Get PJ Media on your Apple

Fracking England: Drillers, Protesters in High-Stakes Showdown

Does Cameron have the mettle to halt the greens?

by
Mike McNally

Bio

August 23, 2013 - 11:57 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

British householders and businesses have looked across the Atlantic with envy in recent years at the shale gas revolution taking place in the U.S., which has led to gas prices plummeting, created tens of thousands of jobs, and set the country on the road to energy independence. Despite being beholden to the environmental lobby, the Obama administration appears to be grudgingly accepting increased shale gas and shale oil production, if only to mitigate the effects of its own mismanagement of the economy.

The UK has been slower to exploit its shale reserves, but that’s changing. Britain is thought to be sitting on enough shale gas to keep the country supplied for between 50 and 100 years, and analysts are talking about a windfall for the economy on the scale of the North Sea oil boom of the 1970s. The government has announced tax breaks designed to kickstart the shale gas industry, and Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron has thrown his weight behind the venture.

An alliance of environmental extremists and leftists are equally determined to strangle Britain’s shale gas industry at birth. They ostensibly object to the process of “fracking” used to extract the gas — a process which even Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency has given up trying to prove is unsafe — and to the burning of fossil fuels in general, despite reports that shale gas has helped to reduce carbon emissions. Their real complaint is with industrial development and wealth creation.

The opening shots in the fracking war have been fired outside the Sussex village of Balcombe, where energy company Cuadrilla has been carrying out exploratory drilling. The opposition initially consisted mostly of local residents worried about having the peace of their rural surroundings shattered and the countryside defaced. They took the NIMBY position: supporting new housing, roads, or industrial development, so long as it occurs elsewhere.

The locals formed an unlikely alliance with environmentalists. Initially they were the relatively harmless, tree-hugging variety; reporters were charmed by the sight of Balcombe’s comfortable professionals and retirees rubbing shoulders with dreadlocked eco-warriors. However, the protest quickly attracted hardened activists from Britain’s permanent protest subculture, the traveling circus of hard-left dropouts and petty criminals who can be found at any demonstration against the government, business, rich people, or “the system” in general. The NIMBYs have been largely sidelined as the numbers of “professional” activists have grown. While the locals are protesting out of simple self-interest, their increasingly unwelcome guests are motivated to varying degrees by misplaced concern for mother Earth and an outright hatred of capitalism.

This week, thousands of activists descended on Balcombe for two days of “direct action,” and tried to stop vehicles entering the Cuadrilla site. Dozens of protestors were arrested, including Britain’s only Green member of parliament. Cuadrilla temporarily halted operations, raising concerns that the protestors might indeed be able to intimidate it and other energy companies into scaling back or halting their operations.

How the government handles the ongoing protests at Balcombe and those that will inevitably follow at other proposed fracking sites will test both its commitment to the shale gas industry and its resolve to stand up to those who want to stop it. The signs are encouraging. In an article for the Daily Telegraph, Cameron said Britain “cannot afford to miss out” on the economic benefits of shale gas. He’s also promised that communities in which fracking is carried out will get a share of the profits.

Until recently, supporters of fracking had little faith in Cameron, and with good reason. He came to power in 2010 promising to lead “the greenest government ever.” While in opposition he engaged in a series of eco-friendly PR stunts, which included having a windmill installed on the roof of his London home and taking a trip to the Arctic to see the alleged effects of global warming. In government, egged on by his left-of-center Liberal Democrat coalition partners, Cameron has committed Britain to fanciful emissions targets that will add around $400 to household electricity bills by the end of the decade.

Now, with a still-stuttering economy, and political capital to be gained from lowering energy bills and creating thousands of jobs, he’s abruptly changed course.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
You know that OPEC is probably funneling huge amounts of money into the fight against Fracking.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (15)
All Comments   (15)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Still supporters of fracking had little faith in Cameron, and with good reason.
http://homebusiness-homejobs.com/
52 weeks ago
52 weeks ago Link To Comment
Frustrating ignorance! The Shale Gas revolution started over a decade ago here in North Texas. Homeowners do have legitimate complaints about noise and lights during the drilling and hydraulic fracturing processes. Heavy trucks can damage roads and spilled used fracing fluid can kill plants and fish mostly because it's salty. These are real problems that can be solved with a combination of reasonable regulation and financial compensation. The end result of developing a shale gas field is pipes in the ground, locally sourced natural gas, and revenue checks.

The frustrating thing is protesters focus on relatively benign parts of "fracking" to throw up roadblocks. First, the new fluid used in hydraulic fracturing is relatively clean and safe compared to the shale rock it's being pumped into. It can be made safe enough to drink. Second, the holes drilled into the ground inherently require steel and concrete casings to prevent leaks. There is no point is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to drill and complete a gas well if the gas leaks before it can get to the pipeline. Energy companies are highly motivated to not have leaks independent of government regulation. Pollution generally comes from used fracing fluid truck spills, not well leaks.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
In the interests of the United States, I hope the EUSSR bans fracking.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You know that OPEC is probably funneling huge amounts of money into the fight against Fracking.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Damn - I hate it when someone gets my words in ahead of me!

Agree 100%!

Follow the funding money for this 'traveling circus'.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You can't follow the money. It's routed through foundations, non-profits and lobbyists.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Radical leftists are the same world over and they will not tolerate anything which conflicts with their 'ideology'. Moreover, their leadership are paid to incite mayhem and their ringleaders are never held to account.

Even Obama Inc, filled to the brim with radical greens, plus beholden to their violent lobby, still has to bend to the will of the majority public which is behind fracking.

Moreover, Obama Inc is doing everything to implode the economy through green deconstruction, but they realize that they have to slow down their plans and 'readjust' to a mounting public rage - http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/07/barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-connecting-the-dots-addendum-to-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-c/

The point being, if Brits who want energy independence show any moment of weakness, then all will be lost. One must fight fire with fire. NEVER give into the left. NEVER.

Leftist dogma is the same world over.

Adina Kutnicki, Israel http://adinakutnicki.com/about/
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Problem is they have no IDEOLOGY, most of the protesters are dumber than the rocks being Fracked like the Maroon in NYC 2010 with cardboard sign protesting BP, I DONT NEED GAS I TAKE THE BUS
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Thanks for that excellent overview. Cameron's turning away from his green populism is a good illustration of Milton Friedman's "getting the wrong people to do the right thing" in politics.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Great point about how the left was dead set against the closing of coal mines during the Thatcher era. How rich!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
FWIW. US Fracking is largely on private land... where our governments have less control than in Britain... I think.

Also, Britain, a land on an Island of Coal, has lots and lots and lots of gas, most not even recognized. This is because coal and methane are siblings, one leading the other.

Finally, coal and methane, if used properly, are excellent raw materials for the production of methanol, the original clean motor fuel... well known to those truly conversant in the energy world, whose primary effluent is water.

ta
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Cannot find dumber people than at those Enviro Rallies
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Obama voters run a close second.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Weed makes you stupid.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All