Expensive Money
As I recall, it was a Thursday and I needed to eat. While gainfully employed in a student job, my check wasn’t due for another week or two. I had nothing in my bank account. The slate clouds threatened that cool, morning drizzle northern California is known for.
After a night of debauchery, I was unsteady. In my book bag was a high-end personal CD player, a gift from my parents. Before me was a shop window backed by metal bars. Above the doorway was that ancient symbol: three golden balls. I screwed up my nerve and entered.
I walked out with a pair of twenty dollar bills in my pocket. Far less than I’d hoped. This had to last me. You know how the story ends: By Sunday, I had not much more than lint in my pocket and was digging for some other funding source. I honestly don’t remember how I made it until my paycheck. But I did; here I am, my financial ship basically righted.
Thank God I had not met a “payday loan” operation. They did not yet exist.
Here’s how a payday loan operation works. Say I need $200, but payday is nine days away. I go to a payday loan outfit, and if I can prove I have a job by showing a pay stub, they will give me the two C’s in return for a check post-dated two weeks from now, for $230. Between now and then, I need to pay off the loan at $230, or they cash the check. No money in my account? In some states, no worries: I can “flip” the loan, buying another two weeks for another $30. (In some states this is illegal.)
That adds up to about a 390% annual interest rate on the loan.
Most folks pay back the money. Indeed, payday loan operations serve in many ways as a de facto banking system for the poor. That’s how they bill themselves, helping working Americans just make ends meet and handle unforeseen emergencies.
But, of course, that’s not where they make their money. They rake in the dough from poor saps like I was, in that pawn shop: desperate, feeling out of options. People in that state will often do anything. Indeed, I can bet that, had there been a payday loan shop available, I would have jumped inside in a shot. And two weeks later, I would have been hoping to flip that loan.
Payday loan companies comprise a $28 billion industry in terms of loan volume — roughly comparable to the gross domestic product of Jordan. They make their money the same way loan sharks do, by squeezing people who don’t pay their debts on time.
Lots of people get taken in, driven by desperation. The problem was big enough that the defense department pushed for a law capping the interest rate payday lenders can charge. The Pentagon said that service members were paying, on average, $827 on a $339 loan.
On October 1, payday lenders won’t be able to charge more than 36% to service members. They are getting out of that business, saying that rate of return just doesn’t make them enough to justify the work.
Other places are trying to do away with these loan sharks, too. Washington, DC just voted to cap rates at the 48 payday shops in that city. Georgia banned them in 2004. Word is that Ohio may be next on the agenda.
Some see this as a liberal-vs.-conservative issue. Those bleeding hearts are out to coddle the poor. But to me, it’s a moral issue that has nothing to do with that. We’ve already agreed, as a society, that it’s wrong. Since Old Testament times, people have agreed it is wrong to charge exorbitant interest. And here on American shores, there were interest rate caps between four and seven percent in the colonies of the New World. Loan sharks, who charge in the neighborhood of 125% interest, are prosecuted under RICO laws.
And, there are other, far less exploitive, options for people who really just need a bit extra to cover an emergency, from bona fide advances from their employer to working out payment plans with legitimate creditors.
No, it’s not that pawnshop’s fault I had burned through all my money back in college; it was my own. We all have a responsibility to live within our means.
But we also have a responsibility not to prey on the weak. An industry that can only survive on poor decisions made in desperation doesn’t deserve a place in our colonies.
Brad Rourke writes a column on public life called Public Comments, produces a videolog called Taxonomies, is a founder of the Maryland neighborhood blog, Rockville Central, and is in a band called The West End.






28 BILLION dollars??? Wow. I had no idea
It’s not just about pawn shops and payday lenders, either. There are lenders out there charging APRs of as much as 99.25% on unsecured loans. It’s not much different from loan-sharking, except that it’s perfectly legal, apparently.
Mob Loan Sharks are waiting in the wings. The demand for short term loans predates Payday lending and it will continue after the industry gets crushed. Less consumer choice is the result. You got 40 bucks for a high end cd player. What rate did you calculate for that transaction? What is the APR on a broken leg? Do everyone a favor and spare them from your paternal instincts. It’s funny that you don’t call for the end of pawn shops or the Mafia. Why is that?
“Mob Loan Sharks are waiting in the wings.”
They most certainly are waiting in the wings. Have we already forgotten the prohibition era? We must allow people to make foolish choices. After all, we are talking about full-grown adults. Did somebody appoint one of us to be a benevolent dictator? No, we should essentially mind our own business—and hope the free market resolves many of these difficulties. It must also be added that at least one group has attempted a non-profit solution. Sadly, they have found it to be a waste of time. Too many of the loans go into default.
Hey Brad, nice article. It’s clearly amoral to charge too high a percentage from the poor folks. Those guys are too stupid to know what they are doing.
Before I forget – the reason I am writing this letter to you is this -I need to loan $100 for a gift to my old lady. I am getting my paycheck two weeks from now. The government has closed the pay day loans here in Oregon, so there is no one for me to turn to. Can I swing by your office and get the money? I hope it won’t be a problem for you to help out a brother. It won’t take more than a few minutes. After all, I still need the dow, you know.
A’ight, what’s the address of your place? BTW, if it’s okay, I will bring a few dozen of my friends with me – they are also looking for a quick loan.
Hey, guys, thanks for the comments. Here’s just a quick response. This is not meant to argue, but to keep the conversation going. And, I guess, to clarify what I did not make clear.
I am in general opposed to government intervention, I value small government (and no-government) approaches to society’s ills. But I also know that there are highly unscrupulous people out there and there are limits to a “let the buyer beware” philosophy. For instance, it is illegal (not just wrong) to advertise that the bottled tap water I sell you will cure pneumonia. It’s fair that some would say that’s overly paternalistic, that the market can punish such liars. I just don’t agree that the hands-off approach is right in _every_ case.
So, if there are some cases where intervention is OK, what are they? I think that is the line that America needs to re-draw. Over the past decades, the area of intervention has expanded far too much…so let’s pull it in. Way in. I’m with you on that. The question I think everyone is facing is: How far is “way?”
Overall, my point isn’t about “poor folks” so much as it is about “desperate folks.”
I strongly believe in taking personal responsibility, and that perhaps the greatest problem facing society is that too few people take such responsibility. But, I also I stand by my claim that it’s simply wrong to prey on people who are desperate. . . whether they brought that desperation on themselves (like me, in the day) or not.
Thanks, everyone.
–Brad
Hey Brad, thanks for the response. If I might speak for the others, your compassion isn’t what we are responding to. Poor and desperate people get ripped off all the time and that isn’t going to change, no matter how much we all would like it to change. If you demonize payday lenders, who put their own capital at risk in a GOVERNMENT regulated industry, you will force these folks into much worse alternatives. By the way, when was the last time YOU needed a payday lender? What is your response to the suggestion that you start trying to close down the Mafia and pawn shop business first?
Steve, thanks. Sorry I didn’t answer your earlier direct questions. First, I am all for cracking down on the Mafia. Second, I don’t take as dim a view of pawn shops as I do of payday lenders. In general, the current rules are OK by me.
Why do I have less of a problem with pawn shops? Because, even though the pawn is a “loan,” the pawner can walk away from it and forfeit the collateral, without necessarily needing to flip their loan.
On the other hand, payday lenders’ business model DEPENDS on people failing to pay the first loan and flipping it into an ongoing and escalating. It’s like crack in that regard.
Yes, desperate folks get ripped off…that won’t change. I am saying that SOME limits on what people can rip them off for are reasonable. So, far from pushing folks into worse alternatives, I am actually advocating taking what I see as one of the worst alternatives off the table in the first place. But, I have no doubt others disagree.
Man, I did NOT mean to type so much.
(P.S. I have not needed the kinds of “services” provided by a payday lender in some time, but I will admit that I have been check-to-check and had to push basic expenses forward in the not-too-distant past.)
I worked in a pay day loan place for awhile…
Contrary to what you wrote, most people do NOT pay the loans back, by a long shot!
We even had people hit 3 or 4 places to pay the attorney to file bankruptcy!
Nothing that looks this easy to make money is, as a rule. When you think about it you might agree.
I DO think that it is a great way to LAUNDER money for the mob/drug guys…
Fake bad loans to your straw names and poof! It’s in the system, free and clear!
Over 80% defaults! You make $60 off two and LOSE $1200 on the others!
Maybe in some bigger cities it’s better, but it can’t be by much.
Oh and you can’t collect on bad checks cause they’re post dated, making them a loan notes.
Try hiring a lawyer to sue for $200.00 and see how THAT works out.
Brad, What are the numbers? If you close down the pay day lenders, 100% of their customers will look for ‘alternatives”. We all know what they are, and they are a heck of a lot nastier than the consequences of reneging on an agreement the borrower initiated in the first place. Why do you think most folks go there in the first place? BTW, the Big Government crowd needs people to default and screw up their lives. That’s how they keep their constituency.