France’s Fate: Socialist François Hollande Leads Presidential Election
Front de Gauche (Left Front) is modeled after Die Linke, the German Far Left party founded by Oskar Lafontaine. Front de Gauche federates the former communists with the most leftward elements in the socialist party, and attracts quite a lot of Trotskyites and green militants.
The other party is a reborn National Front that — by supplementing its old anti-immigration rhetoric with a quasi-socialist platform — has been able to take over the working class and parts of the middle class.
Both populist parties owe their sudden fortunes to charismatic new leaders. Jean-Luc Mélanchon of Front de Gauche, a former socialist MP and junior minister, is a robust if sketchy Castro- or Chavez-style orator. His rallies throughout France, complete with red flags and the Bolshevik or Spanish Civil War paraphernalia, have gathered tens of thousands. Marine Le Pen, the daughter of National Front founder Jean-Marie Le Pen, is a much more brilliant and nuanced orator and debater. Mélanchon always wears a business suit with a red tie. Le Pen, a very attractive woman in her forties, wears a business suit as well: a dark blue jacket with dark blue trousers. Le Pen’s equivalent to Mélanchon’s emblematic tie is her face: half-long blond hair and deep blue eyes. While Mélanchon acts as a plebian tribune (his campaign motto was “seize power”), there is something almost royal in Le Pen’s demeanor. Her motto was, quite boldly, “France, of course”.
Even more striking are the political similarities between Front de Gauche and the National Front. Both parties call for a “revolution” against the present elites of France. Both oppose the European Union and the euro. Both insist on national independence and are defiant of NATO. Both claim to be “secular”. Both support a strong state. While Front de Gauche is fiercely pro-Palestinian, the National Front seems to be “neutral” — Ron Paul-style — on Israel, a far cry from the pro-Israel stand of other right-wing populist parties in Europe, not to mention the conservative populists of North America.
The main differences lie with immigration: whereas Front de Gauche praises it, the National Front opposes it. But even so, Marine Le Pen avoids anything in her speeches or in her party’s literature that smells of racism or hatred of Islam as a religion.
Hollande woke up quite late to the two-fold populist threat. In recent weeks, he has been much more active and has engaged in the exacting business of rallies and public speeches and meetings with the average citizen in the street. His activity may have cut Mélanchon’s wings to a point, but not Le Pen’s, who emerged on Sunday as the ballot’s real winner.
The case of François Bayrou, the centrist outsider, is much different. A former minister of Education with strong Christian and peasant roots, Bayrou is concerned with national unity (with himself as the unifier) rather than with revolution. Until 2007, he was the leader of a sizable third party, in between Right and Left. Then most of his centrist allies deserted him to support Sarkozy — and to keep their seats, with conservative support, as MPs or local elected officials. For a short while, pollsters credited him with 13% or even 15% of the national vote in 2012. Now that he has dropped to a frustrating 9%, he must play his last card: join either Hollande or Sarkozy or neither, in the most cautious way.
The first polls, taken right after the first ballot on Sunday night, are rather confusing, yet still they show that Sarkozy stands a chance to win over the Le Pen vote. According to a CSA poll released on Sunday night, 40% of Bayrou’s supporters will settle for Hollande on May 6, along with 27% of Le Pen supporters; Sarkozy will retain 25% of the Bayrou vote and 52% of the Le Pen vote. According to a Louis Harris poll, Hollande will get 38% of the Bayrou voters and just 17% of Le Pen’s, whereas Sarkozy will attract 32% of Bayrou voters and 44% of Le Pen’s. A third poll by firm BVA ascribes 36% of the Bayrou votes and 20% of the Le Pen vote to Hollande; Sarkozy would gather 39% of Bayrou supporters and 57% of Le Pen supporters. Chances are that two weeks of hard campaigning will help Sarkozy make inroads into both camps.
The major task for both the conservatives and the socialists is to woo the National Front voters. Sarkozy has called for “every patriot” to join him on May 6. As for the socialists, they say openly that the Le Pen sympathizers must be “understood” and “won back”. Marine Le Pen is going to hint as to her final stand on the second ballot on May Day. Clearly, she wants to hear from both sides regarding what they are willing to give her. One prize could be an explicit promise to change the electoral law in order to give the National Front full access to Parliament and to other electoral offices.
On the other hand, she would be mistaken to believe that she owns her supporters votes. Many people voted for her not in order to get her elected but just to make it clear to the classic Right that immigration and Islamization are definitely non-starters. Even long-time supporters hate the Left even more that they despise Sarkozy. If she helps Hollande win, she will be seen as a traitor by many of them, especially since the Left will then quite probably win the National Assembly next June, and thus be in control of almost all political powers: the Executive, the Assembly, the Senate, almost all regional councils, most local councils, and the French représentation to the European Parliament.
One party rule by another name.






Sarkozy’s original Mediterranean Union scheme was consistent with his opposition to Turkish membership of the European Union; the Turks themselves understood that it was a way of shunting them away from the EU mainstream into a Mediterranean siding. Subsequently, due to German concerns about Sarkozy empire building in the Med without German consent, the MU was turned into a EU project. The whole MU scheme has gone nowhere since.
Merkel Merkel vetoed it, she isn’t interested into Mediterranean club, but into MittelEuropa
Yeah, “Gravitas.” That’s how we got Bam. Al hat, no Cattle.
Gravitas? DeGaulle thae man with an ego big enough to put in risk hundereds of thousands on D- Day
. Profitted in a failed coup dtate to fast his grip on the country. he reformed the Consituion against the Constitution.
Pompidou? The unelected prime minister, a first in republican history of France. Even Napoleon was elected
Destaing ? His buddy Bokasa , the man eater ( and you worry about the dog eater), paid with diamonds for protection.
Mitterand? Member of Vichy. Ministry of Interior with DeGaulle overview the dirty war in Algeria. Chased out of france the journalist who reveled he had a love child.Murdered two green activist.Resurrecetd the communist party. To be fair, he supported the deploymnet of missiles by the Reagan´s goverment.
Chirac, the Verme. The first ever President of France who could speak english and studied in the USA. he did not have problem to accuse the USA( that he admired) of france problems. In the payroll of Hussein.
And now, the inmigrant that hates inmigrants . To be fair , he thinks Obama is naif
“Gravitas? DeGaulle thae man with an ego big enough to put in risk hundereds of thousands on D- Day”
???????????????????????
“Profitted in a failed coup dtate to fast his grip on the country. he reformed the Consituion against the Constitution.”
???????????????????????????
Some say, the coup was a CIA plot:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58155246/Terrorism-in-Western-Europe-An-Approach-to-NATO%E2%80%99s-Secret-Stay-Behind-Armies-by-Daniele-Ganser
(scroll down until page 79)
He reformed the constitution, because France was ungovernable before, the governments had only a few to several months life lenght
“Pompidou? The unelected prime minister, a first in republican history of France. Even Napoleon was elected”
He was a former Directeur of the Rotschild bank, probably useful during war time, one needed to be reflussed for the nerve of war, is this the reason?
But he was elected as president of France
“Destaing ? His buddy Bokasa , the man eater ( and you worry about the dog eater), paid with diamonds for protection.”
Oh that, when the king of Spain had a accident while hunting elephants in Africa !
“En avril 1973, à la fin de son séjour, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, ministre des Finances de Georges Pompidou effectuait une visite de convenance au chef de l’État centrafricain. Après avoir visité le palais présidentiel en compagnie de son hôte, celui-ci lui remit des fruits d’ébène et une plaquette de diamants africains (deux étoiles de petites pierres fines), échantillon de la production de l’école de taille de pierre qu’il avait créée à Bangui. Ce cadeau était généralement réservé à ses hôtes de marque3. Henry Kissinger notamment avait reçu une plaquette similaire, qui selon Valéry Giscard d’Estaing4 avait été estimée à l’époque d’une valeur entre 4 000 et 7 000 francs. Selon le témoignage de F.L. Copperman5, ancien consul honoraire britannique à Bangui en 1973 et administrateur national du diamant (CND), la valeur des diamants que Bokassa dispensait à ses invités de marque n’excédait jamais 10 000 US $. À son retour à Paris, le ministre des Finances rangea la plaquette de diamants « dans un tiroir » au ministère sans plus y prêter attention6.
Peu après son élection à la présidence de la République française, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing rencontra de nouveau Bokassa et des membres de son gouvernement dans le château de ce dernier en Sologne. Après les entretiens entre les deux chefs d’État et le déjeuner, le président centrafricain remit au président français plusieurs cadeaux en guise d’amitié notamment un panneau décoratif en ivoire et des plaquettes de diamants. Les deux hommes se rencontrèrent encore à Bangui en mars 1975, lors d’un voyage officiel, où des cadeaux furent échangés, le président centrafricain offrant encore trois carrés de compositions en brillants au côté de défenses d’éléphants.
Dans ses mémoires, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing déclare s’être encore rendu en Centrafrique pour deux voyages privés en août 1976 et août 1978 dans la concession de chasse et bien qu’ayant décliné l’invitation de Bokassa à lui rendre visite, c’est ce dernier qui se déplaça pour rencontrer le président français en vacances7.
Les relations personnelles entre les deux hommes restaient cordiales. Bokassa était cependant peu apprécié par la plupart de ses pairs et lui-même reprochait à la France la diminution de son aide financière. Les relations entre les deux pays ne s’étaient pas arrangées après son couronnement comme empereur avec un faste napoléonien et le refus de Valéry Giscard d’Estaing d’y assister personnellement”
“Mitterand? Member of Vichy. Ministry of Interior with DeGaulle overview the dirty war in Algeria.”
?????????? Mitterrand never work for de Gaulle, they were “enemis”
Though Mitterrand as Minister of Interieur during Pierre Mendes-France government in 1954 launched the “Pacification” of Algeria, de Gaulle ended the war with the referendum on the independance of Algeria, bizarre no?
“Chased out of france the journalist who reveled he had a love child.”
who? don’t tell me it was Thierry Meyssan ! LMAO, no it’s Jean-Edern Hallier, a megalomane, but he wasn’t chased out of France, he had a curious end though, some said that he might have been assassinated by Mitterrand’s sbires
“Murdered two green activist”
no, one journalist who was malencontreusement on the rainbow warrior, it was a CIA style action sinking the greenpeace ship that was annoying the Mururoa nuclear tests.
“Resurrecetd the communist party”.
in the contrary, from 20% at the beginning of Mitterrand mendate, the finished less than 10% when he died, but it was Le Pen party that took the relay
To be fair, he supported the deploymnet of missiles by the Reagan´s goverment.”
“Chirac, the Verme. The first ever President of France who could speak english and studied in the USA. he did not have problem to accuse the USA( that he admired) of france problems. In the payroll of Hussein.”
BS, Chirac was opposed to the Irak war without tangible proofs that Saddam had WMD, where are these WMD? He never said a word against the US, nor against Bush, it was the lefties medias, that you were reading of course.
he wasn’t in the Saddam payroll, at least not more than Chesney…and the Clintons… and the UN… and all the countries that participated into the “oil for food” big enterprise.
“And now, the inmigrant that hates inmigrants . To be fair , he thinks Obama is naif”
Are you saying that Sarkozy is muslim? sorry fer ya, he is a Jew, baptised catholic.
and you’re a stoopid ignorant !
Marie-Claude stop lying.
And Nicolas Sarkozy is not Jewish, unless you adhere to Nuremberg legislation, since one of his grandfathers converted to Catholicism.
The big, existential, problem facing France, and Mediterranean Europe, and all of Europe eventually, is the stream of North African refugees that is set to become a raging torrent, courtesy of the “Arab Spring”. Probably only Le Pen would do what is necessary to meet that challenge, and clearly quite a proportion of the French electorate are aware of that. The others will do nothing until it is too late.
And the solution is to NOT let them come aboard. Culture HAS to trump in these days. Don’t dilute it.
the best analyse so far of the stakes
I would not count Marine Le Pen amongst the Right. She is pro-abortionist, wants to ban the free exercising of religion (at least for several kinds of believers), supports a protectionist trade policy, is “anti-globalization” minded and supports a Big Government outreach into education and fiscal politics.
She is part of the Nanny State consent, she just represents one particular interest group within the distributional struggle, but does not question redistributionist politics as such.
For all German speaking readers here: http://dreeschheart.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/wer-ist-schuld-am-le-pen-erfolg/
your paper is lies and propaganda against Le Pen, who is Germany’s enemy, cuz she wants France out of EZ, and out of EU, things that Germany can’t bear, as, without France into her scheme, Germany can’t lead the EU and the EZ, finish the german enterprises big surpluses….
Le Pen isn’t for that the state reimbourses “confort” abortments, but only necessary and medical’s
She isn’t promoting one religion over the other, just that religions must stay a private concern, not a political one, but she promotes “LAICITY”
She isn’t promoting big government, FN has always been pro free markets without state interferrence
She isn’t anti-globalization, but for rational protectionism aginst countries that aren’t respecting the the rules, and make a big deal of merchandizing in manipulating currencies (ie China, Germany…)
France is a “statist” country since our first constitution, and she isn’t going to abandon the fundment of our society, but she is against “abusive” redistribution
So, if you want objective infos, you’d better not rely on POS
All this prognosticating is interesting but means very little. With only a short amount of time left until the French decide who will be their next/new “leader”; many things can take place. Sarkozy managed to deal many blows to Islam, given the pressure to submit to PC by all the entrenched bureaucrats in gay Paris; his latest being three in a row: nuking the nutcase Toulouse killer; rounding up at least 19 known, armed and dangerous Mo’ lovers; and lo and behold he helped Israel (along with some other nations) by preventing another Flotilla debacle and ensuing madness, by preventing the oh so humanitarian wackos from boarding planes heading to Israel for the “Welcome to Palestine” nonsense organised by Iran. Press TV (Iranian TV) was not very happy and made it perfectly clear in their anti-Israel reporting. I have every confidence that things will go well for France because they have not cursed Israel … thank you Mr. Sarkozy for leading the way.
“by all the entrenched bureaucrats in gay Paris;”
this sentence is discrediting your whole post
Sarkozy managed to deal many blows to Islam
Uh, no. His immigration policy has been terrible. And that’s all that really matters when it comes to Europe.
he helped Israel (along with some other nations) by preventing another Flotilla debacle and ensuing madness, by preventing the oh so humanitarian wackos from boarding planes heading to Israel for the “Welcome to Palestine” nonsense organised by Iran. Press TV (Iranian TV) was not very happy and made it perfectly clear in their anti-Israel reporting. I have every confidence that things will go well for France because they have not cursed Israel
Israel is a Middle Eastern country. Sarkozy is supposed to be looking after France.
You ignorant shill.
You have no idea how much Israel helped France to look after France.
really? I thought it was the other way round !
if you watched the 7hr. documentary, the sorrow and the pity, you would not care either whether or not france fell into the abyss. their cowardly, ugly actions in collaborating with the nazis, still stinks in the nostrils.
the north african muslim deluge is overwhelming the french. no nation deserves it more.
this french guy, jules, who commented with a whiny snark that israel is a middle eastern country is likely one of those north africans (and there’s more to come) tapping on his computer from what once was a sweet little village out in the french countryside.
hey, france. good luck with that.
OK, then how do you explain that 75% of the french Jews survived, while in the other occupied countries only 5% did?
isn’t your antic anti-french sentiment still directing your subconscient?
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/04/beyond-freedom-fries-the-roots-of-american-francophobia/256253/
How do you explain that French Jews immigrating in mass, and those that left have to bear attacks from Muslims. There are areas where french police does not even enforce the law?
where and when?
during the Sharon regime, some sionnist agent were making a aggressive policy for french Jews to leave for Israel, in paying them bribes and a six months stay there, so that they integrated the Israeli society. Some were tempted, half of them were deceipted, they couldn’t find a job, and or a equivalent position, half came back to France, the other half found their way to Canada and or to the US.
Do you know why? Because the french jewish minority is the biggest after the US’, and that Israel needs badly to repopulate, their Arabs neighbours make more children, but problem, Israel only accepts religious immigrants, and only Jewish’s !
The attacks by the Muslims on Jews aren’t more current in France than in any other western country, then Israel then would be the last place that Jews would go to !
this french guy, jules, who commented with a whiny snark that israel is a middle eastern country is likely one of those north africans (and there’s more to come) tapping on his computer from what once was a sweet little village out in the french countryside.
Sorry to disappoint you! Actually France’s Jewish population has been the demographic most in favour of mass immigration and multiculturalism and they have used their influence in academia, cinema, government, business, and other areas to promote it and to defame patriotic French who oppose such an agenda. This is not a debatable point and, indeed, official Jewish groups in France regularly brag about their role in all this! They say to the North africans “look at all we’ve done for you against the French racists! You should love us”. French Jews may be starting to have second thoughts on it all now -though so far I see only sporadic evidence of it. Time will tell.
Sarkozy will fail just because of himself, of his mercurial personality.The guy does not know how to handle power, he runs after the last opinion poll and try to correct his course; this is not the behaviour of a statesman, this is an eternal gambler who does not know how to stay away from the gambling table.We elected him because we had enough of Chirac ( the lazy king who did nothing except copycat of the left agenda ) but now we shall discard him, because Sarkozy is nothing but hot air.We are fed up with those petty politicians who only excell at marketing themselves like PR men,but we are also convinced the french left is very toxic and dangerous
Hollande will be the next lazy king
Sarkozy is making the show de la “Societé du spectacle”, everyone knows that things aren’t decided in Paris, but in Brussels and in Berlin, when it’s not in Washington and in WS
Good luck! Better late then never. But frankly, I’m not sure you can do it anymore. Too far along the socialist utopia.
remember, who were those that created marxism? your fellows !
Marie Claude, que vous defendez la France avec une telle ardheur! C’est bien, de defendre la patrie… However I take issue with your defense of the Front National… as an American who voted for Reagan in my first Presidential vote, and after living in rural France for nearly twenty years, I find that the Front National is socialist, but very facist, or at the very least nationalistic socialists… that is all I have ever heard from the group, whoever has been their porte parole. I will concede that my French isn’t perfect, however I have many friends, from all over the French political spectrum, that have told me that I have understood correctly including Front national voters… I wish I could remember the interview I heard just last month, where she accused Sarkosy of being a free market liberale, and that Hollande was not that far behind Sarkosy… I watched with my French husband. I will agree with you however that this article is spot on in it’s analysis of the stakes in the French elections.
I wish I could remember the interview I heard just last month, where she accused Sarkosy of being a free market liberale,
The nation is more important than economics.
Jules, I beg to differ. The nation, as a political entity is defined by it’s economics, because the welfare of it’s people depend on their being able to provide themselves with a fair way to earn a living… to support their children and continue to sustain that particular nation. Without paying attention to the economics of a country, and how the government spends the money of that country, that country can or can not prosper, and as usual, it’s the poorest which suffer the most if the economic system is abused because there is not a means for them to move up or out of their poor situation. Everything else in this world follows afterwards… This is something I have never once heard anyone mention in France about France. While I think amny Americans find this to be fairly self evident (please notice that I did not say all Americans).
hmm what she means, it the neo-liberal policies of Brussels that are but for big corporation without borders, and that are ruining the french economy in forcing our private domain to open to them, like EDF, like SNCF to let german trains grasp the french clients… like Ryan Air ruining the planes companies, but you forgot that this disloyal concurrence is subsidied by Brussels, Ryan air without them and of the Region’s wouldn’t exist !
Marie Claude: When you mean neo liberalism, you are referring as is Marine LePen, to the “Anglo Saxon version free markets” fortunately those words are clear enough in her speeches… she is a socialist, she would not change anything about the French welfare system, except to decide who would or would not be eligible, in ways similar to Hitler or Mussolini, but I seriously doubt she’s imagining extermination camps… Also I understood Marine Le Pen perfectly well, I just might miss a bit of the nuances that things like verb tenses can bring. She is about protecting France and exporting France’s exceptional everything while absolutely only allowing the French to buy France’s production(it is her decision on who is French, which as a foreign national living in France, is scary). While I love France for many reasons, this particular chauvinism would not be one of those reasons. I understand your and many of the French people’s love for their country, but you are not the only people in the world that work hard and care about that work, care about the food you eat, and live lives that are worthwhile. As for DeGaulle, he was not “le sauveur.” He was a man that did good things and he did bad things for France. By the way, I understand that EDF is now one of the biggest electric companies in Europe, under the neo liberalism from Brussels… again you can’t have your cake and eat it as well.
Please let me clarify: I have no say whatsoever in how the French people run their country or how they choose their government, their Constitution, etc. I abide by the rules of France, because I live here. I do miss my own country, it’s Constitution, and mentality that is all I am saying. Had France elected Marine Le Pen or whomever they elect that is their right, as it is their country. I just don’t have to like it, but I do have to respect it as I am living here, so your vision on socialism is your country’s choice, and that is your country’s responsibility to own that choice, everyone else doesn’t have to lay down to your laws just for your choices, if it works fine if it doesn’t, well maybe then something needs to be done about that, but it’s up to the French to decide that.
yes EDF has become a big Electric company in the meanwhile (thanks to our nuclear sites, and because Germany decided to close their down, though nonetheless buy our electricity, also Spain and Italy) it was forced to, otherwise Brussels would fine the company.
Hmm Le Pen is still stigmated with her father’s positions, though, most of the political journalists forecast that she will form a big conservative party, UMP will split after the elections, the hard faction of it will join Le Pen new party.
Also the socialist party will split, the actual candidate Hollande and his peers don’t represent the workers class anymore, they are much like the UMP soft faction.
So it will be interesting to watch their evolution in the next months, the political spectre f France is changing;
you can’t remove a social welfare sytem in just deciding it, you would get mobs in the streets, though she is supported by small business owners, and deceipted workers from the communist party, (because their jobs go to low-cost labour countries), I don’t think that she has the ambiton to become a Hitler and or a Mussolini, but a de Gaulle.
“She is about protecting France and exporting France’s exceptional everything while absolutely only allowing the French to buy France’s production”
hmm never heard that, though she would make contracts with countries that play fair rules
“but you are not the only people in the world that work hard and care about that work, care about the food you eat, and live lives that are worthwhile”
so? then we should accept goods that are made in China by pressed workers? but that earn nickels !
“As for DeGaulle, he was not “le sauveur.” He was a man that did good things and he did bad things for France.”
hmm le sauveur? he who fled to London for organizing Resistance, apart the peids noirs of algeria, none is contesting his good will for france today, except the Anglo-Saxons, I wonder why !
” everyone else doesn’t have to lay down to your laws just for your choices”
We never ask them to, except if they live in France
Michel, I say this as a person who has volunteered at summer camps for the mentally disabled: “Are you retarded?”
What is this parenthetical supposed to mean: “However, France uses the two-round electoral system (along with beacons of democracy such as Afghanistan, Argentina, Ukraine, and Zimbabwe). ”
Now, for those of us who have studied comparative politics, this doesn’t seem that big of a deal- those Constitutions are practically based off Frances, just like Romanias and several other countries… but, to the uneducated readers of PJMedia (no offense guys, but lets get real, not all of you have your political science degrees), this statement looks a-mighty lot like you’re saying that France /doesn’t/ have a democratic system…
So… why would you make that comparison, when it is very clear that France, does, indeed, have a VERY democratic system? Check yourself before you wreck yourself, Mr. Gurfinkiel
because he, and the Hollande plebe want to abolish the Vth Republic constitution, that they assimilate as a monarchic one, and want to implement a 6th one that would give less power to the president, like a chrisanthemus innaugurating president in Germany, and or in Italy, but then again, we should make some economical cuts there, no need of a president, only a PM would suffice
But France isn’t Germany, nor the UK, as Churchill said, who can govern france with so many cheezes and wines !
De Gaulle created the Vth republic for getting more stability in governation