Finally Some Hope, Thanks to the Paul Ryan Pick
Though eleven weeks is an eternity in presidential politics, it now seems likely that Mitt Romney’s decision to choose Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan as his running mate will come to be seen as the day when Barack Obama’s chances at reelection began to fade.
The 2012 presidential campaign is — at least for now — about substantive fiscal, economic, and regulatory matters, as well as about fundamental human freedoms. Romney has very serious problems in some of these areas. But Obama has failed miserably in all of them; Ryan’s presence on the Republican ticket will serve as a constant reminder of that indisputable fact.
Romney’s August 11 announcement electrified a GOP base which, though already motivated to defeat Obama, was having a hard time getting excited about their standard bearer. Now it seems that Romney himself has finally moved out of his previous robotic campaigning mode and may actually fight to win.
Meanwhile, the crowds lining up to see and hear Ryan speak have been so large and enthusiastic that the national establishment press has had to dust off its annual “March for Life” game plan and spectacularly lie about their size. The Associated Press and Politico claimed that Ryan spoke before a crowd of “hundreds of supporters” and “several hundred supporters,” respectively, at Ryan’s alma mater Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, on August 15, The New York Times counted “over 1,000,” but condescendingly noted that their number included “much of the current membership of his former fraternity.”
The truth? Every local news outlet reported that the crowd was in the “thousands.” A Dayton scribe relayed a Secret Service estimate of 5,500. WKRC-TV in Cincinnati reported that the crowd numbered 6,000, and uniquely told its viewers (but strangely, not its printed post’s readers) something even the rest of the local media “somehow” overlooked — namely that “a whole line of people were turned away, because there wasn’t enough room” to squeeze all who wanted to be there into the outdoor venue.
Romney’s move has clearly shaken the Obama campaign to its core. Less than a week after the pick, David Axelrod & Co. all but threw in the towel on disparaging Ryan, and instead made a desperate “offer” to stop attacking Romney over his tax returns if the former Massachusetts governor releases three more years of them — as if Team Obama can or even cares to hold their SuperPACs and press apparatchiks to that pledge.
Another indication that Romney’s choice of Ryan was substantive and astute is that the people who claim to wish for Obama’s defeat who have neither of those traits believe that Ryan is a horrible pick. The Wall Street Journal hilariously and all too accurately called them “the bedwetter caucus” in an August 14 editorial. One such coward sent an anonymous 1,300-word treatise to Howard Fineman at the Huffington Post, who of course pretended that his informant is conservative. Among this person’s howlers:
- “Jeb Bush would have been the strongest contender for VP because of his credentials and appeal.” This is the same Jeb Bush who still thinks that his father’s early-1990s betrayal of his “no new taxes” presidential campaign pledge, which set the stage for the Bill Clinton era, was a good move.
- “Romney won’t win Wisconsin unless it’s a landslide for him.” Really? Then why did the Rasmussen poll for the Badger State move from Romney trailing Obama by three points to leading by one just days after the Ryan pick?
- The dead-giveaway topper: “… support for the Tea Party and the number of people who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters have collapsed since the Ryan Plan was first promulgated.” Tell that to, among many others, incumbent Senator Dick Lugar, ousted in Indiana’s GOP primary by Richard Mourdock; Nebraska’s old-boy network, stunned by Deb Fischer’s triumph in the Cornhusker State’s U.S. Senate primary despite spending only $300,000 (her two opponents each spent over $1 million); and Texas Republican establishment favorite David Dewhurst, crushed by insurgent Ted Cruz in the primary for that state’s open Senate seat.
We can also take comfort and solace in Romney not going the supposedly “safe” route, which more than likely would have led to the selection of Ohio Senator Rob Portman.
We’ll probably never know, but perhaps Romney’s vice-presidential vetting team happened upon two items which should have automatically eliminated Portman from any kind of consideration, and which should, unless demonstrably and consistently repudiated in words and actions in the coming years, forever remove Portman from serious presidential consideration.
The first is that he considers being a Washington establishment fixture a feature and not a bug. As the Washington Post accurately noted in the early stages of his 2010 Senate run, Portman first positioned himself “as a dealmaking insider” until he realized that he had to at least pretend to have Tea Party sympathies.
The other is that Rob Portman is all about Rob Portman. That isn’t my opinion; it’s something Portman himself told the Cleveland Plain Dealer in 2005 upon leaving Congress to become George W. Bush’s trade representative:
“I probably am a little risk-averse compared to some members [of Congress],” he concedes, “but I think a lot of that is a deliberate decision on my part that some things are worth it for my career and some things aren’t.”
So Rob Portman will do the right thing as long as it doesn’t hurt his precious career. This is the last thing we need in a United States senator, but for now we’re stuck with that. We certainly don’t need any more of it in the Oval Office or one heartbeat away from it. Fortunately, with Paul Ryan on the GOP ticket, we’re instead getting healthy doses of integrity and courage, which finally provide some hope for a change.






Ryan is a game changer. Winning with him on the ticket will create a mandate for real change. All Republican candidates need to get on board and focus their message so there can be no confusion as to what winning means.
Obama has had 90 days and 300 million to trash Romney; to still be in basically a tied race. Obama is a dead Prez walking.
Give Romney the Ryan pick-the convention-and a big chunk of that 200 mill he’s got-and 30 days. Lets just see where the race is come Oct 1st. I am in IL and Obama is seriously worried about losing here-his ads are on every night. I hear the same is going on in other “safe” states. As Harry Reid says…the word is out!!
I’m waiting for the “final poll” which will be taken this 6th of November (unless your Michelle Obama then it’s 2 Nov.). Romney/RYAN with a Reagan size landslide!
Jeb Bush’s main drawback is that his last name is Bush as in no more Bushes for President. Not to mention all the idiotic comments he has made after he has left the governorship of Florida.
Portman’s main problem is that he has introduced a bill that essentially mirrors Agenda 21. Read up people and get rid of him and anyone who supports this freedom killing bill.
So the fresh face from Wisconsin is helping Romney lead the charge against O’dismal. Who knew what’s brewing in Wisconsin? They’ve given us the courageous Gov. Walker, Rience Priebus, and contender for veep Paul Ryan. And last night Mark Levin interviewed Paul Ryan and Ryan talked freedom and opportunity. Let’s hope they follow through and deliver. That’s real hope and change as opposed to Rope-A-Dope and Chains.
Patty–
You should have mentioned that Wisconsin gave us Ron Johnson, too.
Well, that and being pro-amnesty.
All of which means that Jeb Bush’s biggest problem isn’t his name, it’s who he is and what he values.
Bye-bye Bush!
Ryan is such a stellar pick that even Tom Blumer can’t nit pick it.
As for Blumer’s criticism of Portman, who in their right mind doesn’t consider the impact of a decision upon their career? In Blumer’s mind this makes Portman selfish. In the real world it makes him intelligent.
I believe that the criticism was directed at an individual who was not really looking at doing the right thing regardless of the consequences.
We all are, at one time or the other, looking out for our own best interests. In government, what sets true patriots apart from the rest of the herd is the ability to put themselves (their political reps and capital) at risk for something that they strongly believe in, consequences be damned.
We’d do well to ensure that those are the kinds of folks we send to Washington, our state capitols, city hall, or the halls of power at any organization.
I am astounded by the quote in numerous ways. First, I don’t know whether to find it more egregious because he considers it “his career” OR the fact that he is clearly stating that his personal needs will take precedent over what is right for our country – both are wrong and outrageous. Finally, his willingness to express those feelings in a public forum is not very illustrative of an individual who is reported to be so intelligent.
You suggest in the real world the attitude of considering the impact of decision on a career is not selfish … it is just intelligent. That statement makes me thank God the signers of the Declaration of Independence did not demonstrated such character, as they certainly did not put their career, wealth, security, family, and home above their principles and what was best for others.
As a matter of fact, I think many Americans would suggest that the problems we face today and will impact the quality of life we leave for many American generations to come are directly attributable to politicians who put their personal needs before those of our country and view their positions as careers from which they can build personal wealth and security.
Agreed. I bet Portman thinks the Founders were just engaging in political rhetoric when they pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.
Building on the comments of others: I reviewed the Senate’s oath of office —
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
I fail to see any “unless it’s not worth it for my career” exception.
I really think Paul Ryan was a game changer. He is one of the few people who can clearly articulate the financial mess we’re in right now and he is also one of the few people who has ideas on how to get out of it. And, in Washington, it takes A LOT of guts to come up with ideas on how to reform entitlements. Obama offers you nothing more than “stay the course” until we end up like Greece. Romney picked well by taking Ryan, a man of honesty, courage, and integrity. You can’t ask for more than that in a Vice Presidential nomination. And Ryan will wipe the floor with Biden in a debate. THAT should be fun to watch, too. For the first time in a long time, I feel confident that the Republicans will not only win in November, but win BIG.
He can clearly articulate it because he helped put us here. His voting record clearly establishes that he voted time and again to increase the size of government, increase government spending, decrease government revenue, and assault the civil liberties that people use to care about before 9/11.
And his budget still increases spending for years to come without any real additional revenue. So, the deficit will continue to soar under his budget and fiscal policies as well.
You say that like it’s a bad thing, Oh Leftist Troll.
When you vote for incredibly expensive programs, like the invasion of two countries and a drug prescriptoin plan, and then vote to decrease revenue, thereby drastically increasing the deficit, then yes I view it as a bad thing. If he wasn’t willing to pay for it, he shouldn’t have voted for it. But that is how it is with big government conservatives.
As opposed to big government liberals who shill for votes with promises of freebies and who loot the Treasury for their friends and cronies?
What the heck is wrong with “decreasing government revenue”? THat means more of MY money stays with ME. Sorry, but I don’t see a downside.
As a Tea Partier form Wisconsin, who witnessed Paul Ryan speak to our first Tea Party in Madison on April 15, 2009, I can attest that his fiscal policies are welcome to the vast majority of us. As a huge Sarah Palin supporter, who was unbelievably disappointed that she chose not to run for POTUS, I was newly enthused when Romney wisely chose Paul Ryan, bringing a large contingent of Tea Party support with the Ryan choice. It truly was inspired, and makes me much more willing to support this ticket. Wisconsin IS IN PLAY this election — especially if our photo ID law is upheld.
“You didn’t build that” was the turning point. Maybe it gave Timid Mittens a clue.
Ryan, I think, brings a mixed bag to the table. He offers a lot to like in the financial realm. On the other hand, his budget proposal doesn’t go far enough because it does nothing about pork in the Pentagon.
Ryan seems more moderate than some of his House colleagues, with their hard rush to gut some of the country’s bedrock environmental laws and to make energy development the primary use of our public lands here in the West.
(According to the Western Governors Association, outdoor recreation, mostly on public lands, is a monster sized industry here in the West & generates more income & jobs than does energy. This industry is sustained by some of these environmental laws)
Ryan’s biggest shortcoming will be in the social issues arena. It will be difficult to overlook his sponsorship of “personhood” bills and a bill to require women seeking abortions to obtain ultrasounds. Most people I know who voted Republican in 2010 did so for jobs & the economy, not for stuff like HR 1 and HR 3.
#4 Libertyship46 “And Ryan will wipe the floor with Biden in a debate…..” If Obama hopes to save his presidency, he needs to replace Biden with Hillary Clinton.
Pork makes people mad. It makes me mad. Ranting about pork is a great way to get people riled up, but …
Pork is a drop in the bucket. Our budget problems are with the entitlements.
Focusing on pork now would be like mopping the deck of the Titanic.
I’m glad Ryan has the wisdom to know where to concentrate his fire for greatest effect.
We can mop the decks later.
Great point. And we didn’t get here in four years. We won’t solve this problem in four years. It’s going to take decades of sustained effort.
Energy royalties income will far outstrip recreational fees income.
Ryan was a great pick, but don’t get cocky! as Instapundit would say.
No Vice Presidential pick is a game changer. The top of the ticket, is, was, and always will be the determining factor in winning the White House, with one exception. It is common, today, to vote against a candidate. Romney will garner millions of votes from people who loathe and fear Obama. Few have any great opinion of Romney, none will vote based on Ryan.
From now to election day, we will, again, see the bugs crawl out of the wood work. We will be deluged with vital news: a Congressman skinny dipped in the “holy” Sea of Galilee, another having sex with a boy in a rest stop, another exposed his stupidity discussing legitimate rape. We will not read in the main stream press that the American taxpayer got $24 million back from the $527 million they invested, secretly and illegally, in Solyndra. (DOE was barred from subordinating the loan to other lenders; they did.) You were stiffed. If your investment agent did this, he would go to jail. After the Fast and Furious fiasco, many high level government executives should also go to jail. Instead, they are on track to get life time retirement benefits.
It is being reported that Ryan may have dated a black girl in college; he may have dated a two headed Martian. Romney may have a bank account in Timbuktu.
Nothing matters except saving America. Wasteful government spending has destroyed the fiscal value of our nation. We are headed toward a dictatorship. Throw the bums out, all of them.
The first is fine with me.
I can tolerate the second.
But I draw the line at three heads!
Reality Check: Is Rep. Paul Ryan Actually A Big Spender? His “Principle” Problem
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKJaVJpJ-FI&feature=plcp
So, what if Paul Ryan was delving into the federal budget when he was still in high school? I didn’t peek at a federal budget until I was out of college. Yet there is no way I would have cast the votes in Congress that Ryan has through the years. Ryan voted for TARP, the auto bailouts, No Child Left Behind, the Medicare prescription drug benefit, the Bush stimulus, the Patriot Act, and military adventurism abroad. No policymaker is perfect, but no one with a real Conservative bone in their body could have supported these policies.
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/paul-ryan-biggovernment-conservative
Ryan is the face of the ESTABLISHMENT, and should be considered as such! Wake up folks, and put down your pom poms!
I think the real value of the Ryan pick isn’t so much to bring in the lefties or the independents, but rather to motivate those who were already favorably disposed to Romney. This may make a real difference!
Ryan is a great pick and probably one that conservatives would go behind. He would not only get the support of the fiscal conservatives but also the social conservatives too. Let’s just hope those conservatives who wouldn’t vote for Romney initially would do it because of Ryan.
Indeed. Ryan’s a pro-life Catholic, but he’s too smart to go shooting his mouth off with crackpot theories about magic veejayjays. It’s the economy,
and the economy,
and the economy,
and the economy,
and the economy,
and the economy stupid.
Will he do the right thing? His record and votes let me know he will not, and it is all about what power he can have and the benefits he can get!
GAO Report: $400 Billion Wasted Annually On 1,500 Duplicative, Fragmented, Inefficient Government Programs
http://budget.senate.gov/republican/public/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=5b942c34-d1e5-49de-be92-a85dad8aa191&SK=42ED5BBA6767481D74B2057AC359ACD4
Published on Aug 15, 2012 Reality Check takes a look at Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan’s spending record during his seven terms in office.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKJaVJpJ-FI&feature=plcp
There is room in the bloated defense department industrial complex for sure! $250,000 apiece
The U.S. Army just took a big step closer to getting a brand-new, high-tech ride. Yesterday the Army announced the three companies that will continue to develop the new Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, a sort of blend between today’s workhorse Humvee and the bomb-resistant MRAP trucks that have saved so many lives in Iraq and Afghanistan. Lockheed Martin, AM General and Oshkosh Defense each received around $30 million to refine their JLTV prototypes ahead of a final selection 27 months from now. At stake in the seven-year-old competition: up to 50,000 trucks for the Army and another 5,000 for the Marines, at a cost of $250,000 apiece. The nearly $14 billion program is one of the few big, near-term prizes in Pentagon budgets squeezed by war costs and the economic downturn.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/08/army-new-vehicle/
It’s a curious thing.
Ryan is beginning to dominate this campaign from the undercard; an election that just happens to be the most important election is several generations; I would argue the most important election since either Lincoln became the post-Renaisance moral giant or the Founders de-selected George III.
Surprising isn’t it what a simple man with integrity can do in a desert of deceipt and self-indulgence. Sure, Mr Ryan can do his sums and appears to love his mother, but he’s no Leonardo, his resume doen’t compare to thousands of MIT, Oxford, and Ivy League graduates, and if he has a Gettysburg Address in him, it hasn’t surfaced yet. Essentially, he’s the guy next door who doesn’t fall for the latest fad and puts his family ahead of himself.
Maybe honesty and integrity can still cut through the fog.
And credit to Romney for whatever reason he had for picking him.
Lincoln wanted to deport all “negros” as he called them to Haiti and South America (in line with Henry Clay). He called this “colonization.” He supported slave owners, even defended one when he was a lawyer in Illinois. The only reason he opposed slavery in new states was because they took away labor from the whites. Not that there is anything wrong with this, but he slept with men frequently…
I’m glad you put some political stances Ryan has had to support your claims on on how great he is, also, that didn’t include anything personal about him, like how much he loves his mother….
First, Lincoln was president in 1860. We can hardly expect the same degree of race enlightenment people have today. Jeez, learn some historical context. And I didn’t know lawyers only defended people they agree with. That’s news to me.
Ryan voted for
1. The GM Bailout
2. Tarp
3. NDAA (Revised to include arresting suspected Americans, no cause or warrant)
4. Domestic Drones
5. No Child left behind and growing the education department
6. Increasing the debt ceiling
7. Going to war in Iraq
8. Keeping our troops in Iraq, with no timeline of coming home
Should I keep going? Just because someone is an independent doesn’t mean the can’t be further right then you. Try doing a bit of research on the guy outside of knowing he’s good looking an catholic. The establishment is out of touch.
Thanks