Exclusive Excerpts From New Black Panther Case Investigation Report
The New Black Panther Party voter-intimidation case, which has rocked the Justice Department, will reach an important endpoint on November 19. At its regular business meeting tomorrow, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will consider a draft report on its investigation of the Department’s scandalously politicized handling of the case.
This case was unique in one vital aspect almost from its beginning — the existence of a visual recording of the New Black Panthers in their paramilitary, fascist-style uniforms, one holding a night stick, blocking the entrance to a polling place. That kind of direct evidence is very unusual in a voting rights case. It helped to graphically illustrate the preposterousness of the Obama administration’s dismissal of virtually the entire federal lawsuit the Civil Rights Division had commenced against the New Black Panther Party and several of its members. The feeble and completely non-credible explanations for the dismissal advanced by the Department’s political leadership only made the matter worse.
Most of the mainstream media initially ignored the lawsuit, despite all of the powerful evidence. That changed, however, with the dramatic and courageous testimony of former Voting Section lawyer Christian Adams (who resigned from Justice in disgust over its handling of the case) and former Voting Section Chief Christopher Coates (who was removed from his post by the Obama administration). Coates testified in defiance of orders from the Department’s senior leadership, who in a brazen act of lawlessness directed him not to comply with the subpoena issued by the Civil Rights Commission.
The draft report of the Commission that was leaked is devastating in its portrayal of the deviousness and politicization of the Obama Justice Department. The Department has misled the public, Congress, and the Commission from the very beginning.
For example, the Department claimed that career lawyers made the decision to dismiss the voter-intimidation case. But the report notes:
[The] record of communications within the Department appears to indicate that senior political appointees played a significant role in the decision-making surrounding the lawsuit. … [The Department’s repeated attempts to hide the involvement of Obama political appointees] raise questions about what the Department is trying to hide.
The Commission’s report concludes:
There is currently a conscious policy within the Department that voting rights laws should not be enforced in a race-neutral fashion. … [The testimony of Adams and Coates provided] specific examples of open hostility and opposition to pursuing cases in which whites were the perceived victims and minorities the alleged wrongdoers.
Further, the dismissal of the Panthers case was “the result of anger on the part of acting political appointees and other attorneys.” That anger arose from a “deep-seated opposition to the equal enforcement of the Voting Rights Act against racial minorities.” The testimony shows that Obama political appointee Deputy Assistant Attorney General Julie Fernandes specifically ordered a policy of ignoring violations of the voting rights laws. Efforts to obtain more evidence on this policy “have been met with extraordinary resistance by the Department.”
The report also summarizes the evidence on the refusal of the Justice Department to enforce important provisions of the National Voter Registration Act — provisions that require states to maintain and clean up their voter registration lists by removing ineligible voters. The Department has never specifically denied that Fernandes instituted such a policy. As the Commission says, the evidence raises “doubts as to whether officials within the current Civil Rights Division have unilaterally limited the types of cases the Division will enforce.”
Julie Fernandes, Maura Lee, steve Rosenbaum, Becky Worst, Tom Perez, Loretta Ding. Its going to be one long hot and embarassing 2011!!! Go get a glamour shot for the media! Ha ha ha ha!
A secret pre-election letter from the Attorney General is discovered:
From the desk of Attorney General Eric Holder:
To: John F. Clark, Director, U.S. Marshal Service
Dear Mr. Clark,
Of late there has been considerable discussion over the matter of voter intimidation at certain polling places, as well as the responsibility of the Department of Justice to protect voters. As there seems to have been some confusion about our responsibilities and policies in this area, I am sending you this memo in order to make sure you are fully aware of your department’s responsibilities in this matter.
As Assistant Attorney General King has already indicated to you, it is NOT your responsibility to ensure free access to polling places for persons of European or Asian descent. In certain instances, such as the matter of undocumented aliens, you should work to protect the voting rights of Hispanics. Finally, in all instances you must ensure the voting rights of African Americans. Please make sure that your subordinates are aware that any deviation from these guidelines is grounds for immediate dismissal. As Ms. King has previously stated, there are now two black men running this country. Any polling practices which might change this are unacceptable, and of course prima facia evidence of Racism, which is grounds for immediate termination and subsequent criminal prosecution.
Some of your subordinates have apparently been questioning what they mistakenly believe to be an “unequal” enforcement of the laws concerning voter protection. Nothing could be further from the truth. These laws are being enforced EXACTLY as they were intended. These laws were passed to protect African Americans and disenfranchised Hispanics from their caucasian oppressors. It was never the intent of these laws to provide any protection to caucasians. The fact of the matter is that caucasians already constitute a majority of this country’s population, and as such are not capable of being discriminated against, nor of having their rights infringed. Only minorities such as African Americans are in need of legal protection in these matters. As African Americans are an oppressed minority, they are not capable of true racism. In point of fact, any anger which they may feel towards caucasians is completely justified; and any actions they may take as a result, including minor altercations at polling places, are not significant enough in their impact on the electorate as a whole to constitute a breach of Federal protections.
In order to help you with this matter I am providing you with some extra manpower. As of today I am appointing a Mr. King Samir Shabazz as the U.S. Marshal for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Mr. Shabazz has extensive experience working as a poll watcher on behalf of the Democratic Party, and is well acquainted with various riot-control tools. Mr. Shabazz will personally ensure that there are not polling practices which conflict with the policies of the U.S. Department of Justice in this district. Mr. Shabazz has, furthermore, been good enough to provide me with a list of individuals with whom he is well-acquainted who will make excellent Marshals for this purpose to serve in other areas of the country. Please be advised that Our Great President for Life has already reviewed and approved of this plan, and that I am appointing these individuals directly per my authority as Attorney General. Also please be aware that you will not need to contact these individuals, as we have set up a system whereby they may report directly to myself. This will, of course, streamline your agency’s operations and thus clear up plenty of time for you to find other things to look into.
Once again, please make it clear to your subordinates that their complete adherence to this policy is required at all times. Please make them aware that they are to render whatever services and aid required by Mr. Shabazz and his associates. Adherence to this policy is of the utmost importance, for only by complete obedience to these directives may we reach a day when we have true racial unity in this nation. As a side note, if Mr. Shabazz says anything to you about “killing white infants in their cribs”, please remind him to take his medication as scheduled. He does sometimes forget.
Thank you for your complete co-operation,
Attorney General Eric Holder
http://beautifulletters-bls.blogspot.com/2010_10_01_archive.html
“As a side note, if Mr. Shabazz says anything to you about “killing white infants in their cribs”, please remind him to take his medication as scheduled. He does sometimes forget.”
PS: It’s not that the Obama DOJ doesn’t agree w/the above listed “cracka” practice, we just don’t want Megyn Kelly at Fox News blabbing it all over the place.
Racially yours,
E.H.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Your most intelligent output evah. I notice no one bothers with you anymore.
For many years the Department of Justice has not been a very good proponent of justice, but under this administration it has become so political that it now reeks of injustice. In reality it is not entirely the fault of political appointees either, the left as entrenched itself in all facets of our government and until they are rooted out it will be business as usual. I seriously doubt the congress will have the stomach to do anythig about it, so that venue is lost.
This is one shoe.
The next shoe is the FAILURE of the DOJ to support Military voting.
Agreed. Both of these are obvious and egregious violations and complaints. How can anyone approve of this crap with a strait face?
Assuming the final report is ‘damming’ of Holder and his Justice Dept., what will happen?
Want to bet…NOTHING!
They try the terrorists in civilian courts, they free the thugs of the black panther party, they call the police stupid, they sue Arizona for defending the border.
It’s called subversion.
The new House will have to resort to counterinsurgency tactics, investigate everything.
as the letter states, obama approved this letter….’OUR GREAT PRESIDENT FOR LIFE” TOLD YOU SO, THERE WILL BE NO VOTING IN 2012, AND THE BIG TAKE OVER WILL START SOON, NOT LATER.
You’re right; It’s the Democrat agenda to implement ‘martial law’ (To be known as Obama’s Law) in 2012.
The boy president doesn’t know it yet, because he hasn’t read it on his tele-prompter. But, they have already vowed ‘no bipartisanship’. So; How else do they plan to implement their agenda?
Keep your powder dry.
Cybergeezer,
RE: your last sentence.
Damn straight my fellow patriot. I hope the other posters are paying attention to your advice.
Mega dittos . . . keep your powder dry, and your blush and your eyeliner and your lipstick and your rope, you know, just in case you find one walking alone late at night.
You realize of course that it’s the Republicans who have vowed no bi-partisanship, right? I WISH Democrats wold do the same, but they won’t.
That’s funny. I could have sworn that at the Health Care Summit, it was Mr. Obama who made such partisian remarks as, “The campaign’s over, John.” And wasn’t he also the one who, when questioned earlier, replied with, “Elections have consequences…I won”? (Or something to that effect.)
He wasn’t even bipartisian enough to call his political colleagues “Senator” or “Representative” at the HCS. Instead, he insolently called them by their first name, as if they were students and he the teacher.
Oh, yes, and then there’s the little matter of calling political opponenets “enemies.”
Propaganda aside, it’s pretty obvious that this new spirit of “bipartianship” is just Obama (again) lying his face off to look good in the public eye.
A good test of the DOJ would have been to get 2 Klan morons outside a poling place in Georgia and see if they were treated the same as the Black Pansy morons in Philadelphia. I think there would be a big difference. Add the wonderful terrorist trial in New York. Suing Arizona for enforcing immigration. The lack of any action on Military voting this year.
This DOJ works like a parody of third world legal system, only worse.
“The report also summarizes the evidence on the refusal of the Justice Department to enforce important provisions of the National Voter Registration Act — provisions that require states to maintain and clean up their voter registration lists by removing ineligible voters.”
That will NEVER happen under the Democrats. Here in Minnesota we have a system in which bus-loads of unknowns can be delivered to the polls to vote on the say-so of any citizen who will “vouch” for their legal-voter status. I am not making this up. Seriously, only a Democrat could come up with this crap. This is wholesale FRAUD and American voters need to pay attention. It is difficult, of course, insofar as the Establishment Media bends over backwards to hide this outrage, but there you have it. It is time to enact state-level voter-protection laws (as in laws that protect the voting power of bona fide voting citizens) throughout the land. We need voter I.D.s. People MUST have faith in the truthful accounting of their votes.
Yep, those chickens are coming home to roost.
“This is wholesale FRAUD and American voters need to pay attention. It is difficult, of course, insofar as the Establishment Media bends over backwards to hide this outrage, but there you have it.”
The “Establishment Media” USED TO bend over backwards “to hide this outrage” & many other outrages of the Obama Administration. Now they just “bend over.”
This is a prime place to start cutting unnecessary budget expenses; Fire, demote, re-assign anyone in this department that has been a part of this ‘conspiracy’.
Cleaning up OUR GOVERNMENT could not start at a better place.
This is a prime target for the new republican house majority. It will be interesting to see if the DofInjustice complies.
You have high expectations for the new GOP majority. I bet they’ll do nothing but then I hope to be proven wrong. The Alaska situation is a proof that the GOP lacks discipline. They can almost be counted on rescuing defeat from the jaws of victory. Yet I hope, I hope.
Welcome to the new age of diversity which has fallen somewhat short of what was hoped for. Now, the Americans who did the most to create a wonderful society are racist baggage handlers for a Third World baby boom and victimhooded people of color. Congratulations all.
I want everyone in America ,to find someone that voted for Obama.Walk up to him and plant a big left hand on his left cheek with full force.
It wont change anything but it will make you feel better.
how about putting your boot in their ass to keep their noxious fumes from afflicting the rest of us the next time they tell you how to live your life
What about Sam Giancana and “the Chicago Outfit” tilting the 1960 presidential elections? Aren’t we a bit overdue for a NON-FEDERAL 50-state governor’s commission on voting standards and procedures? As for these “panther” clowns and other parasites who live without working while leeching the black communities… it is high time for black Americans to clean their own house before someone else starts doing it for them.
Add the NAACP to that list of groups leeching. While writing the report calling the Tea Party racist, their attorney (who formerly worked for the DOJ) lobbied hard at Holder’s Dept. to get this case dropped. Seems she and many others were upset that under the Bush administration, admittedly with some difficulty, the first case had been put through with whites discriminated against.Evidentally, she and Loretta King (neice of MLK) joined Holder in using this case to show that this defending of whites would NOT happen under Obama.
I just read the entire report and all documents. Astonishing how the DOJ just blew the USCRC off repeatedly, lying, digressing, sending wrong documents or none at all..And nothing the Commission can do other than publicize it because the DOJ is in charge of enforcing the Act that created the commission!
BO needs to be impeached with this as the basis for not enforcing the 14th Amendment.
Why will I not be surprised to see Eric Holder getting an Image award from the NAACP for this great work? Previous winners? Barry Hussein O’bwana’s buddy Van Jones.
The great Martin Luther King is rolling in his grave.
Interesting. I posted my last comment before I read yours. I’d say MLK is turning somersaults by now, since his niece (a career attorney and political appointee to this higher position when it opened) was on the whistleblower’s a** for the past year about it.