His Worst Mistake: Obama Surrenders to Vladimir
Barack Obama went to South Korea and met with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev. Huddled tête-à-tête with Medvedev, when he thought nobody was listening he told Medvedev the he would be able to sell out U.S. security interests and allies in Europe on the missile defense issue once he had his reelection in the bag. The purpose: he’d like the Russians to shut up and stop criticizing him because he needs his Russian “reset” to appear valid until then.
“I understand,” Medvedev whispered. “I transmit this information to Vladimir.”
Fortunately for American voters, Obama was oblivious to the active microphone that recorded and broadcast his every word.
Even more fortunately, the Republicans were not asleep at the switch on Russia, as they usually are. Mitt Romney pounced. The Republican presumptive nominee for president stated of Russia:
This is without question our number one geopolitical foe, they fight for every cause for the world’s worst actors. The idea that he has more flexibility in mind for Russia is very, very troubling indeed.
Romney got it exactly right. Now, he must make sure to finish what he has started.
He should remind U.S. voters that one important reason their gasoline prices are soaring is Russia’s determined effort to support dictatorship in the Middle East. Every time Russia speaks out in support of rogue regimes, it makes the oil markets think protracted war rather than peaceful democratic transition is likely. That makes them nervous, and prices skyrocket.
And if the “world’s worst actors” happen to kill a few Americans with terrorism, so much the better as far as Vladimir Putin is concerned.
Romney should remind U.S. voters that, though Obama may not know it even though Medvedev told him so in so many words, Russia isn’t ruled by its “president” and never has been. Ever since the late 1990s, it’s been ruled by a proud KGB spy who spent his entire life learning how to hate and destroy America. A man who believes the collapse of the USSR was a tragedy, who has brought back the Soviet national anthem, who rigs elections and murders or jails political opponents.
You know how right Romney was from the ferocity of the Kremlin’s response. Medvedev fired back:
I would recommend all U.S. presidential candidates to do two things. First, when phrasing their position one needs to use one’s head, one’s good reason, which would not do harm to a presidential candidate. Also, [one needs to] look at his watch: we are in 2012 and not the mid-1970s.
It’s hard to know what Medvedev bases his opinion on. Opposition parties and local government authority have been liquidated, history texts are politicized and controlled by the Kremlin, and the denizens of the Kremlin are firing off vicious personal attacks which seem oblivious of the facts — just like they did in the 1970s.
And there’s more. The House Foreign Affairs Committee recently heard testimony documenting chapter and verse the horrific rise of a neo-Soviet state in Russia under Putin. The president of Freedom House told the Committee:
Putin oversees a regime that shows utter disregard for the human rights of its own people or for those in other countries, as evidenced most recently by its continued arms sales to the murderous Assad regime in Syria.
The Kremlin is arresting anyone who appears on Red Square wearing a white protest ribbon, supporting democracy. Welcome back to the USSR.
Obama isn’t listening to such facts, of course, but Romney is, and he should make sure American voters are doing so as well. Instead of standing up for American values where Russia is concerned — in the manner of Ronald Reagan (who defeated one-term incumbent Jimmy Carter) — Obama is acting like Neville Chamberlain.
Obama is, just for instance, aggressively seeking to repeal the Jackson-Vanik amendment’s demand that Russia act like a civilized state before being treated like one. He doesn’t know history, so he likely doesn’t know Natan Sharansky warned: “You can only talk with the Kremlin in the language of sanctions.” A Russian blogger wrote of Jackson-Vanik:
As long as it is not repealed, it hangs like Damocles’ sword over the heads of the crooks in power, since the moratorium might be lifted at any moment if the human rights situation in Russia gets worse.
In contrast, once it is repealed Putin can proclaim to the world that his government has been officially vindicated by the West. This will give him all the cover he needs to pursue a vicious crackdown, already well underway, as he consolidates his position as president for life.
Obama’s claims about trying to support American business by repealing Jackson-Vanik so as to promote market access in Russia are pure fabrications. Russia has had a waiver from Jackson-Vanik every year Obama has been president, and every year our trade deficit with Russia has become larger. Romney should call Obama out on this lie: Obama wants to repeal it simply to make the Kremlin happy. His “plan” for Russia: give the Kremlin whatever it wants and hope that Russia, out of the goodness of its heart, will not stand in the way if Iran goes postal. This type of “plan” didn’t work with Hitler, it didn’t work with Stalin, and it won’t work with Putin.
But Obama doesn’t care what happens to Russian civil society, nor does he care what happens to Syrian women and children butchered by Russian weapons and diplomatic cover. All Obama cares about is pretending before American voters that he has made Russia into a reliable friend, just long enough to get himself reelected. As Obama told Medvedev: once he is back in office he can do whatever he likes, with nothing more to lose.
Just look into the faces of the Kremlin’s “little girl soldiers.” Romney should challenge U.S. voters, and ask us if this is a country Obama should be pursuing a partnership with, a nation with whose leader he should be whispering in corners.
Obama is right that nothing will get better where Russia is concerned until the next U.S. presidential election is over. Romney should make sure American voters understand why.






“Obama was oblivious to the …..”
How many events can we label with this comment?
I must disagree on Russia being our greatest geopolitical foe.
I offer China in that role.
I tend to agree with that assessment, but I have no dobts the Russians are aiding things behind the scenes. They’re wayyyy too chummy.
I would bet this is not a new relationship…and the surrender took place years ago..
Maybe China is our enemy, except they’re busy manufacturing our consumer goods at ridiculously low prices. What do we trade with the Sovs? Only recriminations.
You know Vlad and Med are jrubbing their hands together…
“Hey, this guy is gonna give us missile technology and secrets, all we have to do is wait for his second term ! That will REALLY HELP us ramp up the old Soviet Union, in all its glory ! How totally cool !”
jrubbing=rubbing
whatever, salivating
What is wrong with aiding the rebirth of the USSR, Alinksy’s Utopia? Isn’t that what an Alinskyite’s dream? Mr. Teleprompteur is proud to be the greatest Alinskyite of all times. May be Czar Putin of the new USSR could help Mr. Teleprompteur scuttle that outdated two hundred years old paper and declare the Teleprompteur Czar-in-Chief of America, Teleprompteur-for-Life. Don’t say he was hiding his aspirations, what do you thinks those 12 little czars for? To get Americans used to his new title.
Nikita ate an unwitting JFK for lunch (even though JFK gave a valiant try.)
Imagine Bambi-Barack and the bald-headed shoe-pounder.
Sheesh!
Traitor in the open.
I suggest all GOP candidates wear the white ribbun and speak to the issue from on. The Marxists need to be shamed.
“His “plan” for Russia: give the Kremlin whatever it wants and hope that Russia, out of the goodness of its heart, with[sic] not stand in the way if Iran goes postal.”
You’re too kind. Once re-elected, he can drop the pretense of appeasing Russia for any purpose that would benefit the U.S. What he — his “ideology” is (if it can be called that) — is that the “powers” are more “equalized” — which to him means that U.S. power is diminished. That’s his reason. I won’t say anything further on that for now.
Regarding Iran … he won’t make a move to stop them whatever they do. It’s all part of the “plan.” It’s much worse than Chamberlain ever was — Chamberlain at least meant well for his country, but was just foolish. This is something else.
This is why the SKoreans helped keep reporters away from Obama during that visit – you never know what truth he might utter without TOTUS.
Mistake, my ass. This might be a mistake for America but for Obama this is part of his game plan from day one, when Obama huddled with Bill Ayers to plot a trajectory that would put a traitor in the White House.
This president acts more like he’s passing gossip on the school bus amongst his pals. I mean, really, it’s as if he has no concept of the world around him. And…history started whenever he decides it did, whether (mis)quoting a former president or maligning one of his enemies, he gets a lot wrong and shows his childish petulance at every turn.
I don’t like him as a president and I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t like him very much as a person.
Scoop Jackson, one of the last honest Democrats.
U.S. May Repeal Jackson-Vanik Amendment-NPR
It’s Time to End the Jackson-Vanik Amendment-Forbes
GE plans sales push when Jackson-Vanik repealed-Russia Today
After Jackson-Vanik-WSJ
The era of Jackson-Vanik amendment about to end-Pravda
A sampling of top Google stories. My guess is it’s pretty much a done deal. Lots of business pressure on GOP and Jackson-Vanik has been waived annually by presidents of both stripes since 1994.
I believe Obama’s message to
the KGBPutin regards matters more far-reaching (and sinister) than Jackson-Vanik.I think Henry Jackson would be appalled by the actions of this president who calls himself a Democrat. He would not recognize the politics of his old party. He was more hawkish than many Republicans and his legislation efforts bear that out.
There are no Democrat Americans any more. I am old enough to remember when the Democrat party was more conservative than today’s Republican party.
I think the last democrat American was Zell Miller.
Welcome Back, Bear.
We missed you. Game on
That’s not a bug, that’s a feature.
“His worst mistake….” Mistake???? That’s WAY too generous.
In his eyes and those of his advisers, the unintentional hot mic was the only mistake in this conversation.
Good on Romney for recognizing the threat to Europe and the west. I wonder what Ron Paul would have to say. Any word on that?
………….on second thought – I don’t care what Ron Paul has to say.
Never trust the Ruskies. Obama likes these guys because of the total power they have over their people.
Its like bad dialog from a spy movie. Its like a spy talking to his “control.”
Understood. Will transmeet de information to Vladimir.
Must have reminded him of his college days.
Actually, I’ve heard it’s probaby easier to do business in Russia right now than in the U.S., but I guess that may change soon enough.
“But Obama doesn’t care what happens to Russian civil society,..”
From what I hear from my wife’s side of the family, the Russian public at large consider Barry a laughing stock (durak).
Everyone outside the US considers Obama a laughingstock.
Even if the mike had been off it was incredibly foolish of Obama to lean toward Medvedev in a conspiratorial way. That was a very bad visual. But those reassuring words offered by a sitting US president to the titular head of a state that has been unremittingly hostile toward the US for almost a century will be particularly damaging to O’s dwindling reelection prospects. It’s at least a sure thing that the gaff will turn out to be worst in terms of long term political impact—the Obamanoids must be stammering “thank goodness for what’s going on at the Supreme Court.” Given O’s background the words strongly suggest that he has a comradely sympathy for the Kremlin’s worldview. It also suggests that he recognizes, as the Kremlin gives every indication of believing, that the Cold War never really ended.
How many angles have I tried on Obama for size over the last 5 years to explain his intention to destroy America? It feels like a zillion.
Well, ObamaTraitor’s latest gaffe with Mendevev on open mike night impels me to bring back a Rachel encore metaphor. See if you remember this one.
Obama’s like a football head coach. But secretly he’s plans and plots to throw the game.
Every play he calls he signals the opposing coach what’s coming. He plays his worst players. He has meetings with the opposing coach before the game to divulge his game plan and hands over all his plays. He’s like a war spy. And you know what happens to them.
This is what our marxist/communist president has been doing vis-vie our enemies.
Obama’s not a metaphorical traitor. He’s a dye in the wool traitor. The kind who’s led out of the White House in handcuffs.
ObamaSpy’s end game is to lose the game. In the real world, he’s out to destroy America.
How many other ways do I have to point this out before Hannity, O’Reilly, Malkin, Hewitt, or Rush will pick up on it and have the nerve to tell their listeners? How many commenters in here will tell me I’m overstating the case?
It’s Dec. 7th., 5:30 am and I see the whole Jap attack, about 300 planes, on radar. I phone Lt.Kermit A. Tyler, duty officer. His response, “forget about it. There’s nothing to worry about.”
Tyler, by the way, was a fighter pilot, who bravely fought the Japs for the rest of the war.
Obama, by the way, is a mole in the White House who one day will be discovered for all the damage he’s done, the missile defense secrets he gave to the Russians; but by then, he’ll have amscrayed; conveniently be living in a middle eastern country, having divorced fat ass and married a beautiful Muslim bombshell.
This is the President you elected; at least 53% of the voters elected.
Every ObamaVoter should all be waterboarded, not to get information out of them, but as a gentle reminder how crucial the vote can be.
You people, not you commenters; I’m talking about the Democrats and turncoat Republicans; you elected a living, breathing spy. A traitor. An enemy of the people.
Anybody who voted for Obama, is dumber than dirt. A prime candidate for the witless protection program. Getting the drift? When you pass by a Holiday Inn and the big sign in front in big letters says, “WELCOME IDIOTS”, it’s time for you to find a place to park.
Problem is they’re like (idiot)fruit flies…they just seem to keep on coming.
‘conveniently be living in a middle eastern country, having divorced fat ass and married a beautiful Muslim bombshell.’
Or four?
“This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.” words spoken by a US President at a Nuclear Security Summit, in secret, to a national leader who commands over ten thousand thermonuclear warheads whose target is us.
He followed with an open explanation, “The only way I get this stuff done is if I’m consulting with the Pentagon, if I’m consulting with Congress, if I’ve got bipartisan support, and the current environment is not conducive to those kinds of thoughtful consultations. I think we’ll do better in 2013.”
I can draw only one conclusion from his words. On a matter of life or death, he has far more faith in his relationship with the Russian leaders than he has with the American voter. He will level with one, but not the other.
There have been many US Presidents who contented with foreign aggressors who wanted us dead, or conquered. I can not think of one President who have uttered these thoughts.
And then he laughed it off.
You have to remember that Frank Marshall Davis, a mentor of Obama, was a member of the Communist Party USA. I’ve also read that his grandparents as well as his mother may very well have been communists (something about the little red house or church?). Valerie Jarrett’s father-in-law (can’t remember his name) was also affiliated with the communist party.
When I hear him say this, I don’t think he’s a socialist, I think he’s a marxist. This is not the kind of message that leaders relay to Putin, once very high up in the KGB and someone who for all appearances is still very much in favor of that kind of government.
If it walks like a duck . . . .
You are spot on with this comment. Dig even deeper on Frank Marshall Davis
and the services he provided for Mother Russia.
Then linked to his role as our president’s “mentor”
I told people in 2008 that 0bama was ‘a manchurian candidate’
they thought I was nuts…
I can relate to that.
Check please….
Impeach.
Amen. And imprison. For life.
Has it occurred to anyone that the US would be better off with Benedict Arnold as President rather than Obama. Arnold just wanted money, Obama is dedicated to undermining US liberty.
Unfortunately what matters to an immature hedonistic people is not moral compass but whether or not the candidate is sexy. America deserves Obama.
I have been telling people for the last 10 years that we are going to have terrible trouble with Russia. Russia today is far more dangerous than in Soviet times.
Excellent article. It’s frightening to realize that Obama and Putin have the same goals with regards to the future of the United States and the nations that rely on us. Romney is absolutely correct. Russia is behind Iran all the way.
Looks like Vlad isn’t laying off Barry much in spite of the tete-a-tete. The Voice of Russia published an article called “Obama’s birth certificate may be forgery” and sends it around the world.
http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_03_26/69604819/
News organizations have to report the news. There is still the choice of emphasis –but the baseline news has to be reported –or else create in the breach a newsworthy evidence of support. Just take a look at yourself –the report is all you needed to disbelieve the evidence created by the open mic. So, in this hypothetical (en arguendo), a captured news organization gives up very little, in return for saving the loss of a whole lot.
The problem America has is that 13% of the voters are Racist Blacks who will vote for the traitor no matter what add to that 20-25% dyed in the wool irredeemable left wing moonbats who will do likewise and the 20 – 25% or so who are congenitally stupid and you can see getting rid of the Race Hustling Document Hiding man with no history will not be an easy task.
Russia should sell Iran S-300 air defense missiles that are currently banned from the sell by Medvedev as a favor to his “friend” Obama. And why not? Mitt Romney and company are already consider Russia the dictatorship and after “democratization” of the Middle East is complete, it’s Russia’s turn to be “democratized”.
Recent history proves that. I’d like to remind you that Russia and China didn’t block UN resolution about stopping violence in Lybia. Then they were quite surprised, that protecting civilians turned out to be supporting a side in the civil war, the regime change and the brutal murder of Gaddafi. To avoid any misunderstanding McCain flew to Libya and explained to the world that Russia and China turn is next, and that Putin is likely to meet same fate as Gaddafi. Still wonder why UN resolution on Syria was blocked by Russia and China? And no surprise that Russia’s “white ribbon civil society”, aka fifth column failed miserably to stop Putin from winning the elections. Most Russian’s hated the idea to become next Libya. And by the way the real opposition to Putin are the communists and not those write ribbon traitors.
And Syria’s turn is next. In the fight against “bloody Assad’s regime” US has nice allies: theocratic monarchy of Saudi Arabia, Catar and Ail-Kaida. Only Israel stays away from “Arab spring” nervously watching how secular dictatorships all around Israel are replaced with governments dominated by radical Muslims, who don’t hide their hate to Israel.
And of course Iran will pursue nuclear weapons. They have no other choice. The examples of Iraq and Libya show perfectly clear that the country will be bombed and occupied and it’s leaders killed if it has no nuclear weapons. Claiming to everyone that they are playing the game “give up weapons of mass destruction or else”, Americans actually playing “get weapons of mass destruction or else”.
Chamberlain did the similar thing, playing the game of peace, he actually started World War II. Eventually communist Soviet Union under Stalin’s leadership had to clean up the mess created by western democracies and free the world from Hitler and Nazi Germany.
And of course US is going to go ahead with missile defense program in Europe despite Russia’s security concerns, apparently US is already decided to dominate the world by brutal force. Starting new arm race and undermining other countries security is perfectly normal on the way to the world of the absolute dictatorship of the United States of America.
Just remember 9/11, where most of the hijackers were from theocratic monarchy of Saudi Arabia that today helps America “spread democracy” in the Middle East, trained on Taliban bases in Afghanistan that was “liberated from Soviet occupation” with American help and headed by American ally in the holy fight against “an evil empire” Osama Ben Laden.
Some Chamberlain, some Stalin, some Hitler.
Speaking calmly
Republicans have valid concern that Obama wants tackle issues after election, on the other hand missile defense in Europe is the Russia’s valid security concern and there was no reason to lash out all this anti-Russian rhetoric after this incident.
How, exactly, is an entirely DEFENSIVE system a “security concern”? Was British radar a “security concern” for Hitler?
Re-read the posts and you’ll find anti-Soviet, not anti-Russian rhetoric, as it becomes more and more clear that Vlad and his followers want to return to the bad old days.
Isn’t obvious that defensive system changes the existing balance of power? American missiles still be able to reach Russia, while Russian missiles will be disabled. It’s like involuntarily disbarment of one side, while the other side stays fully armed. Purely “defensive” radar is equal to many “offensive”
bombers in that regard.
Soviet Union collapsed 20 years ago leaving United States as the world sole superpower. Then “purely defensive” NATO that was created to counter Soviet threat in the first place, didn’t dissolve but quickly moved to Russian borders and actively participates in offensive wars since then. Then “purely defensive” missile system went to Russian borders while local wars started on Russian borders here and there. And then possible next US president Mitt Romney becomes so arrogant, that he unleashes controversial anti-Russian rhetoric only to pinch Obama for his mistake.
Did the world become safer place under US leadership, after “an Evil Empire”, Soviet Union gone? May be we got less wars, less terrorism, less threats to Israel, but the global economic prosperity?
As a recent OSCE/ODIHR election observer for the Russian Presidential election, I find it a little ironic/amusing that the Russian Prime Minister, the Russian President, as well as the top Russian Elections Commission director all engaged in public verbiage on how America was sabotaging (or at least trying) their elections, fomenting dissent, sending spies to disrupt their election process…and well, the list went on. I asked my Russian interpreter why does their top officials act like it is the 1970s? International politics = Double standards for everyone.
Where were American observers when in 1996 Boris Yeltsin stole the elections from the communists? 2012 Russian election game was also suppose to be about Putin against communists, but somehow it was turned into Putin against pro-American white ribbon civil society. Just a miracle! And that’s despite the fact that so called civil society doesn’t have a change to exceed single digits at any election unless there is some sort of the coup. They are noisy of course, but in fact little more popular than “occupy wall street” movement.
Power to “occupy wall street!”. They are 99%! Return stolen American election to people!
Observers observe. There were 506 election observers at the 1996 elections, 1st round. There were 350 election observers at the 2nd round. American observers were there.
Obama didn’t surrender. He is gladly screwing over the USA and handing it over. Nothing could make him happier. This has been planned since before he was supposidly elected.
Obama is our Manchurian Candidate. His intent is to wreck this country. He is succeeding.
http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012/03/president-makes-dangerous-linkage.html
Ever listen to the Tom Fife interview? Entitled “the first time I heard of Barack Obama”?
“His Worst Mistake: Obama Surrenders to Vladimir”
It ain’t no mistake. It’s deliberate sabotage by our Manchurian president.
Now, to believe that it’s a mistake *is* a mistake, indeed.
Things Our “Flexible” President May Do When He Is Re-elected
Barack Hussein Obama is so cocksure of re-election that he is making plans for 2013-2016.
Obama made that surety obvious when he pulled yet another gaffe in South Korea by not realizing he was speaking with a hot mike as he whispered to the outgoing Russian figurehead President Dmitry Medvedev.
The surreptitious exchange:
Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.
Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
Obama: (reaching over and putting his hand on Mr. Medvedev’s knee): This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.
Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.
America’s commander-in-chief essentially promised to give away America’s European missile defense secrets to Russia after he wins in November, that he would share vital, military information with the incoming Russian fraudulent President Vladimir Putin since he will have fooled the American electorate once again.
That treasonous plot with the nation against which we waged a decades-long Cold War and which Mitt Romney called America’s “number one geopolitical foe” has raised suspicions on what else Obama has hidden up his sleeve, as if outright presidential treason were not enough.
Based on the president’s words and actions over the past four years, here are some educated guesses on what Americans can expect by 2016 or sooner should he win four more years to perpetrate more treason, wreak havoc with our economy, undermine our international standing, and convert the country into a Third World nation:
. Israel will be abandoned despite Obama’s pledges to the contrary, Venezuela will become a trusted ally, and the 50 year old sanctions against Cuba will be lifted. (Obama and his administration have frequently demonstrated an antipathy to Israel and an affinity for all things Islamic, have indicated they want Hugo Chavez to be a buddy, and have a special affection for Communism.)
. The United Nations will be recognized as the preeminent authority to dictate America’s foreign and domestic policy. (Obama is a professed “One-Worlder” who sees the U.N. as the one organization capable of insuring peace and tranquility throughout the planet.)
. Attorney General Eric Holder’s racist and corrupt DoJ . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=19397.)
Oh Ya cannot surrender when the victor is on the same side as the surrendering President.
“This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility” means only one thing: I can concede more to you next year. I will reward your patience!
Communists have killed some hundred-plus million ordinary civilians in living memory, folks, and it’s always to secure some real-estate based popultion’s threat to –well, the Communists. They’ll do it again, won’t they? They’ll do it in Kansas, won’t they? Hell, Kansans did it in Kansas a short century and a half ago.
This American law and order tranquility, these fear-free neighborhoods without a secret police listening to someone who wants something of yours denounce you before you can denounce him –these nice things we have are not the normal state-of-being, in either time or space, for a human on the Earth.
Yes, for you, dear reader, and for your loved ones, history’s big lesson is that it is within the realm of possibility to perish violently by fire and sword, or noose and bullet right down there at the local schoolyard, per the demands of pacification.
***(begin excerpt)
Lenin correctly identified the Tambov uprising as the most dangerous one to his regime. This is why the Bolsheviks stopped pushing against Europe and turned East. Their best generals and armies were thrown against the Tambov area. The official reason was to occupy Tambov. During that war, the key episode of the Russian Civil War, was the elimination of large segments of the male population in this particular area. In 1991 the regional KGB department was alarmed. For some reason, the opening of records in Novosibirsk, shed some light on what happened in Tambov. One third of the population was killed. The Bolsheviks were experimenting on people with torture and extermination techniques. When I started to explain to the Germans what happened in Tambov, they were shocked. Those who you would expect to be best prepared for such revelations, researchers into the Holocaust, were surprised at the sophisticated methods of hostage taking (to reveal hidden fighters), and the manner of executions used by the Bolsheviks. A lot of this history is simply incredible. The Bolsheviks introduced a system of concentration camps for men, women, elderly people and children, with various types of terror and indoctrination. That’s what they called an occupation. But the most important thing, what emerged from the ruins of the Tambov Republic, was a permanent system of police control. From time to time they practiced, yet again, hostage taking, indoctrination, Komsomol [youth wing of the Communist Party], and now, the next stage: – they distributed this occupational regime to the rest of the country; so that socialism emerged not from Marx and Engels, but from the practice of occupying Tambov. That was the real socialism Stalin accomplished and accommodated.
***(end excerpt)
(also, see the archive, and note prescient result of having interviewed and studied so many people from inside these structures)
***
Of course this is 2012. Time flies like an arrow, and fruit flies like a banana. Sometimes ugly things get captured and put away in a nice history book, and sometimes they escape worse than ever. Sometimes you don’t have to take a chance, sometimes you take a chance because your fellows elect to, most of the time it hasn’t mattered because no one has had any choice other than to cooperate or suffer, or both, and hope there’s food.
It is not exactly the Soviet Union that Putin is fighting for. Actually, for some time now, he has been working on the establishment of something called “Eurasia.” In order to know what the geopolitical strategy of a nation is, one should start by reading and studying the books that shape the minds of those in power of that nation. In the case of Russia, one should read Aleksandr Dugin’s works. Why? Because his books have been adopted as textbooks on geopolitics, for example, by the General Staff Academy, just for starters. I am sorry to say this but talking about Russia without taking into account Dugin’s work and their influence in the Russian government is like talking about Islam without taking into account the Muslim Brotherhood’s project of a World Caliphate.
A good start is the written debate between philosopher Olavo de Carvalho and Aleksandr Dugin. It can be found here: http://www.theinteramerican.org/blogs/olavo-de-carvalho/286-olavo-de-carvalho-debates-alexandr-dugin-iv.html