GOP, Romney Promote Strong Second Amendment Platform
This information doesn’t excuse President Obama’s average deficit of over $1.3 trillion annually for the last four years. It’s also possible that the writers of the 2012 GOP platform already learned recent history’s lesson.
Nor does anything downplay the Democrats’ Second Amendment platform, which parrots the anti-rights “reasonable regulation” agenda:
- Strengthening our background check system.
- Reinstating the assault weapons ban (Clinton gun ban).
- Closing the “gun show loophole” (ban private sales between individuals).
Mitt Romney appears to be supportive of the Second Amendment, despite having been governor of one of America’s most anti-rights states. Massachusetts’ Gun Owners’ Action League reported:
GOAL had more access to this administration than any other since the days of Governor Ed King in 1979.
Under Romney, positive change happened. For example, a new regulation allowed a “free replacement of firearm licenses to those who had them stolen or lost.” Previously, this would have required repeating the entire application process and paying $100.
GOAL notes that Massachusetts passed its own “assault weapons” ban in 1998, before Romney’s tenure. James Wallace, GOAL’s executive director, explained what happened when Massachusetts updated this law in 2004:
The Massachusetts AW ban already existed and we didn’t have the votes to get rid of it. With that in mind, we wanted to permanently attach the federal definitions to MA law to retain the existing listing of hundreds of guns that could not be considered AWs. Also, we wanted to have a clear definition of what an AW is.
This protected against what Wallace called the legislature’s desire “to play the vagueness of any law in their favor.”
GOAL worked with the Romney administration and the heavily Democratic legislature to remove gun control language buried in a 2006 anti-gang bill. Said Wallace:
The original language of this bill was very loose, so bad that had you put your shotgun in a rack at the trap range and stepped away, you could have been convicted for illegal distribution of a firearm.
Overall, GOAL concluded:
- “During the Romney Administration no anti-Second Amendment or anti-sportsmen legislation made its way to the Governor’s desk.”
- “Governor Romney did sign five pro-Second Amendment/pro-sportsmen bills into law.”
Education and participation remain the best way to protect your rights. To avoid diminishment of rights or a negative repeat of history, voters must take a more active role in supervising their representatives. Your involvement can make the upcoming election a significant first step in restoring America.






First of all, I fully intend to vote for Romney.
He wasn’t my first choice. Heck, he wasn’t even my second or third choice, and if he stabs us all in the back over things like Obamacare and Gun Control once in office there are a lot of RINO’s and RINO-lovers (I’m looking at you, Ann Coulter) who are going to have some ‘splainin’ to do for foisting off on the rest of us such a flawed candidate.
Still, he’s better than who we have in the White House now.
I also believe people’s views on subjects evolve over time.
I hope that’s what has happened with Romney, and I hope he completely understands just what kind of fubar would happen were he to get behind any gun control measures if he becomes president.
Having said that, I also feel Romney should be honest about what he said and what he did. Here is the quote from an interview he did with Russert on Meet the Press:
“GOV. ROMNEY: I supported the assault weapon ban. I…
MR. RUSSERT: You’re for it?
GOV. ROMNEY: I assigned–and I–let me, let me describe it.
MR. RUSSERT: But you’re still for it.
GOV. ROMNEY: Let’s describe what it is. I signed–I would have supported the original assault weapon ban. I signed an assault weapon ban in Massachusetts governor because it provided for a relaxation of licensing requirements for gun owners in Massachusetts, which was a big plus. And so both the pro-gun and the anti-gun lobby came together with a bill, and I signed that. And if there is determined to be, from time to time, a weapon of such lethality that it poses a grave risk to our law enforcement personnel, that’s something I would consider signing. There’s nothing of that nature that’s being proposed today in Washington. But, but I would, I would look at weapons that pose extraordinary lethality…
MR. RUSSERT: So the assault ban that expired here because Congress didn’t act on it, you would support?
GOV. ROMNEY: Just as the president said, he would have, he would have signed that bill if it came to his desk, and so would have I. And, and, and yet I also was pleased to have the support of the NRA when I ran for governor. I sought it, I seek it now. I’d love to have their support. I believe in the right of Americans to bear arms…”
So yes, Romney does reference the same positive points that Massachusetts’ Gun Owners’ Action League references – but he ALSO comes out fully supporting the Clinton era Assault Weapons Ban law and states unequivocally that he would have signed a renewal of that law.
Instead of now claiming he didn’t support new gun control measures as well as outright gun bans when it’s obvious that he did, he’d be better off asserting that his position has changed based upon newer and better information (Heller case, historical documentation, public support for gun rights, etc.).
Yes, he would be accused of flip-flopping, but arguing that a person has changed their mind based on exposure to better facts is far more believable than trying to talk away what is clearly a flat out lie.
Sigh…and yes, I am still voting for him…..
ALWAYS vote for the non-Muslim, or for the non-Muslim-sympathizer. That means vote against Obama.
No. Matter. What.
At this point, I’d vote for the non-Obama non-muslim candidate even if they sprouted horns, a pointy tail, mustache and goatee, and took to carrying a pitchfork while turning a scarlet shade of red!
Still, it’s a sad commentary that I am voting AGAINST Obama, and not FOR Romney…
He can still change my mind, of course, to voting for him rather than against his opponent – but he gets my vote regardless.
The question is, will he value the votes of people like me enough to keep our interests, values, and perspectives in mind as he carries out the duties of the presidency – or will he immediately try to play ‘moderate’ and cut our legs out from underneath us as he tries to collect votes or accolades from the left (think McCain)?
On that count, I don’t trust his instincts and am hoping a strongly Republican congress can keep his baser instincts in check.
But….still….voting…for….Romney.
“You People”, are starting to sound like Bill Krystol. Really! Romney is a good and decent man. Once he picked Ryan, I know he plans to turn our economy around and create jobs. You are starting to sound like teenagers who didn’t get their pick at the prom. This ain’t the prom boys & girls and Romney is a saint compared to Obama. The more you print that he is just NOT Obama, the more I’s you turn. Romney has spent a great deal of his life helping people for no pay. No salary in the Olympics and no Salary as Governor. Romney has all the money he needs and that alone should make us jump up and down. When Romney has seen someone in need, he helps. Our Country is definately in need and Romney IS OUR GUY!
A “good and decent” person can still have inclinations that are contrary individual liberty.
In Romney’s case (and this is re-hashing the primaries, but whatever….), he had no reservations regarding signing gun control laws or signing a healthcare mandate on the state level.
Someone truly steeped in the concepts of individual liberty would have balked at both measures.
Still, you go to war with the army ya got – and in this case we go into the general election with the candidate we have.
I am not bashing our candidate – I am simply being intellectually honest. The article in question is entitled “GOP, Romney Promote Strong Second Amendment Platform”, “Romney is more supportive of Second Amendment rights than previously thought.”
Given his previous actions on this subject, I am rightfully skeptical and pointed out why.
Still, as I noted elsewhere, he wasn’t my first choice but he will be getting my vote anyway.
Honestly, we have not had a pro-gun president in decades, if ever.
He wants to be pro-gun? All he has to do is…
1. End every anti-gun executive order. Allowing european and chinese firearm imports.(Regan, Bush, Clinton)
2. Re-open the MG registry. It was closed in 1985 (thanks Regan)
If he does that little, he would be the biggest pro-gun president ever. I don’t expect that little.
I am voting Romney only because I do not believe our economy can stand 4 more years. I do not want to have a better credit rating then the US government.
Good. Did you get all of that crap off your chest? If so, time to buck up and realize that we are in a dogfight and we haven’t got any more time for this kind of hand wringing about our guy. If Romney loses, it won’t matter one damned bit what Romney said when Tim Russert was alive. You will lose your Second Amendment rights along with all of your others. Get your damned body armor on, your focus off of your navel, and do some work to defeat your real enemy and, lest you forgot, that guy is the Communist who now occupies our White House. You savvy? ABO2012
Sooooo……are you disagreeing with the facts I laid out, or are you urging me to vote for Romney? I’m a little in the dark here as to your intent. The facts are real and indisputable. I have also stated I’m still voting for him and gave the mitigating reasons as to why.
Hopefully, other people like me with long memories will likewise make the same pragmatic decision I have made and vote accordingly for the least imperfect option in November.
Or did you have an issue with that?
He should know that if he turns out to be pro gun like Kerry is. In other words a liar. Obama wasn’t openly antigun he had to go under the radar to stage a reason for gun control and people died and it blew up in his face.
Mr. Plastic needs to shore up his base.
That’s all this means.
The Second Amendment doesn’t GIVE us the right to bear arms – it merely AFFIRMS that right and DENIES everyone (not just the government, but everyone!) the possibility of infringing on that right.
Are you kidding me? Romney is a flip-dropping windsock. He goes which ever way the wind blows. He’s flip-flopped back to supporting some part of Obamacare, which denounced, but not before writing the blueprint for it with Romneycare. He’s flip-flopped on abortion, stem cell research, DADT, gay marriage, abortion, global warming, Bush tax cuts, immigration and also gun control. He signed gun control laws while governor of Massechussetts.
Gary Johnson is the only candidate who has been steadfastly and unwavering when it comes to gun rights. As governor he signed a law to allowed conceal and carry for the first time in New Mexico. He has said, “No restriction on ammo, clips or caliber, period.” Gary Johnson has a long standing record of keeping his word, Romney does not. Even Gun Owners of America, the only gun lobby Ron Paul has said is respectable, gave Romney a D-.
If gun rights are important to you, better vote for Gary Johnson.
“If gun rights are important to you, better vote for Gary Johnson.”
And Johnson doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hades of winning, therefore voting for Johnson is the same as voting for Obama – who is even worse than Romney.
I’ll go with the incremential improvement as exemplified by Romney and move the nation further right, rather than go for the perfect and have 4 more years of Obama.
In case anyone is paying attention, gun owners have a lot more pull with Republicans in congress and the White House than we ever will have with Obama and the democrats.
Scott, after the SCOTUS’ ‘it’s only a fine if we don’t call it a tax’ ruling, I think the NRA and pro-gun Republicans are a little too sure of themselves. Besides, they don’t run the Republican party. Neither do we. It isn’t our party anymore.
As for Romney, do you really think an investment banker who’s ethics are as plastic as the Ken doll he resembles, will do any more than continue to expand on the powers illegally claimed by the last three administrations?
The membership of the two mainstream parties, with a pathetically few shining exceptions, are all either dead from the neck up, or actively colluding to shred the Constitution, as they feed at the trough. Our biggest problem now is that not enough Americans understand the propaganda war that has been waged against us. We do not have two parties, but one party with two faces. For at least the last fifty years, we’ve been skillfully herded back and forth across the aisle, carefully terrified into believing that we must vote for crook A to avoid more of crook B, so we hold our noses and vote for the lesser of two evils. We change nothing, and just continue our drunken zig zag toward the same cliff. When you vote for the lesser evil, you get exactly what you voted for; more of the same evil.
With Obama, we will see a continued expansion of Socialism. With Romney, we will see only a stasis of the current Socialism, with a shift toward National Socialism. I refer you to this video for an accurate comparison of the two men:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38
With either one, we will shortly be sucked into WWIII, which has already started and in which we are being cast as the villain. This will prevent any more sensible resistance to the loss of our rights from the public, as we are forced to rally ’round the flag (that, of course, is one of the reasons for involving us in the war in the first place).
There is also the matter of an embedded bureaucracy, pampered and protected by the public employee unions, that usually gets its way regardless of which party is in control.
We won’t save our nation by trying to vote anyone out. We need to elect truly dedicated, moral, determined people who can and will reign in this bureaucracy, and take an axe to this out of control government. You won’t find them in the establishment parties. Two good choices for President are Ron Paul and Virgil Goode. Gary Johnson recently dropped out and endorsed Romney. There are equally good candidates for Congress in most states. All that needs to happen is for enough Americans to stop letting the MSM’s talking heads frighten them into voting for one of the ‘officially’ anointed candidates out of fear of the other one, and instead vote their consciences (not on the ballot? Write in). Damn the fear mongering, let the chips fall where they will.
I don’t have much hope that this will happen. If it doesn’t, I suggest that we make sure our children learn Arabic, Spanish, and Mandarin, and that they become familiar with the Q’ran and Sharia law. Otherwise, they may be at a significant disadvantage in the new North American Union.
Ahem…pssst…..your tin-foil hat is a little crooked.
Right on! Watch out for the establishment Serfs!
If gun rights are important to you, you should vote for Romney because Gary Johnson is a vote for Obama!
Obama is the enemy, fool. ABO2014
Department of Homeland Security buys even more hollow point rounds DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 BY: RYAN KELLER
http://www.examiner.com/article/department-of-homeland-security-buys-even-more-hollow-point-rounds
We keep seeing these stories of massive ammo purchases by the feds, but has anyone actually verified any of this? For example, has any investigative reporter with a video recorder:
* seen the actual purchase orders or bills of sale
* seen these rounds (now nearly 1 billion) loaded onto pallets
* seen the pallets loaded onto trucks
* seen the trucks deliver the bullets to some massive federal warehouse(s)
In the absence of such evidence, the conspiracy theorist in me is ready to conclude that these reports are simply a federal psy-op against gun-owning Americans. The purposes:
1. Scare the sheeple into thinking they have no way to resist Leviathan, and should meekly surrender now.
2. Create an artificial shortage of ammunition, thereby driving up prices. (Recall several leftist Congresscritters advocating 10,000% excise taxes, microstamping laws, and other ploys to make bullets unaffordable.)
The more corrupt the state,
the more numerous the laws.
- Tacitus
Mitt Romney vs Barack Obama First Debate Preview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vWVdOTFs8M
Are Romney and Obama the same on most issues? Try, ALL ISSUES!
Comparing side by side the words and political stances of Republican and Democratic presidential candidates Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama. Includes topics like universal health care, gun rights, energy, NDAA, the Patriot Act, Iran, sanctions, economic stimulus. bank and auto bailouts, civil rights, TARP, the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, campaign donations, and more.
I’m almost with ya….I disagree on the machine gun registration issue.
IMO, we should scrap every single federal regulation on firearms as an infringement on the 2nd Amendment, and start over with some common sense (love being able to use that term…lol) federal laws.
Federal law should be limited to import/export at the national borders, should guarantee safe interstate transport of firearms, guarantee that each state recognized at least certain minimum standards regarding the 2nd Amendment (via the 14th Amendment), and defer to the states regarding every other single issue related to weapons in any way, shape, or form.
Of course the states could still elect to leave the federal government with the power to operate an instant check system for use by the states – but the states would be responsible for all firearms laws beyond what I just listed.
That would pass muster with the most stringent reading of the 2nd Amendment, while at the same time become more compliant with states rights issues.
Rats – that was supposed to have been in response to DaveM at comment #1 above…
And if Gov Romney is elected in Nov, all gun owners will breath a sigh of relief. However, IMHO, I don’t believe this will be a fair, free election. The far left, with Soros’ minions, including the MSM have been preparing to steal this election since 2000. And if Romney does win, I expect riots the like of whick we have not seen in 50 years. (Again, IMHO, Soros and his OWS goons).
I’ll know the GOP is truly the party of the 2nd Amendment when it calls for the total abolition of the goon squad known as the ATF.
http://youtu.be/W_pgfWK3sxw
Published on Apr 17, 2012 by channel4truth2012
Know someone who needs to see video proof? Many of Mitt Romney’s flip-flops all in one video. Video compiled with clips from interviews, news, public appearances, and more. IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FAIR USE ACT.
Republican presidential political candidate and former Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney has been known to say one thing…and then say another.
Includes his changed policy stances over the years on universal health care, the auto bailouts, the bank / Wall Street bailouts, pro-choice (abortion) or pro-life, the minimum wage, gay rights, gun rights & the NRA, immigration / amnesty, gay rights, poverty, government spending & laws, social security & Medicare, the Department of No Child Left Behind, lobbyists / lobbying, campaign donations, economic stimulus, Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, global warming, stem cell research, raising taxes, the Federal Reserve / Ben Bernanke, and more.
Includes guest appearances by: Glen Johnson, Sean Hannity, Barack Obama, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, Fred Thompson, Piers Morgan, Tim Russert, Shannon O’Brien, Larry King, Larry Kudlow, Ted Kennedy, Anderson Cooper, Al Sharpton, and others.