<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advice for Republicans From Great Britain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: savage24</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-379167</link>
		<dc:creator>savage24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-379167</guid>
		<description>Sounds like very good advice. The one thing wrong with it is that the Republican Party only takes advice from their enemies. That&#039;s why we are stuck with Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like very good advice. The one thing wrong with it is that the Republican Party only takes advice from their enemies. That&#8217;s why we are stuck with Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narciso</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-378438</link>
		<dc:creator>narciso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-378438</guid>
		<description>After a dozen years, a soft Tory government might come into power. The point that Hannan
and Steyn and the two Geralds ,Warner &amp; Baker, make is that National Health Care, ia what makes
any kind of center right administration that much harder. Bevin, Cripps and Beveridge, knew exactly what they were doing between 46-48. Lets not take that path in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a dozen years, a soft Tory government might come into power. The point that Hannan<br />
and Steyn and the two Geralds ,Warner &amp; Baker, make is that National Health Care, ia what makes<br />
any kind of center right administration that much harder. Bevin, Cripps and Beveridge, knew exactly what they were doing between 46-48. Lets not take that path in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ian Dodge</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-378342</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ian Dodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-378342</guid>
		<description>Cameron leads a party of the right, even if he seems to not be even the slightest bit right of centrist. However don&#039;t be fooled by the leadership of wet centrists the Conservative Party members are far more akin to Hannan&#039;s way of thinking than Cameron&#039;s. 

If you don&#039;t believe me read &lt;a href=&quot;http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2009/08/dan-hannan-is-a-boggleeyed-slapheaded-unpleasant-revolting-heartless-brained-attentiongrabbing-foeti.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Centreright&lt;/a&gt; and its parent site ConservativeHome. Cameron alas, like McCain et al, is out of touch with his grassroot members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron leads a party of the right, even if he seems to not be even the slightest bit right of centrist. However don&#8217;t be fooled by the leadership of wet centrists the Conservative Party members are far more akin to Hannan&#8217;s way of thinking than Cameron&#8217;s. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t believe me read <a href="http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2009/08/dan-hannan-is-a-boggleeyed-slapheaded-unpleasant-revolting-heartless-brained-attentiongrabbing-foeti.html" rel="nofollow">Centreright</a> and its parent site ConservativeHome. Cameron alas, like McCain et al, is out of touch with his grassroot members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Mirkin</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-378227</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Mirkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-378227</guid>
		<description>On of the reasons that the Republican Party is having so much trouble getting it&#039;s message across is that far too many people are confused by political terminology.  Those we call &quot;liberals&quot; today, are pro-Statist.  The original liberal concepts are freedom of the individual, free markets, capitalism, and competition under the Rule of Law.  Today&#039;s so-called &quot;liberal&quot; is a corruption of the term&#039;s original meaning.  One of the main reasons this happened is because academia is infested with Statists.  In their arrogance university instructors do not teach true liberalism.  They teach utopian ideas that have time and again failed.  &quot;Conservative&quot; in many cases is also a misnomer.  Most people who today call themselves &quot;conservatives&quot; are in fact &quot;liberals&quot;...the true liberals.  They believe in the freedom of the individual to make his own decisions, good or bad based on what the individual sees as in his own best interests.  The Statists call this &quot;selfish&quot;.  It is not.  One&#039;s own best interests includes others; they only exclude those whom the individual decides not to include.  That is the freedom of choice.  
One poster asked about recommended reading.  I would recommend the following:
&quot;The Road to Serfdom&quot; and &quot;&quot; , by F. A. Hayek, which was the first book (1944) to clearly show that Statism can only result in the subjugation of the people to the elites running the state.  It shows that there is no major difference between Communism, Socilism, and Naziism.  They are all tyrannical forms of government that use state control and dissolution of private property ownership.  In fact Republicans want to preserve the Constitution, but are amenable to change provided that it is natural change as a result of the efforts of the individual, not dictated by the State.  
2.  &quot;The Socialist Mentality&quot;, and others by by Ludwig von Mises
3.  &quot;Free to Choose&quot;, by Milton Friedman
4.  &quot;Capitalism and Freedom&quot;, by Milton Friedman
5.  &quot;Liberty and Tyranny&quot;, by Mark Levin
There are plenty of others, these are just some of the more important ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On of the reasons that the Republican Party is having so much trouble getting it&#8217;s message across is that far too many people are confused by political terminology.  Those we call &#8220;liberals&#8221; today, are pro-Statist.  The original liberal concepts are freedom of the individual, free markets, capitalism, and competition under the Rule of Law.  Today&#8217;s so-called &#8220;liberal&#8221; is a corruption of the term&#8217;s original meaning.  One of the main reasons this happened is because academia is infested with Statists.  In their arrogance university instructors do not teach true liberalism.  They teach utopian ideas that have time and again failed.  &#8220;Conservative&#8221; in many cases is also a misnomer.  Most people who today call themselves &#8220;conservatives&#8221; are in fact &#8220;liberals&#8221;&#8230;the true liberals.  They believe in the freedom of the individual to make his own decisions, good or bad based on what the individual sees as in his own best interests.  The Statists call this &#8220;selfish&#8221;.  It is not.  One&#8217;s own best interests includes others; they only exclude those whom the individual decides not to include.  That is the freedom of choice.<br />
One poster asked about recommended reading.  I would recommend the following:<br />
&#8220;The Road to Serfdom&#8221; and &#8220;&#8221; , by F. A. Hayek, which was the first book (1944) to clearly show that Statism can only result in the subjugation of the people to the elites running the state.  It shows that there is no major difference between Communism, Socilism, and Naziism.  They are all tyrannical forms of government that use state control and dissolution of private property ownership.  In fact Republicans want to preserve the Constitution, but are amenable to change provided that it is natural change as a result of the efforts of the individual, not dictated by the State.<br />
2.  &#8220;The Socialist Mentality&#8221;, and others by by Ludwig von Mises<br />
3.  &#8220;Free to Choose&#8221;, by Milton Friedman<br />
4.  &#8220;Capitalism and Freedom&#8221;, by Milton Friedman<br />
5.  &#8220;Liberty and Tyranny&#8221;, by Mark Levin<br />
There are plenty of others, these are just some of the more important ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy gunn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-378208</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-378208</guid>
		<description>There is something wrong with this guy if he thinks Cameron is some kind of man of the right. The most you can say about UK conservatives is that they tend to be like FDR style democrats. In USA terms UK conservatives are really liberal.

It is unlikely that this guy will unlock any mysteries on free markets from the UK since the USA is about the only place left on earth where there really are free markets.

Bottom line is that I love going to visit the UK, however it is the best example of a failed model at every level. The people surrendered to the state after WWII and again to the EU in a major death spiral for freedom. They are heading down the tubes today-even if the conservatives are in power. Just look at how the boy toy Cameron jumped out to defend the NHS. Give me a break!!

Tommy Gunn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something wrong with this guy if he thinks Cameron is some kind of man of the right. The most you can say about UK conservatives is that they tend to be like FDR style democrats. In USA terms UK conservatives are really liberal.</p>
<p>It is unlikely that this guy will unlock any mysteries on free markets from the UK since the USA is about the only place left on earth where there really are free markets.</p>
<p>Bottom line is that I love going to visit the UK, however it is the best example of a failed model at every level. The people surrendered to the state after WWII and again to the EU in a major death spiral for freedom. They are heading down the tubes today-even if the conservatives are in power. Just look at how the boy toy Cameron jumped out to defend the NHS. Give me a break!!</p>
<p>Tommy Gunn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason S</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-378037</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-378037</guid>
		<description>Republicans need to position themselves as the party of energy.  Keep America Powered would be a potential slogan.  Or Get America Back to Work.  

With the looming increase in oil prices, the timing would be perfect now to prepare to start hammering the dems on their windmill pipe dreams that do not include more oil exploration and nuclear for the short and mid-term and a promise to continue to &quot;explore&quot; the more dreamy stuff for the long term.  This also merges with the people&#039;s justified belief in Republicans on national security and with the economy due to the people it would put back to work.  3 core issues with one slogan.  I hear Axelrod might be able to help on the PR front, for a small fee of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans need to position themselves as the party of energy.  Keep America Powered would be a potential slogan.  Or Get America Back to Work.  </p>
<p>With the looming increase in oil prices, the timing would be perfect now to prepare to start hammering the dems on their windmill pipe dreams that do not include more oil exploration and nuclear for the short and mid-term and a promise to continue to &#8220;explore&#8221; the more dreamy stuff for the long term.  This also merges with the people&#8217;s justified belief in Republicans on national security and with the economy due to the people it would put back to work.  3 core issues with one slogan.  I hear Axelrod might be able to help on the PR front, for a small fee of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix48</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-377948</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-377948</guid>
		<description>EB has it exactly right from his opening statement when recognizing how Cameron executed leadership - principles first.  It&#039;s easy now for conservatives to forget how long they were marginalized before Reagan because its such ancient history.  Progressive liberals here are not just enraptured by Obama, they actually believe that the country is shifting center-left and its just a matter of Obama and Pelosi gently bringing the public along to where they naturally want to be.

It&#039;s entirely self-delusional on the part of democratic party faithful.  Reagan represented a true shift in the political demographics of america - when he entered office less than thirty percent of state gov&#039;s were under conservative rule.  When he left it was over 60%.

Obama was campaign dynamite - probably the best planned &amp; executed machine since JFK - and they didn&#039;t even need to cheat w/ACORN on the scale JFK pulled off in Chicago &amp; WV in &#039;60.  His fundraising alone was so astounding that he was 80% toward (primary &amp; general combined) the first Billion Dollar Baby.  AS much as I despise the principles I have to admire the accomplishment.

That didn&#039;t change the fact the guy is a practical novice - despite how charismatic he is.  He has demured to Pelosi because she is the true political vet.

It has provided conservatives with an oppertunity hether to not dreamed of given the swooning Obama has enjoyed up until these past few months.

Now it is up to conservatives to provide the kinds of answers governors like Tom Thompson did with welfare reform &amp; Tom Ridgway did cleaning up crony corruption in Pennsylvania.  We only had the success of Gingrich&#039;s congress BECAUSE we won plural conservative majorities in the states.

Principles first - execution second.  We win back states like Virgina, Ohio, Indiana, North Carolina - and peel off a New Jersey or Wisconsin - or dare one believe CALIFORNIA - and we make the gains in 2010 to make 2012 a one term Obama.

It can happen.  Thanks for the suggestions Ian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EB has it exactly right from his opening statement when recognizing how Cameron executed leadership &#8211; principles first.  It&#8217;s easy now for conservatives to forget how long they were marginalized before Reagan because its such ancient history.  Progressive liberals here are not just enraptured by Obama, they actually believe that the country is shifting center-left and its just a matter of Obama and Pelosi gently bringing the public along to where they naturally want to be.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s entirely self-delusional on the part of democratic party faithful.  Reagan represented a true shift in the political demographics of america &#8211; when he entered office less than thirty percent of state gov&#8217;s were under conservative rule.  When he left it was over 60%.</p>
<p>Obama was campaign dynamite &#8211; probably the best planned &amp; executed machine since JFK &#8211; and they didn&#8217;t even need to cheat w/ACORN on the scale JFK pulled off in Chicago &amp; WV in &#8217;60.  His fundraising alone was so astounding that he was 80% toward (primary &amp; general combined) the first Billion Dollar Baby.  AS much as I despise the principles I have to admire the accomplishment.</p>
<p>That didn&#8217;t change the fact the guy is a practical novice &#8211; despite how charismatic he is.  He has demured to Pelosi because she is the true political vet.</p>
<p>It has provided conservatives with an oppertunity hether to not dreamed of given the swooning Obama has enjoyed up until these past few months.</p>
<p>Now it is up to conservatives to provide the kinds of answers governors like Tom Thompson did with welfare reform &amp; Tom Ridgway did cleaning up crony corruption in Pennsylvania.  We only had the success of Gingrich&#8217;s congress BECAUSE we won plural conservative majorities in the states.</p>
<p>Principles first &#8211; execution second.  We win back states like Virgina, Ohio, Indiana, North Carolina &#8211; and peel off a New Jersey or Wisconsin &#8211; or dare one believe CALIFORNIA &#8211; and we make the gains in 2010 to make 2012 a one term Obama.</p>
<p>It can happen.  Thanks for the suggestions Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapwolf</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-377942</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-377942</guid>
		<description>We either continue to drift into socialism and eventually communism, or a civil war develops.  Chances are option 1,  but the crashing economy can put a wrench into Obama/Pelosi/Reid&#039;s plans at even further government madness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We either continue to drift into socialism and eventually communism, or a civil war develops.  Chances are option 1,  but the crashing economy can put a wrench into Obama/Pelosi/Reid&#8217;s plans at even further government madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ian Dodge</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-377897</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ian Dodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-377897</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I will gladly pay for life-saving health care for an indigent person. It is an outrage to force me to pay for his sex-change operation.&lt;/i&gt;

Therein lies the rub. I am sure that when the NHS was introduced in the UK (and Canada) none of its inventors would ever have envisioned it would be paying for people to have sex changes, breast implants or have their tattoos removed. It was set up to provide &lt;i&gt;basic&lt;/i&gt; care for individuals when the life-span was a heck of a lot shorter. 

The NHS has not adapted at all, except for minor tweaks, and can&#039;t handle the load. Even if the UK spent nothing on anything else it would still &quot;not be enough&quot; due to a variety of factors both unforseen &amp; ones that should have been seen a long time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I will gladly pay for life-saving health care for an indigent person. It is an outrage to force me to pay for his sex-change operation.</i></p>
<p>Therein lies the rub. I am sure that when the NHS was introduced in the UK (and Canada) none of its inventors would ever have envisioned it would be paying for people to have sex changes, breast implants or have their tattoos removed. It was set up to provide <i>basic</i> care for individuals when the life-span was a heck of a lot shorter. </p>
<p>The NHS has not adapted at all, except for minor tweaks, and can&#8217;t handle the load. Even if the UK spent nothing on anything else it would still &#8220;not be enough&#8221; due to a variety of factors both unforseen &amp; ones that should have been seen a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theBuckWheat</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/from-the-british-right-advice-for-republicans/#comment-377885</link>
		<dc:creator>theBuckWheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64551#comment-377885</guid>
		<description>The bargain that the Socialist State attempts to seduce us with is antithetical to Judaeo-Christian values.  When the State offers to make it possible for each of us to live at the expense of others if only they can live at our expense, it not only commits fraud in the inducement, the offer is based on lies, coveting and theft.   

For Americans, the offer contrdicts a founding document of US Law: the unalieable right to life and liberty.  

The answer is to instruct people on the benefits of liberty and the prosperity that flows from it.  Socialism can only divvy up a fixed-size pie.  Only liberty can make the pie bigger.  


We must have a public debate on a topic that no politician dares bring up: when should a citizen be expected to pay his own way in life and what do we owe to those who cannot?  

I will gladly pay for life-saving health care for an indigent person.  It is an outrage to force me to pay for his sex-change operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bargain that the Socialist State attempts to seduce us with is antithetical to Judaeo-Christian values.  When the State offers to make it possible for each of us to live at the expense of others if only they can live at our expense, it not only commits fraud in the inducement, the offer is based on lies, coveting and theft.   </p>
<p>For Americans, the offer contrdicts a founding document of US Law: the unalieable right to life and liberty.  </p>
<p>The answer is to instruct people on the benefits of liberty and the prosperity that flows from it.  Socialism can only divvy up a fixed-size pie.  Only liberty can make the pie bigger.  </p>
<p>We must have a public debate on a topic that no politician dares bring up: when should a citizen be expected to pay his own way in life and what do we owe to those who cannot?  </p>
<p>I will gladly pay for life-saving health care for an indigent person.  It is an outrage to force me to pay for his sex-change operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

