The question will become legitimate when blacks have the opportunity to vote for the SECOND viable candidate.

Next, how is black people having voted for white people relevant to the discussion? If the population were divided 50-50 it might make some sense, but in the current demographic reality, the moral equivalence you are attempting to draw is murky. And who said that there is any state that has a majority of people who would never vote for any black person? Did you actually read the article? Or any article?

As the U.S. is about to attack Iran, it is the absolute responsibility of everybody in uniform to disobey an order that is either illegal or immoral, including the use of weapons of mass destruction. They cannot commit crimes against humanity.

Well, Colonel Ted, you’ve just made the 479th prediction of a US attack on Iran, of which zero have been correct. I respect your guts for going against the odds.

Even the clueless 9/11 commission told us that the terrorists were at war with us, but we weren’t at war with them. Iran has been at war with us ever since the Mullahs took over. And Colonel Ted, the longer we wait to take out the Mullah Regime, the more likely we will end up having to use WMD, likely in response to an Iranian first strike.

So, Colonel Ted, like the rest of the “antiwar” lefties, you are supporting the creation of a situation, in which far more people will be killed, than if the situtation had be taken care of earlier. Just think of yourself as Prime Minister Chamberlain in 1938. You’re willing to throw Iraq under the bus, Afghanistan under the bus and the Persian Gulf under the bus.

That’s a lot of casualties all over, Your Enlightenedness, preening in moral superiority, while wallowing in filth. Dumb*ss.

Uh… You mean like George W Bush has?

Cat also said:
“As to the whole issue of racism in this campaign one has to wonder why it’s only described in derogatory terms when it’s used to characterize white voters.”

Well… I certainly don’t want to continue the racial aspect of this election but —please— consider this: Black Americans have been voting for white presidential candidates ever since they have been ALLOWED to vote in this country (which wasn’t all that long ago, I might add). It seems a bit conspicuous when you have much of an entire state refusing vote for Obama under ANY circumstance.

If GWB bombed the hell out of Iran, most Americans would cheer it. Payback has been a long time coming, they deserve it, not the least of which is killing our guys in Iraq. But Bush has the spine of a jellyfish, so he won’t. Sadly.

Whites have been told their racist by guys like Wright, Farrakhan, etc. for so long it’s lost any meaning. Instead you have identity politics, driven by spoils division. White voters know damn well that Black pols will drive policies and spoils to their backers. More taxes (out of white voters pockets) for more welfare and government employment (which excludes whites, check out your local DMV). Soft on crime policies (Blacks like it, white hate it). More affirmative action (taking away opportunities from whites to give to blacks).

Obama will get Blacks, College Kids (demographically small, recall the baby bust?) and professional yuppies (outnumbered significantly by blue collar whites). Clinton’s strengths have been in appealing to white working class voters, by understanding that cultural concerns matter, economically. Crime, drugs, promotion of promiscuity, single motherhood, all equate to not being able to move upwards for white working class voters. So they reject that for cultural conservatism which helps them move up. Obama can never understand that and will lose because of it.

Yup, I am sure you would gladly vote for a center-right presidential candidate. Racism has nothing to do with the non-Ivy League whites rejection of Obama. It all has to do with self preservation. They innately realize that Obama and his guilt tripped white buddies plan on really sticking it to them.