Global Warming Is Causing What Now?
Last winter rewrote the record books in the South and mid-Atlantic states, all of the records being for cold and snow.
During the first two weeks of 2010, a record long and deep cold wave invaded Florida — the longest and coldest penetration of Arctic air into Florida since 1940. West Palm Beach had an average low of 39 degrees.
In February, Washington D.C., Baltimore, and Philadelphia were buried under record amounts of snow. The federal government was paralyzed for days under 50 inches of snowfall in just a week.
Another storm closed schools and highways in Dallas, where a foot of snow in 24 hours set the local record.
Al Gore told us to expect the end of winter, yet to the amazement — and amusement — of many, some warmists explained that last winter’s record cold and snowfall was due to global warming! Apparently extremes of weather are a sure sign that global warming is dramatically mixing things up — and it’s even worse than we thought!
Record cold, record heat, drought, floods, everything that happens is consistent with man-made global warming theory. What a theory! All my life I believed that warmer made snow melt and colder made water freeze. I dressed accordingly.
As with all global warming disaster proclamations, these pronouncements are simply pronouncements, and that global warming could produce any kind of weather at all is a relatively new one. Only a few years ago alarmists were claiming a future of more heat waves, droughts, melting ice caps and glaciers. But the global temperature stopped rising after 1998, winters got colder and snowier, and the alarmists had to restructure their doomsday theory. The new spin — everything will happen! everything! — can’t possibly be wrong, and record cold is the result of warmer temperatures now, as the new theory predicts.
Reality, not theory, shows that there has been no increase in the variability of weather.
By far the highest levels of extreme warmth in recent history occurred in the 1930s, when more record high temperatures were recorded then at any time in the previous 130 years. The 1960s and 1980s saw the most record lows.
And the most recent decade, the 2000s? The lowest number of record high and record low temperatures since the 1880s! The 2000s were remarkable only in how unremarkable they were!
anAL GOREtentive
I’ve asked Chris Mooney if his next book title will be ‘Calm World’, or ‘The Democrats’ War on Science’.
===================
We’ve already seen the ultimate self-indictment of global warming mysticism:
Inasmuch as one cannot claim scientific knowledge unless one can predict effects from causes within an adequately specified context, these folks have already admitted that they have no scientific knowledge as such…merely an unfalsifiable, and therefore unverifiable, thesis they cling to with religious zeal.
Ignore them.
Francis, with all due respect, we can’t ignore them. For too long, too may have and look how much damage they’ve done!
And don’t forget the GW fringe are now telling us that MMGW causes earthquakes and volcano eruptions. Yike!!!
Are you sure? I thought it was immodestly dressed women.
I think it works like this.
Warm weather causes immodestly dressed women, which then causes earthquakes and volcanoes.
That’s it! I’m joining the kalifate and buying a Prius asap.
It also causes psoriasis,dyspepsia,gout,shingles,and in many cases,chronic left wing hysterical micturation…also known as panty wetting
That’s slightly more “believable” than the Iranian imam who claimed that “immodestly dressed” women cause earthquakes, but only just.
In 2004 some of the AGW believers blamed the deadly Indonesian tsunami on AGW. To me, this indicates thatr with a year of Freshman Geology under my belt from college, I know more about plate tectonics than they do. The difference is, I don’t do it for a living, nor do I expect Western Civilization to change the way it operates based on my opinion of what causes earth tremors, etc.
The imam at least has the excuse that the relationship between geophysics and atmospheric physics isn’t part of his usual skill set. The AGW crowd have no such alibi.
What both have in common is that they have rejected science, which is about facts, for mysticism, which has an allergy to facts. The imam is simply being loyal to his culture, which hasn’t progressed in any meaningful way since the 7th Century AD.
The AGW cultists may think of themselves as “enlightened”, but they have betrayed the basic principles of the Enlightenment, in the pursuit of unearned, and undeserved, power.
Walter Russell Mead has called them a “gnostocracy”, meaning a group who wishes to rule based on their self-perceived superior wisdom. As much as I personally dislike neologisms, he has a point. After all, the Gnostics were an early Christian sect who believed that everything only worked because G-d wanted it to, and therefore the laws of nature, physics, etc., could change in a split second if He wanted them to. They were mystics to an illogical extreme.
Later Christians concluded (based on empirical evidence) that the Gnostics had their heads up their fundaments. Islam has never gotten the memo, and apparently neither have the “warmists”.
Like the Gnostics, the warmists are mystics- nothing more, nothing less. Let them inherit the Gnostics’ name. They deserve no better.
clear ether
eon
Nice — not a single link or cite, even from the usual bogus anti-science sources, to back up any contention in this article. Here’s a little ditty from the American Meteorological Society that somewhat disagrees.
Reality doesn’t need a link.
As to the AMS, the vast majority of actual, real world meteorologists are very vocal in disagreeing with what the politicians who run the AMS have said.
Dr Roy Spencer at UAH shows that **global** temps were warmer than ever in the first quarter despite the north american records. Given that Spencer is mostly a skeptic I don’t think your blog post is particularly meaningful.
As usual the problem is that the world IS warming and posts like yours say otherwise. The real problem here is whether the FACTUAL warming is natural or caused by humans. True skeptics like to think it’s largely natural with some exacerbation by humans.
Post like yours (“it’s a hoax, damn it, I was cold this winter”) will rile up the rubes at PJM though. That much is certain anyway.
…. The Global Heating Up Conference in Copenhagen was snowed under, if you recall.
…..Europe had a hell of a cold time, this past winter.
The author was writing with a north american perspective, which I addressed.
What does this have to do with Dr. Spencer, UAH, or factual warming?
AH…the perspective is what the MMGW crowd claims is caused by GW.
You might want to work on reading comprehension and digesting the main point, not shilling for the folks who have been proven to be fudging DATA.
I can add a bit to this. Hamburg, where I live and a few hundred km. south of Copenhagen, was snowed in from mid-December until the end of February. At one point, 2/3rds of all ER visits were related to people falling on the ice. There were waits of several days for emergency orthapaedic surgery because the city just couldn’t handle the sudden, violent uptick of weather related injuries. Some parts of my street spent an entire season covered under several inches of hard ice.
Do you complain everytime one of the warmists uses a big storm, or a modest heat wave to claim that AGW has been proven?
Tell u what when gore is willing and able to publicly debate the gw hoax, us ‘rubes’ may give himm credibility. But sorry when more facts come out not only disproving this nonsense but showing the proponents of this hoax lied and stand to gain massive financial gain from this wealth redistribution scam. I think it is you my friend that is anti science. Must be nice…no matter what the problem it all can be assigned to gw. Too hot not hot enough earthquakes, you stub your toe all gw fault. Hmmm I wonder how many trees gore has planted…prob to busy enjoying his new 9 million dollar mansion he bought…right next to the ocean he believes is going to flood…. hope he waterproffed his deck for 20 fathoms. Gotta run the sky is falling
Do you complain everytime one of the warmists uses a big storm, or a modest heat wave to claim that AGW has been proven?
Sure, given that it’s the equal and opposite stupidity of you hoaxers.
You lie.
Just below this post, is someone who is making utterly absurd claims in defence of the AGW hoax, yet you despite my bringing up the subject, have declined to say anything to him.
I’ve never had any reason to respect your intelligence, but up till now you’ve never given reason for me to doubt your integrity.
BTW, you’ve been trying to pump yourself up as being in the middle, not convinced by either argument. Your most recent comment shows that once again, you have been lying all along.
Yeah, right!
Credibility: ZERO
When it comes to carbon emissions, does it really matter what’s causing these weather patterns and who is right and who is wrong?
Try living in a room with only carbon emissons to breath? People and especially children living in uran areas and near freeways have more respiratory illnesses than rural people.
The amount of carbon being generated by industry, coal burning power plants and cars and trucks is overwhelming the oceans ability to absorb the carbon and the Ph balance in the ocean is changing, which scientists have verified by testing ocean waters all over the globe. This in turn, is starting to endanger lifeforms in the ocean. If you want to know more about this topic, Google it.
Carbon emissions may or may not be causing Global Warming, but that is not the issue we should be focusing on. Look what just happened with the latest oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. As easy oil becomes scarce, oil compaines go after oil in remote and difficult regions like drilling on the sea floor more than a mile down raising the risks of environmental disasters as we are witnessing in the Gulf of Mexico.
And yet, voices that shout loud against carbon emissions causing Global Warming and drowning any other voices of reason out there.
Oil will not last forever. Eventually, alternate forms of energy must be used to move our vehicles and people around. Humanity can not survive on oil forever while it does more to hurt the earth’s environment and the health of children/adults than warming or chilling the planet.
I have watched this debate about the causes of Global Warming with growing alarm as both sides fight over the causes while ignoring the other dangers from using carbon as a power source.
Do you feel that cigarette smoking is good for everyone? Should we put cigars and cigarette’s in children’s mouths and encourage them to puff? Why not let people smoke in resteraunts and in public again?
What’s the different between cigarette smoke and carbon emissions? After all, both of these emissions are not good for human lungs.
It would be helpful, I reckon, if you could learn to distinguish between carbon and carbon dioxide. You do realise, I hope, that you are constantly emitting carbon dioxide.
The most pressing danger to the world, of course, comes from all the gases and particulate matter emanating from all the burning straw-men—including those who wickedly gave cigars to children in restaurants.
The answer is quite simple for
each carbon-hating dunce;
to end their exhalations and
to suicide at once.
Not so. Carbon is released as they decay. Still, one can hope.
…. So, you are saying that cigarettes should not be used to power automobiles and airplanes ?
….. Respiratory problems are NOT caused by CO2. Certainly, breathing auto exhaust is hardly healthy .. but you are ignoring carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide, etc. Jumping on your horse and riding off in all directions at once is hardly a wise course.
…… Are you advocating drilling in ANWAR (Alaska) for oil, since that uses proven technology, and does not rely on cutting edge oil rigs getting Obama Safety Awards (as the one that blew up in the Gulf received).
…… Note that NO ONE, except you, has posited that Carbon Dioxide from tobacco smoke is harmful. Nicotine, Carbon Monoxide, tar and particulate matter, yes, that is a serious health concern …. but not Carbon Dioxide.
…….. Carbon Dioxide is 0.0387% of the Earth’s atmosphere, 387 parts per million ! ! ! And, 95% of the CO2 going into the air is from NON-Anthropogenic sources ….. NATURE, NOT, repeat, NOT Human Sources.
…….. In short, AGW is a hoax.
Mr. Lofthouse, do you have any idea how much CO2 man releases into the environment? Expressed in metric tons it looks pretty ruinous (for the record man releases around 27,245,758 metric tons, by fossel fuels, a year depending on economic activity). But how much IS that anyway. After all, the earth is a pretty big place and the atmosphere takes up a huge amount of area around it. The figures I have are that of the total earth’s atmosphere, 2% of that is greenhouse gasses. Of that percentage, 3.67% is the CO2 that everybody talks about. Of that percentage, 3.97% is CO2 that man contributes.
So digest this: If you represent the earth’s atmosphere as a rectangle six feet on a side, man’s contribution of CO2 would be the size of a period (.) on this page. And that’s killing the planet? Oh Please.
CO2 is biologically inert in humans up to 8000 ppm. At levels above 8000 ppm, it becomes a suffocating gas, displacing oxygen. At no time does it ever damage the structure of the lungs.
CO2 levels would have to increase to around 10,000 ppm before they became dangerous to life. So an increase from 270 to around 350 ppm is not causing anyone to have breathing difficulties.
As to the ocean’s ph changing, once again, so what. A few million years ago, CO2 levels were over 2000ppm, the ocean criters did fine.
Actual experiments, as opposed to computer models, show that shellfish and coral are not harmed by higher CO2 concentrations in water, in fact they grow bigger.
Try to learn a little something, for once.
This Horn person is trying to pull a fast one. This piece is loaded with common sense, but there is not one single scientific measurement in it. How do I know? Because scientific measurements always have decimal points in them.
Real scientists, like those devoted to selling global warming, Al Gore, for example, can look at a thousand-year old tree ring and tell you that in 1000BC the average temperature of the Earth was X.3271 degrees Centigrade. Now that is science!
Francis W. Porretto
We’ve already seen the ultimate self-indictment of global warming mysticism:
“One of the things we see with global warming is unpredictability,” Bancroft-Arnesen expedition coordinator Anne Atwood said helpfully. “But please know global warming is real, and with it can come extreme unpredictable changes in temperature,” added Arnesen.
“Global warming can mean colder. It can mean wetter. It can mean drier. That’s what we’re talking about,” Greenpeace activist Stephen Guilbeault chimed in.
So when the Nashville flood hit, they say they predicted it. But they say weather is not predictable.
Actually their models seem to be unable to predict. Toss the models and corresponding predictions and we have climate change as we have had since the beginning.
Lloyd, you are not very polite. When you make a claim like this: “People and especially children living in uran[sic] areas and near freeways have more respiratory illnesses than rural people.” It is expected that you provide a reliable source to back it up.
Excellent catch on that clockwise ‘cane in Gore’s book!
Coriolis is mythology to AGW’ers, that is, if any of these “scientists” can even speak intelligently about this basic tenet of weather.
Now, if you’ll ‘scuse me while I flush Gore’s book down the toilet….clockwise, of course, in Buenos Aires!
Who knew that in the midst of a giant fraud, the scientific community would stumble upon the golden grail–”the theory of everything”–abbreviated as AGW. If it happens and it’s bad, it is man caused climate change (they can’t call it global warming and pass the laugh test so it’s morphed into climate change–which is a lot easier to prove. Just look at the temperature from yesterday or last week. Odds are they’re different from today and there you have it.
“The theory of everything” applies to everything.
I recently wrote a letter to the manufacterer of the premium ice cream with some dots over its meaningless, foreign-sounding name. I protested the sneaky shrinkage of the “pint” to 14 oz.
Their reply included the explanation that, due to extremes in climate, the decline in honeybee populations have led to scarcity of ingredients!
What kind of möron do they think I am?
Al Gore’s new book …. that was the funniest line in the story.
Lucretius prophesied the coming of the Algore-effect over two thousand years ago:
tandem Bruma nives adfert pigrumque rigorem;
reddit Hiemps; sequitur crepitans hanc dentibus Algor.
“At last the Hibernal Solstice brings snows and benumbing cold;
Winter returns; Chill follows her with chattering teeth.”
(Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, V. 746-47)
Has anyone here actually worked as a scientist or even completed a single scientific study, ever? If you have, then you will know that science examines physical phenomena by performing experiments to try to come up with the most probable explanation for these phenomena. Experiments are performed and results are repeatable. All theoretical explanations (like the theory of gravity for example) for the phenomena are subject to change or revision, when evidence points to a more probable explanation. In the scientific community, faking your experimental results is professional suicide.
Except is “climate science”, where faking your data is the path to fame, fortune, and the Nobel Peace Prize.
Without a doubt you are correct (BS in biology, minor in chem and a MEd in secondary sci edu-conc physics)’ however, I would take the whole computer simulation thing as proof of anything with a grain of salt. Only when turned over to the “enemy” and they get the same results would I lend them any credence. Call me antiquated, but I don’t have any faith in these climate “simulations”.
Yes…its called jr high science class. It is where I llearned a new thing called the scientific method..it involves not loosing raw data or charting results to suit the theory while discarding the data that disproves it. These’scientists’ should check it out its all the rage. The funny thing is that nobody is saying not to take care of the planet. But this is not about that. Its about redistributing wealth and power to a few individuals based on shaky science at best and outright lies at worst. The propents like gore stand to gain the most from this. And yet you can tell by his and others actions they know its a hoax. Then when called on the lies and double standards they result to insults and hiding and lies rather than letting their evidence stand on its own. They have these idiots fooled into believing gore is the new messiah……and they will not drop it no matter what facts say. That why they are so cranky about it.
You are correct that “science” needs to be replicable. And to properly replicate an experiment, other scientists and researchers need to be able to repeat the experiment, exactly as the original researcher did.
In order to do that, the originator of the claim needs to release the exact data used, explain (or show) what he did with it, show the results, then offer conclusions. (Over simplification.)
The AGW “scientists” offer conclusions and sometimes show what they claim is the results, but strongly resist releasing the first two. The little that has been pried loose includes mistakes or what I regard as falsified data. No one outside the AGW clique knows how reliable the unrevealed data is and the programs we have seen that were used to create the computer models are hopless kludges.
People who think for themselves regard AGW as unsupported and unproven. Junk science. Quakery.
As always, if you want to prove a fraud, FOLLOW THE MONEY. Al Gore just bought a $9 million house on the Pacific Ocean which, according to him & his GW pals, should be completely underwater by next Tuesday. I rest my case!
He is just purchasing the house now so that he will have a ring-side seat to live blog global warming as it sweeps his house away. A martyr and a prophet, that guy.
It would seem there are plenty of ‘scientists’ that are more concerned about political and subsidized financial suicide than any professional issues. Ethics don’t pay all that well in ‘gubment’ work.
The only reason why Al Gore et al have made the cyclone on the cover turn that way, is that it now resembles a swastika.
They have no dignity. The fearmongoring is in overdrive now, but remember: “He who seeds wind, shall harvest storm.”
AGW will implode on itself, sooner or later. Time is on our side.
It is not MMGW. It is not CAGW.
The proper acronym is: CACA (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration).
Examples of proper use of the acronym:
“Some are into antiques. Some are into sports. Albert Gore is into CACA.”
“NASA’s James Hansen is a CACA expert.”
Exchange between 2 climatologists:
– “How’s that CACA study going?”
– “Please wait until I get out of the latrine.”
“CACA happens.”
If these idiots really wanted to prove their global warming point they`d have a conference in Phoenix in August when it 110 in the shade but then again it would be too hot for them….
Hmm. Let’s see, the atmosphere is 78.08% nitrogen, 20.9% oxygen and 0.0314% CO2. With trace amounts of other elements. The exceedingly small amount,0.0314%, of CO2 is nearly from from natural occuring sources. If we’re generous, mankind maybe accounts for 0.0015% of CO2 in the atmosphere.
So sure, let’s destroy our entire economic foundation, drastically reduce our standard of living, endanger our national defense. Of course, it would be just the USA and a few European states reducing their CO2 output. India and China have stated repeatedly they will not do so. So bottom line is continued increase in man made CO2 even after huge and unneccesary sacrifices by Americans. Cap N Trade? Does not reduce man made CO2 one little iota. It just changes who produces it. And generates huge taxes for a gov’t particularly fond of lying and ignoring the will of the people.
But the percent of co2 in the atmosphere, compared to the other gases is not the point. The question is if the changes in CO2 in ppm have a significant warming effect. I agree that the CO2 induced warming has not been proven, but your figures about the % of CO2 vs the other gases is not really relevant.
¿/global-warming-is-causing-what-now/? Answer, from Costa Rica:
death of frogs from ´chytridiomycosis´
la Nacion, 15 de mayo 2010, p 18A side bar ends,
¨Otros expertos creen que el hongo siempre ha estado en el ambiente, pero debido al calentamiento global el se ha vuelto mas letal y los anfibios mas debiles.¨
search http://amphibiaweb.org/search/index.html
Actually the frog deaths are being caused by eco-tourists tracking in the chytridiomycosis on their shoes.
My comment was incomplete: it should continue -
The side bar statement is the article´s sole reference to GW. I included the amphib link because la Nacion´s claim re ¨Otros expertos creen…¨ is neither in the body of the ´story,´nor currently found at the scholarly site.
#22. Thanks, John R T. Incidentally, when do you leave for Arizona? Meanwhile, this may be helpful to BC and Alston, though I doubt they have any real interest in any of the sciences, except Political Science of course:
“Chytridiomycosis is an infectious disease of amphibians, caused by the chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a non-hyphal zoosporic fungus. Chytridiomycosis has been linked to dramatic population declines or even extinctions of amphibian species in western North America, Central America, South America, eastern Australia, and Dominica and Montserrat in the Caribbean. The fungus is capable of causing sporadic deaths in some amphibian populations and 100% mortality in others. There is no effective measure for control of the disease in wild populations. The disease is contributing to a worldwide decline in amphibian populations, a worldwide decline of species that apparently has affected 30% of the amphibian species of the world.[1].” From Wiki.
No plans for ¨when do you leave for Arizona:¨ Usually my State-side travels begin and end in the Old Dominion.
earth temparatures are most influenced by…… “the big yellow one is the sun”
This difference is greatest in the winter, when the North Pole can be 50 to 60 degrees below zero while the tropics are in the 80s and 90s.
BINGO!
That’s intuitive and is how physics works. Temperature extremes are greater during global cooling than global warming. Warming produces milder winters, but doesn’t necessarily dramatically raise temperatures in the summer, while it may raise average Spring and Fall temperatures some. This is the kind of “evening out” — in relative terms — that had happened in previous warm periods, such as the Medieval Warming Period, and the Bronze Age. So, even if some warming is occuring, it is no cause for panic and alarm except for possibly at the margins (i.e., low-level islands, ski resorts for the well-healed).
….. AGW causes Global Warming …..
Anthropogenic Gravitational Weakening….
Because the Earth’s Gravity is weakening, all the cold will more easily escape from Earth, leaving it hotter.
This is certainly as accurate as Albert Gore’s Inconvenient Nonsense.
Even if it does violate the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics …. Heat flows from Hot to Cold.
Thank God, yes GOD, that somebody is FINALLY calling Liberals, HYSTERICAL LUNATICS!
Is Your Cousin A Chimp, Or An ET? I Believe, Nay, I KNOW, It’s ET!
Please see my website for this comment.
Liberal/ATHEIST/Sexular Subhumynists, throught history have caused, it is believed by the Hopi Indians…3 Worlds. Their home is out in the desert, where there is not water and bad soil for crops. They are able to watch the progress of sun’s rays across some engravings on walls to SEE that the earth, “is out of balance.” The woman who spoke on the History Channel show, said we are heading for another disaster.
These disasters are NOT created by Trig Palin, Barbara Bush, SUVs, or Cigarettes(more Democrats smoke than us.)
There is overwhelming evidence, that the earth has been a way station, since before recorded history, by ETs.
Noah was thought to have been a SPECIAL person, as was John The Baptist and Jesus. Jesus’ cousin John’s mother was elderly, when she became pregnant. When newly pregnant Mary came to visit the 6 month along woman…The baby jumped inside her.
Libs are in love with Junk Science and Science Fiction. They are incapable of conceiving of the Supernatural.
Having never been spoiled by being raised in any church, I dug on my own to see what really cooks..
If I KNOW something to be a fact, I’m NOT going to debate it with anybody. Reality and Truth are NOT your opinion, no matter what your IQ is.
I do not “cast my pearls before swine, lest they trample them and turn again and REND ME.” This goes for you folks on the right who are atheists/Neocons?/Post Modernists.
If you want to debate with a loony lib, about whether the coin toss was Heads, for 6 frickin weeks, and STILL can’t convince her, then YOU are worse than she.
There is physics and metaphysics.
There is Natural and Supernatural.
Light, Darkness.
Good and Evil.
If you deny this, please go commit suicide to bring attention to Homelessness, or any other CAUSE, you FEEL that I am responsible for..like this Lunchbag did…Please do it by the million. I SUPPORT YOUR CAUSE. YOU GO, GIRLFRIENDS!http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh205/dishmael_bucket/4thehomeless.jpg
Save the fire ant!
Scooter Libby caused my linque to not light up, of the Demonic Cuckoo Clock, going over Niagra Falls on a Ski Doo, to his death, TO BRING ATTENTION…LOFL!
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh205/dishmael_bucket/4thehomeless.jpg
About Gore…he had a lucrative motive for his agenda. In the back rooms of Chicago (yet, again!), a group discussed some of the most valuable commodities to harness and profit. With the help of Obama and Joyce Foundation (who gave them initial $$$), the Chicago Climate Exchange was born. This private enterprise was created to ration carbon credits to and from Americans. Frank Raines, Goldman Sachs (owns 10%), Fannie Mae, Maurice Strong (ousted from the U.N. for bribery and lives in China), Al Gore, David Blood (Sachs exec), Ayers, etc, etc Obama cronies, needed one essential piece to assure this trillion dollar business would get all the referral business from the government. And…presto! Obama pushes Cap and Trade! Someone put all the pieces together, and blew the cover over a month ago. This is almost fraudulent.
Al Gore and David Blood have their own company, Generation Investment Management in London. Blood had his info removed from Wiki. GIM owns 10% of the CCX, also. Gore just bought a 9 million dollar home. He buys his carbon credits from his own company. There was definitely a method to his GREEN madness…$$$$$$$. After the story broke, the Chicago Climate Exchange was suddenly sold to one big international company that has not revealed their board members. And don’t try to google Maurice Strong wiki…you will get fake virus warnings on the links (help from China?). You can search for him on the actual wiki site, but it has been thoroughly edited.
This is cronyism at its finest. Connect the dots, and you will see Obama linked to all the questionable players in the banking industry, and other high dollar schemes…and socialist global domination.