<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Food Restrictions Fatten Up the Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:35:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BizzyBlog</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-504662</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-504662</guid>
		<description>[...] If you think think these nannies/ninnies are satisfied merely telling us the calorie counts in the things we eat so we might more informed decisions, look at New York and LA, and think again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you think think these nannies/ninnies are satisfied merely telling us the calorie counts in the things we eat so we might more informed decisions, look at New York and LA, and think again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus Warrior</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-97287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-97287</guid>
		<description>Responsibilty at sometime have to be a personal decision. It is not the government place to prohibit anything used properly to substain life. Instead of the elimination of life choices in abortion and homosexuality, why not educate about the cost of health choices. Fastfood, vegetables, fish, red meat, white meat, grains, starches, proteins, can all have a place in a healthy diet along with diary products, water and liquids.  A diet of one of anything is destructive to ones health. A society with all homosexuals would end all society, but a society with all couples of one man one woman would create a healthier society and procreation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responsibilty at sometime have to be a personal decision. It is not the government place to prohibit anything used properly to substain life. Instead of the elimination of life choices in abortion and homosexuality, why not educate about the cost of health choices. Fastfood, vegetables, fish, red meat, white meat, grains, starches, proteins, can all have a place in a healthy diet along with diary products, water and liquids.  A diet of one of anything is destructive to ones health. A society with all homosexuals would end all society, but a society with all couples of one man one woman would create a healthier society and procreation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javelin</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91604</link>
		<dc:creator>Javelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91604</guid>
		<description>To put some perspective on this, wealthy areas have been using zoning ordinances and health regs for decades to control and limit fast food places. Fast food places are the ugly but useful step daughters of american food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put some perspective on this, wealthy areas have been using zoning ordinances and health regs for decades to control and limit fast food places. Fast food places are the ugly but useful step daughters of american food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeatherRadish</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91603</link>
		<dc:creator>HeatherRadish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91603</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;fewer Americans are ... dying of smoking-related diseases&lt;/i&gt;

Prove that.  I don&#039;t think you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>fewer Americans are &#8230; dying of smoking-related diseases</i></p>
<p>Prove that.  I don&#8217;t think you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SGT Ted</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91551</link>
		<dc:creator>SGT Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91551</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The government, which already pays a large share of health costs for low-income residents like those in South-Central LA, has a legitimate financial interest in reducing unhealthy behaviors.&lt;/i&gt;

This is fascist thinking and bigoted. Poor people don&#039;t deserve to be treated as children. They are adults and they have freewill. Where do you get off telling total strangers what to eat? Elitist garbage.

Tell me, do you think that Homosexual adults should have their lifestyles regulated because of the high medical costs of AIDS/HIV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The government, which already pays a large share of health costs for low-income residents like those in South-Central LA, has a legitimate financial interest in reducing unhealthy behaviors.</i></p>
<p>This is fascist thinking and bigoted. Poor people don&#8217;t deserve to be treated as children. They are adults and they have freewill. Where do you get off telling total strangers what to eat? Elitist garbage.</p>
<p>Tell me, do you think that Homosexual adults should have their lifestyles regulated because of the high medical costs of AIDS/HIV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91441</link>
		<dc:creator>goy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91441</guid>
		<description>P.Ami - precisely! See my very first post up above.

I find it not a little bit discouraging - what am I saying...!? lately this has begun to border on terrifying - that so few libertarian and conservative Americans seem to comprehend the simple outcome you&#039;ve concisely described. Because if they do, they&#039;re not putting much effort into making the point.

I also find it amazing that so few capitalists understand how comprehensive health care insurance has driven the cost of most day-to-day health care to a level where almost no one thinks they can afford it without insurance any more. This notion that health care is not even possible without insurance is taken so completely for granted that it seems no longer even &lt;i&gt;possible&lt;/i&gt; for the public - let alone anyone in government - to think outside that box: health care and the insurance that pays for it are one-and-the-same in the minds of most Americans. This is possibly the greatest marketing success in U.S. history, since it is hardly the truth.

Pro-business folks who on other topics usually make perfect sense (yes, like you Glenn) have lost sight of reality on this particular issue I&#039;m afraid. That selective blindness facilitates an outcome (i.e., skyrocketing health care costs) that plays right into the hands of the socialists&#039; strong suit (i.e., their ability to side-step logic and reason, and manipulate the voting masses at an emotional level).

Health care insurance companies and the relentless price increases they promote are causing irreparable damage to our economy. Direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription medications has driven the demand for those drugs way, &lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt; beyond the actual &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; for those drugs. These things are only possible because consumers are barred from closing the loop on price - both for health care goods and services &lt;i&gt;AND&lt;/i&gt; the cost of the insurance they think they have to have to pay for them.

&quot;Progressive&quot; elites want control of health care &lt;i&gt;insurance&lt;/i&gt; for two reasons: it gives them control over the trillions of dollars that would flow through such a system; it provides an unprecedented degree of control over those insured by the system and will ultimately provide a similarly unprecedented degree of control over health care providers (something &lt;i&gt;THEY&lt;/i&gt; obviously haven&#039;t yet realized either).

At its core, the government&#039;s attraction to any socialist medical welfare system is no different than the attraction to the &quot;carbon credits&quot; scam run by the U.N. or the &quot;cap-and-trade&quot; scam Obama wants to foist onto American businesses.

Always. Follow. The. Money.

&lt;b&gt;Government is not the solution to our problems. Government &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; the problem.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.Ami &#8211; precisely! See my very first post up above.</p>
<p>I find it not a little bit discouraging &#8211; what am I saying&#8230;!? lately this has begun to border on terrifying &#8211; that so few libertarian and conservative Americans seem to comprehend the simple outcome you&#8217;ve concisely described. Because if they do, they&#8217;re not putting much effort into making the point.</p>
<p>I also find it amazing that so few capitalists understand how comprehensive health care insurance has driven the cost of most day-to-day health care to a level where almost no one thinks they can afford it without insurance any more. This notion that health care is not even possible without insurance is taken so completely for granted that it seems no longer even <i>possible</i> for the public &#8211; let alone anyone in government &#8211; to think outside that box: health care and the insurance that pays for it are one-and-the-same in the minds of most Americans. This is possibly the greatest marketing success in U.S. history, since it is hardly the truth.</p>
<p>Pro-business folks who on other topics usually make perfect sense (yes, like you Glenn) have lost sight of reality on this particular issue I&#8217;m afraid. That selective blindness facilitates an outcome (i.e., skyrocketing health care costs) that plays right into the hands of the socialists&#8217; strong suit (i.e., their ability to side-step logic and reason, and manipulate the voting masses at an emotional level).</p>
<p>Health care insurance companies and the relentless price increases they promote are causing irreparable damage to our economy. Direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription medications has driven the demand for those drugs way, <i>way</i> beyond the actual <i>need</i> for those drugs. These things are only possible because consumers are barred from closing the loop on price &#8211; both for health care goods and services <i>AND</i> the cost of the insurance they think they have to have to pay for them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Progressive&#8221; elites want control of health care <i>insurance</i> for two reasons: it gives them control over the trillions of dollars that would flow through such a system; it provides an unprecedented degree of control over those insured by the system and will ultimately provide a similarly unprecedented degree of control over health care providers (something <i>THEY</i> obviously haven&#8217;t yet realized either).</p>
<p>At its core, the government&#8217;s attraction to any socialist medical welfare system is no different than the attraction to the &#8220;carbon credits&#8221; scam run by the U.N. or the &#8220;cap-and-trade&#8221; scam Obama wants to foist onto American businesses.</p>
<p>Always. Follow. The. Money.</p>
<p><b>Government is not the solution to our problems. Government <i>is</i> the problem.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Ami</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91397</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Ami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91397</guid>
		<description>&quot;The government, which already pays a large share of health costs for low-income residents like those in South-Central LA, has a legitimate financial interest in reducing unhealthy behaviors.&quot;

--- Out of the mouths of babes. This precise sentiment is the breaking point of liberty. When the government takes over health care then it has taken the right to tell you how to care of yourself; what meds to take (psychological as well), what food to eat, how and when to exercise, etc... This, perhaps more then any other reason, is why universal health care is specifically a bad idea and suggests yet again how it is that socialist programs are illiberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The government, which already pays a large share of health costs for low-income residents like those in South-Central LA, has a legitimate financial interest in reducing unhealthy behaviors.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212; Out of the mouths of babes. This precise sentiment is the breaking point of liberty. When the government takes over health care then it has taken the right to tell you how to care of yourself; what meds to take (psychological as well), what food to eat, how and when to exercise, etc&#8230; This, perhaps more then any other reason, is why universal health care is specifically a bad idea and suggests yet again how it is that socialist programs are illiberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thalpy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91342</link>
		<dc:creator>Thalpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91342</guid>
		<description>Jerry, BackwardsBoy, and others offer outstanding comments. This ban on new restaurants and expansion or remodeling is what socialist nitwits do. Stop voting for them! For test purposes, set up a few fast food restaurants as part of an established church outreach ministry, then dare the LA City Council to come after them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, BackwardsBoy, and others offer outstanding comments. This ban on new restaurants and expansion or remodeling is what socialist nitwits do. Stop voting for them! For test purposes, set up a few fast food restaurants as part of an established church outreach ministry, then dare the LA City Council to come after them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91340</link>
		<dc:creator>goy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91340</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;- In that sense, what Romney and Schwarzenegger have done is solid leadership on reforming health care... &lt;/i&gt;

Pure horse manure.

Romney&#039;s passage of the MA &lt;i&gt;Health Care is Now an &lt;b&gt;Entitlement&lt;/b&gt; Act&lt;/i&gt;, which he claimed to have done grudgingly IIRC (big deal), is by no stretch leadership on reforming health &lt;i&gt;care&lt;/i&gt;. Absolutely the opposite.

A statutory obligation to purchase health care &lt;i&gt;insurance&lt;/i&gt; does nothing to reform health &lt;i&gt;care&lt;/i&gt;. The two are not the same.

Comprehensive health care insurance has been driving prices of health care higher at rates far exceeding inflation for over 30 years now. The ONLY way health care is ever going to be affordable &lt;i&gt;again&lt;/i&gt; - as it was back when people used to pay out-of-pocket for all but the most serious health issues - is through legislation &lt;i&gt;eliminating&lt;/i&gt; the comprehensive health care insurance scam in the U.S., and barring direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications (which inflates the demand far beyond the actual need). Over a transition period, commodity economics will drive the costs of quotidian care back in line with other goods and services, and &lt;i&gt;catastrophic&lt;/i&gt; insurance plans can be administered via the same authority to which you (or your landlord) pay property taxes, leveraging huge actuarial group sizes.

This idiotic notion that our only option is to hand a corrupt system over to a government that NO ONE trusts to do anything else right - just so that it can be corrupted further and concentrate trillions of dollars into the hands of a few - is pure insanity, not &quot;leadership&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>- In that sense, what Romney and Schwarzenegger have done is solid leadership on reforming health care&#8230; </i></p>
<p>Pure horse manure.</p>
<p>Romney&#8217;s passage of the MA <i>Health Care is Now an <b>Entitlement</b> Act</i>, which he claimed to have done grudgingly IIRC (big deal), is by no stretch leadership on reforming health <i>care</i>. Absolutely the opposite.</p>
<p>A statutory obligation to purchase health care <i>insurance</i> does nothing to reform health <i>care</i>. The two are not the same.</p>
<p>Comprehensive health care insurance has been driving prices of health care higher at rates far exceeding inflation for over 30 years now. The ONLY way health care is ever going to be affordable <i>again</i> &#8211; as it was back when people used to pay out-of-pocket for all but the most serious health issues &#8211; is through legislation <i>eliminating</i> the comprehensive health care insurance scam in the U.S., and barring direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications (which inflates the demand far beyond the actual need). Over a transition period, commodity economics will drive the costs of quotidian care back in line with other goods and services, and <i>catastrophic</i> insurance plans can be administered via the same authority to which you (or your landlord) pay property taxes, leveraging huge actuarial group sizes.</p>
<p>This idiotic notion that our only option is to hand a corrupt system over to a government that NO ONE trusts to do anything else right &#8211; just so that it can be corrupted further and concentrate trillions of dollars into the hands of a few &#8211; is pure insanity, not &#8220;leadership&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javelin</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91338</link>
		<dc:creator>Javelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fast-food-restrictions-fatten-up-the-government/#comment-91338</guid>
		<description>If they are really concerned about obesity, stop providing school busses for school kidsand cab vouchers for the Medicaid people and get them to walk. This would be a win win, cause it will cut taxes and nanny statism too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are really concerned about obesity, stop providing school busses for school kidsand cab vouchers for the Medicaid people and get them to walk. This would be a win win, cause it will cut taxes and nanny statism too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

