George Galloway: The Suicide Bomber of Western Politics
Galloway is quite the ham pseudo-radical of a species that only Britain, in its venerable, centuries-long tolerance of cranks and eccentrics, could condescend to produce. He is unafraid of abasing himself before tyrant and transsexual alike (see his unforgettable performance as a kitty lapping at a saucer of milk at the behest of Dead or Alive singer Pete Burns on the UK version of Celebrity Big Brother), and he is adept at navigating the fault line between tragedy and farce. Galloway is the suicide bomber of Western politics.
A former member of the Labour Party, Galloway was expelled in 2003 when, as acting vice president of the Stop the War Coalition, he told an interviewer on Abu Dhabi TV that the Labour government had become “Tony Blair’s lie machine” and that “the best thing British troops [in Iraq] can do is to refuse to obey illegal orders.” Since then, he has been an ostentatious member of the so-called RESPECT Coalition, made up of the all-but-irrelevant Socialist Workers’ Party and a hodgepodge of obscurantist Islamists. (RESPECT has since succumbed to a fratricidal dispute that nearly parodies the violent clash between Fatah and Hamas: the unelectable Marxists want dominance over the electable theocrats, and the theocrats want nothing to do with “progressive” events such as gay pride parades.)
There really hasn’t been a totalitarian regime in the last quarter century to which Galloway has failed to lend his support. He once said the disappearance of the Soviet Union was “the biggest catastrophe of [his] life,” prefiguring Vladimir Putin’s woozy nostalgia for good the old days. Although naturally an opponent of the Anglo-American overthrow of the Taliban, Galloway did previously endorse the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. He also openly supported Saddam Hussein during the first Gulf War, telling the Iraqi dictator in Baghdad, “I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability,” words he has since claimed were — what else — taken out of context. Surely this admission in Galloway’s autobiography I’m Not the Only One is as pellucid as any statement he makes on his largely ignored late night radio talk show: “Just as Stalin industrialized the Soviet Union, so on a different scale Saddam plotted Iraqis own Great Leap Forward. He managed to keep his country together until 1991.”
Of the jihadists now operating in Iraq, Galloway declared, in a 2005 speech at the al-Assad Library in Damascus, “These poor Iraqis — ragged people, with their sandals, with their Kalashnikovs, with the lightest and most basic of weapons, are writing the names of their cities and towns in the stars, with 145 military operations every day, which has made the country ungovernable by the people who occupy it.” Of the Assad dynasty in Syria, he also said on that occasion, “I have one hundred percent agreement with Syria’s policies on the international level, but on domestic level there are points of difference. But, when it comes to defending Syria’s integrity and dignity from foreign attack, this is another point. And I am with Syria.”
Both the U.S. Senate and the independent Volcker Commission implicated Galloway as an illegal profiteer of the U.N. Oil-for-Food program. Although the British House of Commons found “no evidence” to substantiate this charge, the key bank accounts used to funnel the ill-gotten Baathist cash were never examined or audited by the investigating committee. It did, however, suspend Galloway from parliamentary service for a different infraction, this one relating to his affiliation with another dodgy “charity,” Mariam Appeal, whose unstated goal was ending the Iraqi sanctions. Galloway’s Iraq point man for Mariam Appeal was a Jordanian businessman, Fawaz Zureikat, whose name turns up repeatedly in recovered Oil-for-Food documents produced by the former Iraqi State Oil Marketing Organization. Indeed, on the substantive merits of the case against him, Galloway has never adequately answered the questions that Christopher Hitchens and I posed to him in our 2005 dossier regarding his involvement in this international crime. (Lest you think it presumptuous of us to have expected him to read our little pamphlet, copies of it were distributed outside the venue in Manhattan where Hitchens that same year debated the Scottish terrier, to the accompaniment of much media coverage.)
Perhaps most relevant to the current news cycle is the fact that Galloway has been to Canada before. Two years ago he visited Ottawa as the guest of honor at the 74th anniversary of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, the black shirt outfit responsible recently for roughing up Hitchens, Michael Totten, and Jonathan Foreman in Beirut. The SSNP’s flag carries a logo that is a conspicuous imitation of the Nazi swastika, and its anthem is sung to the tune “Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles.”
How nice, then, that a liberal democracy often assailed for its capitulation to Islamic speech codes and political correctness has managed to turn away an abettor of terrorism and a preening blimp that has never refused an ideology that would gladly have him for a martyr.






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8oAEtOz6Zc&feature=channel_page
Who the hell in the UK actually votes for this leftist moron?
Maybe Canada will also bar Obama from visiting, as we gave $900m to Hamas.
““These poor Iraqis — ragged people, with their sandals, with their Kalashnikovs…”
Yah, nothing says poor and ragged like an $800 Kalashnikov.
As loathesome and despicable as he is, unless we were going to charge him with a crime, I think he should have been admitted. But make no mistake, this is a loathesome human being. I’m not sure what this says about Canada but what about the Metropolitan United Church of Toronto?
Don’t get used to this kind of principle from Canadian government. The faint-of-heart liberals will soon be back in power with Harvard’s little megaloman Iggy at the helm. He will be just like his school pal Barry and the world will be diminished yet again.
Sixty percent of the Canadian electorate is regrettably leftist/liberal-minded and they are the ones who not only put the ‘dim’ in dhimmitude but also get the significant coverage.
Oy Canada.
Galloway is a thoroughly repugnant individual.
Hilariously fitting that his terrorist-funding outfit was recently attacked on its way to the Middle East – that ranks alongside Robert Fisk, another craven apologist for Islamic terrorism, nearly being lynched in Afghanistan a little while back:
http://trackacrat.com/2009/03/09/couldnt-have-happened-to-a-nicer-person/
As much as I enjoyed the news that this particular POS was denied entry to Canada, restricting free speech is a slippery slope. As long as he has not committed any crime, he should be able to travel the world freely.
Why anyone voted for this man is beyond me.
Yes, Canada should have allowed Galloway in. And then promptly arrested him for supporting terrorism. They would have done the world and the Crown a great favor.
I’m with RW @8 on his suggestion. Galloway is a Communist-Islamist terrorist. He is also a liar when he said,
“I have not now, nor have I ever been a supporter of Hamas.”
Out of his own mouth he spits a lie and damns himself by his actions.
I have, for many years since I left Marxism, tried to tell people that most Marxists/socialists/”progressives”/Communists are inveterate liars. They believe in expediency. Juxtaposed with the preposterous and historically and epistemologically moronical statement by Marx that “socialism would create The New Moral Man.”
Whatever goes ’round, comes ’round. For Galloway was part of the crowd who barred entry of others to speak in Great Britain.
He deserves the hubris from his stance that all are equal, but some are more equal than others.
Note to Blackwater……
Who voted in Galloway? The British Muslims…….
Canada treats Galloway as a pariah because he supports radical Islam. America treats Wilders as a pariah because he tells the truth about radical Islam. Which country has better sense?
Galloway was recently in Gaza, openly and proudly giving money to Hamas. This is in no way a breach of his rights; he supports terrorists, he isn’t welcome here, plain and simple.
“LawhawkSF” @12,
Geert Wilders was indeed allowed entry into the United States, and met with more people and groups beyond the author of this article linked below. Your information is incorrect.
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.2676/pub_detail.asp
Quoth Camaron: “As long as he has not committed any crime,” etc.
That is precisely the point. He HAS committed a crime, by actively funding terrorist organisations. He is a vile anti-semite, but that is not against the law. He is also an enabler of genocidal religious maniacs, and that IS against the law.
And just what are Galloway’s politics, anyway? Is he anything more than an ugly publicity hound? (I mean that as a serious question. I can’t stop snarky answers, but I’m not interested in them.)
i’m sorry, i don’t see how it would compromise our righteous anglo-saxon principles to *occasionally* – judiciously – hang a George Galloway… are we such pus-ies?
Canadians are a bunch of barbaric seal clubbers!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wImtuZ0Csuo
Galloway is nothing for Brits to be proud of. He was voted in by lefties who want to destroy everything in the vain hope that it can be “rebuilt” their way (in other words, with themselves in control and living well) backed by Islamists who want to destroy everything because, er, they think they ought to be in control and living well.
Gorgeous George Galloway deludes himself, but cleverly milks both camps and allows both sides think they are in charge of him and they will “win”. But he is a slippery customer.
Must be rolling in all that free oil he got once before…
Jonathan Kaye (quoted in the original post): A better solution would have been to let the guy in, but then have police on hand to apprehend him as soon as he violated Canada’s anti-terror laws — say, by fund raising for a banned terrorist group (something he’s done before).
The cynic in me can’t help but wonder aloud whether this is precisely why the Canadian gov’t didn’t let him in – to spare themselves, and Galloway, the ignominy of possibly having to do exactly as Kaye suggests.
Idiotic communist traitor gleefully selling his country down the river to Islamic domination for a vote. Glad the food-for-oil crap was shut down.
Read the comments at this blog for an accurate description of what really happened. Terry Glavin has written several articles about this, all of which blow to pieces the spin by the left and their media cronies.
I emailed a message to MP Jason Kenny,who denied George Galloway entry into my country,–Canada, and by doing so denied him freedom of speech.–Why are we so fearful and small-minded of one man who has been democratically elected,and been a British MP for over 20 years? Has he ever been convicted of a violent crime?
What country should file charges for terrorism against George Galloway in the International Criminal Court?[ICC]
Would it be England,–whose Prime- Minister fully supported the 2003 illegal war against Iraq, along with Bush, Cheney, etc, who are responsible for the death and displacement of over 1 million innocent Iraqi people , including women and children, plus the sacrifice of over 5000 American soldiers?
The names of American leaders who planned the 2003 war, involving the treatment and torture of prisoners of war are now being presented to the ICC. This is being requested by an American academic legal group.