<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Can&#8217;t Rely on Foreign Policy to Win in 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedomlover</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-416160</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedomlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-416160</guid>
		<description>If the terms &quot;appeaser&quot;, Chamberlainesque foreign policy&quot; become part of the American vernacular when describing Obama , Obama will lose in 2012.  The comparisons to the 1930&#039;s are stark.  Point them out, repeat often, ad nauseum.  By 2012 Americans may be getting back to work.  Marking Obama as the appeaser he is WILL limit him to one term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the terms &#8220;appeaser&#8221;, Chamberlainesque foreign policy&#8221; become part of the American vernacular when describing Obama , Obama will lose in 2012.  The comparisons to the 1930&#8242;s are stark.  Point them out, repeat often, ad nauseum.  By 2012 Americans may be getting back to work.  Marking Obama as the appeaser he is WILL limit him to one term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texexpatriate</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-416086</link>
		<dc:creator>texexpatriate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-416086</guid>
		<description>The elections of 2010 and 2012 will not turn on questions of foreign policy.  They will turn on the single question of genuine Americans rejecting the Socialism and Fascism of all Democrats and half the Republicans in Washington, D.C. (District of Corruption)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The elections of 2010 and 2012 will not turn on questions of foreign policy.  They will turn on the single question of genuine Americans rejecting the Socialism and Fascism of all Democrats and half the Republicans in Washington, D.C. (District of Corruption)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-414332</link>
		<dc:creator>Varian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-414332</guid>
		<description>SteveB/Colorada (and Vivo)

Eisenhower did in fact speak of the military-industrial complex, &quot;the conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry...new in the American experience.&quot; Eisenhower considered it, like the &quot;scientifictechnological elite&quot; to be among the trends that should be watched for their potential to acquire undue influence over the country.  He did not speak of it, as does Vivo, as if it were some malignant conspiratorial entity actually dictating policy.  Saying things like &quot;But the military-industrial complex won’t give up the billions of $’s that they profit there regardless of human lives lost&quot; is in fact a sophomoric (and paranoid) distortion of what Ike said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SteveB/Colorada (and Vivo)</p>
<p>Eisenhower did in fact speak of the military-industrial complex, &#8220;the conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry&#8230;new in the American experience.&#8221; Eisenhower considered it, like the &#8220;scientifictechnological elite&#8221; to be among the trends that should be watched for their potential to acquire undue influence over the country.  He did not speak of it, as does Vivo, as if it were some malignant conspiratorial entity actually dictating policy.  Saying things like &#8220;But the military-industrial complex won’t give up the billions of $’s that they profit there regardless of human lives lost&#8221; is in fact a sophomoric (and paranoid) distortion of what Ike said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveB/Colorado</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-414283</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveB/Colorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-414283</guid>
		<description>#49 Carla:  &quot;Vivo: &#039;the military industrial complex&#039;.....you&#039;re such a tool. It&#039;s hard to control my bladder when you spout such sophmoric crap....&quot; 

I believe it was outgoing president Dwight Eisenhower in a 1960 speech who first warned about the military-industrial complex. I&#039;m surprised that anyone would call the leading US general in WW II &quot;sophmoric.&quot;

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a study of weapons procurement programs back in February of this year. 66 of 94 programs reviewed were running a collective $268 billion or so over projected budget. I can understand a few billion over, but 268!!

I find it amusing and sad that Fox News, tea party citizens, talk radio types like Rush, and posters on these PJM threads are blistering Obama about stimulus payments and ACORN, but continually ignore defense contractors lining their pockets at taxpayer expense. If you want to have credibility in opposing excessive &amp; wasteful government spending, you got to be in for it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#49 Carla:  &#8220;Vivo: &#8216;the military industrial complex&#8217;&#8230;..you&#8217;re such a tool. It&#8217;s hard to control my bladder when you spout such sophmoric crap&#8230;.&#8221; </p>
<p>I believe it was outgoing president Dwight Eisenhower in a 1960 speech who first warned about the military-industrial complex. I&#8217;m surprised that anyone would call the leading US general in WW II &#8220;sophmoric.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a study of weapons procurement programs back in February of this year. 66 of 94 programs reviewed were running a collective $268 billion or so over projected budget. I can understand a few billion over, but 268!!</p>
<p>I find it amusing and sad that Fox News, tea party citizens, talk radio types like Rush, and posters on these PJM threads are blistering Obama about stimulus payments and ACORN, but continually ignore defense contractors lining their pockets at taxpayer expense. If you want to have credibility in opposing excessive &amp; wasteful government spending, you got to be in for it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Barham</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-414201</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-414201</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be great if the GOP would openly pick up where the 19th century libertarian Democrats left off, before the Rousseau-Marx infection captured the Democrats, as cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS (Amazon.com) and www.claysamerica.com?  They might win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if the GOP would openly pick up where the 19th century libertarian Democrats left off, before the Rousseau-Marx infection captured the Democrats, as cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS (Amazon.com) and <a href="http://www.claysamerica.com?" rel="nofollow">http://www.claysamerica.com?</a>  They might win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carla</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-414066</link>
		<dc:creator>carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-414066</guid>
		<description>VIVO

&#039;the military-industrial complex&#039;.....you&#039;re such a tool. It&#039;s hard to control my bladder when you spout such sophmoric crap. I gotta guess that you&#039;re in you&#039;re late teens or early twenties.  You&#039;re so funny. Keep entertaining us with your vapidity, it helps lighten the mood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VIVO</p>
<p>&#8216;the military-industrial complex&#8217;&#8230;..you&#8217;re such a tool. It&#8217;s hard to control my bladder when you spout such sophmoric crap. I gotta guess that you&#8217;re in you&#8217;re late teens or early twenties.  You&#8217;re so funny. Keep entertaining us with your vapidity, it helps lighten the mood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-414056</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-414056</guid>
		<description>If Moderate-Independents need the GOP to convince Moderate-Independents that the Democrat Party is leading America on a suicide mission of destruction then Moderate-Independents are too insane to vote since they are still unaware they can be easily bamboozled by state-run Big Brother media. 

Moderate-Independents voted Obama and the Democrat Party into acquiring complete control of the the White House and Congress so if Moderate-Independents wish to stop the madness they put into power they have much work to do to convince me they know what they&#039;re doing.


Moderate-Independents made this mess, and they better quickly figure out a way to clean it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Moderate-Independents need the GOP to convince Moderate-Independents that the Democrat Party is leading America on a suicide mission of destruction then Moderate-Independents are too insane to vote since they are still unaware they can be easily bamboozled by state-run Big Brother media. </p>
<p>Moderate-Independents voted Obama and the Democrat Party into acquiring complete control of the the White House and Congress so if Moderate-Independents wish to stop the madness they put into power they have much work to do to convince me they know what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p>Moderate-Independents made this mess, and they better quickly figure out a way to clean it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supaman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-413873</link>
		<dc:creator>Supaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-413873</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe some of the comments on here. There are so many people here who claim they know so much about the real world when in fact nothing could be further from the truth!!!! Somebody on here said that no world leader respects Obama: Are you kidding? Right after the election, they all responded enthusiastically to his victory. It&#039;s Bush they hated. Somebody else said that the liberals control education and the media. The media I may understand (MSNBC), but doesn&#039;t FOX news count as the media? And  education? So being educated is a liberal thing now? Gee, I&#039;m happy I&#039;m liberal. If anyone on here knew anything about the real world, had any facts about the world in general, they would be approving of Obama. His &quot;Socialist&quot; public option actually PROMOTES competition. His stimulus, according to leading ECONOMISTS, has helped turn the recession around. His bank bailouts have given the banks liquidity. Iraq was a travesty. Afghanistan is a war we should be focusing on. So for all the people on this blog &quot;Shocked&quot; that America voted for Obama better wake up and go read a history book or two. Stop your backwards thinking. America finally makes the right choice and there are people who simply don&#039;t get it. They&#039;re under the impression that George W. Bush and the republicans were respected around the world (yeah, that&#039;s why Bush got a shoe thrown at him, right?). Obama&#039;s campaigns was one of the most fantastic campaigns run in this election, and not because he&#039;s feel good but because he makes sense and is intelligent and has lived abroad and has a worldview which frankly many Americans don&#039;t. By the way, isn&#039;t Reagan a &quot;feel good&quot; candidate for the Republicans? Remember, its very easy to make a mess, but it takes time to clean it up. So to all the conservatives on this blog, please research your facts. If you did, you would be agreeing with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe some of the comments on here. There are so many people here who claim they know so much about the real world when in fact nothing could be further from the truth!!!! Somebody on here said that no world leader respects Obama: Are you kidding? Right after the election, they all responded enthusiastically to his victory. It&#8217;s Bush they hated. Somebody else said that the liberals control education and the media. The media I may understand (MSNBC), but doesn&#8217;t FOX news count as the media? And  education? So being educated is a liberal thing now? Gee, I&#8217;m happy I&#8217;m liberal. If anyone on here knew anything about the real world, had any facts about the world in general, they would be approving of Obama. His &#8220;Socialist&#8221; public option actually PROMOTES competition. His stimulus, according to leading ECONOMISTS, has helped turn the recession around. His bank bailouts have given the banks liquidity. Iraq was a travesty. Afghanistan is a war we should be focusing on. So for all the people on this blog &#8220;Shocked&#8221; that America voted for Obama better wake up and go read a history book or two. Stop your backwards thinking. America finally makes the right choice and there are people who simply don&#8217;t get it. They&#8217;re under the impression that George W. Bush and the republicans were respected around the world (yeah, that&#8217;s why Bush got a shoe thrown at him, right?). Obama&#8217;s campaigns was one of the most fantastic campaigns run in this election, and not because he&#8217;s feel good but because he makes sense and is intelligent and has lived abroad and has a worldview which frankly many Americans don&#8217;t. By the way, isn&#8217;t Reagan a &#8220;feel good&#8221; candidate for the Republicans? Remember, its very easy to make a mess, but it takes time to clean it up. So to all the conservatives on this blog, please research your facts. If you did, you would be agreeing with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-413861</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-413861</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that, as a &quot;brand name&quot;, Republican is damaged goods. 

Part of that blame put at the feet of the popular news media, which have made it their business to so damage it. 
The other of that blame I put on the Republicans themselves, who under Bush, spent more like Democrats, and in many cases behaved with the same licentiousness, only without the forgiveness of their constituents. 

That&#039;s why I said in my opening comment that things aren&#039;t bad enough at this moment. 

The voters feel like battered wives going from bad to worse right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that, as a &#8220;brand name&#8221;, Republican is damaged goods. </p>
<p>Part of that blame put at the feet of the popular news media, which have made it their business to so damage it.<br />
The other of that blame I put on the Republicans themselves, who under Bush, spent more like Democrats, and in many cases behaved with the same licentiousness, only without the forgiveness of their constituents. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I said in my opening comment that things aren&#8217;t bad enough at this moment. </p>
<p>The voters feel like battered wives going from bad to worse right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W. Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/gop-cant-rely-on-foreign-policy-to-win-in-2012/#comment-413831</link>
		<dc:creator>David W. Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68471#comment-413831</guid>
		<description>The Aecon Group is an engineering firm based in Frisco, and it is one of the companies working on the Light Rail Transit being extended in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.  This bit of information was ignored, or forgotten, by Canadian and American negotiators trying to head off retaliation for the &quot;Buy American&quot; provisions of the stimulus package brought into being by the current US government.

So, is this a foreign affairs matter?  Partially.  But when you have Canadian firms (as well as firms based in countries other than the US) being frozen out of work made available to American based firms, you can bet that this is more than a foreign affairs matter.  It is an economic matter.  

Plus, there is this matter of firms being barred
from US stimulus funding who hire people who are
not American citizens.

Plus, what about the role the United States plays
in distorting trade via excruciating subsidies that make foreign aid necessary.

These are not just foreign affair matters.

Plus, the matter of the same mistakes being made
in regards to the financial maelstrom.  Sloppy research, as pointed to in &quot;Check the Numbers&quot; by
McKitrick and McCullough, continues to haunt the global financial market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Aecon Group is an engineering firm based in Frisco, and it is one of the companies working on the Light Rail Transit being extended in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.  This bit of information was ignored, or forgotten, by Canadian and American negotiators trying to head off retaliation for the &#8220;Buy American&#8221; provisions of the stimulus package brought into being by the current US government.</p>
<p>So, is this a foreign affairs matter?  Partially.  But when you have Canadian firms (as well as firms based in countries other than the US) being frozen out of work made available to American based firms, you can bet that this is more than a foreign affairs matter.  It is an economic matter.  </p>
<p>Plus, there is this matter of firms being barred<br />
from US stimulus funding who hire people who are<br />
not American citizens.</p>
<p>Plus, what about the role the United States plays<br />
in distorting trade via excruciating subsidies that make foreign aid necessary.</p>
<p>These are not just foreign affair matters.</p>
<p>Plus, the matter of the same mistakes being made<br />
in regards to the financial maelstrom.  Sloppy research, as pointed to in &#8220;Check the Numbers&#8221; by<br />
McKitrick and McCullough, continues to haunt the global financial market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

