<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drunkblogging the First Presidential Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-120977</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-120977</guid>
		<description>on martini #3 the defense department did not invent the computer just like Al Gore did not invent the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on martini #3 the defense department did not invent the computer just like Al Gore did not invent the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Show’s Over; How Was the Live Coverage? (video) &#160;&#187;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115613</link>
		<dc:creator>The Show’s Over; How Was the Live Coverage? (video) &#160;&#187;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115613</guid>
		<description>[...] the online coverage of the debates? I&#8217;m not talking about the punditry, the live streams and the drunkblogs. I&#8217;m specifically talking about the much-vaunted live coverage on Twitter and FriendFeed. You [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the online coverage of the debates? I&#8217;m not talking about the punditry, the live streams and the drunkblogs. I&#8217;m specifically talking about the much-vaunted live coverage on Twitter and FriendFeed. You [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Show&#8217;s Over; How Was the Live Coverage? (video) - Mashable</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115593</link>
		<dc:creator>The Show&#8217;s Over; How Was the Live Coverage? (video) - Mashable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115593</guid>
		<description>[...] the online coverage of the debates? I&#8217;m not talking about the punditry, the live streams and the drunkblogs. I&#8217;m specifically talking about the much-vaunted live coverage on Twitter and FriendFeed. You [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the online coverage of the debates? I&#8217;m not talking about the punditry, the live streams and the drunkblogs. I&#8217;m specifically talking about the much-vaunted live coverage on Twitter and FriendFeed. You [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imp</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115142</link>
		<dc:creator>imp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115142</guid>
		<description>Obama\&#039;s statement was  VERY IGNORANT AND UNINFORMED or just naieve as Russia would veto any  resolution seeking to replace Russian peacekeepers with International peacekeepers!.

Obama on Georgia in the debate
&quot;No. 1 is we have to have foresight and anticipate some of these problems. So back in April, I warned the administration that you had Russian peacekeepers in Georgian territory. That made no sense whatsoever.

And what we needed to do was replace them with international peacekeepers and a special envoy to resolve the crisis before it boiled over.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/the_first_presidential_debate.html

BUT
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is the branch of the United Nations charged with the maintenance of international peace and security. Its powers, outlined in the United Nations Charter, include the establishment of peacekeeping operations, the establishment of international sanctions, and the authorization for military action.[1] Its powers are exercised through United Nations Security Council Resolutions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Security_Council#Role_of_the_Security_Council

The Security Council is charged with maintaining peace and security among countries. While other organs of the United Nations can only make &#039;recommendations&#039; to member governments, the Security Council has the power to make binding decisions that member governments have agreed to carry out, under the terms of Charter Article 25.[6] The decisions of the Council are known as United Nations Security Council resolutions.
 unacceptable to it

VETO POWER
Under Article 27 of the UN Charter, Security Council decisions on all substantive matters require the affirmative votes of nine members. A negative vote, or veto, by a permanent member prevents adoption of a proposal, even if it has received the required number of affirmative votes. Abstention is not regarded as a veto despite the wording of the Charter. Since the Security Council&#039;s inception, China (ROC/PRC) has used its veto 6 times; France 18 times; Russia/USSR 122 times; the United Kingdom 32 times; and the United States 81 times. The majority of Russian/Soviet vetoes were in the first ten years of the Council&#039;s existence. Since 1984, China (ROC/PRC) has vetoed three resolutions; France three; Russia/USSR four; the United Kingdom ten; and the United States 43.

Procedural matters are not subject to a veto, so the veto cannot be used to avoid discussion of an issue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Security_Council#Veto_power</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama\&#8217;s statement was  VERY IGNORANT AND UNINFORMED or just naieve as Russia would veto any  resolution seeking to replace Russian peacekeepers with International peacekeepers!.</p>
<p>Obama on Georgia in the debate<br />
&#8220;No. 1 is we have to have foresight and anticipate some of these problems. So back in April, I warned the administration that you had Russian peacekeepers in Georgian territory. That made no sense whatsoever.</p>
<p>And what we needed to do was replace them with international peacekeepers and a special envoy to resolve the crisis before it boiled over.<br />
<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/the_first_presidential_debate.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/the_first_presidential_debate.html</a></p>
<p>BUT<br />
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is the branch of the United Nations charged with the maintenance of international peace and security. Its powers, outlined in the United Nations Charter, include the establishment of peacekeeping operations, the establishment of international sanctions, and the authorization for military action.[1] Its powers are exercised through United Nations Security Council Resolutions.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Security_Council#Role_of_the_Security_Council" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Security_Council#Role_of_the_Security_Council</a></p>
<p>The Security Council is charged with maintaining peace and security among countries. While other organs of the United Nations can only make &#8216;recommendations&#8217; to member governments, the Security Council has the power to make binding decisions that member governments have agreed to carry out, under the terms of Charter Article 25.[6] The decisions of the Council are known as United Nations Security Council resolutions.<br />
 unacceptable to it</p>
<p>VETO POWER<br />
Under Article 27 of the UN Charter, Security Council decisions on all substantive matters require the affirmative votes of nine members. A negative vote, or veto, by a permanent member prevents adoption of a proposal, even if it has received the required number of affirmative votes. Abstention is not regarded as a veto despite the wording of the Charter. Since the Security Council&#8217;s inception, China (ROC/PRC) has used its veto 6 times; France 18 times; Russia/USSR 122 times; the United Kingdom 32 times; and the United States 81 times. The majority of Russian/Soviet vetoes were in the first ten years of the Council&#8217;s existence. Since 1984, China (ROC/PRC) has vetoed three resolutions; France three; Russia/USSR four; the United Kingdom ten; and the United States 43.</p>
<p>Procedural matters are not subject to a veto, so the veto cannot be used to avoid discussion of an issue.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Security_Council#Veto_power" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Security_Council#Veto_power</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imp</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115136</link>
		<dc:creator>imp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-115136</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s STATEMENT ON RUSSIA was  VERY IGNORANT AND UNINFORMED as Russia would veto any  resolution rplacing Russian peacekeepers with international peacekeepers!.
Obama on Georgia in the Debate 
&quot; So back in April, I warned the administration that you had Russian peacekeepers in Georgian territory. That made no sense whatsoever.

And what we needed to do was replace them with international peacekeepers and a special envoy to resolve the crisis before it boiled over.&quot;

AS PER WIKIPEDIA 
The Charter of the United Nations gives the UN Security Council the power and responsibility to take collective action to maintain international peace and security. For this reason, the international community usually looks to the Security Council to authorize peacekeeping operations, AS ALL PEACEKEEPING MISSIONS MUST BE AUTHORISED BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeping

As such Obama&#039;s statement was  VERY IGNORANT AND UNINFORMED as Russia would veto any  resolution rplacing Russian peacekeepers with international peacekeepers!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s STATEMENT ON RUSSIA was  VERY IGNORANT AND UNINFORMED as Russia would veto any  resolution rplacing Russian peacekeepers with international peacekeepers!.<br />
Obama on Georgia in the Debate<br />
&#8221; So back in April, I warned the administration that you had Russian peacekeepers in Georgian territory. That made no sense whatsoever.</p>
<p>And what we needed to do was replace them with international peacekeepers and a special envoy to resolve the crisis before it boiled over.&#8221;</p>
<p>AS PER WIKIPEDIA<br />
The Charter of the United Nations gives the UN Security Council the power and responsibility to take collective action to maintain international peace and security. For this reason, the international community usually looks to the Security Council to authorize peacekeeping operations, AS ALL PEACEKEEPING MISSIONS MUST BE AUTHORISED BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeping" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeping</a></p>
<p>As such Obama&#8217;s statement was  VERY IGNORANT AND UNINFORMED as Russia would veto any  resolution rplacing Russian peacekeepers with international peacekeepers!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nine-of-Diamonds</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114987</link>
		<dc:creator>Nine-of-Diamonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114987</guid>
		<description>@CRACKHEAD - Jeff has been making identical posts time after time on different sections of PJM, and everyone is sick of it. IMO he&#039;s a fine candidate for a banning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CRACKHEAD &#8211; Jeff has been making identical posts time after time on different sections of PJM, and everyone is sick of it. IMO he&#8217;s a fine candidate for a banning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debate transcript &#124; Think Forward</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114980</link>
		<dc:creator>Debate transcript &#124; Think Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114980</guid>
		<description>[...] Blow by blow with Vodka. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blow by blow with Vodka. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CRACKHEAD ALMANAC</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114959</link>
		<dc:creator>CRACKHEAD ALMANAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114959</guid>
		<description>I think the BROKEBACK SPACESHIP story is pretty great. Jeff should send a copy of that to hollywood. In the sequel, BROKEBACK SPACESHIP 2, Steve, Jeff, and John go back in time so they can get Obama elected as US emperor. Upon returning to 3000, they realize that THEY DONT HAVE A GD TIME-MACHINE because the american inventor was stomped out by 5th worlders with outstretched arms and pitiful eyes, and pro-entitlement wealth redistribution. Steve, Jeff, and John are also very puzzled at the fact that Judeo-Christian names, like &quot;steve&quot; &quot;jeff&quot; and &quot;john&quot; have been globally outlawed. So they make a camp fire amongst the &quot;cracker slave-huts (translated to english)&quot; where they are imprisoned. In BROKEBACK SPACESHIP 3, an old man tries to build a lightbulb, despite public opinion that the &quot;Spark-God&quot; should never be manifested for fear of certain death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the BROKEBACK SPACESHIP story is pretty great. Jeff should send a copy of that to hollywood. In the sequel, BROKEBACK SPACESHIP 2, Steve, Jeff, and John go back in time so they can get Obama elected as US emperor. Upon returning to 3000, they realize that THEY DONT HAVE A GD TIME-MACHINE because the american inventor was stomped out by 5th worlders with outstretched arms and pitiful eyes, and pro-entitlement wealth redistribution. Steve, Jeff, and John are also very puzzled at the fact that Judeo-Christian names, like &#8220;steve&#8221; &#8220;jeff&#8221; and &#8220;john&#8221; have been globally outlawed. So they make a camp fire amongst the &#8220;cracker slave-huts (translated to english)&#8221; where they are imprisoned. In BROKEBACK SPACESHIP 3, an old man tries to build a lightbulb, despite public opinion that the &#8220;Spark-God&#8221; should never be manifested for fear of certain death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114789</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114789</guid>
		<description>Capt Nemo:

My final comment, John took this one. I’m still flabbergasted that McCain wants to eliminate cost plus contracts. I have a new level of concern for how clueless a US Senator is. Yes, I’m in the biz.

---------------

Totally agree with this comment.

Unfortunately, most Americans probably think that cost-plus jobs are the way contractors fleece the government (rather than the way contractors and the government share risk on development of new technology).

Not sure what McCain was trying to do, other than lose the support of contractors (who generally support him strongly).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capt Nemo:</p>
<p>My final comment, John took this one. I’m still flabbergasted that McCain wants to eliminate cost plus contracts. I have a new level of concern for how clueless a US Senator is. Yes, I’m in the biz.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Totally agree with this comment.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, most Americans probably think that cost-plus jobs are the way contractors fleece the government (rather than the way contractors and the government share risk on development of new technology).</p>
<p>Not sure what McCain was trying to do, other than lose the support of contractors (who generally support him strongly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Wallis</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/drunkblogging-the-first-presidential-debate/#comment-114587</guid>
		<description>Poor &quot;Jeff&quot; (10:23pm), 

Destined to spend the rest of his life copy/pasting &quot;transcendental&quot; nonsense in the ether....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor &#8220;Jeff&#8221; (10:23pm), </p>
<p>Destined to spend the rest of his life copy/pasting &#8220;transcendental&#8221; nonsense in the ether&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

