Get PJ Media on your Apple

House and Senate in Different Lanes on Highway Trust Fund

"The House will not support billions of dollars in higher taxes to pay for more spending,” vows one chairman.

by
Bill Straub

Bio

July 14, 2014 - 12:48 am
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

As with much of the president’s agenda, it was ignored by the Republican-controlled House. Lawmakers in the lower chamber have advanced several plans but none have thus far resulted in a consensus. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) initially proposed ending Saturday mail delivery and using the resulting savings to replenish the trust fund. That idea drew little support.

Calls to increase the gas tax earned a cold shoulder from Republicans. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), ranking member on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, voiced support for bolstering the fund, insisting that “maintaining and improving our nation’s infrastructure is absolutely vital to our country’s economic prosperity.”

“I am skeptical about the financing proposals the administration has put forward to fund its $302 billion plan, especially the administration’s reliance upon one-time revenues from so-called corporate tax reform,” Thune said. “This aspect of the plan is unlikely to secure broad support in Congress and fails to provide a longer-term funding solution for these vital programs.”

On Thursday the House Ways and Means Committee, by voice vote, adopted a plan to bolster the fund by $10.7 billion, which could carry it to May 31, 2015. The package employs a budget gimmick known as “pension smoothing” to pay the tab. Pensions smoothing permits employers to delay contributions to employee pension plans. Pension contributions are tax deductible. Postponing the contributions therefore theoretically raises a firm’s taxable income, increasing revenue for the Treasury.

The plan also will allow the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to collect user fees in 2015 and transfer funds from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund. A floor vote could come this month. Camp expressed hope the Senate would simply adopt the House plan and avoid “brinksmanship.”

“There is no need to jeopardize critical road and transit projects, let alone the thousands of jobs they provide,” Camp said. “The House and Senate can easily pass this legislation.”

Meanwhile, the Senate Finance Committee has passed, with bipartisan support, a stopgap measure that pumps $7.8 billion into the Highway Trust Fund. Like the House bill, the version offered by the upper chamber also uses pension smoothing and customs fee extensions but to a lesser extent. It also employs smaller measures not contained in the House bill characterized as tax revenue boosters, including a plan to institute a new penalty on individuals who fail to comply with reporting requirements for child tax credit claims.

The House already has made it clear it will balk at the tax measures.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee who pieced the funding proposal together with Sen. Orin Hatch (R-Utah), characterized the House proposal as a “partisan bill” while his has support from Democrats and Republicans.

Most importantly, Wyden said, the Senate’s temporary measure provides a bridge to “a long-term bill that rebuilds America’s broken infrastructure, which needs $3.6 trillion dollars of repairs.”

“Every one of us knows the consequences of failing to act on both our short-term and long-term transportation needs,” Wyden said. “Short-term, hundreds of thousands of workers could lose their jobs – jobs that pay good wages, a living wage you can support a family on. Long-term, a little-league infrastructure harms our ability to compete with big-league competition from nations like India and China.”

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Washington freelancer Bill Straub is former White House correspondent for Scripps Howard News Service.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
I thought the stimulus was supposed to take care of all of that. (yeah, right)
They need to stop raiding the "roads and bridges" for things that aren't roads or bridges.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Unintended consequences" due to stupid, incompetent government would be my pick. Coupled with the gas tax money going to mass transit, bicycle lanes and pedestrian projects. No wonder they've run out of money - an intelligent third-grader could have figured it out but not our bureaucrats and politicians.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (16)
All Comments   (16)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Every state has state taxes on fuel and license plate fees to work with. Some also collect tolls on some roads. Why don't we declare the federal project of building highways done and let each state sort out how to maintain and build highways? States can raise their fuel excise taxes to capture the federal portion. I can't figure out how sending part of the fuel tax on the long trip through Washington, DC does anything positive for the roads I use.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
I'm pretty sure that labor costs for federally-supported highway projects are required to be at "prevailing wages" - ie union scale, whether or not that's the market rate.

Change that specific requirement and I'll bet that we have more and better roads at lower costs.

I would keep a requirement that all labor be citizen or green card holder.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
Does anyone remember the "Big Dig" in Boston? Congress overrode Reagan veto to fund at least a portion of that project which was projected at $2.6 Billion and finally cost $14.6 Billion, finishing 9 years late.
The only solution to each and every problem is to spend money.
Every. Time. Maybe we can get Algore to put the money in a lock box.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why are we so in love with 1st Century transportations solutions? Yeah, one cart with one driver and one power source pulling it. The emperors of Rome would be right at home on our highways.

The railroad, OTOH, is a revolutionary system that enables one driver and one power source to pull hundreds of carts at one time with minimal land and energy usage. Why aren't we using this system more? Because the GOVERNMENT owns the highway system and insulates the users from the full costs of that system. Privatize the Interstates, if you REALLY believe in a free market.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has advised governors that reimbursements may slow to a trickle"

The Department of ______ is an impediment, except to graft and corruption. The States should collect revenues and dispense to DC, not the other way around.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
The tax per gallon is the same as it has been for years and years? Well, why did they not build in annual inflation adjustments?

I remember in '07, Huckabee was called a tax-hiker, because he had increased the gas tax to adjust for inflation. Well, they are supposed to do that. I do not have a problem with raising gas taxes, as long as the money is being used the way it should be.

Of course, I understand some 40%(?) of it goes to support the 4 big-city subway systems, as well as other mass-transit projects.

Perhaps the fund should be split up. This much tax to support highways. This much for mass-transit. And so on. If they did that, then the highway fund would be easily kept replenished, as people would support that, and the other things might die a slow death. This would be the canny thing to do for the Republicans. Use line-item funding, and the boondoggles would die.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
I am so tired of hearing this same story: The Federal government finds itself with a massive agency that grew from some past activity where some modest success was demonstrated. But centralized government is so naturally inefficient, wasteful and politicized that it can no longer perform in its current bloated role without grossly expanded tax funding. So then ensues a fight for more money where the party in charge points to the past success and claims obstruction by the other party and the potential for a huge loss of jobs. This is why unraveling the federal government is difficult to impossible. Its a system of a thousand ratchets that knows only one direction - up.

19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
Don't unravel, deflate.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
I thought the stimulus was supposed to take care of all of that. (yeah, right)
They need to stop raiding the "roads and bridges" for things that aren't roads or bridges.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
When government tries to take care of every need of every person, they fail to handle the things they are supposed to do.

As we pour more into free health care, free food, free housing, free education... we won't have money for roads.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
“Ineptocracy: in-ep-toc’-ra-cy”

“A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.”
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All

One Trackback to “House and Senate in Different Lanes on Highway Trust Fund”