That’s where all the latest things once started – some good, like Casual Friday and surfer music, some bad like the drug culture, and some intensely annoying like “Have A Nice Day!”

California was the liberal opposite of the hidebound, narrow-minded, culturally repressed American Gothic folk who inhabited places like Iowa, or Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine, New Hampshire or Connecticut. You know, the Rubes.

Yes, unfortunately for you the United States is ruled by the people for the people and not the tyrannical few, although that element is constantly barking at the gates to intimidate.

Keep your chin up though because it appears that through the courts, intimidation, name-calling, and censorship, you may soon get the upper hand.

Censorship it’s a word and words have definitions and censorship is commonly used by tyrannical minorities to suppress speech, or delete material which may be inconvenient to their goals.

It’s not that I’m thinking really, it’s that you don’t like what I’m thinking and have nothing to counter with but insults.

Thanks for the diagnosis. I was wondering what was wrong with you. Now I know. You are completely vacuous. I will try to break it to you gently, but I have a very difficult time being ‘buddies’ with those so devoid of intelligence.

Hey I want to marry myself and get tax benefits for it, so what is wrong with that.

As long as you are two consenting adults, go for it. Paying for double occupancy at the hotel, and the extra insurance premiums for both of you, as well as feeding both your mouths, will be a major expense. You’ll need the deductions, but the economic stimulus you provide will outweigh the loss to the treasury.

Thanks for taking the argument outside the absurd to the totally irrelevant. Very refreshing.

What part of two consenting adults is hard to understand?

Peace.

DS

It is a phrase. It means “Mob Rule” and comes with all of implied meanings i.e. the unthinking mob. That would be you.

It’s a diagnosis, buddy -

When a minority along with a government entity will not tolerate any point of view other then theirs and force the majority to go through the legislature to reverse their over-reaching judicial directives, it is bigotry in it’s purest form.

Labeling people who are against redefining marriage as divisive, pointless, bigots, shrill, silly, tyrannical, etc., points to the importance of not allowing the courts, and a minority, to become dictatorial and intimidate the majority into deciding the issue of changing the definition of marriage to anything other than a man and woman joining together to become husband and wife.

Examining the motives and being aware of the tactics of the courts and those who wish to dictate to United States citizens how they should think and what they should change just because they say so is important and insinuating otherwise is another diversionary tactic.