Gitmo Lawyer Julia Tarver Mason: Aiding, Abetting … and Not Talking
Yesterday morning, I had an encounter on the outskirts of Washington, D.C. with Julia Tarver Mason — a lawyer who represents several accused terrorists.
I found that Ms. Mason is more willing to speak with terrorists than reporters.
My interest in Ms. Mason began two nights ago, when I read the investigative piece by Debra Burlingame and Thomas Joscelyn in the Wall Street Journal regarding 400 American lawyers from high priced law firms who have “volunteered” their time to personally wage “lawfare” on behalf of enemy combatants held at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. One of the premier firms involved is Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, which boasted in 2007: “Paul, Weiss achieves more victories for Guantanamo detainees.” Ms. Julia Tarver Mason is a partner in the firm.
In 2006, Mason was banned from Guantanamo Bay by the base commander and the U.S. Department of Justice for secretly passing on anti-American propaganda and operational detention details to her “client.”
This client was Majeed Abdullah Al Joudi. Al Joudi, a Saudi member of the Taliban and al-Qaeda, was captured in Afghanistan in 2001. In 2004, it was disclosed at his combat status review tribunal that he was “was captured with al-Qaeda surveillance evasion reports and after-action reports.”
The anti-American propaganda Mason secretly passed on to Mr. Al Joudi was a slick, inflammatory 18-page color brochure — written entirely in Arabic — that slammed American detention policy as “that of anti-Arab, anti-Islamic, and other racist abuse.” It was filled with pictures of masked, bound, and kneeling prisoners, and according to the Wall Street Journal, “included pictures of what appeared to be detainee operations in Iraq.”
Ms. Mason had been secretly sending incendiary materials to her client through a system called “legal mail,” which is supposed to be strictly legal correspondence between a lawyer and the enemy combatant. According to Burlingame and Joscelyn, a 2004 protective order by federal Judge Joyce Hens Green forbids the lawyers to give out any information on political news, current events, or the names of U.S. government personnel.
Ms. Mason and her other Paul, Weiss lawyers were banned by Major General Jay W. Hood, then commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo. General Hood said — in a sworn affidavit submitted to the D.C. District Court, obtained by Burlingame and Joscelyn under the Freedom of Information Act — that the pamphlet aided and abetted the terrorists there:
The very nature of this document gives tremendous moral support to those who would strike out against our country.
…
It is not a factual report.
…
[Photos] were staged, inflammatory photos from Iraq [with] provocative story captions.
In 2005, there were two widespread hunger strikes at Guantanamo Bay. It appears Mason played a major role in them. According to Burlingame and Joscelyn:
Ms. Mason herself inflamed tensions with the hunger strikers during a visit to Guantanamo in October 2005. She told one of the detainees, Yousef Al Sherhri, that the U.S. Government had no court authority to feed him using a nasal tube, according to Justice Department documents. As a result Al Sherhri pulled out his feeding tube, persuaded detainees in his cell block to do the same and exhorted them to physically resist. DOJ lawyers would later argue that Ms. Mason’s advocacy “resulted in a disruption of camp security and a potential threat to the health of eight hunger-striker detainees.”
The ban on the Paul, Weiss lawyers was in effect for part of 2006, but was eventually lifted as part of a private settlement containing a variety of stipulations.
On February 20, 2007, the day her law firm crowed that it “achieves more victories for Guantanamo detainees,” Al Joudi was released and repatriated to Saudi Arabia. On May 20, 2009, the New York Times — citing an unreleased Pentagon document — reported that Department of Defense officials claimed Majeed Abdullah Al Joudi was one of 74 former Guantanamo captives who “are engaged in terrorism or militant activity.” A week later the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency confirmed he had “reengaged in terrorism.”
Ms. Mason has not been the only lawyer providing assistance to detainees which extends beyond mere legal help. The John Adams Project — an enterprise undertaken by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers — says they “have assembled defense teams to be available to assist in the representation of detainees facing prosecution at Guantánamo.” That description did not cover the scope of their activities.
Keep trying and writing about it; that’s what journalists do. She can’t hide forever, and she is, after all, a public official.
she’s not a public official, she’s a lawyer.
OT, but does anyone know how/why treason seems to have passed from the American lexicon?
I’m having trouble believing people act like this today.
Next thing, she’ll have TEN people trying to interview her. Then a hundred. How many personal thugs can she have?
This is provocative.
LOVE IT, Richard!!! A beautifully just response. (Not that she would ever be able to recognise it.) Keep it up!
Why has this shystress not been, at minimum, disbarred if not prosecuted?
This is not the behavior of an attorney engaged in the ‘szealous representation’ of a client. Her activities constitute active conspiracy against the national security of the United States.
Dude investigate and write about the cases she argued and the people she defended. Get that into the open. Then use FOIA and get her case load from the DOD. If she defended terrorists she was either paid (her legal office) by the government or did it pro bono. Either way the DOD must tell you.
Next let the net do the dirty work. Put up all that you know about her on Facebook and other networking sites and ask for information about her. Background stuff.
Next use a camera on her and her body guards. Photograph her body guards SUV and report it to the police for reckless driving.
Lastly investigate her legal office. Find their money trail and follow it. Talk to the Federalist Society and other conservative legal foundations about what they know or seek their help.
What you are doing is going to either get you hurt or sued.
Thank you, and thank Andy McCarthy and Debra Burlingame and Thomas Joscelyn and Marc Thiessen and John Yoo and on and on for going out and helping put the truth to this tired stream of left-wing lies.
Many of us saw Marc Thiessen on Jon Stewart’s show and heard him repeat that idiotic argument that these lawyers are “like John Adams” and “upholding an American tradition”. It’s bunk. And the more sunlight cast upon the actions of these traitors, the more people will see that.
Keep up the good work.
Obviously at some point the terrorists internal security people will start assassinating all of the attorneys who worked on their cases in order to cover their tracks.
Be interested in learning if the Dude had a PI license. Report the vehicle for reckless driving. Camp out in the parking garage with a camera. Take photos of all at the house with a telephoto lens… if asked, tell them you’re interested in the property and heard it was about to be listed so you wanted pictures. Carry pepper spray! Be relentless.
2. Morton Doodslag:
Its the second lesson taught in Law School. “Cloak thyself in quasi-defense attorney garments and thou shalt not be liable for treason.”
…father a retired Episcopalian minister? No way anyone in that family could be liberal.
u wanna bet?
I am not the least bit surprised about this. This Administration is so feckless and so anti-American that we can only hope not all that much damage will be done to this great country over the next two and one-half years.
Whatever happened to our treason laws. If people aren’t charged with treason, I suppose they will keep doing it. It’s time to squash the ACLU, and the rest of the communists in this country.
One more thing – It is clear this POTUS was imbibing the Kool-aid that the “Reverend” Wright was decanting; and being buddy-buddies with Lew Ayres and Bernadine Dohrn, two know anti-American terrorists should have cued everyone in right away.
The secret war against Americans. The DADT, is the way the government tells you the government is going to re-instate the “draft”; they can not have all the draftees evading the draft by claiming to be “gay”. The government does not care about Iran terrorizing its own people, and the region, and naming plazas after terrorist…The USA is outraged by a zoning issue in Jerusalem for houses that can be bought by Moslems, Jews, Christians, athiests et al…
“A nice long lasting war and sell lots of weapons”. c 1991 Getty
Typical Quisling response. If they’re so proud of themselves, surely they’d be happy to answer questions. Yeah, sure.
So, you didn’t call her office for an interview, you didn’t knock on her door. You’re a creepy guy who is waiting in his car outside her house and you’ve effectively posted her home address for some nutjob out their on the internet to find.
At least when Bill O’Reilly sends a camera crew out to ambush someone he has the decency to not print out a map to their home. Either way, this is just another example of how far bloggers can be from responsible journalists.
Well Richard look at it this way.
Considering everything involved you could have ended up in the hospital writing this article with your tongue because it was the only thing you had left on your body that would wiggle.
That, and if you’re lucky you will wake up tomorrow morning, plus have the medical bills taken care of before Obama wipes it out.
You knew that the broad is a zero dude. Why not stay home and watch Opera?
But in the future, if you just have to break away from the rules at least remember this.
Never leave home without a spare pair of undershorts, enough change to make and phone call – - and one of those universal remote garage door openers.
To save my life, I can’t understand why Mason some of her fellow lawyers, and all the lawyers and people associated with the John Adams project aren’t serving long prison sentences today.
What the heck does it take for a liberal criminal to get arrested in the U.S. these days? If a liberal slit a child’s throat on live national TV, would Katie Couric merely say “The kid had it coming”, and that would be the end of it?
It is as if all liberals in the U.S. are above any and all laws.
Wonderful article! Ms. Mason, her family, and her cell will be outraged by this behavior. If you were a bug they would crush you – well, actually, they would scream and the maid (black) would crush the bug. Ted Kennedy’s ghost is hurling invective against this outrage; that is, when he can get a demon’s appendage out of his throat. Ms. Mason and her family will be unable to understand what happened to the America that they knew, the America that stood up for Nazi death camp murderers. But they will rally. They will meditate on the pureness of their cause and of themselves. Then, someday, they will die and join Ted with a demons’ appendages down their several throats.
Ms. Mason, her family, and her cell are as ready to pop as a mature zit. If nothing but your presence caused someone to block your path on the street, they will be screaming bonkers and defenseless tomorrow.
A wise man once asked the question, “What do you call one thousand lawyers at the bottom of the sea?”. The answer this sage was looking for is “A good start!”. I’m sure there are decent and patriotic people out there who are lawyers, but they sure as heck seem to be in the minority of their profession to me. Mason and her ilk at the bottom of the sea would be more aptly described as water pollution!
Mason alone is not the story here. It is good that Mr. Pollack attempted to interview her yet identifying her residence is, in my opinion, wrong. Respectfully, I offer that it would be far more helpful for reporters and pundits to identify one, two, or a few detainees and then thoroughly research their readily available, related legal filings made on their behalf. Then look at all the news reports related to those detainees for the enemy propaganda fed to the media likely came from their lawyers. There is gold in them there hills; seek and you shall find.
Hundreds of lawyers went out of their way to represent America’s enemies. Many of them knowingly committed security violations and perhaps violated federal statutes while doing so. The lawyers were acting as officers of the court and they had ethical obligations. Yet they chose their politics over professional responsibilities. The ones stalking these folks ought to be state bar associations and the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility.
Countering lawfare is a hard slog yet it is a target-rich environment. Please, pick a few, take aim, and report back what you discover. Good hunting!
Lending support to Shakespeare’s concept of legal control. This becomes more of a workable concept as every day passes.
the fact that these people (actually human scum) are so evasive is that they know that they are being dishonest.
that makes them a lot worse then they may seem.
I hope some day she realizes her dream if havig to wear a Burqua. If not in this world, then hopefully the next. Although, there is still time to repent.
Excellent field work! Next time bring video and take photos of the people coming in and out of the home. Post the photos with the captions “Can you identify these people?” Do it at her work, her home and where she eats. This is the kind of thing that lawyer love to do TO you but hate having done to them. Her head will literally explode!
Can you imagine doing it to all of them, having their lunch guests looking over at a guy photographing them?! Do it respectfully and do it legally. I would think the minute they involve themselves in a terrorist defense their ability to claim their lives are private is out the door. Public figures have to put up with the cameras.
Like I said, good work. I did this type of surveillance while working as a detective, trust me, nothing makes people go crazy quicker than having to look over their shoulder all the time wondering if someone is going to catch them dirty!
You guys aren’t getting it. these people really are being tortured. and not only is that against the law but it’s against the CONSTITUTION even criminals have representation. a murderer has the right to a lawyer. that doesn’t mean julia supports these violent act they were demonstrating. she is simply trying to uphold the law.
you don’t know her because if you did you would know she is a patriot. and that guy who wrote the article is a freaking staulker.
its people like you that are destroying America…not her. I abhor you.
No, ‘does it matter’, “these people” really are not being tortured, no matter how many times you repeat the enemy’s baseless propaganda. BTW, is your name Mason?
Always mistrust women with two last names.
@28 doesitmatter
Yes, even murderers have a legal right to counsel, in America (these guys are not in America). However, the law (American law, International law, ALL LAW) recognizes a form of life even LOWER than a murderer, and that’s called an illegal combatant, which these guys are! Even the Geneva Conventions figurtively wash their hands of scum like these, leaving them open to summary execution, torture or whatever else may occur.
You wail and whine about the damage being done to America by the alleged treatment of this collective waste of genetic material, yet you know NOTHING of what REALLY goes on there! Why do you do that? Where do you get your impression of this issue? WHO is manipulating you???
The “garbage wrapped in skin” being held at Gitmo has no value to humanity. They are intelligence resources and that all they are! When the spooks are done with them, there’s no longer any reason for them to continue to waste resources.
Your sympathy is misplaced!
Does it matter? Do you not know that “enhanced interrogation” is code for “trick the bass turds into cooperating.”
What was done as enhanced interrogation is a well choreographed set of tricks, one built upon the other to allow the enemy to talk and give away confirmation of and build flesh on the framework of information already gathered by Intelligence. The terrorist can talk and save face with their fellow terrorists.
There was nothing done to these guys that could ever be considered anything but a well rehearsed con job.
Terrorists are trained to claim they were tortured horribly, but that of course d will not enter into the leftist lexicon, for it puts in doubt the mantras that are constantly being repeated them.
The term “enhanced” is used in the sense of “improve the quality of”; That is to say that LESS is done to yield more. It is “enhanced” because it works!
But of course, our gathering of intelligence from the enemy to protect Americans, is exactly what the left objects too.
Does It Matter that you can’t spell, and you lie? You abhor us — as do our enemies — birds of a feather flock together.
While I support the idea that all criminals deserve fair and competent representation, these people are unlawful combatants and sworn enemies of the USA, not American citizens. With that in mind, I can’t quite understand the enthusiasm in this area exhibited by people like Mason. Especially considering that not only would she not be practicing law if her clients had their way, she wouldn’t be escaping them in an Infiniti, either.
I have been following the many articles relating to “our” justice department’s hirees, along with disclosures of other activists involved in the defence of detainees on powerlineblog.
Holder would be an insult to the intelligence of the American people, if the American people had not been so stupid as to have hired his boss.You get the government you deserve.
This nation is going to pay big time for this epic mistake.Every single day there is more to be concerned over.
Spoken like a good little indoctrinated Lefty. Gramsci, Lenin, Stalin, Alinsky…all would be especially proud of just how thorough Leftist propaganda campaigns are at producing useful idiots such as yourself.
This is excellent work.
I hope there is a follow up, except, as someone has requested, next time take along a cameraman and post a piece online.
Why not wait outside her office next time. Or follow her from her obscenely expensive mansion (isn’t that how lefties like to descibe wealth) for a while; then overtake and head for her luxury offices.
Lol, bubblehead… Don’t you wish you knew
Oh, also bubblehead, you ask who is manipulating me? Well, why does someone have to influence me for me to have an opinion. Why can’t I just think for myself, that these are awful, hanus acts happening at gitmo. Get out of my face and wake up and smell the flowers. They are human beings too.
btw theo goodwin, how do you know the maid’s black? Do you just assume that? You’re such a racist.
Also, the evidence gained in torture, won’t stand in court… so i ask you…what is the point?
i agree with “does it matter”
The person that wrote the article followed her. didn’t look like a reporter even though he said he was. she was afraid. in representing these criminals, she was trying to do the right thing, and i applaud her for that. You people DON’T know her. so how can you know so definitely that she would do anything to hurt america…the counry she loves.
Look all im saying is. the media are all people who enjoy hurting others, and miss debra burlingame and the dude who wrote the article above are those people. It really makes you wonder how much they tell us is really true. (absolutely none of it)
you’re all attcking her for her wealth, when the truth is she deserves it. she’s worked hard for what she has. as for this situation at gitmo…what i think is sad is that, the way the government acts…has nothing to do with justice anymore.
A question for Bubblehead:
The underground resistence during World War II in France, and Italy and Holland and Denmark and even in Germany were all illegal combatants, were they not? Does that mean they were all scum? Or are some iollegal combatans more scummy than others?
does it matter and neal johnston –
arabs who post always make the most peculiar mistakes because english is not their first language.
arabs who use what they imagine are american names likely made a list from an old fred astaire movie.
what a bunch of shmucks.
I suggest you google the stalking statutes in Virginia and DC. The DC statute is very broad, both jurisdictionally (it would apply even to your actions in Virginia as described here) and as to the type of conduct that is a criminal violation. Another afternoon hanging around her driveway and chasing her car could land you in handcuffs.
There’s a difference between presenting a defense, ans seemingly coaching your
client to present a false allegation. Al Joudi must be laughing all the way
from Riyadh or wherever, to see how he put one over on her,
42. hipeople:You people DON’T know her. so how can you know so definitely that she would do anything to hurt america…the counry she loves.
Weak. YOU don’t know her either. Yet you say she loves her country.
44. NealJohnston:
The underground resistence during World War II in France, and Italy and Holland and Denmark and even in Germany were all illegal combatants, were they not?
The working defintion of a non sequitur. You make specious arguments using non-joined up thinking. Do you even know WHY the Laws of War, which became the Geneva conventions were formulated.
And yes, the Dutch who resisted the Nazis in their own country were heroic. The Islamo-Nazis who flew planes into buildings killing 3000 people were scum.
What a pathetic product of some lumpen Marxetariat inspired uneducation you sound.
pj:I suggest you google the stalking statutes in Virginia and DC.
I suggest you google the 1st Amendment. American history is replete with journalists being jailed on bogus charges for simply doing their job in asking the rich and powerful questions. So what.
Oh my goodness.you people are posting acting like you know everything…how stupid. “narciso” obviously you dont know the meaning of justice… but u know what’s sad? the law has nothing to do with justice anymore. and that’s the kind of America julia tarver mason was trying to bring back. The America that our founding fathers envisioned… the America that values truth and justice above all else.
look here dangergirl, does it matter that maybe i didn’t spell right because i didn’t want to waste the time? does it matter that personal jabs won’t make the situation better. does it matter that people like you are the ones who should be shoved in with the cesspool of people like these terrorists we are so adimantly disgusted by? look this guy has no life, if he did, he wouldn’t be creepin around people’s houses or following them to work like a freak… he’s got no business to do this, he’s not a reporter. he shouldn’t have posted her address on the internet for all the other freaks like him.
@44 Neal Johnson
Yes, some illegal combatants are more scummy than others!!! For instance, those who blow up civilians in the marketplace; and those who target women and children; and those who strap explosives to their children and send them off to be myrters; and those who go to someone else’s country to fight just so they can brag “I killed an American”!!!
Are you one of those mental midgets who thinks these guys are the equivalent of the freedom fighters you mentioned? Because if you are, you have just disqualified yourself from debate among intelligent company! Only a fool can make that argument!
If you are not such an intellectually challenged individual, then what’s your point???
Crawl back under your rock, slimeball or you might get stepped on!
@40 & 41 doesitmatter
First, if you were actually thinking for yourself you could not possibly hold the opinions you have expressed! The only way you could possibly think these things is if you have listened to those who have tried to create a frightening monster out of GTMO! Do you never question the leftist propaganda? Do you never ask yourself WHY you think what you think? Critical thinking requires intelligence, self-awareness and the willingness to be wrong. Your beliefs cannot withstand critical thinking!
As to your assertion that evidence gained will not stand up in court: aren’t you paying even the least attention? To spell it out; these gomers should never appear in any court anywhere! They do not have a right to a hearing; they do not have a right to an attorney; they do not have the right to remain silent; and when the military has wrung every last ounce of intelligence from them, they do not have a right to continue breathing!!!
So, in short, “the point” is to gain as much information as possible from these “assets” so we (the GOOD guys) can prevent others like them (the BAD guys) from killing more old women, little girls, everyday people merely trying to live their everyday lives and, yes Americans! Then, they die!
Is that clear enough for you?
If it was good enough for German born Nazi saboteurs in 1942, and Confederate sympathizers during the Civil WAr, it’s good enough for Saudis caught in Pakistan in 2002.
WTF is wrong with you people? Did you all lose your collective minds after 9/11? I’ll type slowly, so you cowboys can understand it. Every criminal suspect who is brought before a court of law is entitled to counsel. It is in the Bill of Rights, and it has been the tradition of this country since its founding. Since when does conducting guerilla war or for that matter, using “terrorist” tactics disqualify a person from that right? Oh, since Liz Cheney and her cabal have decided to crank up the Wurlitzer and start calling lawyers “traitors” for simply doing their jobs. This is the single most revolting activity (amongst many) practiced by GOP apologists for torture. Damn you all to hell, and bravo to the brave men and women who decided to represent unpopular defendants. Dick Cheney and Karl Rove, et al. should be in the dock themselves to answer for war crimes. But rest assured, no one would be calling for them to be tried without counsel. Quite the opposite, I am sure.
You mean if some dude showed up in front of your house and camped out, without identification, you would be happy to talk to the guy? You are either stupid or suicidal. It appears Ms. Mason is neither. If you wish to interview her, I recommend you follow normal channels, instead of stalking. Otherwise, she can and should report you to the cops. She is not a public figure.
David Jack Smith,
How do you know i don’t know her?
Tell us where she lives. Maybe she’ll hat up and live some place else far away where it’s better!!!!!!!!!!!1 Nelson
Mason in my opinion was just doing her job. She didn’t want to talk with our “reporter” clearly because she had no idea who he was. He should have
called her or went to her place of work to set up a formal interview. He had no business showing up at her private home to ambush her the way he did.
Nelson,
Maybe u should hat up and live somewhere else far away. you don’t need to know where she lives. That scumbagofballs who wrote that article just told you remember?!!!! All of you don’t know what your talking about, you hate her because that stalker said she was bad, and your opinions shouldn’t be based on what someone else said. that’s called rumors…most of which aren’t true like this one.
btw liberty, u r totaly right…
ohmygoodness, bubblehead, i can’t believe you’re so full of yourself. That i have this political understanding and tolerance, proves that i have more intelligence than you will ever have you narrow minded, self absorbed, narcissistic, cesspool of rotten ideas and opinions.
@54 xenocrates
It seems apparent that the point you don’t grasp is that these guys are NOT CRIMINAL SUSPECTS!!! People captured in war are either legal combatants as defined by the Geneva Conventions, in which case they become prisoners of war for the duration of the conflict; or they are illegal combatants, in which case they have no standing at all and their captors are free to do as they please.
Your friends down in GTMO fall into the latter category. the fact that they still breathe and waste resources is a testament to their intelligence value and nothing else!
I know it is an uncomfortable truth to accept. It doesn’t seem “American”. However, these are the rules that have always prevailed (ever since rules for warfare were first instituted). These guys broke the rules and they are suffering the consequences of their actions. However, before you feel TOO sorry for them, remember Pearl and what he went through. That is how THEY treat prisoners.
@ #61 doesitmatter
Thanks doesitmatter! It’s nice to be appreciated!
It’s also nice to know I can still argue a leftie into a quivering mass of foaming-at-the-mouth, wild-eyed name-calling incoherence! (Well, you were already incoherent)
Light a fresh candle on your Obama shrine, assume the fetal position and think calming thoughts. Keep repeating “It’s Bush’s fault; It’s Bush’s fault…” You’ll feel better tomorrow!
oh, bubblehead, get over yourself.
btw, your welcome
Xenocrates:”WTF is wrong with you people?”
Great start and sets the tone for the rambling brain fart that follows. A farrago of misinformation and concentrated ignorance.
“I’ll type slowly,”
Of course you will. That matches the speed of your mind. Which is pedestrian at best.
“Every criminal suspect who is brought before a court of law is entitled to counsel.”
Unlawful enemy combatants captured during warfare are not criminal “suspects.” Check out the Geneva conventions, aka the Laws of War. Your ignorance is woeful.
“It is in the Bill of Rights, and it has been the tradition of this country since its founding.”
No. It has not. The BoR encompasses citizens and inhabitants of the United States. But I am glad to hear that you support the Bill of Rights. Such as the 1st Amendment which guarantees free speech to all, including business and corporate organizations who wish to involves themselves in the political process; The 2nd Amendment which guarantees a self-armed citizenry, et al.
“Since when does conducting guerilla war or for that matter, using “terrorist” tactics disqualify a person from that right?”
Since forever. See above, regarding the Laws of War. You really are a bit slow. Hence the slow typing. But I will perservere.
“Oh, since Liz Cheney and her cabal have decided to crank up the Wurlitzer and start calling lawyers “traitors” for simply doing their jobs.”
Wrong again. Liz Cheney wants to know which lawyers who rushed to defend terrorists pro bono (that means free)are now employed in the Justice Department; and whether they are working in areas that conflict with litigation they argued in private pracise. You know, as if a former Klan lawyer was later employed in the Justice Department on civil rights matters.
“Damn you all to hell, and bravo to the brave men and women who decided to represent unpopular defendants.”
There’s nothing “brave” about a bunch of lawyers of the Lumpen Marxetariat secretly photographing CIA agents and passing the photos on to their terrorist clients.
So damn YOU to hell for supporting al-Kayda Mob Lawyers who helped faciliate those who wish to set up brave CIA agents for murder.
But I bet you were all outraged when Dick Armitage leaked the name of ex-CIA employee: Valerie Plame.
some people can be sooooooooooo dense.
perhaps a blood-sucking lawyer can correct me if I am wrong, but I am certai nthat these people have violated ethical oaths in a manner worthy of dismissing and barring them from practicin law.
Quote:
“…the John Adams Project had covertly photographed up to 45 CIA field agents.”
This behaviour is treasonous – these people should be swinging by their necks from the end of a rope.
c’mon don’t try to sound like an expert when know absolutely nothing about law.
you’re narrowminded, a-hole
ps, are you drunk?