUS.
Don’t laugh, that’s the stuff you see on many left-wing blogs. They really believe that we don’t deserve Obama.
Well, on that last point, they won’t get an argument from me.
Well, I for one welcome this momentous occasion.
The Barry Mitzvah, where he finally becomes a man and becomes responsible for his own actions.
(perhaps now we can put aside the blaming of Bush, Japanese tsunamis and other spin heavy blame dreidels)
Barry Soetorah as he will now be known, will be celebrating his own Passover in November. 2012. I’m quite sure at the seder he will join in the chorus of “next year in Jerusalem”, although it is uncertain whether he will utter a proviso of “not including East Jerusalem”.
And…as for Yom Kippur, the day of atonement…for some people a day simply is not enough.
It is the Jewish way to respond with ajoke in very serious times. But I just couldn’t. This insulting photo and article are making me sick to my stomach. The Chutzpah that these people have!
It is no worse than those who acted like he was the Messiah in 2008, without realizing he was fulfilling Scripture http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024:3-8&version=NIV
Even more to the point is the last part of Luke 21:24-
“Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.”
This began in 70 AD and came to an end in 1967. Think of the implications.
Did he got a bris?
Good point. I think we should give him one to celebrate his newfound Jewishness and get someone’s drunken sibling to perform as a mohel, so he might learn how “tough love” really feels.
NY magazine is anxious to please its masters that they’ll start to kick the Jews to the curb when instructed to. It’s sad that there are so many modern multiculti mahyofis-yidden/Jewish dhimmis who are eager to cooperate.
We actually have no idea what kind of family man or father he is. Most of what we were led to believe has been a lie. For someone who sounds like an opera singer warming up for a big performance “me-me-me”, I can’t imagine there’s much room to spare for other people.
Well, this is typical. “Israel must make the hard choices, make concessions.” giving up the Sinai, signing the Oslo agreement and letting the PLO back in when it had been driven out, giving up territory in and along the border with Lebanon, withdrawing from daily control of Judea and Samaria, unconditionally withdrawing from Gaza–none of that counts. When it comes to Israel history began this morning and what happened last night, let alone how Israel came into possession of the disputed territories, is irreelvant.
As is, of course, the Jews who fled Arab lands, roughly equivalent to the Arabs who left Israel for whatever reason. That’s not only irrelevant, it’s “divisive.” Damn straight it is.
Good list, Alex.
giving up territory in and along the border with Lebanon
I would add: Israel signing binding contracts with the UN over that border and THEN having the UN go back on that and opening land up, again, for “negotiation” (Shebaa Farms).
I also like to add in all these discussions the interesting fact that more “palestinians” have American citizenship than citizenship in any arab nation (other than the palestinian state of Jordan). The number of “palestinians” who hold Israeli citizenship is even larger, yet. Funny.
I believe that Jordan revoked the citizenship of those “Palestinians” living there since 1948.
Actually, it is not. The Jews who were forced to flee the lands in which they lived for over two thousand years, numbered at least 850 thousand, no comparison to the ones who left Palestine.
Like Henry II, Obama wonders aloud “who will rid me of this meddlesome democracy?” And like Henry, Obama seems unable to grasp the green-light effect such an attitude encourages among the murderous enemies of his “friend”.
He has breathed the enlightened air of leftist anti-Semitism for so long, that he probably does see his role as tough love. God save Israel from such love.
When I hear someone say “I am not anti-Semitic; I am just anti-Zionist” I wonder. Isn’t that like saying “I don’t hate Americans, just America”? One hears that kind of thing on the Left on occasion, and I think for the same reason. Leftist anti-Americans believe the US is responsible for most or all of the ills in the world. They blame US aggressive capitalism and arrogant neo-imperialism for every problem, at home or abroad (including global warming). Anti-Zionists blame Israel for every problem, from Islamic Jihad to insane tyrants to the Muslim oppression of women. Of course, anti-Zionism is considerably more bi-partisan: from Walt and Mearsheimer to Noam Chomsky to Pat Buchanan to Jeremiah Wright to Dennis Kucinich to Ron Paul to… Well, you can add to the list at your leisure.
Anti-semitism is a poison which has proved useful to every despot, fully infected Islam, for too long distorted Christianity, undermined our faith in our own values, and now weakens the West’s resolve to face the internal and external threats we face.
Obama has not yet figured out that defense of Israel is defense of everything America values.
I’m a Coney Island born, middle class Conservative Jew, as are my cousins, and I’m insulted that the cover would even show the President with a Yarmulka. It should now be taken off and burned. The idea that the President of the U.S.A. should give “Tough love” to Israel is such a condescending insult that it makes me want to puke. How about the U.S.A. quits funding the P.A. and backs Israel for a change. The Palestinian Authority needs to be told that they can have the land the currently have, the Israelis will keep what they have, and the Blue Line is the border, done deal, take it or move to Jordan.
You know this will never happen under the watch of this administration.
The Palestinian Authority needs to be told that they can have the land the currently have,
They want more. The PA wants to be declared the state sovereign over Gaza, where they have no control, at all. It’s like a big Monty Python routine, with bomb vests.
The palestinians want to get the first state established with two separate governments. They’re getting a jump on the “two state solution”. Not much room for Israel after that. Three’s a crowd. Everybody knows that.
That’s where yu are wrong. They don’t want a two state solution. That’s only for show. What they really want, and they say it in Arabic, is a one state solution. Goodby Israel.
If Oba is the first Jewish President, he’s also the first self-hating Jewish President. Two Jewish firsts in one President.
Maybe he’s also the Sabbatai Zevi of Jewish Presidents. (Which would make him the first Muslim President as well.)
Phyllis, its good to see you posting here again. You were really missed.
Now to the subject at hand. There has been a tremendous erosion in Jewish support for Obama. Even at the start of his presidency I predicted that the Jewish vote would turn against him. His winning margin was approximately the Jewish vote. Today, at best, its a push for him with about a 50/50 split. If we are so disenchanted with him, think about the rest of America. Remember his campaign “Yes we can”. Now we know what it means. We can have double digit unemployment, inflation (which is covered up), erosion of power-principle-values-influence, a broken monetary system.
The reason that picture was taken from behind was that they didn’t dare really show his face. Had they shown his face it would have been a deeper mockery of the title, it would have shown the truth. I can’t wait to see this sun tanned Howdy Doody voted out of office.
If Bill Clinton can be the first black president, I guess anything can be true…
/sarc
Phyllis: Re your problem with words like “paranoid”, “hysterical” and “strident.” Don’t worry about using them properly.
SOMETIMES A PARANOID PERSON IS THE ONLY SANE ONE IN THE GROUP.
(i.e – a paranoid person can often sense trouble when others fail to see it coming or be aware of its existence). I didn’t say “insane” or “crazy” people, as in when Bob Hope once said, “Oh, like Democrats”).
If it’s a New York publication hell, it has to be true, right? And even if it’s NOT, we’ll just keep pushing the lie until it BECOMES true. If there has been ever a case that showed the ignorance of liberals, the sheep mentality, the belief in EVERYTHING spouted from the state-run propaganda machine, Obama as “the first jewish president” would be a front runner.
Israel has been warned that it must accept suicide or murder-with the additional warning that suicide is the only honorable choice. I think Israel should privately warn appropriate governments that THIS time the fate of our children will be the fate of their children. Parenthetically, whatever Jewish “leaders” say, Jewish voters will make their own decisions. If a voter is a dedicated Obama fan they will agree with the article. For those who are already becoming disenchanted the presumptuousness of the article/picture will further alienate them. Obama and his incestuous band of advisors are too insulated from ordinary people to imagine how much damage they are doing to their own position. NY 9 is an example and it is only the beginning. I say this as an educated,secular Jewish woman and lifelong registered Democrat. I am saddened and disgusted with this Administration’s contempt for Jews and Israel, which only mirrors and magnifies the President’s contempt for America itself.
If anyone needs proof that there is a direct hard-wired line between the White House and the MSM here it is.
- In the NY-9 special election, Jews turned out for the Republican.
- The VERY NEXT ISSUE of New York magazine runs “First Jewish President” on the cover.
What’s really insulting is that they think I’m so stupid that I won’t notice.
An American Jew has to be willfully gullible to buy into Obama as a champion of the Jewish State.
I caught a segment on NY1 last evening featuring a debate on Jewish support for Obama between Dov Hikind and a beady eyed, horse-faced Jewish social climber with wannabe WASP mannerisms representing J-Street who goes by the unlikely moniker of Alexandra Stanton.
To Hikind’s reasonable and modest assertion that, though Obama would inevitably carry the Jewish vote in ’02, he would certainly lose a substantial percentage of his Jewish support in ’08, this elitist Jewish mieskeit responded with a quote from the late great Daniel Patrick Moynihan that “you’re entitled to your own opinions but not to your own facts.”
This insult to Hikind and malicious abuse of the long departed Moynihan was followed up with the perfidious insistence that Israeli security is at the bottom of the American Jewish voters’ concerns etc. etc. Her purchase on the moral high-ground, Ms Stanton informed NY1 viewers proudly, was secured by her father who served in WWII.
We Jews are a family, gushes Ms. Stanton warmly. Were it so, this batty yenta would be locked away in our familial Jewish attic.
What is to be done about Ms Stanton and her degenerate and seditious like in the Jewish community, never so brazen and so numerous? How do we handle careerist Jews who readily sell out their fellow American Jews and the State of Israel for one more inch up the greasy pole? What is the antidote to Jewish journalists like Thomas Friedman and Roger Cohen and Peter Beinart who continually engage in Jew baiting, poking the Jewish community in the eye to fill the editorial mailbags and justify their six and seven figure salaries to their editors and publishers?
A quick and sketchy internet search reveals that Alexandra Stanton is the professional name of a New York divorce lawyer whose married name is Alexandra Natapoff, wife of Sam Natapoff. The Natapoffs are a Power Couple. Friends of Bill and Hillary. Alexandra has served in various minor political posts—Chief of Staff for this mediocre pol and that. Sam is an economist who served along with his wife on Bill Clinton’s World Economic Council. (Which spouse brought the other on board and made a second place place at the public trough is hard to ascertain.) Sam is also a booster and lobbyist—official or otherwise–-for the Turkish government.
Alexandra’s mother, Domna Stanton, is President of the Modern Language Association, an organization described by critics as a “mammoth academic bureaucracy” which has radically politicized the study of language and literature since the Nineteen-seventies. MLA conferences typically concentrate on such lofty issues as race and gender studies with scholars presenting such papers as “The Epistemology of the Queer Classroom.” Domna Stanton’s own literary output is said to read like something “written by committee.”
Momma Stanton is a society lady at whose South Hampton home Andrew Cuomo met his current girlfriend, and Alexandra’s best buddy. The Stantons are social butterflies on everyone’s invitation list and the Internet is replete with photos of the mishpacha at various elite social functions. Any PJM reader interested in attaching a face to the lefty socialist elite undermining and ruining America ought to have a look. See if you can distinguish the lefty Jews from the lefty WASPS in the group shots. You can always distinguish J-Street rep Alexandra Nepertoff/Stanton (Stanton/Nepertoff?) by her toothy and beatific smile. Makes you want to pat her on the nose and feed her a carrot.
With the next election, the American political pendulum will swing far to the right. For the first time in years, Americans will have an opportunity to clean house. Our institutions are rotten with lefties and in need of fumigation. Americans are rightfully leery of purges but a purge the nation must have lest we follow the Europeans to perdition.
For the Jews, this demands a Tikkun Bayit—a repair of the Jewish home. Begin with the Tikkun Olam and J-Street crowd and Jewish posers and one eyed Jacks and Jacquelyns like Sam Nepertoff and Alexandra Stanton. Strip them of their positions and pretensions. Expose them for the enemies of America and the enemies of Israel they are. Insist that Jewish criminals like Barney Frank and George Soros be put behind bars where they belong. Be a good and loyal American like Alexandra Stanton’s GI Daddy.
Misspelled some of the names, but no matter. Names are merely flags of convenience to these folks.
Re these “social butterflies.” I love butterflies, the real ones.
As for these leftist, elitist, arrognant know-nothing “social butterflies”, I say, “Get me that can of FLIT”.
We will put them on either the Endangered Feces List or the Endangered Species List. I don’t particularly care which one as long as they are on one.
Thank you for this article. Yes, one way to fight them is to uncover their motivations. I sincerely hope that the 2012 elections will change the American lanscape, and with it, perhaps, the Jewish landscape as well. I do wish that we could purge the country of this vermin, but I am afraid that they are too slippery. At least if their influence in education and the media would wane, this would be a wonderful beginning.
Blaming the Jew? My advice to Jews everywhere (including my NY liberal Jewish BiL) is to arm yourselves. I’ll stand in the front row, but you need to be there too.
I want to thank the New Yorker for the cover of the first Jewish president. I’ll be sure to drop a copy off at each of the 2000 mosques in the. U.S.
Let’s see if you really do it.
The first Jewish president? Really sick. Obama is consumed with HATE for Israel and Jews.
Obama communicated to the ummah – the global Muslim community from day one, that serving Islam was his top priority. Obama’s first official phone call was to PLO Muslim leader, Abbas. Immorally respected by past and present U.S. administrations, Muslim terrorist leader Abbas, financed the massacre of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympic Games. Obama’s first interview was with Al-Arabiya, Muslim TV station.
In October, 2009, the Obama administration co-sponsored a UN resolution with Egypt to ban speech that defames religion (Islam). A massive attack that threatens the freedom and safety of every non-Muslim on earth.
Obama Bows low to Saudi King:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd425zfw5Ew&feature=related
Dear Phyllis,
Let me say that I am happy to see your commentary appearing on Pajamas Media.
As a Jew, I have a hard time believing that anyone, Jewish or not, except for his most sycophantic followers, could accuse of Barack Obama of even having a single tender spot in his heart for Jews or Israel.
To claim that Barry HUSSEIN Soetero loves Israel is a bigger lie than even Goebbels would attempt.
Yep, that’s what you call “chutzpah”.
The picture caption should Read: The First Marxist President
The Truth?
The best friend the Communists have.
Any American Jew who would vote for Obama is thinking with his foreskin.
he isn’t a Jew he’s a philistine.
“Barack Obama is the best friend Israel has right now.”
In that case, Israel is screwed.
The libs, who got us involved with Israel in the first place, will turn on the Israelis in a New York second if the libs think they can gain some advantage by doing so.
Same thing they did to the anti-communists in Vietnam in the 1970s.
American liberals are even MORE treacherous than the French.
Let’s face it. Jews just aren’t exotic enough for today’s western, college educated liberal.
Obama’s Latest Gaffe: Jews and Janitors
There’s long been more than a sneaking suspicion that President Barack Hussein Obama is a dyed-in-the-wool anti-Semite although there’s no doubt he is more prone to gaffes than even George W. Bush. His closet anti-Semitism may have met his “gaffery” over the weekend at the Congressional Black Caucus awards in Washington.
Quickly scrubbed from the official transcript of Obama’s speech advocating class warfare–technically, he was addressing what he called a growing disparity of wealth in the United States–the president mixed up Jews and janitors before he realized his Freudian slip but he had already been caught by the tale of the (video)tape.
I guess it’s easy to confuse the two. After all, both words begin with a “J.”
Not that much of the mainstream media will make mention of Obama’s “Jews janitors” flub; they’re still more interested in Bush gaffes.
The Jewish vote is, of course, critical to his re-election, not as critical as the black, union, and homosexual votes but very significant nonetheless. He needs money from all of them to hit his goal of a billion dollar campaign chest.
Blacks, unionists, and gays are guaranteed supporters but those Jewish backers have been slip, slip, slipping away in view of the administration’s policies on the Mideast and his kowtowing to Arab potentates and catering to Muslim interests at home. The last thing he needed at this point was to demean Jews but he did so anyway, assuming that confusing Jews with janitors is demeaning.
In Obama’s talk to the CBC, he was in the middle of another rant against the rich when he blurted out, “If asking a billionaire to pay the same tax rate as a Jew uhh as a janitor . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5558)
None of you has any historical sense or knowledge. Anyone who thinks this movie is any good should go read about the olmec. The olmec remains found have been even farther south than the Aztec (Mexico City). Also the Olmec were poor migrant farmers. Their crops required a warm humid environment such as around the equator. They would never have traveled to such an arid place like the black hills let alone build a city of gold in them. Finally Ben Gate’s mom goes to the top of a temple near an alter. Ben says its is where they slit the victims throat and cut out their heart this is absolutly incorrect. The idea of human sacrifice did not come for another two hundred years during the mayan empire.
Attractive element of content. I simply stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your weblog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing on your augment or even I achievement you get right of entry to consistently quickly.