Get PJ Media on your Apple

House and Senate in Different Lanes on Highway Trust Fund

"The House will not support billions of dollars in higher taxes to pay for more spending,” vows one chairman.

by
Bill Straub

Bio

July 14, 2014 - 12:48 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – The federal Highway Trust Fund, which contributes to road building and maintenance projects across the country, is expected to run out of money in early August, leading some states to issue plans to halt construction in case the well runs dry.

The House and Senate are considering dueling packages and have not reached an agreement on how to address the fund’s impending insolvency. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has advised governors that reimbursements may slow to a trickle if the chambers can’t agree in time.

Foxx told the states his department “will continue to take every possible measure to fully reimburse your state for as long as we can. However, as we approach insolvency, the department will be forced to limit payments to manage the reduced levels of cash available in the trust fund. This means, among other things, that the Federal Highway Administration will no longer make ‘same-day’ payments to reimburse States.”

Congress still has time to act on a long-term solution, Foxx said.

“Our transportation infrastructure is too essential to suffer continued neglect and I hope that Congress will avert this crisis before it is too late,” he told the governors. “I urge you to stand with me in calling on Congress to ensure the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund while committing itself to a sound, bipartisan, and long-term solution that will ensure the stability of the surface transportation system of our nation for the next several years.”

Some states aren’t waiting. Kentucky, for instance, has delayed $185 million in road projects because it can’t count on the federal government to provide reimbursement for the state’s outlays. The Obama administration estimates insolvency could result in the loss of 700,000 jobs.

The Highway Trust Fund was created in 1956 to build the interstate highway system envisioned by President Dwight D. Eisenhower. It has since expanded to help pay for myriad road projects.

It has encountered funding problems for several years. The fund receives money from an 18.3 cents per gallon federal fuels tax on gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon on diesel fuel, rates that have been in place since 1993. The Congressional Budget Office determined that revenue stream is inadequate to meet contemporary road needs even though the miles Americans drive each year continue to rise. That’s because improved automobile fuel efficiency means drivers are stopping at the pump less frequently, resulting in lower revenues for the fund. Currently, the fuel tax brings in about $34 billion a year.

Congress authorized the transfer of $35 billion from the Treasury to keep the fund solvent from 2008 to 2010 but it thus far has balked at taking action on the latest problem. It has rejected entreaties to increase the fuels tax or tie it to the rate of inflation even though the proposed hike carries the support of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other organizations.

“I do not support, and the House will not support, billions of dollars in higher taxes to pay for more spending,” said Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee.

The CBO reports that the fund requires an additional $8 billion just to meet its contractual obligations through year’s end. The outlook for FY 2015 is even bleaker. If all existing projects continue at the previous year’s budgeted levels plus inflation and the fuels tax remains at current levels, the Federal Highway Administration would not be able to add any new projects.

The states would be the ones facing the consequences if the issue is not addressed. The American Road & Transportation Builders Association estimates that the average states receives 52 percent of its highway and bridge outlays from the federal government, ranging from a low of 35 percent in New Jersey to a high of 100 percent in Rhode Island. States with toll roads generally receive less federal support than those without toll roads.

President Obama responded by proposing a $302 billion, four-year transportation package that included $63 billion to fill the fundraising gap in the Highway Trust Fund. It included policies and reforms to prioritize investments for repairs and to improve the safety of highways and bridges, subways and bus services, with particular attention to improving roads and bridges in rural and tribal areas.

“It’s not crazy,” Obama said in introducing the plan. “It’s not socialism. It’s not the imperial presidency. We’re just building roads and bridges, like we have for the past 50 years.”

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
I thought the stimulus was supposed to take care of all of that. (yeah, right)
They need to stop raiding the "roads and bridges" for things that aren't roads or bridges.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Unintended consequences" due to stupid, incompetent government would be my pick. Coupled with the gas tax money going to mass transit, bicycle lanes and pedestrian projects. No wonder they've run out of money - an intelligent third-grader could have figured it out but not our bureaucrats and politicians.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (16)
All Comments   (16)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Every state has state taxes on fuel and license plate fees to work with. Some also collect tolls on some roads. Why don't we declare the federal project of building highways done and let each state sort out how to maintain and build highways? States can raise their fuel excise taxes to capture the federal portion. I can't figure out how sending part of the fuel tax on the long trip through Washington, DC does anything positive for the roads I use.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
I'm pretty sure that labor costs for federally-supported highway projects are required to be at "prevailing wages" - ie union scale, whether or not that's the market rate.

Change that specific requirement and I'll bet that we have more and better roads at lower costs.

I would keep a requirement that all labor be citizen or green card holder.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
Does anyone remember the "Big Dig" in Boston? Congress overrode Reagan veto to fund at least a portion of that project which was projected at $2.6 Billion and finally cost $14.6 Billion, finishing 9 years late.
The only solution to each and every problem is to spend money.
Every. Time. Maybe we can get Algore to put the money in a lock box.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why are we so in love with 1st Century transportations solutions? Yeah, one cart with one driver and one power source pulling it. The emperors of Rome would be right at home on our highways.

The railroad, OTOH, is a revolutionary system that enables one driver and one power source to pull hundreds of carts at one time with minimal land and energy usage. Why aren't we using this system more? Because the GOVERNMENT owns the highway system and insulates the users from the full costs of that system. Privatize the Interstates, if you REALLY believe in a free market.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has advised governors that reimbursements may slow to a trickle"

The Department of ______ is an impediment, except to graft and corruption. The States should collect revenues and dispense to DC, not the other way around.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
The tax per gallon is the same as it has been for years and years? Well, why did they not build in annual inflation adjustments?

I remember in '07, Huckabee was called a tax-hiker, because he had increased the gas tax to adjust for inflation. Well, they are supposed to do that. I do not have a problem with raising gas taxes, as long as the money is being used the way it should be.

Of course, I understand some 40%(?) of it goes to support the 4 big-city subway systems, as well as other mass-transit projects.

Perhaps the fund should be split up. This much tax to support highways. This much for mass-transit. And so on. If they did that, then the highway fund would be easily kept replenished, as people would support that, and the other things might die a slow death. This would be the canny thing to do for the Republicans. Use line-item funding, and the boondoggles would die.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
I am so tired of hearing this same story: The Federal government finds itself with a massive agency that grew from some past activity where some modest success was demonstrated. But centralized government is so naturally inefficient, wasteful and politicized that it can no longer perform in its current bloated role without grossly expanded tax funding. So then ensues a fight for more money where the party in charge points to the past success and claims obstruction by the other party and the potential for a huge loss of jobs. This is why unraveling the federal government is difficult to impossible. Its a system of a thousand ratchets that knows only one direction - up.

18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
Don't unravel, deflate.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
I thought the stimulus was supposed to take care of all of that. (yeah, right)
They need to stop raiding the "roads and bridges" for things that aren't roads or bridges.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
When government tries to take care of every need of every person, they fail to handle the things they are supposed to do.

As we pour more into free health care, free food, free housing, free education... we won't have money for roads.
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
“Ineptocracy: in-ep-toc’-ra-cy”

“A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.”
18 weeks ago
18 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All

One Trackback to “House and Senate in Different Lanes on Highway Trust Fund”