Get PJ Media on your Apple

Game-Changer: Signs of the al-Qaeda-Assad Alliance

Hands-off policies, convenient assassinations, coordinated attacks, an endgame: Is everything you know about al-Qaeda in Syria wrong?

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

September 12, 2013 - 3:40 pm
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Last week, the ISIS kidnapped and executed activist Dr. Mohammed al-Abyad in Aleppo. Two days earlier, the ISIS killed an opposition poet, Mohammed Hamadeh. Last month a Free Syrian Army commander, Kamal Hamami, was shot in cold blood at a checkpoint by the ISIS. When a high-profile opponent of Assad’s is rubbed out, there’s a consistent calling card: al-Qaeda.

Assad appears OK with losing a building now and then by a car bomb — bombings that never hit too close to his home and that come with ample warning anyway. Al-Qaeda units, meanwhile, get left alone by Assad’s forces. “They never touch them,” Al Hendi said.

And in a grotesque PR stunt, they’ve even coordinated on attacks.

Former Syrian Ambassador to Iraq Nawaf Fares, a 35-year regime operative who defected in July 2012 after the killings grew to be too much, told the Telegraph of the blurred lines between regime and jihadists in attacks such as the May 2012 suicide bombings outside a military intelligence building in the Damascus suburb of al-Qazzaz.

“I know for certain that not a single serving intelligence official was harmed during that explosion, as the whole office had been evacuated 15 minutes beforehand,” Fares said. “All the victims were passers by instead. All these major explosions have been have been perpetrated by al-Qaeda through cooperation with the security forces.”

Backing up cooperation claims from other defectors and activists, Fares said the relationship goes back to 2003 and the U.S. invasion of Iraq. “The regime in Syria began to feel danger, and began planning to disrupt the US forces inside Iraq, so it formed an alliance with al-Qaeda,” he said. Also a onetime top security official, he said the Syrian regime still has “liaison officers” tasked to work with al-Qaeda.

In the prescient interview, Fares added: “Al-Qaeda would not carry out activities without knowledge of the regime. The Syrian government would like to use al-Qaeda as a bargaining chip with the West – to say: ‘it is either them or us.’”

Another defector, top Air Force intelligence aide Affaq Ahmad, confirmed that the jihadists don’t get into conflicts with the regime forces. “They also decline to get into fights in the coastal areas due to an agreement between them and the regime that had been brokered by the financial backers of these brigades,” Ahmad said in an interview after fleeing Syria. “Actually, the jihadist groups and brigades were very useful for the regime because they provided a justification for the regime’s insistence on a military solution, and provided some legitimacy under the cover of the War on Terror.”

Under that agreement, he added, the regime accepted the killings of minorities including Assad’s own Alawite sect “in order to use that to convince these minorities to rally around the regime and hold on to it.”

Assad has never been particularly religious and the Alawites have not been exclusively behind Assad. “He’s always used them,” Al Hendi said. “I don’t think he’s sectarian in a spiritual way; he’s using Alawites only now to protect himself.”

Al-Nusra has already admitted to being in a deal with the Assad regime — holding fast to the Deir Ezzor oil fields and reaping sweet payouts in return.

Abdulrahman Alhaj, a professor and member of the General Secretariat of the Syrian National Coalition, told PJM that Assad “has too much information about [al-Qaeda] in many ways.”

And Assad feels that if he is taken out or taken to the brink, Alhaj added, the ultimate revenge is sharing his WMDs with the terror organization — something he may do anyway in backroom deals.

“He’ll try to make it easy for them because he wants to — he will try to punish the international community,” said Alhaj. “How he can do that — he can give them his chemical weapons.”

“It’s a very dangerous scenario,” he added.

When PBS’ Charlie Rose asked Assad in a sit-down interview Sunday about what kind of retaliation could be expected if the U.S. launched airstrikes against the regime, he cryptically responded, “You should expect everything.”

“You should expect everything, not necessarily through the government. It’s not only — the governments are not only — not the only player in this region,” Assad added. “…Expect every action. Everything.”

A handful of Senate aides contacted by PJM said they didn’t know if the alliance of al-Qaeda and Assad was being discussed with lawmakers in closed-door Syria briefings.

Assad needs the situation on the ground to look chaotic enough to keep from being ousted. Al-Qaeda enjoys a safe haven and access to stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. And if Assad should fall, al-Qaeda can take advantage of the vacuum, though it does run the risk of having to deal with a president who’s not compliant like Assad.

“Assad today is trying to convince the West that he is secular and liberal and that he is fighting Islamic extremism. Those who work in the field of politics, however, know Assad’s regime very well. They know it is nothing more than an extension of the extremist political and religious Iranian regime,” Al Arabiya General Manager Abdulrahman al-Rashed wrote in March.

“His father adopted the case of Arab Baath to justify his seizure of power and continuity of sectarian rule. After him, his son sought the company of long-bearded men from supreme leader Khamenei to Hassan Nasrallah. He resorted to holding Islamic jihadi conferences in Damascus,” al-Rashed continued. “After the revolution erupted, he now speaks of secularism and claims it!”

Images of jihadist atrocities have also shown timing to play into a PR strategy, including the grisly execution video from spring 2012 released to the New York Times just as Congress was debating Syria.

In another aptly timed move, al-Qaeda declared war today on the Free Syrian Army — in particular, the secular brigades most likely to be vetted and cleared — just in time to attempt to seize CIA arms deliveries beginning to flow to the rebels.

“The Assad regime…will increase extremism in Syria,” said Alhaj. “That will affect all the people of the world.”

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Bridget Johnson is a veteran journalist whose news articles and opinion columns have run in dozens of news outlets across the globe. Bridget first came to Washington to be online editor at The Hill, where she wrote The World from The Hill column on foreign policy. Previously she was an opinion writer and editorial board member at the Rocky Mountain News and nation/world news columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. She is an NPR contributor and has contributed to USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico and more, and has myriad television and radio credits as a commentator. Bridget is Washington Editor for PJ Media.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
There are three elements to this conflict- ideological, financial and the desire for self preservation.

Understanding what motivates Putin ( financial ), Iran ( ideological ) and Assad ( self preservation ) is the key to winning the conflict.

Deals can be struck with Putin and Assad. With the Iranians no deal is possible.

There are tremendous new discoveries of oil and gas in the middle east. That, while not the root of the, " arab spring ", is what is motivating the current conflict and seems to be of upmost concern for both Putin and Obama. At least that is what their actions lead me to believe. The latter having delivered Libya to his cronies wishes to help his , " best friend " , make a little dough as well.

http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000879065&fid=942

While the western media has focused attention on poison gas the most important factor may be the gas yet to be pumped out of the ground.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The info presented is interesting. The way in which is has been presented is troubling. A 'leading question' fallacy of some sort, isn't it?

Plus, the implication that maybe we should trust the sources of the intel.

If Muslims are involved, anywhere along the way, they're lying about some or all of it.

If we were going to start WWIII, is should've been right after 9-11. Just cause. Just war. We'd have been the good guys.

The way we're trying to start WWIII, now, is just insane.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Bridget, your neocon bosses have been trying to highlight lover's spats among the jihadists to convince us we wouldn't be allying with Al-Qaeda for months. They're still trying to convince us the people we'll be supporting won't slaughter Christians. It hasn't worked. All that's left is a massive false flag attack, which the Russians have already hinted at, against Israel that will be blamed on Assad even though Assad would have to be suicidal to take on Israel directly while under siege from the rebels. It won't matter. You will do what you're told Bridget, but most of us conservatives won't.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (52)
All Comments   (52)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Speaking of a possible Al Qaida Assad alliance, means understanding CLOSE TO NOTHING of the SUNNI Muslim Jihadist mindset and practices.
Sorry lady, you are WAY OFF THE MARK.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
We must not forget that all of the above islamic jihadist elements share a commitment to destroy the USA.Whatever internecine quarrels they may or may not have, we need to destroy them all, first, if we hope to survive. Since they are killing one another, let 'em loose! The more of them they kill, the fewer we need to kill. Lets hope that some of the weapons the Traitor-In-Chief has supplied to the rebels are used to kill many other islamic jihadists, of whatever faction.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I recall when Bush rightly labeled Syria among the 'axis of evil' to the applause of conservatives. Now conservatives are praising assad, attacking neo-cons and spewing anti-American and anti-Israel rhetoric. It sounds like the left under Bush. The conservative movement has turned completely on its head.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Assad is a dictator who doesn't need jihadis to assassinate people for him.

Here's your REAL "gamge-changer" story:

Syrian Children Kidnapped By Rebels Identified As Gas Victims By Obama Administration - Those children were kidnapped over a week earlier, before they were slaughtered……. by the Obama backed Syrian rebels.

http://unclevladdi.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/syrian-children-kidnapped-by-rebels-identified-as-gas-victims-by-obama-administration/
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
What assad does need however is for the west to believe al qaeda is his enemy in order for gullible people in the west to support him.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Let me word that better. What assad needs is for it to appear al qaeda is his enemy and that is who he is fighting in order to prevent the west from overthrowing his regime.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Al Qaida and Assad loyalist forces have been KILLING EACH OTHER at the rate of over ONE HUNDRED THOUSANDS IN THE LAST THREE YEARS and you talk about make-believe????
Where do you live and what is your EXPERIENCE ON THE FIELD WITH TERRORISM??
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
assad is worse than his father who had boils on his soul.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Very well.

IF there is any truth to this one, does this mean we all owe Elizabeth al-Bagy a heartfelt apology? That her thesis is true, and the Al Nusra types are NOT in the lead in the fight and her map is accurate?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Sorry, but to assume that AQ is unified in it's command and control is whimsical thinking. It is entirely possible, in fact likely that the AQ groups fighting Assad have little, if anything, to do with the AQ groups in Iran.

Why did OBL take refuge in Pakistan, so close to the US military instead of the iron clad safety of Iran if they are so tight?

More and more support is being lent to the argument that the "rebels" had far more to gain by a chemical attack that did Assad. It will never be possible to verify the claims, but here are a couple of interesting possibilities:

http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/2013/09/08/syrian-children-kidnapped-by-rebels-identified-as-gas-victims-by-obama-administration-video/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/09/12/Journalist-overheard-conversation-blaming-rebels-for-chemical-attacks

The "truth" is out there. But, unless it involves a direct attack on the US or threat to our strategic interests, even the present arming of these "rebels" should be stopped and used to impeach the pretender n chief.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Why did OBL take refuge in Pakistan, so close to the US military instead of the iron clad safety of Iran if they are so tight?"

Who said AQ and Iran have an Iran clad alliance? They share the same intermediate goal, overturning the international system in the Mid-East and perhaps beyond. Other Muslim states (ex. KSA, Jordan, etc.) have a strong interest in the stability of the international system and are therefore enemies of AQ and Iran, even if their domestic life revolves around Sharia and traditional Arab tribal modes of life.

In any case, Iran is a major state actor with a WMD program, worldwide terrorism support network and attractive subversive ideology. AQ, in comparison, are panhandlers, looking for a handout to continue their fight.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I hate new PJM comments - for "Iran clad alliance" above, read "iron clad alliance"
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Assad is trying to protect the Christians of Syria against the US backed jihadis that are raping and murdering them. That's all I need to know. I hope Assad exterminates the US backed vermin. The US has a long record of using jihadi vermin to advance their objectives.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Some people seem NOT TO HAVE UNDERSTOOD the basic FACT that it was US blindness caused by Arabists in the CIA (now the CIA chief is actually a Muslim, former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia affected by Stockholm Syndrome!) to sponsor, feed and arm since 1979 the Afghani Mujahidin who then became Al Qaida!
They would do themselves LOT OF GOOD to watch the Award Winning Documentary "JIHAD IN AMERICA" by TERRORISM EXPERT Steve Emerson
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
Sir, you are as fatally and eternally mistaken as was your namesake.Assad is evil, as are his friends and also his immediate enemies. Assad is a Bad Guy. The Rebels are also Bad Guys. Your mind has been poisoned with the propaganda of the Islamic Jihad, worshippers of the babylonian moon "god".
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
People tend to be remarkably credulous. I think AQ has more to gain with the rebels. AQ has much to gain by convincing the West that they are now with Assad.

How would you bet?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Mao's guerrillas are said to have tried to avoid fighting the Japanese during WWII, leaving that to Chiang Kai-shek's nationalists, while building up their strength and bases for a civil war.

House Intel Comm Chairman Mike Rogers reported on Hugh Hewitt 1 or 2 days ago that AQ elements are focusing on creation of a safe haven in Syria, next to the Iraq border.

Sounds like good poker to me.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Commenters below: "There's nothing effective to be done in Syria. For that, you have to look at Iran ... Iran is above Obama's pay grade".

I agree 100% that Iran (under its current Khomeini-ist regime) is the nub of the problem and a mortal threat to the US. I believe that the goal US goal policy should be to remove it, ASAP.

Having said that, given current US weakness, I don't think it's a bad start, if the opportunity presented itself, to take a shot at lopping off the Western horn of the "Shia Crescent" in Syria.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 Next View All