German Troops Riot in Italy over Disney Film!
A State Department spokesman followed up: “The German people have to understand that the American government had nothing to do with the making of this film, and unfortunately, that pesky First Amendment to our Constitution doesn’t allow us to prevent such despicable things from being created. But this cannot justify all the bloodshed that we see taking place in Italy today.”
However, sadly and shockingly, the statement has done nothing to quell the rioting. Some aren’t surprised, however.
“The notion that this was caused by a propaganda film is ludicrous,” said one source at the War Department on background. “No one is surprised that the Germans would counterattack when we’ve invaded their territory. This is war.”
When asked if the attacks weren’t spontaneous, he scoffed. “The Germans have been massing troops for days in preparation for this operation. The State Department people don’t know what they’re talking about. People protesting propaganda films don’t come armed spontaneously with tanks and artillery.”
But the State Department is holding its ground, for now.
“Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous — not a premeditated — response. What happened today in Italy, and many other parts of the region was a result, a direct result, of a heinous and offensive film that was widely disseminated, that the U.S. government had nothing to do with, which we have made clear is reprehensible and disgusting.”
Generals Patton and Clark were asked for comment, but their response was unprintable.
“Generals Patton and Clark were asked for comment, but their response was unprintable.”
I know exactly what General George S. Patton would say about America’s current Army and Marine generals.
“The building formally known as the Pentagon has become a G-d damned mega mosque whore house of servicing Muslims. The Perfumed Pimps there masquerading as Generals have no regard for America and it’s Constitution or their own troops and they are all out sons of bitches, traitors, and chronic dhimmis!”
And he says to quote him word for word.
This is an unwarranted rant:
” The Perfumed Pimps there masquerading as Generals have no regard for America and it’s Constitution or their own troops and they are all out sons of bitches, traitors, and chronic dhimmis!”
The outraged contempt indicated by that adolescent outburst is misdirected, a severely toned down version should instead be aimed at the civilian bosses of these Generals, those who issue the directives which the Generals are ordered to follow.
No commander, regardless of rank, is ever inconsiderate of the dangers to their men.
“No commander, regardless of rank, is ever inconsiderate of the dangers to their men.”
Really? The current commander-in-chief sent an ambassador into a consulate without sufficient security. He allowed two contractors to attempt a rescue without sufficient support.
“No commander, regardless of rank, is ever inconsiderate of the dangers to their men.” Obviously, you are not old enough to have served in Viet Nam. Every single military disaster has been brought to us by the ill-considered actions of those in charge.
“No commander, regardless of his rank, is ever inconsiderate of the dangers to their men.”
Normally I would agree with you Charlie, but Afghanistan has caused that noble ideal to be disregarded all to often. In my opinion it is the underlining cause of the unprecedented number of horrific lost limb wounds suffered by our troops. Check out Diana West’s site. Over the past few days she has documented a truly heartbreaking story surrounding the death of SSG Matthew Sitton.
Obviously, you have ignored how Hassan, piss soon be upon him, was allowed to continue on as he got more and more radical. All the commanders in the know who let him slide so we didn’t offend the dear, precious little muzzies was “inconsiderate of the dangers to their men.”
You are over thinking this. Patton was an emotionally spontaneous person. And unfortunately a lot of commanders do seem to be willing to accept high causalities. This is not common for most US armies, but it does happen on occasion.
Patton mouthed off enough to get him suspended for the Normandy invasion. They reassigned him to lead the decoy invasion of Calais.
Um, no.
Patton was (temporarily) relieved of duty for slapping two different enlisted men, both of whom were suffering from post-traumatic stress at the time.
It had nothing to do with any comments he made.
“Suffering from post traumatic distress”? Don’t make me laugh. I served in Sicily (where Patton lost his temper) and fought in Italy, was wounded in Italy, still limp from German shrapnel, and I assure you there was no post traumatic disorder in those days. Some guys fought, some guys just went along and kept their heads down, and some guys were just plain yellow. Patton slapped a couple of the latter. I hold no brief for Patton (“Old Blood and Guts,” his guts and our blood) but I have no use either for the malingerers that he stupidly slapped. Do you think war is a fun game?
“No commander, regardless of rank, is ever inconsiderate of the dangers to their men.”
Tell that to those poor Yankees staring up Marye’s Hill at Fredericksburg or to the hundreds of thousands of British and French troops hurled against entrenched Germans armed with machine guns with overlapping fields of fire. The generals may have been considerate of their men but any consideration was overwhelmed by their ambition and ignorance.
It is a fair bet that anyone promoted to Major or Lt. Colonel or above since the communists came to power has been thoroughly vetted to be simply a careerist or a fellow traveller. It will take a couple of decades to get rid of them once a legitimate government is restored.
That the people of America care so very little about America’s troops as to collectively allow our government to keep them in Afcrapistan, losing life and limb and being forced by their sick in the head generals, who care not one wit about them, to bow and scrape to Muslims and Islam, with almost suicidal ROE, so as not to hurt the ‘feelings’ of Muslims, our “Partners in Peace” as our generals call them, in what can truthfully only be described as a Trillion Dollar Bridge To Nowhere, paved with the lives and limbs of America’s troops, is a national disgrace.
The knee-jerk vehemence of some of these responses has genuinely surprised me. Especially that bit about the “perfumed generals”…..what on earth prompted that?
Cf: Remember always that combat commanders are continuously faced with making instant decisions, forced into choosing between very rapidly developing conditions, under varying ghastly alternatives, making rapid decisions affecting the lives of their men. …as are their superiors up the complete chain of command. They, everyone of them, all have assigned responsibilities…originating with, and emanating from….civilians.
Cf: remember Harry Truman, former U.S.Army Captain in the First World War, later choosing to drop two atomic bombs on Japanese civilians, not really certain of their effectiveness. He chose obliterating most of Nagasaki and Hiroshima instead of submitting his invading forces to literally millions of estimated casualties…..on top of the horrors of the previous years.
Cf: …that current Commander-in-Chief, and the stark tragedy of his Libyan Ambassador being raped and murdered, is always a civilian. They set the policies. As was even the revered Dwight Eisenhower after his retirement. Do you think that, while mingling with his troops immediately prior to launching that Normandy invasion, (look up that famous poignant photograph) that General Eisenhower, who had that sole awesome responsibility for giving the launch signal under changing tidal conditions….did not consider the welfare of those wading ashore? …into murderous machine gun fire?
Cf:..yes, indeed, I’m old enough to’ve served in Vietnam, and Laos; I was there as a U.S. Government civilian on TDY’s …DaNang, NhaTrang…. from 1964 until December of 1968.
Remember that decisiveness amongst literally exploding chaos leaves no time to consult the Manual Of Marquess of Queensbury Rules.
Sorry, Charlie; you and I agree about lots of things but I’m with the opposition on this one: the skills that advance the career of an officer from Colonel on up in peacetime are pretty much antithethical to the skills actually necessary to lead men in battle. Sorry, but the “perfumed princes,” a phrase that goes back to at least the US Civil War, of the Pentagon are pretty much useless for anything other than than working the budget and getting pretty secretaries once the shooting starts.
“No commander, regardless of rank, is ever inconsiderate of the dangers to their men.”
Your statement is a testable hypothesis. Unfortunately for you, pointing to a few examples to support your argument does not prove it. But examples that contradict your argument DOES PROVE IT FALSE:
Gallipoli
Much of WWI generally
Japanese kamikaze “volunteers”
Nidal Hasan (both the run-up to & the aftermath of the Fort Hood massacre)
Rules of Engagement in both Iraq & Afghanistan
The Commander in Chief’s wholesale leakage of sensitive intel & military operations info
We could marshall a fairly long list. Anyone care to join in?
The only thing a General Casey or Dempsy is concerned with is their next OER ( Officer’s efficiency Rating ). No matter who they put in harms way matters not one iota to these politically correct, narcissistic cowards. Can you picture in your wildest dreams a Patton calling some small time preacher to ask him to curb his opinions so that some 7th century inbred piece of DNA will stop whinning and burning buildings while ventilating the chests of his equally infantile co-religionists ? Patton only would have called to tell them how to do so more efficiently. Appeasement does not work when a three year old has a tantrum and sure doesn’t work with spoiled grownups. Our so called Generals need to tell their Commander in Chief that they will resign on mass right after their press conference if he doesn’t start worrying about the security of American Troops and stop
groveling to their enemies. If they are forced to resign they should call the Seals and ask them for help with a statement to the American People and some illuminating ads showing the callousness of their Dear Leader. A couple of shots of or soldiers in combat juxtaposed next to ” the Pimp with the Limp interviewing the Wimp” might be worth those thousand words.
That could be considered adventurous even in the American military. It was definitely not true in WWI’s Frenc Army where Foch was ablme to tell impunely “I Have two hundred thousand men to get killed” or in the Soviet Army whre generals boasted of using soldiers for clearing minefields.
There was/is a great difference between combat commanders and desk jockeys. Patton was an old-fashioned combat general who had no use for political niceties. He was the man who could be trusted to win battles, but was unsuited for the political world.
Brilliant!
General Patton also says if any of those Generals try to get through the Pearly Gates, he will personally be there to shoot the sons of bitches as they try to get in.
That ain’t where he is.
I like his chances better than yours.
So very true. Ha ha!
The PoliSci society at my Alma Mater, Yeshiva Unversity is named after Dr. Joseph Dunner, a lowly captain who bravely stopped Patton from sending Jews back to Poland, where they were being murdered by their fellow Poles. (It is hard to find much info online, and a search tends to bring back anti-semitic sites.)
Here is a quote I was able to find, (also found copied verbatim into wikipedia):
“The first event involved General George Patton, acting as military governor in southern Germany, decided that the entire Munich area was to be cleared to DPs with an eye toward repatriating them to their country of origin. Joseph Dunner, an American officer and former professor of political science, protested the
order. Patton had sent 90 trucks of the Third Army to Buchberg intent on transporting refugees. The DPs refused to move citing Dunner’s protest. Word of Patton’s order and other anti-Semitic remarks made their way up the chain of command resulting in his being relieved of his command. Patton died shortly
thereafter in an automobile accident.”
(Jews ran away from Poland because of attacks on them by their fellow Poles.)
I remember Dr. Dunner from my years at college. He gave a series of talks; I guess today you would call them “Neo-conservative”, at a time when attacks on such a viewpoint were most likely to come from the Left. What I mean is that he was pro-American, pro-Israel, and anti-Communist. It is a shame Wikipedia has no article on him.
I like the satire some, but as the MSM propaganda machine continues to blame the video trailer for all present Mid-East flareups, one needs to raise the question: whose films caused the original 9/11 attack and all the other attacks by islamists?
It sounds like Dr. Dunner also deserves a movie.
W/respect to Gen. Patton, VDH’s writings on the irony of liberal democratic societies periodically requiring the services of harsh and autocratic military leaders (Patton, Sherman) to save the day but then recoiling from them after the wars are over may be of interest.
Great poem by Kipling, TOMMY
Last Stanza
You talk o’ better food for us, an’ schools, an’ fires, an’ all:
We’ll wait for extry rations if you treat us rational.
Don’t mess about the cook-room slops, but prove it to our face
The Widow’s Uniform is not the soldier-man’s disgrace.
For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Chuck him out, the brute!”
But it’s “Saviour of ‘is country” when the guns begin to shoot;
An’ it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ anything you please;
An’ Tommy ain’t a bloomin’ fool — you bet that Tommy sees!
Good, apt post, T57. Love Kipling.
Re:…”…. to save the day but then recoiling from them after the wars are over may be of interest.”
Hanson’s articles are without fail, all worth reading, slowly.
Of even more interest would be the mob-psychology behind that abrupt populist reversal.
Here’s a paste suggesting a book popular about forty some years ago, and still very topical reading right this hour with our discussions of th’Media.
….”A Nation of Sheep – William J. Lederer – Google Books
books.google.com › … › Social Science › Politics & Government
Rating: 3.5 – 4 reviews
Discusses the effects of the apathy and ignorance of the American people on United States foreign policy, relations with other nations, and use of foreign aid …”
Critics…especially smug media folks…..who’re not privy to the closed-door sessions of upper echelons of our government, and dependent upon selective “leaks”, are themselves very vulnerable to withering criticism. They’ve got to have thick skins, like politicians in general.
We’re seeing this now at our immediate fulcrum-point of a national election cycle.
Call me a skeptic, but my BS meter goes off when I read very obscure passages lifted from wikipedia – complete with misspellings and grammatical errors – intended to smear the reputation of an American patriot and anti-communist. I mean, look around at the in-your-face comtemporary blathering Jew haters who ply their venomous trade with no apparent censure or criticism from ACADEMIA. In fact, these animals are trotted out by academics as enlightened warriors against the disease of American Exceptionalism. So again, I’m really very skeptical of your criticism of Gen. Patton. I’m an old man and had not, until now, heard that Patton was a Jew hater. However, I can generate a list as long as my arm of contemporary Jew haters in academic, journalistic and military positions of note who are exalted by American media and other prominent corners of our culture. I wish you had scalded them instead of dead General Patton.
Right. I have no doubt that Patton can be quoted using some offensive slang word for every ethnic group, including his own, but that would not be evidence of antisemitism, just barbaric communication skills. As for repatriation of Poles, that was the official policy of all the Allied governments, not Patton’s personal agenda. And who made repatriation official US policy? None other than the overtly antisemitic and racist Democrat president, Roosevelt. He was a good war president, I’ll give him that much, but on the other hand FDR is largely responsible for the destruction of the American way of life that we are still struggling to restore today.
Repatriation of displaced persons was US policy. It took awhile for the US political authority to really come to grips with the nature of our gallant Soviet allies and many in US politics still remain oblivious to the mostrosites of the former Soviet Union and its evil political and social system. Some even seem to want to institute such a system here.
I spoke with a WWII vet from the European Theater. They knew the Russians were killing most of the prisoners freed from the Germans and being sent back home. Took awhile for word to get up high and wide enough to stop the practice, indeed. I was not aware of the Polish DP executions, though. I knew only Lutherans.
This piqued my curiosity a bit because I do know a bit about the Shoah and post-war events in Europe. I think this is largely leftist propaganda against a General who quickly saw and reacted to the threat posed by the Soviet Union. Just exactly what constituted “repatriation” to Poland is a very complex question as Polish borders moved both before and after entry into the War by the Western Powers.
Under the Potsdam agreement, there was to be ‘repatriation” of Soviet nationals and the nationals of other German allied states that had been deported or fled to Germany or the West. This remained Allied policy until the resistance by Jews and other political refugees convinced the Allies to first informally and later formally abandon the policy of forced repatriation. Who was a Pole and who a Ukrainian was subject to very flexible and ideological interpretation and the Soviets generally denounced Ukrainians as Nazi sympathizers. Unfortunately, Germans and Ukrainians forced to the East faced almost certain death at the hands of the Soviets.
At the same time the Soviets were exterminating collaborators and political enemies, they were encouraging settlement of non-Germans in the formerly German occupied areas, particularly in Poland. It was a wild and lawless time. It may make you or someone else feel good to lay it all on a controversial and very anti-communist general, but to the extent that he may have been involved in repatriation of “Polish” Jews, he was following Allied policy reached by agreement with our gallant Soviet allies, who, by the way, were allied by treaty with the Soviets by the end of the War despite the fact that the Western powers had gone to war to preserve Polish sovereignty. I think you’re carrying the Commies’ water with this story.
Why are you putting quotation marks around “Polish” jews. poland for nearly a thousand years had an enormous jewish population. you need to explain your “quotes”.
Sad – but true.
Patton didn’t like Jews, saw them all as Wall street manipulators, wealthy the whole nine yards.
But it was his idea to make German civilians visit the death camps, to see for themselves the net effect of the third reich.
Liar. My relatives had to flee Poland because they were in the Polish underground helping Jews. Hitler hated Poles as much as he hated Jews, Blacks, you name it. The concentration camps were heavily populated with non-Jewish Poles. You are a disgusting person with little knowledge of history beyond the propaganda peddled by revisionist liberal professors.
PJMedia’s satire has been very much hit and miss, but this is a good one.
Scary thing is the loony moral relativist Left just won’t get it, I mean this kind of thing just goes through the holes in their heads.
Wonderful; I’m going to try to publicize this piece a bit.
I would note that such things were in fact harmful, because they led people not to take the Nazis seriously, and thus to disbelieve the reports regarding the Holocaust. The WWI exagerated atrocity stories didn’t help either.
(This was first pointed out to me by my Dad; Herman Wouk also refers to this in his WWII novels.)
Great piece, but you forgot the part where General Eisenhower personally phoned Walt Disney to chastise him for producing such an insensitive and potentially inflammatory film.
And FDR ordered the FBI to arrest all of the cartoonists
Cute, good but the problem today is, our elites do not believe (or want) us to be a country anymore. They are too conditioned to “think globally” and high trade and high immigration both have created this new reality.
I wish we were a bit more “nationalistic” (that is, sovereign) but the trend line keeps moving toward world socialist government and I fear it will never be stopped.
Nonsense – they don’t want a global government per se. They want to destry the west with it’s nasty Judeo – Christian value system. When I see them flooding muslim countries with hispanics – caucasian – white orientals I’ll buy into it.
Very droll, and just about the way some people would have wanted it to go.
I remember Barry gets all wee-wee over the thought of MacArthur taking the surrender of Japan in Tokyo Bay.
PS 2 quibbles.
The 31st Division served in New Guinea and the Philippines under MacArthur. It was the 36th Division that took a pounding at Salerno.
And Patton was still in the doghouse over the slapping incident.
He did a lot worse. See my post above.
As a retired construction worker, I know from experience and through theory, that a building must begin with the foundation. As it refers to this topic, those on the political spectrum left of center do not recognize that there is a global war taking place presently. Well, in order for the left to understand how to fight the war, they must first understand that there is a war. One of the fundamental blocks to accepting the war concept is the underlying racism of leftists, who, even though they might believe in moral and cultural equivelency, if you scratch the surface, they regard Islamists as complete idiots. Over the years, I’ve met some Islamic people and some of them are “lacking”, but I’ve met some Islamic folks who are just as intelligent as I am, sometimes more, and that it is racist for the left to assume that organized Islamists do not pose a formidable threat to the West. We are at war, and we’d better understand that.
has joined forces with islamists in this war against the west
IslamistsMuslimsThe Left is in cahoots with the Islamists in the war against the West. Wake up!
And so is the Pentagon.
This really shouldn’t have to be continually pointed out at PJMedia, but “Islamist” and “racist” have nothing to do with one another. Islam is a religious cohort, not a racial (or even ethnic) one. Each time the two are confused it plays right into the hands of the race-mongering left.
Islam is gender racist since it is considering women as inferior beings.
From this regard alone it is a racist ideology.
No – it makes them sexist. You need to get your “ist’s” straight.
Yes, I left out the part that said when the man was created he was divided in two halves: one white who will rule over heaven and one black who was made of coal and sent to hell.
I also left the part about the Judgement Day when all the non-believers will have their faces blackened as punishment.
I also left out references about The Most Perfect Human Being Ever Born condoning black slavery.
Obviously sexism is not racism, therefore a concept socially acceptable to all “progressives”.
Islam is not racist on a doctrine level, but it does get implemented on a race level at times. An easy current example is to note that the blacks who did not flee in Libya were murdered.
Islamist, themselves are racist – just ask any non-arab muslim how that goes. But the point is WE are not racist in our disdain and contempt for islam since muslims come in every color and walk of life.
Late breaking news.
“Upon further investigation your threat-and-death-defying reporter [ed. who knew we had any of these??] has discovered from his mole in the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda that Goebbels himself ordered the overdubbing of this U.S. produced film in an effort to further motivate the German troops who have sworn their undying loyalty to their Hero of the Great War.” He was heard to say “As anyone who would hide behind children while killing the enemy, what’s a little blasphemy as long as it advances Allah’s interests? The imam even gave Goebbels the best words to use and blessed the effort.” “And he was right, the great satan did roll over and beg – and after a series of defeats our forces were inspired to greater effort by the spectacle.” Granted, the long overdue restoration of the bombed out Bayer plan and resupply of amphetamines may have been a factor. Ministry insiders did say that they understand they can’t use this psyop more than once a quarter, else the americans will come to understand we play them for fools.
More news at 11.
This is great! I have seen the cartoon, and in retrospect have to state unequivocally that political correctness has stifled America’s free speech more than anything else so far. A good tongue in cheek commentary along this lines is here http://fundamentalrefounding.ning.com/forum/topics/movies-the-real-killers
The events in the Mideast were acts of war against the US, and had nothing whatsoever to do with that movie, and our stupid administration gets out and refuses to even say the word ‘terrorism.’ Obama is afraid of offending the terrorists. I think he wants to have them over to the White House for a state dinner, and let them know that we will no longer offend them by existing.
The reason there are stereotypes is because people act stereotypically. If Ach-I-need-a-job didn’t act like the Jew-hating terrorist he is, there would be some cause for civility. Remember Arafat? In order to appease his desires to kill as many people as possible, the west’s intellectuals ladled the Nobel Peace Prize upon him.
Appeasement/”peace in our time” is always a failure when dealing with those who are more than happy to take advantage of the weakness.
Sure, people can say what they want about Patton. But he was dedicated to defeating the Nazis and did so. His knowledge of history led him down the politically incorrect path he would choose. But he knew basic human instinct and was a brilliant tactician. Out of all the flawed people in our society, there are worse things than to be like Patton. I don’t think I’d like him at all but I would still respect his abilities to lead and win. Expecting a General to be an ambassador is like expecting a pro football player to be an expert on Shakespeare though some probably are.
Thinking globally has done more harm to this nation than anything I can think of since the hippies of the 60′s. It’s one thing to acknowledge and understand that the US is but one nation in the whole world, but it’s something else entirely to apply left-wing “give everybody free stuff” because they are less fortunate due to their own government’s lackings. Shoveling money to the mid-east was always a bad idea.
The left’s notions of “energy independence” is a facade of crap. By paying for solar cells and windmills and shutting out harvesting of our own oil, they have merely created the illusion of paving a road to independence. This has a two-fold aspect to it where their own ignorance of physics as well as their desires to kiss the muslims’ ass. In fact those two concepts are at odds with one another. If the muslims hate us already just think how much more they will when the spigot of money for oil shuts off. Thus, the left can’t stop sending money to them or they will be —-”offended”.
At the end of the day, the realist has to ask, “What doesn’t offend a muslim?” and “Why should I care?”.
Well said and needed! Congratulations!
First it was Chaplin’s The Great Dictator who offended them to no end; luckily Roosevelt did apologize. (Everybody remembers the mega-talented mega-rapper Eff-Y and the super-duper pop sensation Missy Garre-garre who convinced the President to do it).
The Disney movie was the last drop though, for both the modest Germans and their perfect Fuhrer.
A very appropriate piece. I’ve pointed out often to those I work with (who are essentially ignorant of all history not involving football) that one of Hitler’s staunchest allies has yet to be defeated. . . the islamists.
If only we could understand why they hate us so! Nonetheless, I blame Churchill.
Thank God ‘The Greatest Generation’ was smarter than the current bozos in charge. Surely this is how WWII would have been conducted by the current brain trust. They can’t recognize a (strategic) war when they see one – how would you expect them to recognize a (tactical) terrorist attack?
Just a datapoint: It was the 36th Division at Salerno, not the 31st, which was in the Western Pacific.
Don’t forget the Stooges! “You Natzy Spy” and “I’ll Never Heil Again” – both released before we were in the war. (You can catch them in their entirety on YouTube.)
Moe Howard was the first comedian to lampoon Hitler; pretty darned ballsy, I say.
What, no love for Friz Freleng’s “Herr Meets Hare”?
It’s that Stalin thing, isn’t it.
Man I wish those three got the Hollywood recognition they deserve, I mean Charlie Chaplain level recognition. But alas, they were true working people’s entertainers, not commie elitists like Charlie.
I enjoy the old Stooges shorts on AMC cable channel. They run them uncut, any they run the titles like those you mention (and the more mature “burlesque” titles) that were censored by broadcast TV.
I think there was a movie about this episode starring Lloyd Bridges. I consider myself a minor movie buff but the only thing I can remember, it was black and white, is that he was an American soldier who had fallen in love with a DP in a camp. The orders came to send them back to the Soviets and he lay down in the path of the trucks to block their exit.
http://crombouke.blogspot.ca/2011/03/church-of-adolf-hitler.html
From Bishop Joseph Goebbels D.D.
I am writing on behalf of the Church of Adolf Hitler (pbuh), formerly known as the Nazi Party.
Having decided to transform ourselves into a religion, we have abandoned all worldly ambitions, and intend to concentrate on our higher spiritual objectives of non-violent global conquest, compassionate enslavement of inferior peoples, and peaceful extermination of the Jews.
Since we are now a religion rather than a political movement, we demand the following rights and privileges appropriate to our new identity:
- An end to Naziphobia in the media, especially war films showing the Nazis in a bad light.
- Tax exemption for all places of worship including airfields, munitions factories, extermination camps etc.
- Destruction of all blasphemous cartoons of Adolf Hitler(pbuh) produced in the Second World War.
- An apology from the British government for the campaign of Naziphobia waged by Winston Churchill, and the hurt feelings inflicted on the Afrika Korps at El Alamein by the Naziphobic bigot Montgomery.
- An apology from the American government for the insensitivity by the raging Naziphobe Eisenhower in failing to forewarn Nazi community leaders of the D-Day landings, which caused much distress among the peaceloving Nazis holidaying in Northern France.
- Burning ‘Mein Kampf’ must become a hate crime punishable by hanging with piano wire.
- Application of our parallel legal system known as ‘The Gestapo’ must be enforced in so-called ‘democratic’ countries.
- We demand affirmative action, in the interests of community cohesion, to promote Nazis to high positions in the security services.
- We demand government funding for the expansion of our youth activities, which play a vital role in keeping the younger generation out of trouble, and concentrate their minds on wholesome activities such as rallies, processions, camps, pogroms etc.
- The occasional Blitzkrieg invasions of sovereign states must not be portrayed in the media as being typical of Nazis as a whole, since this leads to Naziphobia. Rather they must be shown to be the work of a tiny minority of extremists who have hijacked a peaceful spiritual movement.
Peace in our time and Heil Hitler!
- Bishop Joseph Goebbels
What are we – chopped liver?
Benito Mussolini
Hirohito (Emp.)
A masterwork.
Sad indeed, but a masterwork.
BRAVO !
That the people of America care so very little about America’s troops as to collectively allow our government to keep them in Afcrapistan, losing life and limb and being forced by their sick in the head generals, who care not one wit about them, to bow and scrape to Muslims and Islam, with almost suicidal ROE on top of it all, so as not to hurt the ‘feelings’ of Muslims, our “Partners in Peace” as our islamophile/’Noble People Of Afghanistan” generals call them, in what can truthfully only be described as a Trillion Dollar Bridge To Nowhere, paved with the lives and limbs of America’s troops, is a national disgrace.
Has America hit the mute button on this?
Letter from Staff Sgt. Matthew Sitton, RIP (1986-2012)
Pic of the Day: Speak Kindly Of The Hun!
http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2012/09/speak-kindly-of-hun_23.html
This link, sorry:
http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2012/09/speak-kindly-of-hun_7322.html
If General Patton were on active duty the political correctness of today’s military would soon force him to retire. I hope he would get a few slaps in as he was leaving.I was very disgusted when one of the generals (Frank, I think) was viewing the war from his cushy seat in Florida. There is something very unseemly about the generals watching a war they have planned on TV. The same goes for that famous photo of Obama, the cabinet, and VIPs watching the Osama raid from the White House
….you’re really tilting against wind mills here….careful…..you’ll fall off your horse.
Here is some info frompeople who have been in combat and have studied the leadership there:
“Is it any wonder that we are losing this war? Red Crosses themselves are not entirely to blame, obviously, but they are indicative of poor generalship, and we have had that in abundance. Pundits blame this disaster on former President Bush, on Obama, on the press, on our ISAF partners, and most of all on the Neolithic Afghan “government,” all of which are rancid ingredients of this unhealthy pie. But the reality is that the U.S. military leadership has failed. Who does the President ask for options? He asks the Generals. Our Generals have helped morph Afghanistan into a bomb and opium factory.”
“As a matter of national security, and as an American, I feel vulnerable knowing that our military is administered by political Generals rather than led by seasoned war fighters. The word administered is appropriate.”
Quotes by Michael Yon, war journalist
http://feeds.feedburner.com/michaelyon-online
Being 76 years old, and a veteran of the “Cold War”, 1954-1958 (intelligence), I know the sorry state of our present “military leaders”. The purpose of war is to destroy the will of our enemies to go on fighting, and throughout history, a huge number of “civilians” have been killed, as civilians produce an enemy’s war material.
The present “military leaders” obviously no longer know how to wage a war, and violate their oath of office: To protect and defend our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
The present “rules of engagement” in reality force our troops to engage in suicidal military actions.
You nailed it. The purpose of our military is to kill our enemies and break their things. When we lose sight of that, all manner of folly happens.
“The present “military leaders” obviously no longer know how to wage a war, and violate their oath of office: To protect and defend our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”
You think? When 13 American soldiers are gunned down at Ft. Hood, TEXAS, and an US Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey rambles on about “it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here.” Casey walked over corpses of HIS men do mutter so bullshit about diversity?
Considering the present commander-and-chief never wore a uniform nor posseses American cultural traits, I doubt if he has ever understood the US Constitution.
He isn’t one of us. He needs to be dispatched.
I think for some to truly honor their oath, “To protect and defend our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” should sh00t themselves.
Imagine for a moment:
You weren’t paying much attention while driving your car and suddenly you’re in an accident. You aren’t sure what happened, but the police, when they arrive, look at the situation. They assure you that the other person was to blame, that the law is in your favor. Their official report also says you are blameless.
The other person in the accident for whatever reason decides to try to sue you. You aren’t afraid. You have the police report saying you’re innocent. The law is on your side, you have nothing to fear. But when you and your lawyer enter the courtroom, immediately your lawyer goes over to the other fellow and his lawyer and begins to say, “We are so sorry. We are so sorry for this accident. We hope you are okay. We are so sorry.” Suddenly the other lawyer begins to think he has missed something and that his case is winnable. Suddenly he is bold and confident. You on the other hand are looking in disbelief at your lawyer who is throwing away your chances of winning the case. You begin to wonder how much this is going to cost and whether you can get your lawyer disbarred.
Our government has been apologizing for a film in the Middle East, using our tax dollars to run ads that deny any official US involvement.
Unfortunately, the ads may be working as advertisement for the film. People who might never have heard of it are now intensely aware of its existence. The ads may be throwing gas onto the flames.
Also, the ads make us look very weak: We’re sorry our founding documents contain laws that allow people to offend you. We’re very sorry—don’t hurt us.
It’s ridiculous, apologizing over and over for something legal, even if distasteful. (Yes, I’ve read most of the al-Haddith and Sirat Rasul Allah as well as the Qur’an.) What do we care what they think of our laws. And if our Bill of Rights offends, there is a legal way to change it. Get a bill submitted to Congress to begin the process of rewriting the First Amendment if any of you don’t like it.
All of this was possible, only because nobody could identify our enemy!
I really with he was still around to hear him pitching a fit at these dinks we have today