Comments on: Getting It Wrong about Atheism and Science

By: Elite Parrots Club

Elite Parrots Club — Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:17:44 +0000

I have learn a few just right stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how a lot attempt you place to make the sort of fantastic informative site.

By: emily

emily — Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:13:22 +0000

Although the wedding is the existence of the world since ancient times the ceremony, but the bride wedding gown at the wedding but not to 200 years of history. Wedding dress on the moon should be the prototype of 1700 BC to 1550 BC, ancient Greek aristocratic dynasty of three generations of women Minnow worn bare chest, sleeves to the elbow,chest,waist position by a thread in the breast below the lower dressed bell-shaped dress,the overall tight fitting clothing. Now the bride wore white gauze dress hem trailing ceremony was originally a Catholic service.

By: Danny

Danny — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:41:32 +0000

Warren, I don’t think the IDers on this thread need anybody help in making themselves look stupid. The ignorance displayed by people who seem to think they are terribly well read is shocking.

By: griefer

griefer — Fri, 30 May 2008 00:04:30 +0000

do i have to have go get the Derb?

By: griefer

griefer — Fri, 30 May 2008 00:03:40 +0000

just this part, warren, can u read this?

It’s clear that the Discovery Institute is trying to introduce controversies that don’t exist, while ignoring those that do. That’s why the academic freedom bills it’s promoting are such dangerous things; while supposedly promoting intellectual analysis, they’re actually an attempt to pave the way for MISINFORMATION to enter the scientific classroom.

from arstechnica

why are christians culturally stereotyped as “stupid”?
it must be because you cannot actually read.

By: griefer

griefer — Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:01 +0000

can’t you read warren?
lets try this one more time.

Nationwide, nearly half a dozen states are considering variants of such bills, some of which throw in the origin of life and climate change for good measure. Legislators in Florida recently introduced such a bill in response to new educational standards that were the first to formalize the teaching of evolution. Althought two incompatible bills passed the state House and Senate, they died when the legislature went out of session; similar measures are still pending in other states. These bills appear to have originated at the pro-Intelligent Design thinktank the Discovery Institute, and constitute part of its latest effort towards reducing the teaching of evolution in public schools.

Evolution clearly has no shortage of controversies. But none of those controversies involve the basic principles of evolution, and all of them operate within a framework where random mutation and selection play a key role in creating diverse species that are related by common descent. It’s clear that the Discovery Institute is trying to introduce controversies that don’t exist, while ignoring those that do. That’s why the academic freedom bills it’s promoting are such dangerous things; while supposedly promoting intellectual analysis, they’re actually an attempt to pave the way for misinformation to enter the scientific classroom.

By: Warren

Warren — Thu, 29 May 2008 21:41:51 +0000

Another perfect example, Grief. Nothing more need be said.

By: griefer

griefer — Thu, 29 May 2008 18:57:09 +0000

No, what this thread illustrates is that Berlinski is a DI stooge who is devoid of integrity and any knowledge whatsoever of the scientific method, and that believers cant be thinkers OR readers.

and if you don’t post my comments i’ll tell the Derb on you.

By: Warren

Warren — Tue, 27 May 2008 18:57:49 +0000

Actually, what this thread illustrates (repeatedly) is that the Design so apparant (to scientists of every stripe for hundreds of years) is so scientifically relavent (and politically un-nerving) that modern materialists will ridicule its proponents at every turn, in any way, and at all costs – regardless of science.

Griefer (and the inane number of strawmen that he has invented to lament) is yet another prime example.

By: griefer

griefer — Thu, 22 May 2008 12:08:10 +0000

Danny:

This whole comment thread seems to validate the cultural meme that believers CAN’T be thinkers.
And can’t be readers either I guess.